Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 242-060-2 | CAS number: 18172-67-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Epidemiological data
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- epidemiological data
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- No data
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- No individual results given for each terpene; cohort of population studied is low (only 38 individuals); only one day of investigation for exposure levels; co-exposure to many substances including wood dust, wood fumes (not measured) and probably glue vapours for some workers; exposure to aldehydes, carboxylic acids, and other strongly irritating substances released from wood were not assessed; high exposures to terpenes, and to potential strongly irritant substances (not measured), due to recirculation of dust-only recycled air indoors
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Terpene exposure and respiratory effects among workers in Swedish joinery shops
- Author:
- Eriksson KA, Levin JO, Sandström T, Lindström-Espeling K, Lindén G and Stjernberg NL
- Year:
- 1 997
- Bibliographic source:
- Scand J Work Environ Health 23(2):114-20
Materials and methods
- Study type:
- cross sectional study
- Endpoint addressed:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- A cross-sectional study of 38 workers was carried out in 4 joinery shops. The investigation included personal air sampling of monoterpenes, biological monitoring of metabolites of α-pinene in the workers' urine, interviews following a standardized questionnaire, and dynamic spirometry.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 129874-08-4
- Cas Number:
- 129874-08-4
- IUPAC Name:
- 129874-08-4
- Reference substance name:
- Terpenes
- IUPAC Name:
- Terpenes
- Test material form:
- not specified
- Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Monoterpenes (alpha-pinene, beta-pinene, delta-3-carene)
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Method
- Type of population:
- occupational
- Ethical approval:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION
- Type: Personal air sampling of monoterpenes, biological monitoring of metabolites of α-pinene in the workers' urine, interviews following a standardized questionnaire, and dynamic spirometry.
- Details: Questions regarding acute symptoms were answered by all the subjects immediately before and after a workshift. The questions pertained to headache, dizziness, tiredness, chest tightness, cough, dyspnea, irritation of the eyes, nose, or throat. The intensity of the symptoms was determined according to Borg's scale (Borg, 1982).
SETTING: Occupational (Joinery shops in northern Sweden)
STUDY POPULATION
- Total number of subjects participating in study: 38
- Sex: 28 men and 10 women
- Age: Mean age 40 (range 20-63) years
- Smoker/nonsmoker: 9 were current smokers, 9 were ex-smokers and 20 were never smokers. The ex-smokers had stopped smoking 3-41 (mean 13) years before this investigation.
- None of the workers used any kind of personal breathing protection equipment.
HEALTH EFFECTS STUDIED
- Disease(s): Acute respiratory effects were evaluated - Exposure assessment:
- estimated
- Details on exposure:
- TYPE OF EXPOSURE:
- Four joinery shops in northern Sweden, selected as representatives of joinery shops within the area, were investigated. They all handled pinewood (soft wood) but made different finished or semifinished products. The study was performed on 2 consecutive days at each shop, and the production of wooden goods followed normal practice at each workplace. The joinery shops recirculated the indoor air to an extent of approximately 80-100 % since the outdoor temperature was approximately -10 to -5 °C when the investigations were performed.
TYPE OF EXPOSURE MEASUREMENT: Area air sampling / Personal sampling / Biomonitoring (urine) / Other: Lung function tests
- Air sampling of monoterpenes and wood dust: personal exposure to monoterpenes was assessed by diffusive sampling with charcoal as sorbent. The sampler was attached to the lapel of the worker's overalls, and the sampling period was 7-8 h. The samplers were kept at -20 °C (2-7 days) until analysis by gas chromatography, using a capillary column with a nonpolar phase. The analytical procedure according to Eriksson and Levin (1990).
- Exposure to wood dust was measured by pumped personal sampling, using the 37-mm open-face cassette method with airflow of 2 L/min, the sampling time being approximately 8 h. The filters were conditioned for 16 h at 21 ± 0.5 °C and at a relative humidity of 55 ± 2 % and were weighed before and after the sampling period.
- Biological monitoring: urine samples were collected before and immediately after the workshift. After enzymatic hydrolysis and cleaning of the samples by solid phase extraction, the amount of verbenols in the urine was determined by gas chromatography.
- Lung function tests: measurements of pulmonary function were carried out with a spirometer in the morning immediately before work was started and directly after the end of the workshift. Forced vital capacity (FVC), Forced expiratory volume during 1 s (FEV1.0) and Forced expiratory flow (FEF75) were recorded. - Statistical methods:
- The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired observations was used for analysis of the lung function readings and the questionnaires. Spearman's rank correlation test was used for correlation testing. P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Results and discussion
- Results:
- - Monoterpene concentrations: Geometric mean (GM) of the personal exposure to total terpenes during a workshift at the different joinery shops was 43 mg/m3 (9-214 mg/m3). For some of the workers in the joinery shop, the time-weighted personal exposure exceeded the present Swedish limit of 150 mg/m3 for total terpenes.
- Wood dust concentrations: The exposure to wood dust was relatively low, 0.4 mg/m3 (GM: 0.3-0.9 mg/m3) in each joinery shop, compared with the present Swedish exposure limit of 2 mg/m3.
- Biological monitoring: The concentration of verbenols in the postshift urine samples (GM = 9.12 µmol/mmol creatinine) was higher when compared with the concentration in the preshift samples (GM = 1.14 µmol/mmol creatinine).
- Lung function parameters: Neither for the whole group of 38 workers nor for the group of 20 never smokers were there any significant changes in any of the lung function parameters over a workshift. There was no correlation between exposure to terpenes during a workshift and acute changes in any of the lung function parameters studied. Workers’ preshift lung function parameters lower than the age-matched reference values (local non-smoking population): significantly low FEV1.0 and FEV/VC, even in never smokers only.
- Acute subjective symptoms: Two subjects experienced eyes, nose, and throat irritation, whereas 2 workers experienced eye irritation, 2 felt nose irritation, and 2 observed throat irritation. In general, there was no statistically significant change in any of the recorded symptoms over a workshift. - Confounding factors:
- The lung function data still remained significantly low when smokers and ex-smokers were excluded, and therefore smoking was not the confounding factor.
- Strengths and weaknesses:
- - No individual results given for each terpene
- Cohort of population studied is low (only 38 individuals)
- Only one day of investigation for exposure levels
- Co-exposure to many substances including wood dust, wood fumes (not measured) and probably glue vapours for some workers
- Exposure to aldehydes, carboxylic acids, and other strongly irritating substances released from wood were not assessed
- High exposures to terpenes, and to potential strongly irritant substances (not measured), due to recirculation of dust-only recycled air indoors
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 7.10.2/1: Level of exposure to terpenes, wood dust and verbenols in the different joinery shops studied
Type of joinery shop |
Number of workers |
Total terpenes (mg/m3) |
Wood dust (mg/m3) |
Verbenols (µmol/mmol creatinine) |
|||||||||
GM |
AM |
Range |
GM |
AM |
Range |
Preshift urine |
Postshift urine |
||||||
GM |
AM |
Range |
GM |
AM |
Range |
||||||||
Doors |
10 |
19 |
21 |
9-33 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
0.2-4.6 |
0.33 |
0.40 |
0.12-0.87 |
5.3 |
5.83 |
2.2-8.8 |
Strips of wood |
9 |
35 |
36 |
27-47 |
0.3a |
0.3 |
0.1-0.5 |
1.15 |
1.23 |
0.65-1.97 |
4.4 |
5.13 |
2.6-7.7 |
Window frames |
9 |
41 |
45 |
15-79 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.2-1.0 |
1.00 |
1.45 |
0.23-4.97 |
5.6 |
8.96 |
0.6-20.6 |
Glue-laminated wood beams |
10 |
123 |
135 |
38-214 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.3-0.5 |
4.34 |
6.54 |
0.81-27.5 |
36.1 |
45.0 |
20.2-101 |
All |
38 |
43 |
60 |
9-214 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.1-4.6 |
1.14 |
2.43 |
0.12-27.5 |
9.12 |
16.5 |
0.6-101 |
aNumber of samples = 7; GM: Geometric mean; AM: Arithmetic mean
Table 7.10.2/2: Preshift lung function parameters of 38 employees (including smokers and ex-smokers) and the 20 never smokers in the joinery shops as the percentage of reference values and the percentage of change over a workshift
Lung function parameters |
38 workers |
20 never smokers |
||||||
Percentage of reference values |
Percentage of change over work shift |
Percentage of reference values |
Percentage of change over work shift |
|||||
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
|
VC |
96.5 |
13.8a |
3.8 |
8.7 |
95.0 |
9.9b |
3.3 |
9.0 |
FVC |
96.1 |
14.8a |
1.8 |
10.3 |
95.4 |
10.2b |
2.3 |
9.5 |
FEV1.0 |
89.9 |
15.3*** |
2.3 |
8.8 |
90.3 |
13.0** |
3.3 |
8.6 |
FEV1.0/VC |
92.9 |
10.0*** |
0.7 |
5.7 |
94.8 |
9.8* |
0.2 |
4.3 |
FEF75 |
84.0 |
34.0** |
2.8 |
22.9 |
90.1 |
39.4 |
7.1 |
25.8 |
VC =vital capacity, FVC = forced vital capacity, FEV1.0=forced vital capacity in 1 s, FEF75= forced expiratory flow rate at 75% of the FVC
*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001;a p = 0.07; b p = 0.06Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- No acute changes in lung function parameters were observed during a workshift, but the joinery shop workers had significantly lower lung function values than local referents, even when smokers and ex-smokers were excluded. Lower lung function parameters indicate obstructive lung pathology. The origin of obstruction is probably due to wood dust rather than to terpenes, as suggested by the authors.
- Executive summary:
In a cross-sectional study, exposure to monoterpenes (alpha-pinene, beta-pinene and delta-3-carene) was studied in 38 workers who worked in 4 joinery shops in Northern Sweden (20/38 never smokers). The investigation included personal air sampling of monoterpenes, biological monitoring of metabolites of alpha-pinene in the workers' urine, interviews following a standardized questionnaire and dynamic spirometry.
Results from the lung function tests indicate chronic rather than acute reactions in the airways. The fact that there were no major changes in lung function over a workshift indicates chronic reaction in the airways.
Co-exposure to many other substances, due to recirculation of dust-only recycled air indoors, such as wood dust (known to induce occupational asthma), wood fumes, probably glue vapours for some workers and potential strongly irritating substances released from wood (aldehydes, carboxylic acids...) was not assessed. Therefore, the lower lung function parameters observed could be due to exposure to many of these substances and most probably wood dust rather than to terpenes, as suggested by the authors.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.