Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 242-060-2 | CAS number: 18172-67-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 5.69 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 142 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC mouse (mg/m3) = (NOAEC (ppm) x MW) / Vmol = (50 x 136.24) / 24.05 = 283.24 mg/m3; Modification for exposure (experiment to human): 6/8 (Mouse Exposure condition (6h) / Worker Exposure condition (8 h) ; Modification for respiratory volume: 6.7/10 (respiratory rate difference under standard conditions and under conditions of light activity for 8 hours) Thus, the corrected starting point for inhalation is : 283.24 mg/kg bw/d x (6 h/8 h) x (6.7 m3 for 8h exposure /10 m3 for 8h exposure) = 142 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Starting point is a NOAEC
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Sub-chronic to chronic extrapolation
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- AF not used for oral to inhalation extrapolation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic remaining differencies
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default factor for workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Appropriate database
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- None
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.8 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 175
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 142 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC mouse (mg/m3) = (NOAEC (ppm) x MW) / Vmol = (50 x 136.24) / 24.05 = 283.24 mg/m3; Modification for exposure (experiment to human): 6/8 (Mouse Exposure condition (6h) / Worker Exposure condition (8 h) ; Standard respiratory volume for mice: Standard respiratory volume for humans x allometric scaling x duration of exposure = 0.2 L/min/kg x 7 x 60 min x 8 h = 0.672 m3/kg. Thus, the corrected starting point for inhalation is : 283.24 mg/kg bw/d x (6 h/8 h) x 0.2 L/min/kg x 7 x 60 min x 8 h= 142 mg/kg bw/d
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Starting point is a NOAEC
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Sub-chronic to chronic extrapolation
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 7
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling from mouse to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic remaining differencies
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default factor for workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Appropriate database
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- None
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 54 µg/cm²
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 135
- Dose descriptor:
- other: NOAEL
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- EC3 is considered as a NOEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 3
- Justification:
- Repeated (long term) exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 3
- Justification:
- From all animal studies assessing skin sensitisation, the lowest concentration inducing a positive response was found in an LLNA with EC3=29%. In humans, the highest concentration without positive response was 10%; therefore, an AF of 3, corresponding to the difference of concentration without effect between animals and humans, was considered
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- None
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default factor for workers
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 3
- Justification:
- Dermal integrity and exposure conditions (matrix effects)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no DNEL required: short term exposure controlled by conditions for long-term
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
Justification for the selection of the key study (repeated dose toxicity study) for the calculation of systemic long-term DNELs
alpha-Pinene and beta-pinene are structurally similar compounds. They are bicyclic terpene hydrocarbons and are positional isomers. A great extent of similar patterns was demonstrated for physico-chemical properties, (eco)toxicological properties and environmental fate. Therefore the use of repeated dose toxicity studies on alpha-pinene for establishing the DNELs for beta-pinene is fully justified.
Two 90-day inhalation studies were conducted by NTP (National Toxicological Program) with alpha-pinene, one in rats, the other in mice. Mortality was observed in female rats in the high dose group. As no specific target organ was sufficiently impaired by the treatment to cause mortality, it may be concluded that these deaths have a general systemic toxicity origin (NOAEL 200 ppm). The lowest NOAEL was found in male and female mice (50 ppm) based on minimal to moderate hyperplasia in the transitional epithelium of the urinary bladder from 100 ppm. Although the relevance of this effect for humans is uncertain, this study is selected for calculating the systemic long-term DNELs for (-)-beta-pinene, in a conservative approach.
Justification for the selection of the key study (LLNA assay) for the calculation of local long-term DNELs
Skin sensitisation is the most critical local effect of (-)-beta-pinene.
Among all available animal studies, a recent LLNA assay conducted according to GLP guidelines is the most reliable (Pelcot, 2010).
According to the EC3 value (29%) observed in this experiment, (-)-beta-pinene is considered as a weak sensitiser.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 50.6 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC mouse (mg/m3) = (NOAEC (ppm) x MW) / Vmol = (50 x 136.24) / 24.05 = 283.24 mg/m3; Modification for exposure (experiment to human): (6/24)*(5/7) (Mouse Exposure condition (6h – 5/7 days) / General population Exposure condition (24 h – 7/7 days). Thus, the corrected starting point for inhalation is : 283.24 mg/kg bw/d x (6 h/24 h) x (5 d / 7 d) = 50.6 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Starting point is a NOAEC
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Subchronic to chronic extrapolation
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- AF not used for oral to inhalation route extrapolation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic remaining differencies
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default factor for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Appropriate database
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- None
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.3 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 350
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 102 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC mouse (mg/m3) = (NOAEC (ppm) x MW) / Vmol = (50 x 136.24) / 24.05 = 283.24 mg/m3; Modification for exposure (experiment to human): (6/24)*(5/7) (Mouse Exposure condition (6h – 5/7 days) / General population Exposure condition (24 h – 7/7 days) ; Standard respiratory volume for mice: Standard respiratory volume for humans * allometric scaling * duration of exposure = 0.2 L/min/kg * 7 * 60 min * 24 h = 2.02 m3/kg. Thus, the corrected starting point for inhalation is : 283.24 mg/kg bw/d x (6 h/24 h) x (5 j/7j) x 0.2 L/min/kg x 7 x 60 min x 24 h= 102 mg/kg bw/d
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Starting point is a NOAEC
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Subchronic to chronic extrapolation
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 7
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling from mouse to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic remaining differencies
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default factor for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Appropriate database
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- None
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 27 µg/cm²
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 270
- Dose descriptor:
- other: NOAEL
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- EC3 is considerd as a NOEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 3
- Justification:
- Repeated (long term) exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 3
- Justification:
- From all animal studies assessing skin sensitisation, the lowest concentration inducing a positive response was found in an LLNA with EC3=29%. In humans, the highest concentration without positive response was 10%; therefore, an AF of 3, corresponding to the difference of concentration without effect between animals and humans, was considered
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- None
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default factor for general population
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 3
- Justification:
- Dermal integrity and exposure conditions (matrix)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no DNEL required: short term exposure controlled by conditions for long-term
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.3 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 350
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 102 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC mouse (mg/m3) = (NOAEC (ppm) x MW) / Vmol = (50 x 136.24) / 24.05 = 283.24 mg/m3; Modification for exposure (experiment to human): (6/24)*(5/7) (Mouse Exposure condition (6h – 5/7 days) / General population Exposure condition (24 h – 7/7 days) ; Standard respiratory volume for mice: Standard respiratory volume for humans * allometric scaling * duration of exposure = 0.2 L/min/kg * 7 * 60 min * 24 h = 2.02 m3/kg. Thus, the corrected starting point for inhalation is : 283.24 mg/kg bw/d x (6 h/24 h) x (5 j/7j) x 0.2 L/min/kg x 7 x 60 min x 24 h= 102 mg/kg bw/d
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Starting point is a NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Subchronic to chronic extrapolation
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 7
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling from mouse to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic remaining differencies
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default factor for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Appropriate database
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- None
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Justification for the selection of the key study (repeated dose toxicity study) for the calculation of systemic long-term DNELs
alpha-Pinene and beta-pinene are structurally similar compounds. They are bicyclic terpene hydrocarbons and are positional isomers. A great extent of similar patterns was demonstrated for physico-chemical properties, (eco)toxicological properties and environmental fate. Therefore the use of repeated dose toxicity studies on alpha-pinene for establishing the DNELs for beta-pinene is fully justified.
Two 90-day inhalation studies were conducted by NTP (National Toxicological Program) with alpha-pinene, one in rats, the other in mice. Mortality was observed in female rats in the high dose group. As no specific target organ was sufficiently impaired by the treatment to cause mortality, it may be concluded that these deaths have a general systemic toxicity origin (NOAEL 200 ppm). The lowest NOAEL was found in male and female mice (50 ppm) based on minimal to moderate hyperplasia in the transitional epithelium of the urinary bladder from 100 ppm. Although the relevance of this effect for humans is uncertain, this study is selected for calculating the systemic long-term DNELs for (-)-beta-pinene, in a conservative approach.
Justification for the selection of the key study (LLNA assay) for the calculation of local longterm DNELs
Skin sensitisation is the most critical local effect of (-)-beta-pinene.
Among all available animal studies, a recent LLNA assay conducted according to GLP guidelines is the most reliable (Pelcot, 2010).
According to the EC3 value (29%) observed in this experiment, (-)-beta-pinene is considered as a weak sensitiser.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.