Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-537-0 | CAS number: 107-96-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Dissociation constant
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- dissociation constant
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
Sparc
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
n.a.
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
Working SMILES String: SCCC(=O)O
pKa options:
1) Calculation temperature: 20 °C
2) Full speciation study performed:
a) N both acid and base
b) C (most likely),
c) pH range: -0.2 to 14
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
see Any other information on results incl. tables
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
see Any other information on results incl. tables
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
see Any other information on results incl. tables - Guideline:
- other: REACH guidance on QSARs R.6, May/July 2008
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The SPARC chemical reactivity models for estimation ionization pKa in water.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Dissociating properties:
- yes
- No.:
- #1
- pKa:
- ca. 4.27
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: carboxyl group
- No.:
- #2
- pKa:
- ca. 10.44
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: thiol group
Reference
Validity of the model:
1. Defined endpoint: dissociation constant pKa
2. Unambiguous algorithm: To estimate pKa in water the molecular structures are broken into functional units called the reaction center (with known chemical properties) and the perturber. The reaction center is the smallest subunit that has potential to ionize and lose a proton to solvent. The perturber is the molecular structure appended to the reaction center. The pKa of the reaction center is adjusted for the molecule in question using the mechanistic perturbation models. The pKa for a molecule is expressed in terms of the contributions of both reaction center and perturber. The computational algorithm is based on the structure query provided in a form of SMILES code.
3. Applicability domain: the SPARC chemical reactivity models have been designed and parametrized to be applicable to any chemical structure. The reaction parameters describing a given reaction center (Table 1) are the same regardless of the appended molecular structure. Also for substituent the parameters in Table 2 (Tables 1, 2 taken from S.H. Hilal et al. Prediction of Chemical Reactivity Parameters and Physical Properties of Organic Compounds from Molecular Structure Using SPARC, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA. Publication No. EPA/600/R-03/030, Table 4, 3) are independent of the rest of the molecule. This structure factoring and function specification enables one to compute, for a reaction center of interest, the resultant reactivity.
Chemicals for which the applicability of SPARC is limited:
a) SPARC has not been designed to calculate pKa for substances, such as quaternary amines;
b) substances with carbon acid reaction center where the perturbations for this group are very large and the measurement standard deviation is not better than 1 unit. Examples: pKa for methane, nitro-methane, tri-nitro-methane are calculated with SPARC within ±1.3pKa units;
c) substances known to tautomerize, e.g., molecules such as methyl substituted imidazole; d) covalent hydrates, which include many multiple in-ring N compounds such as quinazoline and pteridine;
e) substances with oxy acid reaction center (where the perturbations are extremely small) in structures such as 3- or 4-S-C6H4-YC where Y is a side chain intervening between the benzene ring (e.g., Y=(CH2)x) and the reaction center, (C=CO2H). However SPARC can discriminate these effects for other reaction centers, such as NR2.
Table 1.Characteristics Parameters
Reaction center |
ρelc |
ρres |
χc |
(pKa)c |
CO2H |
1.000 |
-1.118 |
2.60 |
3.75 |
AsO2H |
0.653 |
-0.817 |
2.22 |
6.63 |
PO2H |
0.489 |
-0.394 |
2.72 |
2.23 |
POSH |
0.291 |
-0.402 |
2.69 |
1.55 |
PS2H |
0.101 |
-0.802 |
2.63 |
1.96 |
BO2H2 |
0.355 |
-0.050 |
3.04 |
8.32 |
SeO3H |
1.207 |
-0.400 |
2.30 |
4.64 |
SO3H |
0.451 |
-4.104 |
2.09 |
-0.10 |
OH |
2.706 |
18.44 |
2.49 |
14.3 |
SH |
2.195 |
4.348 |
2.76 |
7.40 |
NR2 |
3.571 |
19.36 |
2.40 |
9.83 |
in-ring N |
5.726 |
-11.279 |
2.31 |
2.28 |
=N |
5.390 |
-4.631 |
2.47 |
5.33 |
Table 2. SPARC Substituent Characteristics Parameters
Substituent |
Fs |
Fq |
MF |
Er |
ris |
Χs |
CO2H |
2.233 |
0.000 |
0.687 |
0.072 |
0.80 |
3.43 |
CO2- |
1.639 |
-0.603 |
0.560 |
2.978 |
1.00 |
2.68 |
AsO3H- |
0.300 |
-0.500 |
0.500 |
0.190 |
1.20 |
2.60 |
AsO3-2 |
0.600 |
-1.000 |
0.300 |
0.150 |
1.20 |
2.60 |
AsO2H |
1.000 |
-2.000 |
0.000 |
0.080 |
0.80 |
2.60 |
PO3H- |
0.600 |
-0.786 |
0.400 |
0.220 |
1.20 |
3.32 |
PO3-2 |
0.600 |
-2.500 |
0.400 |
0.840 |
1.20 |
2.90 |
BO2H2 |
1.078 |
0.000 |
1.010 |
1.484 |
0.80 |
2.40 |
SO3- |
6.315 |
-1.224 |
2.491 |
1.407 |
0.80 |
2.82 |
OH |
1.506 |
0.000 |
-3.116 |
7.240 |
0.80 |
2.76 |
SH |
2.931 |
0.000 |
-1.871 |
3.000 |
0.80 |
2.76 |
O- |
1.913 |
-1.566 |
-3.546 |
11.00 |
-0.50 |
3.01 |
S- |
1.727 |
-1.537 |
-1.437 |
9.368 |
-0.50 |
3.34 |
NR2 |
1.190 |
0.000 |
-4.939 |
17.42 |
0.70 |
2.58 |
NR2H+ |
3.978 |
0.779 |
-2.505 |
21.70 |
0.50 |
3.23 |
CH4 |
-1.10 |
0.000 |
-2.065 |
0.129 |
-0.63 |
2.30 |
NO2 |
7.460 |
0.000 |
2.515 |
3.677 |
1.00 |
3.79 |
NO |
6.714 |
0.000 |
4.127 |
1.691 |
1.00 |
3.80 |
CN |
5.649 |
0.000 |
3.141 |
3.196 |
0.80 |
3.71 |
OR |
2.138 |
0.000 |
-4.767 |
1.987 |
0.80 |
2.90 |
SR |
2.323 |
0.000 |
-1.234 |
1.952 |
0.80 |
2.80 |
I |
4.270 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
4.928 |
0.75 |
2.95 |
Br |
3.756 |
0.000 |
-0.031 |
3.012 |
0.70 |
3.19 |
Cl |
3.622 |
0.000 |
-0.066 |
1.498 |
0.65 |
3.37 |
F |
3.164 |
0.000 |
-1.718 |
0.800 |
0.65 |
3.67 |
in-ring N |
5.310 |
0.000 |
0.929 |
2.055 |
0.00 |
3.30 |
in-ring+ |
1.379 |
3.785 |
6.995 |
8.708 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
SO2 |
6.451 |
0.000 |
2.038 |
4.176 |
0.80 |
3.60 |
=N |
1.533 |
0.000 |
0.544 |
4.918 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
=+ |
2.000 |
1.000 |
2.800 |
2.600 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
=O |
3.195 |
0.000 |
1.584 |
2.281 |
0.00 |
3.60 |
The test substance 3-mercaptopropionic acid, for which prediction was done, falls into applicability domain of the SPARC chemical reactivity model for estimation ionization pKa in water. Both ionisable groups present in the molecule: carboxylic and thiol are listed as tested reaction centers. The substance does not contain any chemical structure for which SPARC has limited application (see p. a)-e)). Moreover the carboxyl group is in the group of chemicals for which SPARC calculations are the most precise (calculated values within ±0.25pKa units).
The dissociation of carboxyl group is predicted in the environmentally relevant pH (pKa=4.27). Therefore further validation of the predicted value was done. The dissociation constant of several analogue substances are present in a Table 3, where experimental and calculated (by SPARC online calculator, V4.2 release) values are given.The experimental and predicted values for carboxyl group differ only by 0.08 -0.2pKa unit, for thiol group: by 0.66pKa unit, therefore calculation performed by SPARC is considered to be reliable. The calculation of SPARC is accepted as valid.
Table 3.
CAS |
Name |
Functional group |
SPARC [t=20°C] |
SPARC [t=25°C] |
Experimental t=25°C |
503-66-2 |
3-hydroxypropionic acid |
carboxyl |
4.33 |
4.31 |
4.51* |
68-11-1 |
thioglycolic acid |
carboxyl |
3.76 |
3.75 |
3.68* |
thiol |
9.97 |
9.88 |
|
||
75-08-1 |
Ethanethiol |
thiol |
10.03 |
9.94 |
10.6** |
*CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 86thEd., 2005-2006
**Serjeant, EP & Dempsey,B (1979) in SRC PhysProp database
4. Statistical characteristic: the ionization pKa calculator was trained on ca. 2400 compounds involving all substituents and reaction centers listed in Tables 1 and 2. The overall training set RMS deviation was 0.36pKa units. In general SPARC can calculate the pKa for simple molecules such as oxy acids and aliphatic bases and acids within ±0.25pKa units; for most other organic structures such as amines and acids within ±0.36pKa units and ±0.41pKa units for =N and in-ring N reaction centers and for complicated structures. When a molecule has more than six ionization sites the expected SPARC error is ±0.65pKa units. A summary of the statistical parameters for the SPARC ionization pKa in water is in the Table 4 (taken from Hilal, S.H., S.W. Karickhoff, and L.A. Carreira. 2003. Verification and Validation of the SPARC Model.Environmental Protection Agency,,Publication No. EPA/600/R-03/033., Table 4)
Table 4. Statistical Parameters of SPARC pKa Calculations
Set |
Training |
R2 |
RMS |
Test |
R2 |
RMS |
Simple organic compounds |
793 |
0.995 |
0.235 |
2000 |
0.995 |
0.274 |
Azo dyes compounds |
50 |
0.991 |
0.550 |
273 |
0.990 |
0.630 |
IUPAC compounds* |
2500 |
0.994 |
0.356 |
4338** |
0.994 |
0.370 |
*Observed values are from many refs.
**Carbon acid pKas are not included
5. Mechanistic interpretation: SPARC chemical reactivity models apply to the chemical properties in transition that is in the conversion of the molecule to a different state or structure. For chemical properties calculated in SPARC (also pKa) the energy differences between these two states of the system are small compared to the binding energy for the reactants involved. The differences in energy are calculated with use of perturbation methods, which threat the final state as a perturbed initial state and the energy differences between these two energy states are determined by quantifying the perturbation. For pKa, the perturbation of the initial state, assumed to be the protonated form, versus the unprotonated final form is factored into the mechanistic contributions of resonance (variations in the charge transfer between the π system and suitable orbital of the substituent) and electrostatic effects (charges or electric dipoles interactions, induced electric fields: mesomeric field effects, σ induction) and other perturbations such as H-bonding, steric contributions and salvation effects.
Adequacy of prediction: The dissociation constants for the substance 3-mercaptopropionic acid were predicted with use of the valid model. It was confirmed that the substance falls into the applicability domain of a model; therefore the result value is reliable. The obtained values are dissociation constants calculated at conditions required for regulatory purposes with respect to the temperature (20°C), pH range (-0.2 to 14). Therefore the prediction can be used for the classification and risk assessment.
Description of key information
Dissociation constant at 20°C:
1) 4.27 (carboxyl group)
2) 10.44 (thiol group)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Two dissociation constants of the test substance 3-mercaptopropionic acid have been determined to be: 4.27 (carboxyl group) and 10.44 (thiol group) at 20.0 °C by using SPARC online calculator , V4.2 release. The dissociation of carboxyl group is predicted in environmentally relevant pH, therefore further validation of the predicted value was done on the basis of experimental and predicted by SPARC values for three other substances: 3 -hydroxypropionic acid, thioglycolic acid and ethanethiol. SPARC prediction for that substances are reliable, therefore the calculation of SPARC of dissociation constant for 3-mercaptopropionic acid is accepted as valid.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.