Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-627-7 | CAS number: 98-01-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 4.26 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 37.5
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 320 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 160 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Correcting the rat inhalation NOAEC for duration of exposure and worker respiratory volume:
NOAECinhalation =320 x [6/8] x [6.7/10]
= 160 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default, clear NOAEC
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 3
- Justification:
- Normally a factor 6 is applied for extrapolation from a subacute (28 days) to chronic exposure. However, according to the EC RAR 2008, a factor of 3 is applied for extrapolation of sub-acute to chronic exposure. A chronic inhalation study with rats is not available. The results of the oral subchronic and chronic study in hamsters, show no effect of exposure duration on the NOAEL and the effects observed.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- No allometric scaling is applicable when setting an inhalation DNEL based on an inhalation animal study
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default AF
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default AF for workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default, GLP compliant guideline study;
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 36.48 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 540 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 912 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The acute inhalation NOAEC (mortality) of furfural in the rat (4 hr exposure) of 540 mg/m3.
Modification of dose descriptor
Initial modification of NOAEC of 540 mg/m3for light work (6.7 m3/ 10 m3) gives 362 mg/m3.
Adjust for duration only applying Haber’s law to derive the equivalent 15 min exposure:
(Ct=4)3x 4 = (Ct=0.25)3x 0.25
(Ct=0.25)3 = (362)3x 16
Ct=0.25 = 912 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 2
- Justification:
- NOAEC from an acute study
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- No allometric scaling is applicable when setting an inhalation DNEL based on an inhalation animal study
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default AF for workers
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default AF for workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- recent GLP study
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 8 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 8 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Dose response clearly demonstrated in 28d study (Staal et al, 2018) , and clear NOAEL identified.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- local effect not relevant
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- No allometric scaling is applicable when setting an inhalation DNEL based on an inhalation animal study.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- The AF of 1 is based on local irritant property, induced by an elevated concentration of furfural, with little difference in toxicodynamic/ toxicokinetic effect across species.
Supporting this position is that there is comparability of effects between golden Syrian hamsters and rats following inhalation exposure, where no differences in response to local effects of inhalation of furfural were seen (Feron 1984).
A residual AF of 2.5 is not applicable since furfural induces a direct physical effect at the site of entry, an effect expected to occur in all exposed species when a threshold exposure concentration is exceeded, and this is supported by the fact that there are no adverse effects reported in the lower respiratory tract/lungs in any inhalation studies conducted.
Correction for differing respiratory rates is not applicable for local irritant effects in the nasal cavity. - AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- Local irritant property induced by an elevated concentration of furfural with no differences in toxicodynamic/ toxicokinetic effect between/within species.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default AF
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Data from the 28d sub-acute inhalation toxicity study with furfural in rats (Staal et al, 2008) confirms the NOAEL as 8 mg/m3 for the purposes of risk assessment.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 24 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.66 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 150
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default AF, clear NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 3
- Justification:
- Normally, and according to ECETOC and ECHA guidance, a factor of 6 should be applied for extrapolation from a sub-acute (28 day) to chronic exposure. However according to the EC RAR 2008; a factor of 3 is applied for extrapolation of sub-acute to chronic exposure, the results of the oral subchronic and chronic study in hamsters, show no effect of exposure duration on the NOAEL and the effects observed.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- default AF
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default AF
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default AF for workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default, GLP compliant study
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.067 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 320 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 80 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The RAR (2008) considered mortality in the 28 day inhalation toxicity study. The mortalities could be viewed to be a consequence of the local, nasal irritation effects and, as also concluded by the EPA, could be considered to not represent a ‘true’ systemic effect.
Taking the NOAEC based on the EC RAR (2008) conclusion and as included in the current REACH dossier, this is 320 mg/m3
The DNEL calculation is as follows:
Correcting the rat inhalation NOAEC for duration of exposure:
NOAECinhalation =320 x [6/24]
= 80 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 3
- Justification:
- A factor of 3 is applied for extrapolation of sub-acute to chronic exposure. A chronic inhalation study with rats is not available. However the results of the oral subchronic and chronic study in hamsters, show no effect of exposure duration on the NOAEL and the effects observed.)(in accordance to the conclusion of RAR 2008)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- no allometric scaling is applicable when setting an inhalation DNEL based on an inhalation animal study
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default AF
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default AF for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 27.22 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 540 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 1 361 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC acute inhalation toxicity 540 mg/m3
Adjusted for duration only applyingd Habers law to derive 15 min exp; (1361 mg/m3).
(Ct=4)3x 4 = (Ct=0.25)3x 0.25
(Ct=0.25)3 = (540)3x 16
Ct=0.25 = 1361 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 2
- Justification:
- NOAEC from an acute study
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- no allometric scaling is applicable when setting an inhalation DNEL based on an inhalation animal study
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default AF
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default AF for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 8 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 8 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Dose response clearly demonstrated in 28d study (Staal et al, 2018) , and clear NOAEL identified.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- local effect not relevant
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- No allometric scaling is applicable when setting an inhalation DNEL based on an inhalation animal
study. - AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- The AF of 1 is based on local irritant property, induced by an elevated concentration of furfural, with
little difference in toxicodynamic/ toxicokinetic effect across species.
Supporting this position is that there is comparability of effects between golden Syrian hamsters and
rats following inhalation exposure, where no differences in response to local effects of inhalation of
furfural were seen (Feron 1984).
A residual AF of 2.5 is not applicable since furfural induces a direct physical effect at the site of e
ntry, an effect expected to occur in all exposed species when a threshold exposure concentration is
exceeded, and this is supported by the fact that there are no adverse effects reported in the lower
respiratory tract/lungs in any inhalation studies conducted.
Correction for differing respiratory rates is not applicable for local irritant effects in the nasal cavity. - AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- Local irritant property induced by an elevated concentration of furfural with no differences in toxi
codynamic/ toxicokinetic effect between/within species. - AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default AF
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Data from the 28d sub-acute inhalation toxicity study with furfural in rats (Staal et al, 2008) confirms
the NOAEL as 8 mg/m3 for the purposes of risk assessment.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 24 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.83 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 300
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default AF, clear NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 3
- Justification:
- Normally, and according to ECETOC and ECHA guidance, a factor of 6 should be applied for extrapolation from a sub-acute (28 day) to chronic exposure. However according to the EC RAR 2008; a factor of 3 is applied for extrapolation of sub-acute to chronic exposure, the results of the oral subchronic and chronic study in hamsters, show no effect of exposure duration on the NOAEL and the effects observed.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- default AF
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default AF
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default AF for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.47 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 53 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 47.7 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL for systemic effects was 53 mg/kg bw/d in the rat. (90% intake)
correctedOral NOAEL = NOAELoralx [ABSoral-rat]
correctedOral NOAEL = 53 x [0.90] = 47.7 mg/kg bw/d
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- normally a factor 2 is applied for extrapolation of subchronic to chronic exposure. However, given the results of the oral sub-chronic and chronic gavage study for furfural, no effect of exposure duration was found on the NOAEL and the effects observed. Therefore, no correction for differences between experimental conditions and exposure pattern of the general population (EC RAR, 2008) )
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- default AF
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default AF
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default AF for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.47 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.