Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-002-1 | CAS number: 102-06-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Based on the animal data, 1.3-Diphenylguanidine is severely irritating to the eye and non-irritating to the skin
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From Feb.15, 1988 to June 13, 1988
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Three rabbits received the substance on an eye and skin. In the skin irritation test, 0.5 g of 1,3 -diphenylguanidine (Soxinol-D) was administered for 4 hours on 2 areas (scratched and intact areas) of the closed skin on the back of rabbits.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Japan Lab Animals Co., Ltd (Osaka, Japan)
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 2.12 to 2.67 kg
- Housing: individually in an aluminium net cage with a suspension system
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ca. 100g/day solid rabbit food (CR-1, CLEA Japan, Inc, Osaka, Japan)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): freely access to purified well water filtered
- Acclimation period: 21 to 35 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 24+/-3°C
- Humidity (%): 60+/-15%
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- other: corn oil
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- Patch was cut into 2,5 x 2,5 cm squares and damped with a small acount of corn oil, and then 0.5 g each of the test substance was evently dropped on the patches. The treated patches were administered to both of the scratched and intact areas and closed with a surgical tape for 4 hours.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 4.5, 24, 48, 72 hours after administration
- Number of animals:
- 3 rabbits (2 males, 1 female)
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
The furs on the back of 3 rabbits were shaved with an electric shaver at the size of 15 x 15 cm.
Two areas (one each on the both sides of the median plane) were designated for administration. One of the two areas for each animal was scratched , while the other area remained intact.
The scratches were made in a way so that only the stratum corneum was damaged and no bleeding or damage to corium was caused.
REMOVAL
After the 4 hours of administration, the patches were removed and the test substances left in the skin was wiped off with cotton containing acetone.
SCORING SYSTEM:
Skin reactions were numerically recorded followed the evaluation standards by Draize. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 rabbits
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 rabbits
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No skin reaction, including erythema and edema, to the test substance was observed on either of the scratched or intact areas at 4.5, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the administration.
The primary irritation index is 0. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- not skin irritating
- Conclusions:
- Based on these results, 1,3 -diphenylguanidine was considered to be non-irritating to rabbit skin.
- Executive summary:
Three rabbits received the substance on an eye and skin. In the skin irritation test, 0.5 g of 1,3 -diphenylguanidine (Soxinol-D) was administered for 4 hours on 2 areas (scratched and intact areas) of the closed skin on the back of rabbits. No skin reaction, including erythema or edema, was observed on either of the scratched or intact during the observation period (72h).
Based on these results, 1,3 -diphenylguanidine was considered to be non-irritating to rabbit skin.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From Fab.15, 1988 to June 13,1988
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test substance was administered to 6 rabbits. Three rabbits received the substance on an eye and skin. The other 3 rabbits received the substance on an eye and their eyes were washed after the administration.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Japan Lab Animals Co., Ltd (Osaka, Japan)
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 2.12 to 2.67 kg
- Housing: individually in an aluminium net cage with a suspension system
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ca. 100g/day solid rabbit food (CR-1, CLEA Japan, Inc, Osaka, Japan)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): freely access to purified well water filtered
- Acclimation period: 21 to 35 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 24+/-3°C
- Humidity (%): 60+/-15%
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 g of the test substance on the conjunctival sac of the one side of lower eyelid.
The eyelids were held for 1 second after the administration to prevent the substance to overflow from the eye. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- For the "unwashed group" (2 males, 1 female), the eyes with administration were not washed and the other eyes were treated as control.
The "washed group" (1 male, 2 females) was separately treated with the same administration but the eyewash with 300 ml of slightly warm water for 1 minute 30 seconds after administration. - Observation period (in vivo):
- Observations was conduted at 1, 24, 48, 72 hours after the administration for the washed group, and 96h, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 weeks for the unwashed group.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- "unwashed group" (2 males, 1 female),
"washed group" (1 male, 2 females) - Details on study design:
- Local reactions were numerically recorded following the evaluation standards by Draize.
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- (severity)
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 rabbits "unwashed"
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 6 weeks
- Remarks on result:
- other: Individual scores : 2 - 2 - 2
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- (area)
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 rabbits "unwashed"
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 6 weeks
- Remarks on result:
- other: Individual scores : 4 - 4 - 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 rabbits "unwashed"
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 4 weeks
- Remarks on result:
- other: Individual scores : 1 - 1 - 1
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (redness)
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 rabbits "unwashed"
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 3 weeks
- Remarks on result:
- other: Individual scores : 2 - 2 - 2
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Remarks:
- (chemosis)
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 rabbits "unwashed"
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.89
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 3 weeks
- Remarks on result:
- other: Individual scores between 1 and 3
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (discharge)
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 rabbits "unwashed"
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 3 weeks
- Remarks on result:
- other: Individual scores between 1 and 2
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- At 1 hour after the administration of the test substance, all 3 animals in unwashed group showed iris congestion (grade 1), conjunctival redness (grade 2), and conjunctival chemosis (grade 3), and 2 animals in the same group showed cornea opacity (severity: grade 1; area : grade 3 or 4).
At 24 hours after the administration, the conjunctival chemosis was wakened to grade 2 and 3, but the iris congestion and conjunctival redness remained at the same grade. At this point, all 3 animals showed cornea opacity (severity grade 2, area grade 4), and all 3 animals showed new occurrence of discharge at grade 1 or 2. These local reactions were still observed at 96 hour at the similar grades.
Cornea opacity at the grade 3 was observed 2 weeks after the administration. The local reactions at the conjunctivae and iris congestion disappeared by 3 and 4 weeks, respectively, after the administration, but cornea opacity remained aven 6 weeks after the administration. Starting at 1 week after the administration, neavascular in cornea were observed.
In the washed group, at 1 hour after the administration of the test substance, all 3 animals showed iris congestion (grade 1) and conjunctival redness (grade 1), and conjunctival chemosis (grade 1 or 2). At 24 hours after the administration, the only reactions such as conjunctival redness (grade 1) and conjunctival chemosis (grade 1) were shown in 2 animals. At 72 hours, no local reaction was observed in any rabbit. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- 1,3-diphenylguanidine was considered to be extremely irritating to the eyes in rabbits.
- Executive summary:
The test substance was administered to 6 rabbits. Three rabbits received the substance on an eye and skin. The other 3 rabbits received the substance on an eye and their eyes were washed after the administration.
In the eye irritation test, a dose of 0.1g of 1,3-diphenylguanidine (Soxinol-D) was administered to one eye of each rabbit. After the administration, strong cornea opacity, conjunctival chemosis, obvious iris congestion, conjunctival redness, a low level of eye discharge and neovascular in cornea were observed. The local reaction on the conjunctivae and the iris congestion disappeared in 3 weeks and 4 weeks, respectively, but local reactions in cornea were still recognized 6 weeks after the administration.
Based on these results, 1,3-diphenylguanidine was considered to be extremely irritating to the eyes in rabbits.
When the test was repeated with a group of 3 rabbits and eyes were washed 30 seconds after administration, obvious iris congestion, conjunctival chemosis, and a low level of conjunctival redness were observed after the administration. All of these local reactions disappeared within 72 hours after the administration, and therefore, there was a washing effect.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation
In the key skin irritation study (Takatsuka 1988), 0.5 g of 1,3 -diphenylguanidine was administered for 4 hours on 2 areas (scratched and intact areas) of the closed skin on the back of 3 rabbits. No skin reaction, including erythema or edema, was observed on either of the scratched or intact during the observation period (72h). Based on these results, 1,3 -diphenylguanidine was considered to be non-irritating to rabbit skin.
These results were confirmed in the supporting study (Birch 1977) : The acute dermal irritation of DPG (1,3 -diphenylguanidine) was evaluated in rabbits according to the Draize test. 0.5g of DPG was applied undiluted to the intact and abraded skin of 6 New-Zealand White albino rabbits and held in contact for 24 hours by means of an occlusive dressing. Mean scores over 24, 48 and 72 hours for the 6 animal were 0 for erythema and 0 for oedema for both the intact and abraded skin. DPG is considered as non-irritant when applied topically to rabbits.
Eye irritation
In the key eye irritation study (Takatsuka 1988), the test substance was administered to 6 rabbits. Three rabbits received the substance on an eye and skin. The other 3 rabbits received the substance on an eye and their eyes were washed after the administration.
In the eye irritation test, a dose of 0.1g of 1,3-diphenylguanidine (Soxinol-D) was administered to one eye of each rabbit. After the administration, strong cornea opacity, conjunctival chemosis, obvious iris congestion, conjunctival redness, a low level of eye discharge and neovascular in cornea were observed. The local reaction on the conjunctivae and the iris congestion disappeared in 3 weeks and 4 weeks, respectively, but local reactions in cornea were still recognized 6 weeks after the administration.
Based on these results, 1,3-diphenylguanidine was considered to be severely irritating to the eyes in rabbits.
When the test was repeated with a group of 3 rabbits and eyes were washed 30 seconds after administration, obvious iris congestion, conjunctival chemosis, and a low level of conjunctival redness were observed after the administration. All of these local reactions disappeared within 72 hours after the administration, and therefore, there was a washing effect.
In the supporting study (Birch 1977 (1)), a draize test was made on rabbit to study the irritant power of 1,3 -diphenylguanidine (DPG). New Zealand White rabbit were exposed to 100 mg DPG, and were observed 1, 24, 48, 72, 120 and 168 hr after exposition. Maximal Irritation score was 56.6 at 24 hours (over 110). The irritation was not fully reversible after 7 days.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Mandatory classification :
- Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 Annex VI Table 3.1
Skin irrit. 2, H315 (Causes skin irritation)
Eye irrit. 2, H319 (Causes serious eye irritation)
STOT SE 3, H335(May cause respiratory irritation)
Proposed self-classification
- Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 : Eye Dam. 1, H318 (Causes serious eye damage)
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.