Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-628-5 | CAS number: 108-90-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
In a 2-year cancer study on male and female F344/N rats and B6C3F1 hybrid mice, groups of 50 males and 50 females were given chlorobenzene doses of 60 or 120 mg/kg/day by gavage for 103 weeks (5 days/week); male B6C3F1 mice received 30 or 60 mg/kg/day.
Increased mortality was statistically significant for male rats (p = 0.033, high dose), but not for female rats and mice. A statistically significant positive trend in the incidence of hepatocellular neoplastic nodules was observed in male rats (4/50, 2/50, 4/49, and 8/49 for untreated controls, vehicle controls, low and high dose groups, respectively). There were no increases in hepatocellular neoplastic nodules for female rats and mice, and there were no increases in hepatocellular or other site-specific tumours for either species.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Carcinogenicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 451 (Carcinogenicity Studies)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Only 2 doses level instead of 3 were administered. Some organs were not microscopically analyzed. Food intake was not determined. No blood smear was obtained from the animals.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories (Portage, MI, USA)
- Age at study initiation: 7 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 206 g (males); 110 g (females)
- Housing: five animals/polycarbonate cage
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Purina Laboratory Chow (pellets), Ralston Purina Co. (St.Louis, MO, USA) ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Edstrom automatic watering system (Waterford, WI, USA)
- Acclimation period: 17 weeks
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-26 °C
- Humidity (%): 40%-70%
- Air changes (per hr): 15 changes of room air per hour were provided.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours dark/12 hrs light
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Appropriate amount of chlorobenzene and corn oil were mixed with a stirring bar of 15 minutes in a graduate cilinder to preparare highest dose. Lower dose levels prepared by sequential dilution of measured volume of high dose formulation with corn oil.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Samples of chlorobenzene/corn oil mixtures were periodically analyzed at Betelle Columbus Laboratories. Results of these analyses ad of the refereeanalyses at Midewest Research Institute indicated that the analyzed mixtures were properly formulated.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 103 weeks
- Frequency of treatment:
- 5 days per week
- Post exposure period:
- no
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 60, 120 mg/kg bw/d
Basis:
actual ingested - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 50/sex/dose
- Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control:
- Not applicable
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily for mortality and morbidity
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
DERMAL IRRITATION (if dermal study): No
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: by cage every week for the first 13 weeks and monthly thereafter
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: No
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: No
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes; grossly visible lesions were performed on major tissues and organs.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes; tissue masses, skin, mandibular or mesentric lymph nodes, mammary gland, salivary gland, bone marrow, sternebrae, thymus, trachea, lung and bronchi, heart, thyroid, parathyroid, esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, pancreas, spleen, kidneys, adrenals, urinary bladder, prostate/testes or ovaries/uterus, brain, and pituitary were microscopally examined. - Statistics:
- See " Any other information on materials and methods including tables
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
The survival of high dose male rats was significantly less than that observed for the vehicle controls (p=0.033). No other significant differences in survival were observed.
No compound-related clinical sings of toxicity were observed at any time during the study.
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
Throughout the studies, mean body weights of dosed and vehicle control male rats were comparable. During the second year of the studies, mean body weights of dosed female rats were greater than those of the vehicle controls. No compound-related clinical signs of toxicicty were observed at any time during the studies.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: NEOPLASTIC (if applicable)
Liver: Chlorobenzene was associated with an increased occurence of neoplastic nodules in the livers of male rats. Generally considered to be late-occurig lesions, the first neoplastic nodule of the liver was detected in a vehicle control male rat that died at week 89, and the majority in all groups were detected at study termination. The incidence of neoplastic nodules of the liver in male rats surviving for at least 89 weeks were 4/44 (9%), 2/48 (4%), 4/40 (10%) , and 8/32 (25%) in the untreated control, vehicle control, low dose, and high dose groups, respectively. Pairwise comparisons by the Fisher exact test indicated that the incidence in high dose male rats was significantly (p<0.05) increased in comparison to the vehicle controls or the combined (vehicle and untreated) controls.
Chlorobenzene was associated with an increased occurence of neoplastic nodules in the high dose (120 mg/kg/day) male rats in composite control group. The increase in the neoplastic nodules of the liver in male rats, therefore, was considered to be chlorobenzene.
Testis: Interstitial cell tumors were observed with a significant positve trend by the life table tes, and the incidence in the high dose group was significantly higher that in that vehicle controls by the life table test. Statistical significance was not indicated by either the incidental tumor of Fisher exact tests. One of the interstitial cell tumors in a vehicle control rat was malignant; none of the tumors in the dosed group were malingnant.
Urinary bladder: A transitional cell papilloma was found 1/46 (2%) low dose and 1/45 (2%) high dose male rats. This tumor type was not observed in untreated or vehicle controls.
Kidney: A tubular cell adenocarcinoma was observed in one high dose female rat. This tumor type was not observed in untreated controls, vehicle controls, or low dose female rats.
Pituitary: Adenomas in female rats, and adenomas, adenocarcinomas, or carcinomas in male rats occurred with significantl negative trends. The incidences in the high dose groups were significantly lower than those in the controls.
Uterus: Endometrial stromal polyps were observed with a significantly lower incidence in the low dose group than in controls.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC
An apparent increase in the occurrence of hepatocellular necrosis, and decreases in the occurences of of hepatocellular basophilic cytoplasmic change and granulomatous inflammation, were observed in chlorobenzene-treated male and female rats. Upon a blind review of all liver sections by an indipendent pathologist, however, the occurrence of hepatocellular necrosis in chlorobenzene-treated rats was found to be similar to that in controls. Both diagnosticians generally graded the necrotic lesions as minimal to mild severity in all groups. Therefore, the evidence for mild chlorobenzene-induced hepatocellular necrosis in these studies is considered equivocal.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 120 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Effect type: other: systemic toxicity (migrated information)
- Executive summary:
- NTP, 1985.
Carcinogenesis studies of chlorobenzene were conducted by administering the test chemical in corn oil by gavage to groups of 50 male and 50 female F344/N rats at doses of 60 or 120 mg/kg, according to OECD guideline 451 with restrictions (Only 2 doses level instead of 3 were administered. Some organs were not microscopically analyzed. Food intake was not determanined. Blood smears were not obtained from the animals). Chlorobenzene was administered five times per week for 103 weeks. Groups controls, of 50 rats of each sex received corn oil by gavage on the same schedule and served as vehicle controls , and additional groups of 50 rats of each sex served as untreated controls,. Mean body weights of dosed rats were essentially the same or greater than those of the controls during the 2-year studies. Survivals of low dose male and female rats were not adversely affected by administration of chlorobenzene. Survival of high dose male rats in the 2 -year study was signifcantly (p=0.033) lower than that of the vehicle controls. No chlorobenzene-induced toxic lesions responsable for this reduction in survival were observed. Male rats dosed with chlorobenzene exhibited a signifcant (p< 0.05) increase in the incidence of animals with neoplastic nodules of the liver (overall incidences: untreated control, 4/50 ( 8%); vehicle control, 2/50 (4%); low dose, 4/49; high dose 8/49 (16%)). Increased incidences of hepatocellular carcinomas in male rats or of neoplastic nodules or hepatocellular carcinomas in female rats were not observed. No increased tumor incidences were observed in female rats. Under the conditions of these studies, chlorobenzene administration increased the occurence of neoplastic nodules of the liver in high dose (120 mg/kg/day) male F344/N rats, providing some but not clear evidence of carcinogenicity. Carcinogenic effects of chlorobenzene were not observed in female F344/N rats.
Reference
Table 1. Analysis of liver tumors in male rats: Statistical comparisons of treated to vehicle controls
Untreated control | Vehicle control | 60 mg/kg | 120 mg/kg | |
Neoplastic nodules | ||||
Tumor rates | ||||
Overall | 4/50 (8%) | 2/50 (4%) | 4/49 (8%) | 8/49 (16%) |
Adjusted | 10.4 % | 4.5% | 12.5% | 29.3% |
Terminal | 2/34 (6%) | 0/39 (0%) | 4/32 (13%) | 7/26 (27%) |
Statistical tests | ||||
Life table | p=0.005 | p=0.255 | p=0.010 | |
Incidental tumor test | p=0 .011 | p=0.290 | p=0.021 | |
Cochran-Armitage trend test | p=0.027 | |||
Fisher Exact test | p=0.329 | p=0.043 | ||
Carcinoma | ||||
Tumor rates | ||||
Overall | 0/50 (0%) | 2/50 (4%) | 0/49 (o%9 | 0 /49 (0%) |
Adjusted | 0.0% | 5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Terminal | 0/34 (0%) | 2/39 (5%9 | 0.32 (0%) | 0/26% |
Statistical tests | ||||
Life table | p=0.139 N | p=0.283 N | p=0.331N | |
Incidental tumor test | p=0.139 N | p=0.283 N | p=0.331N | |
Cochran-Armitage trend test | p=0.098 N | |||
Fisher Exact test | p=0.253 N | p=0.283 N | ||
Neoplastic Nodule or Carcinoma | ||||
Tumor Rates | ||||
Overall | 4/ 50 (8%) | 4/50 (8%) | 4/49 (8%) | 8/49 (16%) |
Adjusted | 10.4 % | 9.4 % | 12.5 % | 29.3% |
Terminal | 2/34 (6%) | 2/39 (5%) | 4/32 (13%) | 7/26 (27%) |
Statistical tests | ||||
Life Table | p=0.033 | p=0.532 | p=0.048 | |
Incidental tumor test | p=0.054 | p=0.570 | p=0.083 | |
Cochran-Armitage trend test | p=0.121 | |||
Fisher Exact test | p=0.631 | p=0.168 |
Table 9. Comparative incidenced of lung lesions in male and female rats
Male (a) |
Female (b) |
|||||||
Group | Untreated control | VehicleControl | 60 mg/kg | 120mg/kg | UntreatedControl | Vehiclecontrol | 60mg/kg | 120 mg/kg |
No. of lungs Examinated | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 47 | 49 | 49 | 49 |
LESION | ||||||||
Aspiration foreign body | 0 (0) (b) | 4 (3) | 15 (10) | 10 (3) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 5 (1) | 9 (4) |
Inflammation acute/ chronic | 7 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
Inflammation,focal granulomatous | 0 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 1 |
(a) Number of animals with specified lesion
(b) The numbers in parentheses include only those animals that were not diasognes as having died from gavage.
Table 3. Analysis of pituitary tumors in rats
UntreatedControl | Vehicle Control | 60 mg/kg | 120mg/kg | |
MALES | ||||
Adenoma | ||||
Tumor Rates | ||||
Overall | 20/49 (41%) | 10/50 (20%) | 9/42 (21%) | 3/47 (6%) |
Adjusted | 47.5% | 24.2% | 27.4% | 10.6% |
Terminal | 12/33 (36%) | 8/39 (21%) | 7/30 (23%) | 2/25 (8%) |
Statistical Tests | ||||
Life table | p=0.172N | p=0.477 | p=0.162N | |
Incidental tumor Test | p=0.109N | p=0.532 | p=0.101N | |
Cohran-Armitage Trend Test | p=0.047N | |||
Fisher Exact Test | p=0.534 | p=0.046N | ||
Adenoma, Adenocarcinoma or Carcinoma | ||||
Tumor Rates | ||||
Overall | 20/49 (41%) | 12/50 (24%) | 9/42 (21%) | 3/47 (6%) |
Adjusted | 47.5% | 28.3% | 27.4 % | 10.6% |
Terminal | 12/33 (36%) | 9/39 (23%) | 7/30 (23%) | 2/25 (8%) |
Statistical Tests | ||||
Life table | p=0.084N | p=0.541N | p=0.086N | |
Incidental tumor Test | p=0.044N | p=0.462N | p00.044N | |
Cohran-Armitage Trend Test | p=0.016N | |||
Fisher Exact Test | p=0.484N | p=0.015N | ||
FEMALES | ||||
Adenoma | ||||
Overall | 27/48 (56%) | 23/46 (50%) | 18/46 (39%) | 13/43 (30%) |
Adjusted | 63.6% | 67.0% | 56.1% | 41.6% |
Terminal | 20/35 (57%) | 16/27 (59%) | 15/29 (52%) | 9/26 (35%) |
Statistical Tests | ||||
Life table | p=0.027N | p=0.146N | p=0.039M | |
Incidental tumor Test | p=0.016N | p=0.252N | p=0.021N | |
Cohran-Armitage Trend Test | p=0.036N | |||
Fisher Exact Test | p=0.201N | p=0.046N |
Table 11. Analysis of endometrial stromal polyps of the uterus in female rats
UntreatedControl | VehicleControl | 60 mg/kg | 120mg/kg | |
Tumor Rates | ||||
Overall | 9/49 (18%) | 16/50 (32%) | 4/49 (8%) | 10/50 (20%) |
Adjusted | 23.2% | 51.3% | 13.3% | 29.3% |
Terminal | 7/36 (19%) | 14/29 (48%) | 4/30 (13%) | 8/31 (26%) |
Statistical Tests | ||||
Life Table | p=0.060N | p=0.002N | p=0.090N | |
Incidental Tumor Test | p=0.059N | p=0.002N | p=0.088N | |
Cochran-Armitage Trend Test | p=0.085N | |||
Fisher Exact Test | p=0.003N | p=0.127N |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 120 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- GLP study similar to guideline
Carcinogenicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Carcinogenicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
No classification is required
Additional information
In a 2-year cancer study on male and female F344/N rats and B6C3F1 hybrid mice, groups of 50 males and 50 females were given chlorobenzene doses of 60 or 120 mg/kg/day by gavage for 103 weeks (5 days/week); male B6C3F1 mice received 30 or 60 mg/kg/day. Due to the fact that neither in rats nor in mice chlorobenzene-related toxic effects were observed, the NOAEL for non-neoplastic effects was considered to be the highest doses tested120 mg/kg/day and 60 mg/kg/day in rats and mice, respectively, leading to the overall NOAEL. to be 60 mg/kg bw/day. Despite the relative closeness of the doses in the subchronic and chronic studies, non-neoplastic lesions clearly attributed to chlorobenzene were not observed in the chronic study. The failure of chlorobenzene to elicit toxic responses in the kidney, liver or haematopoetic system in the chronic study indicates at the most a slight potential for progressive toxicity with continued chlorobenzene administraton beyond 13 weeks.
Regarding the neoplastic effects, the NTP concluded that "under the conditions of these studies, chlorobenzene administration increased the occurrence of neoplastic nodules of the liver in high-dose male F344/N rats, providing some, but not clear evidence of carcinogenicity of chlorobenzene in male rats. Carcinogenic effects of chlorobenzene were not observed in female F344/N rats or in male or female B6C3F1 mice (NTP 1985). In an additional evaluation of this carcinogenicity study extensive statistical calculations led to the conclusion that chlorobenzene cannot be assessed as a carcinogen on the basis of the data determined (Roe, 1987) This was also confirmed by the authors of the study (Kluwe 1987).
In the NTP study (NTP, 1985), the only type of tumour found to occur at a statistically significantly increased incidence in mono- chlorobenzene-treated animals was benign neoplastic liver nodule in male rats of the high-dose group (120 mg/kg/day). The increased incidence was significant by dose-related trend tests, and pair-wise comparisons between the vehicle (corn oil) controls (2/50) but not the untreated controls (4/50) and the high-dose animals (8/49). The only hepatocellular carcinomas found, occurred in two untreated male controls. The committee did not consider these findings indicative of carcinogenic potential of monochlorobenzene (Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits for Monochlorobenzene - SCOEL/SUM/42, January 2003).
Based on inadequate/equivocal evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animal data, in combination with predominantly negative genetic toxicity data and the absence of epidemiological data, the EPA has rated chlorobenzene in Group D: inadequate evidence of human carcinogenicity.
Justification for selection of carcinogenicity via oral route endpoint:
key study(rats) is used
Carcinogenicity: via oral route (target organ): digestive: liver
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.