Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 226-378-9 | CAS number: 5384-21-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute oral toxicity:
The acute oral toxicity dose (LD50) was considered based on different studies conducted on rats for the given test chemical. The studies concluded that the LD50 value was >2000 mg/kg bw, for acute oral toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute oral toxicity.
Acute Inhalation Toxicity:
The acute inhalation toxicity study need not be conducted because exposure to humans via inhalation route is not likely taking into account due to low vapour pressure of the test chemical, which is reported to be 0.00000256 Pa. Thus, exposure to inhalable dust, mist and vapour of the chemical is highly unlikely. Therefore this study is considered for waiver.
Acute Dermal toxicity:
The acute dermal toxicity dose (LD50) was considered based on different studies conducted on rats for the given test chemical. The studies concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw, for acute dermal toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute dermal toxicity.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from study report.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The aim of this study was to assess the toxicity potential of test chemical after single oral administration in rats.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- acute toxic class method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source:Bharat Serum and Vaccines Limited.
- Age at study initiation:8- 11 weeks at the time of dosing.
- Health Status :Healthy young adult animals were used for the study. Females were nulliparous and non pregnant.
- Weight at study initiation:Minimum: 183 g and Maximum: 216 g (Individual body weights were within ± 5% prior to treatment after overnight fasting).
- Fasting period:The animals were fasted for minimum 16-18 hours prior to dosing and for 3-4 hours post dosing.
- Housing:The animals were housed individually in polycarbonate cages.
- Bedding:All cages were provided with corn cobs.
- Room Sanitation:The experimental room floor and work tops were swept and mopped with disinfectant solution every day.
- Cages and water bottle:All the cages and water bottles were changed at least twice every week.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):All animals were provided conventional laboratory rodent diet (Nutrivet Life Sciences, Pune) ad libitum.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Aqua guard filtered tap water was provided ad libitum via drinking bottles.
- Acclimation period:Animal nos. 1-3 were acclimatized for five days, 4-6 for seven days, 7-9 for nine days and 10-12 for six days prior to administration of the test item.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):Minimum: 20.00 °C and Maximum: 23.60 °C.
- Humidity (%):Minimum: 37.40% and Maximum: 61.80%
- Air changes (per hr):More than 12 changes per hour.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12:12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Amount of vehicle:10 ml
- Justification for choice of vehicle:Corn oil was selected because test item was not soluble in distilled water.
- Lot/batch no. (if required):MKBD4650
- Purity:N/A
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED:10 ml/kg body weight. - Doses:
- G1 = 300 mg/kg bw
G2 = 2000 mg/kg bw - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Twelve female rats
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing:Daily
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
At the end of 14 day observation period, all the survived rats were euthanised by overdose of CO2 for external and internal observations.
- Other examinations performed:
Clinical Observation - After test item administration, individual animals were frequently observed at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post dosing on day 0 (day of dosing). Additionally, on day 0 animal nos. 7-9 were observed at 6 hours post dosing. Subsequently, all the animals were observed once a day during the 14 day observation period.
Body weight - All rats were weighed on days 0 (prior to dosing), 7 and 14. Animals were weighed immediately after found dead.
other: Mortality - All the animals were observed twice daily (morning and evening) for morbidity and mortality, throughout the acclimatization and study period. - Statistics:
- No data
- Preliminary study:
- No data
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Non toxic to rat.
- Mortality:
- No mortality was observed in the animals treated with 300 and 2000 mg/kg dose throught out the 14 days observation period post dosing.
- Clinical signs:
- other: At 300 mg/kg, all the six animals (animal nos. 1-6) were observed normal throughout experimental period. At 2000mg/kg, animal no. 7 was observed normal at 30 minutes and 1 hour post dosing, mild to moderate lethargy at 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours and mild ataxia
- Gross pathology:
- No external and internal gross pathological changes were seen in all the six animals treated with 300 and 2000 mg/kg body weight during terminal sacrifice
- Other findings:
- No data
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not classified
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this; acute oral toxicity study of test chemical in female rats is as given below:
The acute oral LD50 value of test chemical was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that test chemical does not exhibit acute oral toxicity i.e it is acutely non toxic to animals. - Executive summary:
Acute Oral Toxicity Study was conducted by using the given test chemical in Rats, This study was performed as per OECD No. 423.
Twelve female Wistar rats were selected for acute oral toxicity study. The animals were fasted for minimum 16-18 hours prior to dosing and for 3-4 hours post dosing, with food withheld but drinking water provided ad libitum. The time intervals between dosing were determined by the onset, duration and severity of toxic signs. Three rats of group G1 were dosed with starting dose of 300 mg/kg body weight and the animals did not show any mortality so another three animals of the group G1 were dosed with 300 mg/kg body weight and no mortality was observed. Three animals of the group G2 were dosed with 2000 mg/kg body weight and no mortality was observed, therefore another three animals of same group G2 were dose with 2000 mg/kg and no mortality was observed. Hence, further dosing was stopped. Body weights were re¬corded on day 0 (prior to dosing) 7 and 14. Mean body weight was observed with gain was observed in the animals treated with 300 and 2000 mg/kg body weight, during the 14 day observation period, as compared to day 0. At 300 mg/kg, all the six animals (animal nos. 1-6) were observed normal throughout experimental period. At 2000 mg/kg, animal no. 7 was observed normal at 30 minutes and 1 hour post dosing, mild to moderate lethargy at 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours and mild ataxia at 3, 4 and 6 hours followed by normal clinical sign till day 14. Animal no. 8 was observed normal at 30 minutes and 1 hour post dosing, mild to severe lethargy at 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours and mild to moderate ataxia at 3, 4 and 6 hours followed by normal clinical sign till day 14. Animal no. 9 was observed normal at 30 minutes and 1 hour post dosing, moderate to severe lethargy and mild to moderate ataxia at 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours followed by normal clinical sign till day 14. Animal nos. 10-12 were observed normal at 30 minutes and 1 hour post dosing, mild to moderate lethargy at 2, 3 and 4 hours and mild ataxia at 3 and 4 hours followed by normal clinical sign till day 14. No external and internal gross pathological changes were seen in all the six animals treated with 2000 mg/kg body weight during terminal sacrifice.
Under the conditions of this; acute oral toxicity study of test chemical in female rats is as given below:
The acute oral LD50 value of test chemical was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that test chemical does not exhibit acute oral toxicity i.e it is acutely non toxic to animals.
Reference
Table 1: Individual Animal Body Weight (g) andBody Weight Changes(%)
Sex:Female
Animal No. |
Group/ Dose (mg/kg) |
Body Weight (gram) |
Body Weight Change (%) |
|||
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Day 0-7 |
Day 0-14 |
||
1 |
G1/ 300 |
210 |
223 |
234 |
6.19 |
11.43 |
2 |
204 |
229 |
234 |
12.25 |
14.71 |
|
3 |
200 |
230 |
237 |
15.00 |
18.50 |
|
4 |
216 |
240 |
253 |
11.11 |
17.13 |
|
5 |
204 |
240 |
246 |
17.65 |
20.59 |
|
6 |
198 |
237 |
218 |
19.70 |
10.10 |
|
7 |
G2/ 2000 |
210 |
219 |
229 |
4.29 |
9.05 |
8 |
197 |
228 |
224 |
15.74 |
13.71 |
|
9 |
195 |
220 |
235 |
12.82 |
20.51 |
|
10 |
187 |
217 |
229 |
16.04 |
22.46 |
|
11 |
183 |
219 |
228 |
19.67 |
24.59 |
|
12 |
185 |
215 |
229 |
16.22 |
23.78 |
Table 2: Summary of Animal Body Weight (g) and Body Weight Changes (%)
Sex:Female
Group/ Dose (mg/kg) |
Rats Body Weight (g) |
Body Weight Changes (%) |
||||
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
0-7 |
0-14 |
||
G1/ 300 |
Mean |
205.33 |
233.17 |
237.00 |
13.65 |
15.41 |
SD |
6.65 |
6.91 |
11.97 |
4.87 |
4.10 |
|
n |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
|
G2/ 2000 |
Mean |
192.83 |
219.67 |
229.00 |
14.13 |
19.02 |
SD |
10.09 |
4.46 |
3.52 |
5.29 |
6.25 |
|
n |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
Keys:SD = Standard Deviation, n = Number of Animals
Table 3: Individual Animal Clinical Signs and Symptoms
Sex:Female
Animal No. |
Group/ Dose (mg/kg) |
Hours (Day 0) |
|||||
1/2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
||
1 |
G1/ 300 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
- |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
6 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
7 |
G2/ 2000 |
1 |
1 |
99+ |
99++ 21+ |
99++ 21+ |
99++ 21+ |
8 |
1 |
1 |
99+ |
99++ 21+ |
99+++ 21+ |
99+++ 21++ |
|
9 |
1 |
1 |
99++ 21+ |
99+++ 21++ |
99+++ 21++ |
99+++ 21++ |
|
10 |
1 |
1 |
99+ |
99++ 21+ |
99++ 21+ |
- |
|
11 |
1 |
1 |
99+ |
99++ 21+ |
99++ 21+ |
- |
|
12 |
1 |
1 |
99+ |
99++ 21+ |
99++ 21++ |
- |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimisch 1 and from study report.
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- the study does not need to be conducted because exposure of humans via inhalation is not likely taking into account the vapour pressure of the substance and/or the possibility of exposure to aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size
- Clinical signs:
- other:
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Quality of whole database:
- Waiver
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from study report.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The objective of the study was to assess the dermal toxicity of test chemical after single dose application by dermal route in rats.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source:In-House Bred at sa-Ford, Animal Facility
- Age at study initiation:Healthy young adult animals were used for the study
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes, Females were nulliparous and non pregnant.
- Weight (Prior to Treatment):Male:Minimum: 238 g and Maximum: 274 g ,Female:Minimum: 234 g and Maximum: 250 g
- Fasting period before study:N/A
- Housing:The animals were housed individually in polycarbonate cages.
- Bedding : All cages were provided with corn cobs.
- Room Sanitation : The experimental room floor and work tops were swept and mopped with disinfectant solution every day.
- Cages and water bottle : All the cages and water bottles were changed at least twice every week.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):All animals were provided conventional laboratory rodent diet (Nutrivet Life Sciences, Pune) ad libitum.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Aqua guard filtered tap water was provided ad libitum via drinking bottles.
- Acclimation period:All animals were acclimatized to the test conditions for 5 days prior to administration of the test item.
- Randomization : Animals were selected manually. No computer generated randomization program was used.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):Minimum: 20.40 °C and Maximum: 23.10 °C
- Humidity (%):Minimum: Minimum: 38.40% and Maximum: 58.70%
- Air changes (per hr):More than 12 changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12:12 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- other: distilled water
- Details on dermal exposure:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure:The test item was applied uniformly over clipped dorsal area of rat skin.
- % coverage:Approximately 10% body surface area of rat.
- Type of wrap if used: Test item was held in contact with the skin with a porous gauze dressing. The test site was further covered in a suitable manner to retain the gauze dressing and test item and ensured that the animals cannot ingest the test item.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done):The residual test item was removed by using distilled water.
- Time after start of exposure:24-hour.
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit):A limit dose of 2000 mg/ kg body weight of test item was applied.
- Constant volume or concentration used: yes
- For solids, paste formed: yes
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit):0.2 ml distilled water. - Duration of exposure:
- 24-hour
- Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg body weight.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 (Five per sex)
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Daily
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes, at the end of 14 day observation period, all the surviving rats were euthanised by overdose of CO2 and subjected to gross pathology examination, for external and internal observations.
- Other examinations performed:
- Clinical signs : After test item administration, individual animals were frequently observed at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post dosing on day 0 (day of dosing). Subsequently, all animals were observed once a day during the 14 day observation period.
- Body weight: All rats were weighed on days 0 (prior to dosing), 7 and 14.
- Local Signs/Skin Reactions: All animals were observed once daily during days 1-14 (in common with clinical signs).
- Mortality: Animals were observed twice daily for any mortality during the experimental period. - Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was performed since the study was terminated with limit test.
- Preliminary study:
- LIMIT TEST : Five male and five female wistar rats were treated with test item by a single dermal application at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight. Since no test item related mortality was observed, the study was terminated with limit test only.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Non toxic to animals.
- Mortality:
- No mortality was observed at limit dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight of test item during the 14 day observation period.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No systemic or local signs of toxicity were observed at limit dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight of test item during the experimental period.
- Gross pathology:
- The external and internal gross pathological observation of all terminally sacrificed animals did not show any pathological abnormality.
- Other findings:
- No data
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not classified
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this, the acute dermal median lethal dose of test chemical was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that test chemical does not exhibit acute dermal toxicity i.e it is acutely non toxic to animals.
- Executive summary:
Acute Dermal Toxicity Study was conducted by using the given test chemical in Wistar Rats performed as per OECD No.402. Five male and five female healthy young adult rats were randomly selected and used for conducting acute dermal toxicity study. Rats free from injury and irritation of skin were selected for the study. Twenty four hours prior to dermal application of test item, approximately 10% of body surface area of each rat was clipped. A limit dose of 2000 mg/ kg body weight of test item moistened with 0.2 ml distilled water was applied by single dermal application and observed for 14 days after treatment. On test day 0, an amount of test item moistened with 0.2 ml distilled water was applied directly on the intact skin of clipped area of rats; the surgical gauze patch was put on to the intact skin of clipped area. This gauze patch was covered with a semi-occlusive dressing. The dressing was wrapped around the abdomen and anchored with non-irritating adhesive tape. After the 24-hour application period, the dressings were removed and the skin was gently wiped with distilled water. The skin reactions were assessed. The animals were observed daily for mortality and clinical signs, during the acclimatization period. All animals were observed for clinical signs at approximately 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours after treatment on day 0 and once daily during test days 1 14. Mortality was recorded after application on test day 0 and twice daily during days 1-14 (at least once on the day of sacrifice). Local signs / Skin reactions were observed daily from test days 1-14 (in common with clinical signs). Body weights were re¬corded on day 0 (prior to application) and on day 7 and 14. All animals were necropsied and examined macroscopically. No mortality was observed in any animal till the end of the experimental period. No clinical signs and any skin reaction were observed throughout the experimental period in all treated animals. The male and female animals were observed with body weight gain compared to day 0 throughout the experiment. The external and internal gross pathological observation of all terminally sacrificed animals did not show any pathological abnormality.
Under the conditions of this, the acute dermal median lethal dose of test chemical was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that test chemical does not exhibit acute dermal toxicity i.e it is acutely non toxic to animals.
Reference
Table 1: Individual Animal Body Weight (g) andBody Weight Changes(%)
Dose:2000 mg/ kg bodyweight
Animal No. |
Sex |
Body Weight (gram) |
Body Weight Change (%) |
|||
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Day 0-7 |
Day 0-14 |
||
1 |
Male |
245 |
247 |
229 |
0.82 |
-6.53 |
2 |
245 |
264 |
280 |
7.76 |
14.29 |
|
3 |
238 |
248 |
257 |
4.20 |
7.98 |
|
4 |
274 |
297 |
269 |
8.39 |
-1.82 |
|
5 |
251 |
244 |
272 |
-2.79 |
8.37 |
|
6 |
Female |
249 |
249 |
265 |
0.00 |
6.43 |
7 |
238 |
254 |
262 |
6.72 |
10.08 |
|
8 |
246 |
250 |
267 |
1.63 |
8.54 |
|
9 |
234 |
227 |
244 |
-2.99 |
4.27 |
|
10 |
250 |
254 |
263 |
1.60 |
5.20 |
Table 2: Individual Animal Clinical Signs and Symptoms
Dose:2000 mg/kg body weight
Animal No. |
Sex |
Hour(s) - Day 0 |
Day |
||||||||||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
1 |
Male |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
6 |
Female |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
8 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
9 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Key: 1 = Normal
Table 3: Individual Animal Mortality Record
Dose:2000 mg/kg body weight
Animal No. |
Sex |
Days of Observation (0 to 14) |
|
Morning Observations |
Evening Observations |
||
1 |
Male |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
2 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
3 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
4 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
5 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
6 |
Female |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
7 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
8 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
9 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
10 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimisch 1 and from study report.
Additional information
Acute oral toxicity:
In different studies, the given test chemical has been investigated for acute oral toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in-vivo experiments in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for the given test chemical. The studies are summarized as below –
Acute Oral Toxicity Study was conducted by using the given test chemical in Rats. This study was performed as per OECD No. 423. Twelve female Wistar rats were selected for acute oral toxicity study. The animals were fasted for minimum 16-18 hours prior to dosing and for 3-4 hours post dosing, with food withheld but drinking water provided ad libitum. The time intervals between dosing were determined by the onset, duration and severity of toxic signs. Three rats of group G1 were dosed with starting dose of 300 mg/kg body weight and the animals did not show any mortality so another three animals of the group G1 were dosed with 300 mg/kg body weight and no mortality was observed. Three animals of the group G2 were dosed with 2000 mg/kg body weight and no mortality was observed, therefore another three animals of same group G2 were dose with 2000 mg/kg and no mortality was observed. Hence, further dosing was stopped. Body weights were recorded on day 0 (prior to dosing) 7 and 14. Mean body weight was observed with gain was observed in the animals treated with 300 and 2000 mg/kg body weight, during the 14 day observation period, as compared to day 0. At 300 mg/kg, all the six animals (animal nos. 1-6) were observed normal throughout experimental period. At 2000 mg/kg, animal no. 7 was observed normal at 30 minutes and 1 hour post dosing, mild to moderate lethargy at 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours and mild ataxia at 3, 4 and 6 hours followed by normal clinical sign till day 14. Animal no. 8 was observed normal at 30 minutes and 1 hour post dosing, mild to severe lethargy at 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours and mild to moderate ataxia at 3, 4 and 6 hours followed by normal clinical sign till day 14. Animal no. 9 was observed normal at 30 minutes and 1 hour post dosing, moderate to severe lethargy and mild to moderate ataxia at 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours followed by normal clinical sign till day 14. Animal nos. 10-12 were observed normal at 30 minutes and 1 hour post dosing, mild to moderate lethargy at 2, 3 and 4 hours and mild ataxia at 3 and 4 hours followed by normal clinical sign till day 14. No external and internal gross pathological changes were seen in all the six animals treated with 2000 mg/kg body weight during terminal sacrifice. Under the conditions of this; acute oral toxicity study of test chemical in female rats is as given below:
The acute oral LD50 value of test chemical was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that test chemical does not exhibit acute oral toxicity i.e. it is acutely non toxic to animals.
The above study was supported with another study mentioned in study report for the given test chemical. The acute oral toxicity study was conducted under the OECD Guideline-423 for testing of chemicals in wistar albino rats. The healthy wistar albino rats of body weight 200+20 gm were selected for study after acclimatization to standard laboratory condition and divided into test compound and vehicle control group each having three animals. The study was conducted stepwise as follow: starting dose 2000 mg/kg body weight:
Step-l - The test compound was mixed with distilled water and administered orally at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight (dose volume 10mi/kg) to three female rats. However; vehicle control group treated with the distilled water at the dose level of 10 ml/kg b.wt. The treated animals were closely observed for clinical signs of intoxication during first four hours of test compound administration. Thereafter, all the animals were observed periodically at one hour interval for 24 hrs and twice daily for a period of 14 days. The necropsy was performed on all animals at the termination of the study. The test compound did not elicit any clinical signs of intoxication throughout the period of observation at the tested dose level 2000 mg/kg body weight. Furthermore, no mortality was recorded at test dose level. Vehicle control group of animals were also free from any mortality and Clinical signs. The necropsy finding did not reveal any gross pathological changes at the tested dose level. Furthermore, no gross pathological change was observed in vehicle control group.
Step -ll: After 72 hrs, the result of step-I was confirmed by administration of same dose level (2000 mg/kg. b.wt) of test compound in additional three animals of same sex (OECD- 423 guidelines) under same test condition. The test compound administered at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg b.wt did not produce any mortality and clinical sign of intoxication throughout the observation period of 14 days. Body weight of each rat was also recorded on day 7" and 14" showed normal gain as compared to control group. Necropsy was conducted at the end of the study (15 day) on all the animals which did not reveal any gross pathological changes.
Based on the results obtained from present investigation, it can be concluded that the test compound is non toxic to Wistar albino rats at the testing dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight.
Thus, based on the above summarised studies on test chemical, it can be concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw, for acute oral toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute oral toxicity.
Acute Inhalation Toxicity:
The acute inhalation toxicity study need not be conducted because exposure to humans via inhalation route is not likely taking into account due to low vapour pressure of the test chemical, which is reported to be 0.00000256 Pa. Thus, exposure to inhalable dust, mist and vapour of the chemical is highly unlikely. Therefore this study is considered for waiver.
Acute Dermal Toxicity:
In different studies, the given test chemical has been investigated for acute dermal toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in-vivo experiments in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for the given test chemical. The studies are summarized as below -
Acute Dermal Toxicity Study was conducted by using the given test chemical in Wistar Rats performed as per OECD No.402. Five male and five female healthy young adult rats were randomly selected and used for conducting acute dermal toxicity study. Rats free from injury and irritation of skin were selected for the study. Twenty four hours prior to dermal application of test item, approximately 10% of body surface area of each rat was clipped. A limit dose of 2000 mg/ kg body weight of test item moistened with 0.2 ml distilled water was applied by single dermal application and observed for 14 days after treatment. On test day 0, an amount of test item moistened with 0.2 ml distilled water was applied directly on the intact skin of clipped area of rats; the surgical gauze patch was put on to the intact skin of clipped area. This gauze patch was covered with a semi-occlusive dressing. The dressing was wrapped around the abdomen and anchored with non-irritating adhesive tape. After the 24-hour application period, the dressings were removed and the skin was gently wiped with distilled water. The skin reactions were assessed. The animals were observed daily for mortality and clinical signs, during the acclimatization period. All animals were observed for clinical signs at approximately 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours after treatment on day 0 and once daily during test days 1 14. Mortality was recorded after application on test day 0 and twice daily during days 1-14 (at least once on the day of sacrifice). Local signs / Skin reactions were observed daily from test days 1-14 (in common with clinical signs). Body weights were re¬corded on day 0 (prior to application) and on day 7 and 14. All animals were necropsied and examined macroscopically. No mortality was observed in any animal till the end of the experimental period. No clinical signs and any skin reaction were observed throughout the experimental period in all treated animals. The male and female animals were observed with body weight gain compared to day 0 throughout the experiment. The external and internal gross pathological observation of all terminally sacrificed animals did not show any pathological abnormality.
Under the conditions of this, the acute dermal median lethal dose of test chemical was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that test chemical does not exhibit acute dermal toxicity i.e. it is acutely non toxic to animals.
The above study was supported with another study mentioned in study report and conducted to determine the acute dermal toxicity dose of the given test chemical on Wistar albino rats. This study was conducted according to OECD guideline 402 for testing of chemicals. The summary of the study was as follows -
LIMIT TEST (2000 mg/kg body weight): Ten healthy wistar albino rats of both sexes (ranging b.wt 200±30 gm) were selected for study after acclimatization. Approximate 10 percent back skin of total body surface area was prepared 24 hrs prior to application of test compound. The test compound was applied dermally at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg b.wt for each animal. The treated animals were closely observed for clinical signs of intoxication during first four hours of test compound administration. Thereafter, all the animals were observed periodically at one hour interval for 24 hrs and twice daily for a period of 14 days. The body weight of each rat was observed on day 0 (pre treatment), 7 and 14 (post treatment). The necropsy was performed on all animals at termination of the study. The test compound applied at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg b.wt in Wistar albino rats did not show any mortality as well as clinical signs of toxicity throughout the observation period of 14 days. Necropsy finding did not reveal any gross pathological changes under test condition.
CONFIRMATORY TEST: After 72 hrs, a confirmatory test was conducted in same species of animals to confirm the results obtained from limit test (OQECD-402 guidelines). Ten healthy Wistar albino rats of both sexes (ranging b.wt 200+30 gm) were selected for study after acclimatization. Approximate 10 percent back skin of total body surface area was prepared 24 hrs prior to application of test compound. The test compound was applied dermally at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg b.wt for each animal. The treated animals were closely observed for clinical signs of intoxication during first four hours of test compound administration. Thereafter, all the animals were observed periodically at one hour interval for 24 hrs and twice daily for a period of 14 days. The body weight of each rat was observed on day 0 (pre treatment), 7 and 14 (post treatment). The necropsy was performed on all animals at the termination of the study. No mortality was recorded in Wistar albino rats after administration of test compound at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg b.wt throughout the period of observation (14 days). The test compound did not elicit any clinical signs of toxicity during the observation period. No skin reaction was observed after 24 hrs of patch removal. The body weight of each animal recorded on day 7 and 14 showed normal increase as compared to day 0 (pre treatment). Necropsy was conducted at the end of the observation on all the animals (day 15) did not reveal any significant gross pathological changes related to compound toxicity.
Result obtained from present investigation can be concluded that the test compound is acutely non toxic at the tested dose level of 2000 mg/kg b.wt in Wistar albino rats when applied by dermal route.
Thus, based on the above summarised studies on test chemical, it can be concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute dermal toxicity.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above studies on test chemical, it can be concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw, for acute oral and acute dermal toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute oral and acute dermal toxicity. For acute inhalation toxicity wavier was added so, not possible to classify.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.