Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 267-051-0 | CAS number: 67774-74-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
In Read-across to EPA OPPTS 870.5265 studies in Salmonella typhimurium (Ames test) with alkylate 215 and 225, no genotoxic activity were observed.
In Read-across to OECD 476 equivalent studies in CHO cells (mammalian gene mutation, HGPRT) with alkylate 215 and 225; no genotoxic activity were observed.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5265 (The Salmonella typhimurium Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 from Aroclor induced rat and mouse livers
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 10, 40, 200, 1000, 3000, and 10000 μg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-acetylaminofluorene
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: sodium nitrite
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
- in agar (plate incorporation) - Evaluation criteria:
- A response was considered positive if three or more treatments were significantly greater than controls, and if there was a significant dose response.
- Statistics:
- Significant differences analyzed using Bartlett's test. Comparison to controls analyzed using Dunnett's t test. Dose response analyzed with regression analysis for a log-log straight line and t-test.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Negative with and without activation. A significant difference was seen in strain TA 98 with S9 at all concentrations. There was also a significant response in strain TA 1535 without S9 at a single concentration. Retesting with strain TA 98 showed no significant increase in revertants. A retest of strain TA 1535 was also negative. Due to lack of a dose-response relationship and lack of reproducibility of the positive results, the test substance is considered negative for mutagenicity.
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions described in this study Alkylate 215 did not show mutagenic properties.
- Executive summary:
This EPA OPPTS 870.5265 (The Salmonella typhimurium Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test) and GLP compliant study was performed to investigate the mutagenicity of the test substance alkylate 215. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, and TA 98 were exposed to concentrations of 10, 40, 200, 1,000, 3,000, and 10,000 μg/plate of test substance. DMSO was used as a solvent. 9-aminoacridine, sodium nitrite, benzo(a)pyrene, 2 -acetylaminofluorene, and 2 -nitrofluorene were used as positive controls substances. No reproducible, dose-response related positive results were seen in the treatment groups. A significant increase in revertants per plate was seen in the positive controls. The test substance is not mutagenic.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5265 (The Salmonella typhimurium Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 from aroclor induced rat and mouse liver
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 3, 12, 60, 300, 1000, 3000 μg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-acetylaminofluorene
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: sodium nitrite
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
- in agar (plate incorporation) - Evaluation criteria:
- A response was considered positive if three or more treatments were significantly greater than controls, and if there was a significant dose response.
- Statistics:
- Significant differences analyzed using Bartlett's test. Comparison to controls analyzed using Dunnett's t-test. Dose response analyzed with regression analysis for a log-log straight line and t-test.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Negative with and without activation
- Conclusions:
- In the current study an Ames test using Alkylate 225 did not show mutagenic properties.
- Executive summary:
This EPA OPPTS 870.5265 (The Salmonella typhimurium Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test) and GLP compliant study was carried out to assess the mutagenicity of the test substance alkylate 225. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, and TA 98 were exposed to concentrations of 3, 12, 60, 300, 1000, and 3000 μg/plate of test substance. DMSO was used as a solvent. 2-acetylaminofluorene, 9-aminoacridine, 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide, sodium nitrite, and benzo(a)pyrene were used as positive controls substances. No positive results were seen in the treatment groups. A significant increase in revertants per plate was seen in the positive controls. The test substance is not mutagenic.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test using the Hprt and xprt genes)
- Version / remarks:
- HGPRT point mutation
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver induced with aroclor 1254
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 100 - 2000 μL/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Ethyl alcohol
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-dimethylnitrosamine
- benzo(a)pyrene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Evaluation criteria:
- A response was considered positive if one of the three highest concentrations with survival of at least 10% had a mean mutation frequency significantly greater than that of controls, and if there was a dose-response relationship.
- Statistics:
- Student's t-test was used to compare mutation frequency. Dose-response was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 1.0 mg/mL with activation; 0.25 mg/mL without activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- There was no significant increase in mutation frequencies as compared to controls.
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions described for this CHO/HGPRT assay Alkylate 215 did not show mutagenic properties.
- Executive summary:
This GLP compliant study and similar to the OECD 476 TG (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test using the Hprt and xprt genes) was carried out to assess the mutagenicity of the test substance in mammalian cells. Chinese hamster ovary cells were exposed to concentrations of 100 - 2000 μL/mL of test substance both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. Ethanol was used as a vehicle. Ethylmethanesulfonate, benzo(a)pyrene, and dimethylnitrosamine were used as positive controls. Cytotoxicity was seen at concentrations of 1.0 mg/mL and above with metabolic activation and 0.25 mg/mL and above without metabolic activation. No significant increase in mutation frequencies was seen in treatment groups. The test substance is not mutagenic to mammalian cells.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test using the Hprt and xprt genes)
- Version / remarks:
- HGPRT point mutation
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 from aroclor 1254 induced rat liver
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 100 - 2000 μL/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- other: dimethylnitrosamine
- Evaluation criteria:
- A response was considered positive if one of the three highest concentrations with survival of at least 10% had a mean mutation frequency significantly greater than that of controls, and if there was a dose-response relationship.
- Statistics:
- Student's t-test was used to compare mutation frequency. Dose-response was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 0.5 mg/mL both with and without activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No significant increase in mutation frequency was seen in the treatment groups.
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions described for this CHO/HGPRT assay Alkylate 225 did not reveal mutagenic properties.
- Executive summary:
This GLP compliant study and similar to the OECD 476 TG (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test using the Hprt and xprt genes) examined the potential of the test substance to cause mutations in mammalian cells. Chinese hamster ovary cells were exposed to concentrations of 100 - 2000 μL/mL of test substance both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. Ethanol was used as a vehicle. Ethylmethanesulfonate, benzo(a)pyrene, and dimethylnitrosamine were used as positive controls. Cytotoxicity was seen at concentrations of 0.5 mg/mL and above both with and without metabolic activation. No significant increase in mutation frequencies was seen in treatment groups. The test substance is not mutagenic to mammalian cells.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Mean Revertants/plate - without S9
Concentration (μg or nl/plate) |
TA 1535 |
TA 100 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
First run |
||||
10 |
28.3 ± 3.51 |
307 ± 51.5 |
8.0 ± 1.0 |
25.7 ± 5.13 |
40 |
23.0 ± 2.65 |
344 ± 33.5 |
9.0 ± 3.6 |
19.3 ± 5.51 |
200 |
29.0 ± 8.00 |
310 ± 17.6 |
10.7 ± 0.58 |
17.3 ± 3.79 |
1000 |
23.3 ± 3.21 |
318 ± 33.3 |
10.0 ± 1.0 |
18.7 ± 1.15 |
3000 |
34.7 ± 5.03 |
296 ± 57.4 |
9.0 ± 1.7 |
21.7 ± 2.08 |
10,000 |
27.3 ± 4.62 |
297 ± 59.2 |
10.3 ± 1.5 |
27.3 ± 6.03 |
Solvent control |
21.7 ± 0.58 |
395 ± 30.8 |
7.3 ± 3.5 |
23.7 ± 0.58 |
NaNO2 |
691 |
|||
9-aminoacridine |
1620 |
|||
2-nitrofluorene |
627 |
354 |
||
Second run |
||||
10 |
321 ± 17.7 |
|||
40 |
297 ± 25.1 |
|||
200 |
292 ± 39.0 |
|||
1000 |
307 ± 20.3 |
|||
1500 |
16.0 ± 1.0 |
|||
3000 |
14.3 ± 0.58 |
322 ± 58.2 |
||
4000 |
12.0 ± 4.0 |
|||
10,000 |
322 ± 33.2 |
|||
Solvent control |
13.0 ± 3.46 |
258 ± 25.5 |
||
NaNO2 |
564 |
|||
2-nitrofluorene |
814 |
|||
Third run |
||||
10 |
245 ± 11.5 |
|||
40 |
236 ± 30.7 |
|||
200 |
166 ± 57.6 |
|||
1000 |
203 ± 49.2 |
|||
3000 |
230 ± 11.8 |
|||
10,000 |
179 ± 22.3 |
|||
Solvent control |
233 ± 27.0 |
|||
2-nitrofluorene |
506 |
Table 2: Mean Revertants/plate - with S9
Concentration (μg or nl/plate) |
TA 1535 |
TA 100 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
First run |
||||
10 |
25.7 ± 5.8 |
309 ± 44.9 |
11.3 ± 1.5 |
72.7 ± 5.8 |
40 |
21.3 ± 5.8 |
294 ± 31.0 |
10.3 ± 2.3 |
79.3 ± 5.5 |
200 |
20.3 ± 1.2 |
283 ± 12.7 |
7.3 ± 2.5 |
63.7 ± 13.9 |
1000 |
24.3 ± 2.1 |
339 ± 38.4 |
6.7 ± 1.5 |
71.7 ± 16.0 |
3000 |
22.7 ± 3.8 |
303 ± 27.4 |
13.7 ± 2.5 |
71.7 ± 4.2 |
10,000 |
28.7 ± 4.9 |
367 ± 62.4 |
12.3 ± 3.2 |
70.7 ± 0.53 |
Solvent control |
24.3 ± 1.5 |
314 ± 20.3 |
9.7 ± 2.1 |
29.0 ± 9.5 |
B(a)P |
938 |
459 |
||
2-AA |
661 |
155 |
||
Second run |
||||
10 |
15.7 ± 3.2 |
280 ± 46.6 |
27.3 ± 2.5 |
|
40 |
11.0 ± 3.6 |
299 ± 15.0 |
33.7 ± 4.9 |
|
200 |
15.3 ± 2.1 |
294 ± 24.4 |
39.0 ± 1.0 |
|
1000 |
21.3 ± 3.1 |
297 ± 26.8 |
30.0 ± 7.2 |
|
3000 |
21.0 ± 11.5 |
301 ± 39.9 |
32.0 ± 7.2 |
|
10,000 |
13.7 ± 2.5 |
296 ± 6.8 |
36.0 ± 4.6 |
|
Solvent control |
13.7 ± 5.7 |
304 ± 29.0 |
27.0 ± 1.7 |
|
B(a)P |
1611 |
|||
2-AA |
511 |
896 |
||
Third run |
||||
10 |
191 ± 43.0 |
|||
40 |
210 ± 3.06 |
|||
200 |
227 ± 15.0 |
39.0 ± 6.2 |
||
250 |
35.3 ± 9.3 |
|||
1000 |
229 ± 12.9 |
32.0 ± 5.3 |
||
3000 |
238 ± 29.7 |
|||
10,000 |
204 ± 12.2 |
|||
Solvent control |
219 ± 39.8 |
34.7 ± 3.2 |
||
B(a)P |
1649 |
810 |
Table 1: Mean Revertants/plate - without S9
Concentration (μg or nl/plate) |
TA 1535 |
TA 100 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
3 |
25.3 ± 2.5 |
109.0 ± 15.7 |
8.7 ± 4.0 |
20.0 ± 2.0 |
12 |
24.0 ± 1.0 |
106.7 ± 7.6 |
8.3 ± 7.1 |
22.3 ± 4.5 |
60 |
23.3 ± 1.2 |
97.7 ± 12.4 |
7.0 ± 2.0 |
19.3 ± 4.0 |
300 |
22.7 ± 4.5 |
83.0 ± 12.5 |
10.0 ± 2.8 |
17.7 ± 3.2 |
1,000 |
27.7 ± 1.5 |
103.0 ± 6.1 |
4.7 ± 3.1 |
19.0 ± 4.0 |
3,000 |
25.7 ± 1.5 |
103.0 ± 12.1 |
9.3 ± 1.5 |
20.3 ± 4.6 |
Solvent control |
24.0 ± 6.0 |
101.0 ± 15.1 |
11.0 ± 1.0 |
22.0 ± 2.0 |
4-NQ 0.1 |
858 |
172 |
||
4-NQ 0.05 |
475 |
118 |
||
4-NQ 0.01 |
191 |
47 |
||
NaNO2 5000 |
587 |
|||
NaNO2 2500 |
387 |
|||
NaNO2 500 |
85 |
|||
9-AA 30 |
164 |
|||
9-AA 15 |
20 |
|||
9-AA 3 |
10 |
Table 2: Mean Revertants/plate - with S9
Concentration (μg or nl/plate) |
TA 1535 |
TA 100 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
3 |
12.7 ± 3.2 |
98. ± 0 7.0 |
8.7 ± 4.0 |
34.7 ± 6.8 |
12 |
15.7 ± 2.1 |
94.0 ± 8.7 |
9.7 ± 2.1 |
46.0 ± 12.1 |
60 |
10.3 ± 4.2 |
92.0 ± 12.5 |
12.0 ± 3.0 |
39.3 ± 17.0 |
300 |
15.0 ± 3.5 |
95.0 ± 15.9 |
10.3 ± 3.1 |
29.0 ± 4.4 |
1,000 |
13.7 ± 2.1 |
100.3 ± 6.4 |
12.0 ± 3.0 |
33.3 ± 7.4 |
3,000 |
10.7 ± 4.5 |
94.7 ± 12.6 |
8.7 ± 4.0 |
32.7 ± 6.5 |
Solvent control |
14.0 ± 2.6 |
103.3 ± 12.1 |
11.3 ± 2.1 |
33.7 ± 6.7 |
B(a)P 2 |
342 |
|||
B(a)P 1 |
183 |
|||
B(a)P 0.2 |
128 |
|||
2AA 30 |
Toxic |
Toxic |
||
2AA 15 |
Toxic |
173 |
||
2AA 3 |
392 |
99 |
||
2AAF 30 |
1038 |
|||
2AAF 15 |
877 |
|||
2AAF 3 |
366 |
Table 1: Mutagenicity
Concentration |
Mutagenicity (mutation frequency x E-6) |
Without S9 |
|
100 |
19.0 |
150 |
18.1 |
250 |
24.0 |
500 |
7.8 |
750 |
10.2 |
1000 |
- |
1100 |
- |
1250 |
- |
1500 |
- |
1750 |
- |
2000 |
- |
Solvent control |
21.6 |
Ethyl methanesulfonate |
284.5 |
1 % S9 |
|
100 |
13.2 |
250 |
12.6 |
500 |
20.0 |
750 |
41.6 |
1000 |
24.8 |
Solvent control |
17.6 |
B(a)P |
415.8 |
5 % S9 |
|
100 |
- |
500 |
- |
1000 |
- |
1250 |
- |
1500 |
- |
1750 |
- |
2000 |
- |
Solvent control |
- |
DMN |
- |
Table 1: Mutagenicity
Concentration |
Mutagenicity (mutation frequency x E-6) |
Without S9 |
|
100 |
2.2 |
150 |
- |
250 |
- |
500 |
2.3 |
750 |
- |
1000 |
3.0 |
1100 |
13.2 |
1250 |
1.1 |
1500 |
1.6 |
1750 |
- |
2000 |
- |
Solvent control |
3.5 |
Ethyl methanesulfonate |
237.9 |
5 % S9 |
|
100 |
0.4 |
500 |
0.8 |
1000 |
8.1 |
1250 |
3.7 |
1500 |
0.8 |
1750 |
- |
2000 |
- |
Solvent control |
4.3 |
DMN |
202.8 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
In read-across to OECD TG 475 studies in rats (bone marrow chromosome aberrations) no genotoxic activity were observed
In an OECD TG 474 study (Erythrocyte micronucleus formation;) in mice no genotoxic activity were observed.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 5 Jun 1989 to 8 Jun 1989
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: BRO:NMRI (SPF Han.)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: FA. Winkelmann
- Age at study initiation: young adult
- Weight at study initiation: about 26 g
- Fasting period before study: 18 hours
- Housing: 5 animals per cage in Makrolon Type III cages, identified by cage signs
- Diet: Ssniff R 10 - Alleindiat fur Ratten
- Water: Tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 1
- Humidity (%): 60 ± 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single oral gavage exposure
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once
- Post exposure period:
- Animals were sacrificed at 24, 48, and 72 hours after exposure.
- Dose / conc.:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 15 including negative controls and 5 in positive control group
- Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control(s):
- Positive control animals were given a single dose of 100 mg/kg cyclophosphamide. Negative control animals were given water instead of test substance.
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- After sacrifice, the marrow from the thighs of each animal were removed and 2 mL fetal bovine serum was added. This suspension was centrifuged for 5 minutes. Marrow from each animals was divided into 3 slides, dried, and stained.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES:
Animals were given a single oral dose, and 5 animals of each sex per dose were sacrificed at 24, 48, and 72 hours after exposure.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Marrow from each animals was divided into 3 slides, dried, and stained.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Cells were analysed by microscope ,1000 cells were analyzed per sample (3000/animal).
- Evaluation criteria:
- The nucleus of each cell was examined for size (micronucleus, which was considered 1/20th of the largest nucleus), and the number of polychromatid erythrocytes (PCE) to normochromatid erythrocytes (NCE).
- Statistics:
- F-test, t-test, and U-test were used to analyze the data.
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- diarrhea and diuresis was seen in test group animals
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Animals in the treatment group exhibited diarrhea and diuresis during the treatment period. There was a significant increase in the PCE/NCE ratio and PCE cells with micronucleus in the positive control group. There was no significant increase in either of these parameters in the treatment group.
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions described for this Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus assay the tested substance did not reveal mutagenic properties.
- Executive summary:
This study in accordance with OECD 474 and in compliance with GLP was performed to examine the mutagenic potential of the test substance in vivo. A groups of 15 female and 15 male mice were given a single dose of test substance to determine the effect on bone marrow. 5 animals of each sex were sacrificed at 24, 48, and 72 hours after exposure. Similar groups were exposed to cyclophosphamide (positive control), and water (negative control). All animals in the positive control group were sacrificed at 24 hours. Analysis of the bone marrow showed no significant increase in either micronucleus or polychromatid erythrocytes in the treatment group as compared to negative controls. The test substance is not mutagenic.
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 475 (Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- EPA/TSCA
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian germ cell cytogenetic assay
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- Corn oil
- Frequency of treatment:
- Single treatment
- Post exposure period:
- Animals were sacrificed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after exposure (6 animals at each sacrifice)
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 6 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 12 700 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 18 - 24, negative control 24
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- 6 males and 6 females were given 40 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide and sacrificed at 24 hours.
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow cells (60 cells per animal)
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- 2 mg/kg colchicine was administered 2 hrs before termination. Immediately after termination, cells were collected and processed for slide preparation.
- Statistics:
- Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- lowest dose producing toxicity = 6000 mg/kg
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No effect on mitotic index or P/N ratio. Significant mean body weight loss in animals treated with 12700 mg/kg bw. Significant weight loss was also seen in males at the 6000 mg/kg dose level.
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions described for this rat bone marrow chromosome aberration assay Alkylate 215 did not reveal genotoxic properties.
- Executive summary:
This GLP compliant study and similar to the OECD 475 TG was conducted to examine the potential of the test substance to cause chromosome aberrations in vivo. Groups of 18 - 24 male and female rats were given doses of 2000, 6000, or 12700 mg/kg of test substance. Negative control animals were given corn oil (vehicle) only. Positive control animals were given 40 mg/kg cyclophosphamide. Animals were sacrificed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after exposure. The bone marrow cells were then removed and examined for chromosome aberrations. The test substance was toxic (reduced body weight) at the 12700 mg/kg dose in both males and females. Males in the 6000 mg/kg dose level also showed weight loss. No significant increase in chromosomal aberrations was seen in any treatment group. The test substance is not clastogenic.
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 475 (Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- EPA/TSCA
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian germ cell cytogenetic assay
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- Corn oil
- Frequency of treatment:
- Single treatment
- Post exposure period:
- Animals were sacrificed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after exposure (6 animals at each sacrifice)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 200 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 4 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 12 700 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 18 - 24; negative control 24
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- 6 males and 6 females were given 40 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide and sacrificed at 24 hours.
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow cells (60 cells per animal)
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- 2 mg/kg colchicine was administered 2 hrs before termination. Immediately after termination, cells were collected and processed for slide preparation.
- Statistics:
- Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- lowest dose producing toxicity = 12,700 mg/kg
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No effect on mitotic index or P/N ratio. Significant mean body weight loss in all treatments groups at the 12700 mg/kg dose level.
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions described for this rat bone marrow chromosome aberration assay Alkylate 225 did not reveal genotoxic properties.
- Executive summary:
This study similar to the OECD 475 was performed to examine the potential of the test substance to cause chromosome aberrations in vivo. Groups of 18 - 24 male and female rats were given doses of 1200, 4000, or 12700 mg/kg of test substance. Negative control animals were given corn oil (vehicle) only. Positive control animals were given 40 mg/kg cyclophosphamide. Animals were sacrificed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after exposure. The bone marrow cells were then removed and examined for chromosome aberrations. The test substance was toxic (reduced body weight) at the 12700 mg/kg dose in both males and females. No significant increase in chromosomal aberrations was seen in any treatment group. The test substance is not clastogenic.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Results of Mouse Micronucleus Assay
Dose (mg/kg) |
Hours after application |
% PCE with micronucleus |
PCE/NCE |
|
Positive control |
100 |
24 |
3.34 ± 0.97 |
0.97 ± 0.07 |
Negative control |
- |
24 |
0.18 ± 0.06 |
1.15 ± 0.10 |
- |
48 |
0.25 ± 0.12 |
1.31 ± 0.09 |
|
- |
72 |
0.28 ± 0.10 |
1.20 ± 0.33 |
|
Treatment group |
5000 |
24 |
0.20 ± 0.07 |
1.07 ± 0.10 |
5000 |
48 |
0.18 ± 0.08 |
1.26 ± 0.16 |
|
5000 |
72 |
0.18 ± 0.11 |
1.38 ± 0.20 |
Table 1: Results of in vivo bone marrow assay
Concentration |
Chromatid gaps |
Chromosome gaps |
Chromatid breaks |
Chromosome breaks |
Exchanges |
% Aberrant cells |
6-hrs |
||||||
Corn oil |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2000 mg/kg |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6000 mg/kg |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12700 mg/kg |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 hrs |
||||||
Corn oil |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.17 |
2000 mg/kg |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0.35 |
6000 mg/kg |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12700 mg/kg |
2 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1.00 |
24 hrs |
||||||
Corn oil |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2000 mg/kg |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0.16 |
6000 mg/kg |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0.18 |
12700 mg/kg |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0.49 |
CP 40 mg/kg |
6 |
1 |
68 |
3 |
9 |
14.80 |
Table 1: Results of in vivo bone marrow assay
Concentration |
Chromatid gaps |
Chromosome gaps |
Chromatid breaks |
Chromosome breaks |
Exchanges |
% Aberrant cells |
6-hrs |
||||||
Corn oil |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1200 mg/kg |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0.16 |
4000 mg/kg |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0.17 |
12700 mg/kg |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 hrs |
||||||
Corn oil |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0.16 |
1200 mg/kg |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0.16 |
4000 mg/kg |
4 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0.16 |
12700 mg/kg |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0.16 |
24 hrs |
||||||
Corn oil |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0.17 |
1200 mg/kg |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0.16 |
4000 mg/kg |
3 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0.54 |
12700 mg/kg |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0.32 |
CP 40 mg/kg |
8 |
0 |
93 |
4 |
31 |
16.25 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
In vitro mutagenicity in bacteria:
The read-across to the EPA OPPTS 870.5265 guideline study determining the mutagenicity of the test substance alkylate 215 and 225. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, and TA 98 were exposed to concentrations of 10, 40, 200, 1,000, 3,000, and 10,000 ug/plate of test substance. DMSO was used as a solvent. 9-aminoacridine, sodium nitrite, benzo(a)pyrene, 2 -acetylaminofluorene, and 2 -nitrofluorene were used as positive controls substances. No reproducible, dose-response related positive results were seen in the treatment groups. A significant increase in revertants per plate was seen in the positive controls. The test substance is not mutagenic.
In vitro mutagenicity in mammalian cells:
The read-across to the OECD 476 guideline study. This study examined the potential of the alkylates 215 and 225 to cause mutations in mammalian cells. Chinese hamster ovary cells were exposed to concentrations of 0.1 to 2 mg/mL of test substance both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. Ethanol was used as a vehicle. Ethylmethanesulfonate, benzo(a)pyrene, and dimethylnitrosamine were used as positive controls. Cytotoxicity was seen at concentrations of 1.0 mg/mL and above with metabolic activation and 0.25 mg/mL and above without metabolic activation. No significant increase in mutation frequencies was seen in treatment groups. The test substance is not mutagenic to mammalian cells.
In vivo mutagenicity:
In the OECD 474 guideline study, groups of 15 female and 15 male mice were given a single dose of test substance to determine the effect on bone marrow. Five animals of each sex were sacrificed at 24, 48, and 72 hours after exposure. Similar groups were exposed to cyclophosphamide (positive control), and water (negative control). All animals in the positive control group were sacrificed at 24 hours. Analysis of the bone marrow showed no significant increase in either micronucleus or polychromatid erythrocytes in the treatment group as compared to negative controls. The test substance is not mutagenic.
The read-across to the OECD 475 guideline study performed with alkylates 215 and 225 which examined the potential of the test substance to cause chromosome aberrations in vivo. Groups of 18 -24 male and female rats were given doses of 1200, 4000, or 12700 mg/kg of test substance. Negative control animals were given corn oil (vehicle) only. Positive control animals were given 40 mg/kg cyclophosphamide. Animals were sacrificed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after exposure. The bone marrow cells were then removed and examined for chromosome aberrations. The test substance was toxic (reduced body weight) at the 12700 mg/kg dose in both males and females. No significant increase in chromosomal aberrations was seen in any treatment group. The test substance is not clastogenic.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data classification for genetic toxicity is not warranted in accordance with EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.