Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin sensitisation (one topical induction, one topical challenge), (occlusive), female Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs, OECD 406 (1981), = EEC B.6 (1984): Captan is skin sensitising category 1 with H 317 ´May Cause an allergic skin reaction’

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
6 August 1991 to 16 September 1991
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Version / remarks:
1981
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Version / remarks:
1984
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The method used followed that described in the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (1981) No. 406 "Skin Sensitisation" - Magnusson and Kligman Maximisation Test referenced as according to EEC method B.6 published in the regulation 440/2008. The testing using the OECD Test Guideline 406 and the EPA OPP 81-6/EU Method B.6 protocol was completed on 16 September 1991. The LLNA -method OECD 429 (July 2010) was not available by the time the study was conducted. The non-LLNA guinea pig test method is described in OECD 406/EU B.6.
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- group of thirty (twenty treated and ten control) female guinea pigs of the Dunkin-Hartley strain
- Source: David Hall Ltd., Moston, Burton-on-Trent, Staffordshire, U.K.
- weight: 311 - 388 g
- age: eight to twelve weeks old
- free access to mains drinking water and food
- animal room temperature: 20 - 23°C- relative humidity: 52 - 61%
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
arachis oil
Concentration / amount:
50% (w/w) in arachis oil B.P.
Day(s)/duration:
2 d
Adequacy of induction:
highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
arachis oil
Concentration / amount:
three injections:
1) Freund´s Adjuvant plus arachis oil B.P. plus distilled water, ratio 1:1
2) 0.1% (w/v) in arachis oil B.P. ;
3) 0.1% (w/v) suuspension of test material in 1:1 preparation of Freund´s Adjuvant plus arachis oil B.P.
Day(s)/duration:
7 d
Adequacy of induction:
highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
No.:
#20
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
arachis oil
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal Induction: 0.1% (w/v) in arachis oil B.P. Topical Induction: 50% (w/w) in arachis oil B.P. Topical Challenge: (w/w) in arachis oll B.P.
Day(s)/duration:
2 d
Adequacy of challenge:
highest non-irritant concentration
No. of animals per dose:
A group of thirty guinea pigs was used for the main study, twenty test and ten control. Control animals were treated in the same way as test animals, except that captan was excluded from the induction phases.
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
1) Selection of concentration for Intradermal Induction:
Four animals were intradermally injected with preparations of the test material: 5%; 1%; 0.5%; 0.1% (w/v) in arachis oil B.P. The highest concentration that did not cause local necrosis, ulceration or systemic toxicity, was selected for the intradermal induction stage of the main study.
2) Selection of Concentration for Topical Induction:
Two guina pigs (intradermally injected with Freund´s Complete Adjuvant nine days earlier) were treated with four preparations of the test material: 50%; 25%; 10%; 5% (w/w) in arachis oil B.P.
The highest concentration producing only mild to moderate dermal irritation after a 48-hour occlusive exposure, was selected for the topical induction stage of the main study.
3) Selection of Concentration for Topical Challenge:
Four preparations of test material (50%; 25%; 10%; 5% (w/w) in arachis oil B.P.) were applied occlusively to the flanks of two guinea pigs for a period of 24 hours.
These guinea pigs did not form part of the main study but had been treated identically to the control animals of the main study, up to day 14.
The highest non-irritant concentration of the test material was selected for the topical challenge stage of the main study.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: two
- Exposure period: 9 d
- Test groups: 20 guinea pigs
- Control group: 10 guinea pigs
- Site: shoulder region
- Concentrations: Intradermal Induction: 0.1% (w/w) arachis oil B.P; Topical Induction: 50% (w/w) arachis oil B.P

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: one
- Day(s) of challenge: 21
- Exposure period: 24 h
- Test groups: 20
- Control group: 10
- Site: shoulder region
- Concentrations: 10% (w/w) arachis oil B.P
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 h and 48 h
Challenge controls:
A topical challenge of 0.1 to 0.2 mL 10% captan (w/w) in arachis oil was applied to the shorn flank on day 21. The area was covered with an occlusive dressing for 24 hours. The area was examined 24 and 48 hours after the removal of the challenge dressing. Control animals were treated in the same way, except that captan was excluded from the induction phases.
Positive control substance(s):
no
Positive control results:
The testing followed the OECD Test Guideline 406 (1981), a positive control was not required.
Group:
positive control
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Remarks:
The testing followed the OECD Test Guideline 406 (1981), a positive control was not required.
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10% captan (w/w) in arachis oil B.P.
No. with + reactions:
20
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
Isolated incidents of hardened light brown-coloured scab and small superficial scattered scabs and desquamation. Oedema. The reactions extended beyond treatment sites during the study.
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10% captan (w/w) in arachis oil B.P.
No. with + reactions:
18
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
Isolated incidents of hardened light brown-coloured scab and small superficial scattered scabs and desquamation. Oedema. The reactions extended beyond treatment sites during the study.
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
vehicle control: arachis oil
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
No adverse reactions
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
vehicle control: arachis oil
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
No adverse reactions
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

Table 7.4.1-1 Magnusson Kligman maximisation study in the guinea pig: skin reactions of individual animals following topical induction with 50% w/w captan in arachis oil


 


















































































































Animal number



Skin reactions



1 hour



24 hours



1”



2



1



2



2 Rt



1



3



2 Rt



1 Bd



4



2 Rt



0



5



2 Rt



1 RtBd



6



2 Rt



0



7



1 Rt



0 Bd



8



Ta



0



9



1 Rt



0



10



1 Rt



0



11



1



0



12



?eBs



0 Bd



13



2 Rt



1 Rt



14



1 Rt



0 Bd



15



?eBs



0 Bd



16



2 Rt



1



17



1 Rt



1



18



?eBs



?eBd



19



Ta



1



20



1 Rt



1 RtBd



0 = no reaction; 1 = scattered mild redness; 2 = moderate and diffuse redness.


Rt = residual test material; Ta = test material adhered to treatment site preventing accurate evaluation of erythema;


?e = adverse reactions prevent accurate evaluation of erythema;


Bs = bleeding; Bd = dried blood.


 


Table 7.4.1-1 Magnusson Kligman maximisation study in the guinea pig: skin reactions of individual animals following topical challenge with 10% w/w captan in arachis oil


 
































































































































































Animal number



Skin reactions (hours after removal of dressing)



24 h



48 h



Test



Vehicle



Test



Vehicle



1



2



0



?eD



0



2



2 R



0



2 Rd



0



3



2 R



0



1 R



0



4



?eWeSp



0



?eSt



0



5



?eWe



0



2 ROeSP



0



6



2 Oe



0



2 ROeSP



0



7



2 R



0



?eDR



0



8



2



0



1



0



9



1



0



0



0



10



1



0



0



0



11



2



0



1



0



12



?eDWeR



0



2 RD



0



13



2



0



1 RD



0



14



2 R



0



1 RD



0



15



2 R



0



2 R



0



16



2



0



1 R



0



17



1



0



1 D



0



18



2



0



1



0



19



?eDWe



0



2 SsD



0



20



1



0



1 D



0



0 = no reaction; 1 = scattered mild redness; 2 = moderate and diffuse redness.


R = extended reaction; ?e = adverse reactions prevent accurate evaluation of erythema;


We = well defined; erythema surrounding test site; Sp = hardened light brown coloured scab;


Oe = oedema extends ventrally below; treatment site; D = desquamation;


St = hardened dark brown/black coloured scab; Cr = superficial cracking of the epidermis;


Ss = small superficial scattered scabs.


 


Following challenge with the test material positive skin responses were noted in 16 and 14 animals after 24 and 48 hours, respectively. Adverse reactions prevented the accurate evaluation of erythema at test material sites in 4 of the 20 animals at 24 hours. At 48 hours, these reactions persisted in one animal and increased in severity in the other three animals. At no time were adverse reactions noted at the vehicle control sites in test animals or at any sites of control animals.

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the Magnusson Kligman test, captan produced a 100% sensitisation rate in the guinea pig and was considered as an extreme sensitiser. In accordance with the provisions of regulation 1272/2008, Annex I, 3.4 captan is classified as Skin Sens. category 1 with H317 ‘May cause an allergic skin reaction’
Executive summary:

A study was performed to assess the skin contact sensitisation potential of the test material in the albino guinea pig. The method used followed that described in the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (1981) No. 406 "Skin Sensitisation" - Magnusson and Kligman Maximisation Test referenced as according to EEC method B.6 published in the regulation 440/2008. Twenty test and ten control animals were used for the main study. Based on the results of sighting tests, the concentrations of test material for the induction and challenge phases were selected as follows: Intradermal Induction: 0.1% (w/v) in arachis oil B.P. Topical Induction: 50% (w/w) in arachis oil B.P. Topical Challenge: 10% (w/w) in arachis oll B.P. The test material produced a 100% (20/20) sensitisation rate and in accordance with regulation 1272/2008, Annex I, 3.4 captan is classified as Skin Sens. category 1 with (H317) ´May cause an allergic skin reaction’

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Additional information:

A study was performed according to OECD guideline 406 "Skin Sensitisation" by application of Magnusson and Kligman Maximisation Test on guinea pigs.


Twenty test and ten control animals were used for the main study. Captan test material produced a 100% (20/20) sensitisation rate and in accordance with regulation 1272/2008, Annex I, 3.4 captan is classified as skin sensitising category 1 with H317 ´May cause an allergic skin reaction´.


In accordance with guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, part E, captan is classified with high hazard on skin exposure.



Skin sensitisation (one topical induction, one topical challenge), (occlusive), female Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs, OECD 406 (1981), = EEC B.6 (1984): Captan is skin sensitising category 1 with H 317 ´May Cause an allergic skin reaction’

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Captan is a skin sensitizer. In accordance with regulation 1272/2008, Annex I, 3.4 captan is classified as skin sensitising category 1 with H317 ´May cause an allergic skin reaction´.