Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-390-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2009-07-21 to 2009-08-02
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study, GLP, All validity criteria fulfilled, idenfication of test substance complete, including chemical analyses
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: From the series of concentrations the second lowest and the second highest test concentration (1.25 and 5.00 mg/L) and the control were analytically verified at the beginning of the test.
- Sampling method: Separate replicates for the test item analysis after 0 and 72 h were prepared without algae. Analysis after 72 h of these concentrations was carried out to demonstrate stability of the test item. Sorption to the walls of the glass container was checked out of one test replicate (prepared with algae) of a concentration level close to the EC50-value (the second lowest test concentration of 1.25 mg/L was chosen). Additionally, the freshly prepared stock solution of 10 mg/L was analytically verified to check their correct preparation.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: All samples were stored at room temperature until start of analysis, if necessary. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: A stock solution of 10 mg/L was freshyl prepared with test medium. Dispersion treatment ultrasonification for 15 min at 40 °C and an equilibration phase for at least 1 h.
- Eluate: Natural river water
- Differential loading: 0.625 - 1.25 - 2.50 - 5.00 - 10.0 mg/L
- Controls: Six replicates (without test item) were testedt under the same test conditions as the test replicates
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): None
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium (stock solution and final test solution(s) including control(s)): -
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): No - Test organisms (species):
- Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Desmodesmus subspicatus Chodat
- Strain: SAG 86.81
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): SAG Pflanzenphysiologisches Institut der Universitaet Goettingen, Nikolausberger Weg 18, D-37073 Goettingen, Germany
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): 4 days
- Method of cultivation: Fresh stocks were prepared from Z-Agar. Light intensity amounted 35 - 70 µE x m-2 x s-1 for 24 h per day.
ACCLIMATION
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): Not the same, standard growth medium
- Any deformed or abnormal cells observed: No - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- After 72 h of exposure, 0.5 – 1 mL aliquots of the test medium (i.e. samples of exposed algal cells) from the test concentrations 1.25 – 10.0 mg/L and the control were transferred to 10 mL untreated test medium. Algae were then allowed to grow for further 5 - 7 days under test conditions. The test item effect was observed to be reversible at these concentrations. Therefore, there is potential for recovery following exposure up to 10.0 mg/L.
Recovery of Alga Cells
Nominal test item concentration [mg/L] Incubation time [d] Cell density [cells/mL] Growth rate after incubation time [d-1]
Initial# Final
10.0 7 86 277 0.17
216 0.13
433 0.23
5.00 215 2266 0.34
1200 0.25
699 0.17
2.50 5 10331 157738 0.55
159127 0.55
144564 0.53
1.25 27709 504934 0.58
343160 0.50
312771 0.48
Control 69362 1955932 0.67
1997801 0.67 - Hardness:
- Not measured
- Test temperature:
- Mean: 23 °C, Min: 22 °C, Max: 24 °C
- pH:
- Nominal test item concentration pH-value
[mg/L] Start; 0 h End; 72 h
10.0 8.05 8.17
5.00 7.98 8.12
2.50 7.95 8.01
1.25 7.94 8.11
0.625 7.93 8.19
Control 7.93 8.05 - Dissolved oxygen:
- Not measured
- Salinity:
- Not measured, freshwater
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Concentrations and Recovery Rates of Tallowtripropylenetetramine
(CAS No. 85632-63-9)
Sampling date 200-07-21
Test start 2009-07-24
Test end (with algae) 2009-07-24
Test end (without algae)
Start of analysis 2009-07-24 2009-07-24 2009-07-24
Nominal concentration of test item
[mg/L] Tallowtripropylenetetramine
Meas.
conc.
[mg/L] RR
[%] Meas.
conc.
[mg/L] RR
[%] Meas.
conc.
[mg/L] RR
[%]
1.25 1.05 84 82.0 7 89.3 7
5.00 4.63 93 -- -- 462 9
( Absorption on the glass wall )
1.25 -- -- 168 13 -- --
Control < LOQ -- -- - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: sterile 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, test volume 100 mL
- Aeration: Test containers were placed on a rotary shaker and oscillated at appr. 70 rpm
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): None
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): One application at test start
- Initial cells density: 5074 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: Mean 1387239 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): None
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: Yes
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Water of the river Innerste was used. This river is located in
Sarstedt / Ruthe. Water parameters are given in Table 1. Additionally 50 % of the components concentrations of the dilution water (total application volume 6.5 mL/L) acc. to the guideline were added to enable a sufficient growth of algae
Characterisation Data of Natural River Water
River Innerste
Location D-31157 Sarstedt / Ruthe, Ruther Straße, Innerste
Sampling Date 2009-02-12
Weather on Day of Sampling dry, sunny, ca. 1 °C
Colour Slightly, turbid, yellowish
pH 8.08
Conductivity [µS/cm] 887
DOC [mg C/L] 2.8
TOC [mg C/L] 2.9
Ammonium-N [mg N/L] 0.163
Nitrate-N [mg N/L] 6.10
o-Phosphate-P [mg P/L] 0.103
Total Phosphate [mg P/L] 0.152
Suspended Matter [mg/L] 24
Total Hardness [mg CO3/L] 338
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 24 h
- Light intensity and quality: 60 - 120 µE x m-2 x s-1
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Determination of cell concentrations: [counting chamber; electronic particle counter; fluorimeter; spectrophotometer; colorimeter] Fluorimeter, via Chlorophyll-a fluorescence (excitation at 436 nm, emission at 685 nm), cell concentrations were related to all cell density values acc. to a calibration curve.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study: Yes
Results of the Range Finding Test (0 – 72 h)
Nominal
Test Item Concentration [mg/L] Rate-related inhibition
[%] Yield Inhibition
[%]
10.0 100 100
1.00 1 3
0.10 -1 -7
0.01 -1 -3
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium dichromate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 1.27
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 0.999-1.45
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 2.47 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 2.23 - 2.71
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1.12 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: yield
- Remarks on result:
- other: (1.04-1.18)
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test):
- Unusual cell shape: No
- Colour differences: No
- Flocculation: No
- Adherence to test vessels: No
- Aggregation of algal cells: No
- Other: No
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: No - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? Yes
- EC50:
Rate-related inhibition: 0.695 (CI 0.657 - 0.729) mg/L
Yield Inhibition: 0.320 (CI 0.294 - 0.358) mg/L - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- EC10-, EC20- and EC50-values of the growth rate and yield inhibition after 72 h were calculated by sigmoidal dose-response regression. Calculation of the confidence intervals EC10-, EC20- and EC50-values were carried out using standard procedures.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Tallowtripropylenetetramine (CAS No. 68911-79-5) was found to inhibit the growth of the freshwater green alga Desmodesmus subspicatus after 72 h with the following effect values (nominal concentrations): The EC10-values with 95 % confidence intervals for inhibition of specific growth rate (ErC10) and yield (EyC10) after 72 h were 1.27 (0.999 – 1.45) and 0.822 (0.758 – 0.894) mg/L, respectively. The EC50-values with 95 % confidence intervals for inhibition of specific growth rate (ErC50) and yield (EyC50) after 72 h were 2.47 (2.23 – 2.71) and 1.12 (1.04 – 1.18) mg/L, respectively.
The test effect was observed to be reversible at all tested concentrations following 72 h exposure and 5 - 7 days of growth under test conditions.
The concentrations of Tallowtripropylenetetraminewere analysed at the concentration levels 1.25 and 5.00 mg/L (prepared without algae) and the control at test start and test end via LC-MS/MS analysis. The measured concentrations at test start were in the range of 84 – 93 % of the nominal values. At the end of the test Tallowtripropylenetetraminewas additionally analysed at the concentration level 1.25 mg/l (prepared with algae) and gave recoveries of
7 - 9 % of the nominal values. Biodegradation as possible reason for this decrease is very unlikely considering the short time frame, also the river water was frozen before use to minimize the microbial activity. The decrease was attributed to additional sorption to suspended matter and DOC due to thermodynamically driven redistribution of the sorbed fraction. Minor adsorption (13 % of nominal) of the test item to glassware was observed. Therefore all effect values are given based on nominal concentrations of Tallowtripropylenetetramine (CAS No. 68911-79-5). - Executive summary:
The toxicity of Tallowtripropylenetetramine (CAS No. 68911-79-5) (Batch no.: S001255)to the unicellular freshwater green alga Desmodesmus subspicatus was determined according to the principles of OECD 201 at Dr.U.Noack-Laboratorienin 31157 Sarstedt, Germany from July 21 to August 02, 2009. The aim of the study was the determination of EC10 - , EC20 - and EC50 - values of growth rate and yield over a period of 72 h.
An individual test design was applied. Natural river water was used as dilution medium (for details and initial considerations please refer to page 12).
Tallowtripropylenetetramine(CAS no. 68911-79-5) is practically insoluble in water and also has a strong tendency to adsorb to negatively charged surfaces such as suspended matter, algae and test vessels or organic material (including dissolved organic matter such as humic acids). Many cationic substances in general but long chain alkyl diamines in particular rank among the most difficult substances to test in environmental toxicology. Standard guideline studies are inappropriate to test substances with such properties and the current REACH Guidance Documents do not provide sufficient guidance concerning bioavaibility and exposure assessment for cationic surface-active substances like the diamines as these were written with normal hydrophobic chemicals in mind, failing to take into account the lack of bioavaibility that occurs in the environment with cationic surface-active substances.
The aquatic ecotoxicity tests with diamines were therefore performed in river water to allow a PECaquatic,bulk/PNECaquatic,bulkapproach and is considered to be conservative but more environmentally realistic than the standard method. This approach is based on PEC estimations representing 'total aquatic concentrations'. To characterize the risk to the aquatic compartment the PECaquatic,bulkis compared with the PNECaquatic,bulk derived from river water ecotoxicity studies (ECETOC, 2003).
In order to class standard laboratory toxicity study valid, it is of particular importance that – besides information on test substance, test method / conditions and test organism used – suitable precautions are taken to prevent the loss of test substance by adsorption and that exposure concentrations are based upon measured levels.
For ecotoxicity tests performed using the bulk approach, however, adsorption to suspended matter and DOC is acceptable and only adsorption to glassware should be accounted for. For a valid bulk approach test the concentration-effect relationship should be based on the sum of adsorbed and dissolved substance in the volume of the medium tested. One of the advantages of the bulk approach tests with these difficult substances is that in the presence of suspended matter, humic acids and/or algae, the residual sorption to glassware will be negligible. The results of these bulk approach tests are therefore much easier and more realistic, and if compared to PECbulk clearly provide a more appropriate assessment of risks for the environment.
The study was conducted under static conditions with an initial cell density of approximately 5 x 103cells/mL. Five concentrations were tested in a geometrical series with a dilution factor of 2, nominal: 0.625 - 1.25 - 2.50 - 5.00 - 10.0 mg/L. Three replicates were tested for the test item concentrations and six replicates for the control. Environmental conditions were determined to be within the acceptable limits.
The concentrations of Tallowtripropylenetetraminewere analysed at the concentration levels 1.25 and 5.00 mg/L (prepared without algae) and the control at test start and test end via LC-MS/MS analysis. The measured concentrations at test start were in the range of 84 – 93 % of the nominal values. At the end of the test Tallowtripropylenetetraminewas additionally analysed at the concentration level 1.25 mg/l (prepared with algae) and gave recoveries of
7 - 9 % of the nominal values. Biodegradation as possible reason for this decrease is very unlikely considering the short time frame, also the river water was frozen before use to minimize the microbial activity. The decrease was attributed to additional sorption to suspended matter and DOC due to thermodynamically driven redistribution of the sorbed fraction. Minor adsorption (13 % of nominal) of the test item to glassware was observed. Therefore all effect values are given based on nominal concentrations of the test item.
Tallowtripropylenetetramine (CAS No. 68911-79-5) was found to inhibit the growth of the freshwater green alga Desmodesmus subspicatus after 72 h with the following effect values (nominal concentrations): The EC10-values with 95 % confidence intervals for inhibition of specific growth rate (ErC10) and yield (EyC10) after 72 h were 1.27 (0.999 – 1.45) and 0.822 (0.758 – 0.894) mg/L, respectively. The EC50-values with 95 % confidence intervals for inhibition of specific growth rate (ErC50) and yield (EyC50) after 72 h were 2.47 (2.23 – 2.71) and 1.12 (1.04 – 1.18) mg/L, respectively.
After 72 h algae were transferred from the nominal concentration of 1.25 – 10.0 mg/L and control to fresh untreated medium and allowed to grow for further 5 - 7 d under test conditions. The test item effect was observed to be reversible at this concentration. Therefore, there is potential for recovery following exposure up to 10.0 mg/L (highest test concentration)
Reference
EC10-, EC20-and
EC50- values and 95 % Confidence Intervals of
Tallowtripropylenetetramine (CAS No. 68911-79-5) (0-72 h)
based on nominal test item concentrations [mg/L]
Rate-related inhibition |
|
ErC10 |
1.27 (0.999 - 1.45) |
ErC20 |
1.60 (1.43 - 1.79) |
ErC50 |
2.47 (2.23 - 2.71) |
Inhibition of yield |
|
EyC10 |
0.822 (0.758 - 0.894) |
EyC20 |
0.881 (0.804 - 0.955) |
EyC50 |
1.12 (1.04 - 1.18) |
Cell Densities
|
Nominal |
Replicate |
Cell density [cells/mL] |
||||||
[mg/L] |
No. |
0 h |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
|
|||
10 |
1 |
5074 |
4135 |
11 |
408 |
|
|||
2 |
5074 |
5254 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
3 |
5074 |
5808 |
1564 |
2163 |
|
||||
Mean |
5074 |
5066 |
525 |
857 |
|
||||
5.00 |
1 |
5074 |
9518 |
2372 |
1900 |
|
|||
2 |
5074 |
11212 |
2803 |
1900 |
|
||||
3 |
5074 |
12454 |
2881 |
2660 |
|
||||
Mean |
5074 |
11061 |
2685 |
2153 |
|
||||
2.50 |
1 |
5074 |
20818 |
37280 |
86639 |
|
|||
2 |
5074 |
25107 |
52450 |
100608 |
|
||||
3 |
5074 |
26341 |
39022 |
122695 |
|
||||
Mean |
5074 |
24089 |
42917 |
103314 |
|
||||
1.25 |
1 |
5074 |
32991 |
172055 |
450482 |
|
|||
2 |
5074 |
33467 |
220775 |
574716 |
|
||||
3 |
5074 |
39432 |
224190 |
637360 |
|
||||
Mean |
5074 |
35297 |
205673 |
554186 |
|
||||
0.625 |
1 |
5074 |
33184 |
530091 |
1807422 |
|
|||
2 |
5074 |
35344 |
497144 |
1876658 |
|
||||
3 |
5074 |
38497 |
552330 |
1812051 |
|
||||
Mean |
5074 |
35675 |
526522 |
1832044 |
|
||||
Control |
1 |
5074 |
52265 |
255137 |
1435322 |
|
|||
2 |
5074 |
41937 |
278372 |
1610441 |
|
||||
3 |
5074 |
42962 |
330032 |
1388623 |
|
||||
4 |
5074 |
50244 |
226499 |
1208375 |
|
||||
5 |
5074 |
42626 |
248237 |
1382994 |
|
||||
6 |
5074 |
38551 |
241829 |
1297681 |
|
||||
Mean |
5074 |
44764 |
263351 |
1387239 |
|
Evaluation after 72 h
Nominal |
Replicate |
Growth rate |
Rate-related inhibition |
Yield |
Inhibition of yield |
||
[mg/L] |
No. |
[d-1] |
[%] |
[cells/mL] |
[%] |
||
10 |
1 |
-0.840 |
100.00 |
-4666 |
100.00 |
||
2 |
n.a. |
100.00 |
-5074 |
100.00 |
|||
3 |
-0.284 |
100.00 |
-2911 |
100.00 |
|||
Mean |
n.a. |
100.00 |
-4217 |
100.00 |
|||
5.00 |
1 |
-0.327 |
100.00 |
-3174 |
100.00 |
||
2 |
-0.327 |
100.00 |
-3174 |
100.00 |
|||
3 |
-0.215 |
100.00 |
-2414 |
100.00 |
|||
Mean |
-0.290 |
100.00 |
-2921 |
100.00 |
|||
2.50 |
1 |
0.946 |
49.39 |
81565 |
94.10 |
||
2 |
0.996 |
46.73 |
95534 |
93.09 |
|||
3 |
1.062 |
43.19 |
117621 |
91.49 |
|||
Mean |
1.001 |
46.44 |
98240 |
92.89 |
|||
1.25 |
1 |
1.495 |
19.99 |
445408 |
67.77 |
||
2 |
1.577 |
15.65 |
569642 |
58.79 |
|||
3 |
1.611 |
13.80 |
632286 |
54.25 |
|||
Mean |
1.561 |
16.48 |
549112 |
60.27 |
|||
0.625 |
1 |
1.959 |
-4.79 |
1802348 |
-30.40 |
||
2 |
1.971 |
-5.46 |
1871584 |
-35.41 |
|||
3 |
1.959 |
-4.83 |
1806977 |
-30.74 |
|||
Mean |
1.963 |
-5.03 |
1826970 |
-32.18 |
|||
Control |
1 |
1.882 |
1430248 |
||||
2 |
1.920 |
1605367 |
|||||
3 |
1.871 |
1383549 |
|||||
4 |
1.824 |
1203301 |
|||||
5 |
1.869 |
1377920 |
|||||
6 |
1.848 |
1292607 |
|||||
Mean |
1.869 |
1382165 |
Section-by-Section
and Average Specific Growth Rates of the Control Group
(0
– 72 h)
Replicate No. |
Specific growth rate [d-1] |
Mean (0 - 72 h) |
SD ± |
VC % |
Mean VC % |
|||
section-by-section |
||||||||
0 - 24 h |
24 - 48 h |
48 - 72 h |
||||||
Control |
1 |
2.332 |
1.585 |
1.727 |
1.882 |
0.3966 |
21.1 |
15.8 |
2 |
2.112 |
1.893 |
1.755 |
1.920 |
0.1799 |
9.37 |
||
3 |
2.136 |
2.039 |
1.437 |
1.871 |
0.3788 |
20.2 |
||
4 |
2.293 |
1.506 |
1.674 |
1.824 |
0.4143 |
22.7 |
||
5 |
2.128 |
1.762 |
1.718 |
1.869 |
0.2254 |
12.1 |
||
6 |
2.028 |
1.836 |
1.680 |
1.848 |
0.1742 |
9.42 |
||
Mean |
1.869 |
|
||||||
SD ± |
0.03 |
|
||||||
VC % |
1.73 |
|
Description of key information
72 h Algae ErC10 = 1.27 mg/L; 72 h algae ErC50 = 2.47 mg/L
Note that the key algae study is a higher tier study performed in river water with relatively low (realistic worst-case) DOC and suspended matter concentrations. This means that for the risk assessment the bulk approach should be applied i.e. both the effect and exposure assessment are based on the total concentration (dissolved and sorbed).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 2.47 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 1.27 mg/L
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.