Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 235-120-4 | CAS number: 12070-08-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Ecotoxicological Summary
Administrative data
Hazard for aquatic organisms
Freshwater
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Marine water
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
STP
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Sediment (freshwater)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Sediment (marine water)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Hazard for air
Air
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Hazard for terrestrial organisms
Soil
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Hazard for predators
Secondary poisoning
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no potential for bioaccumulation
Additional information
In general, the hazard assessment is based in the concentration of the Ti ion in environmental media. As the T/D test could not demonstrate release of Ti from TiC (method detection limit 0.4 µg/L), hazards for the environment were not identified. Thus, derivation of PNECs is not necessary.
Conclusion on classification
Aquatic toxicity classification of metals and inorganic metal compounds is conducted by comparing transformation/dissolution (T/D) data for the substance, generated using the standard protocol (UN GHS, Annex 10) with toxicity data for the most soluble metal substance as described in the CLP technical guidance (section IV. 5, application of classification criteria to metals and metal compounds; EU, 2008). The T/D data is ideally tested at the pH at which the highest dissolution is expected, within the range defined by the test protocol. In the T/D pre-test on TiC no metal ion release above the method detection limit was detected at any of the pH values assayed (pH 6, 7, and 8). Since the solubility of most metals is higher at lower pH values, pH 6 was chosen to perform the full T/D test (24-hour, 7-, and 28-day T/D testing) (CIMM, 2012).
According to the ECHA CLP Guidance (v.3, 2012) “Reading across metal compounds can [...] be conducted by comparing the soluble metal ion concentration (µg Me/L) causing the ecotoxicity effect and translating this towards the compound under investigation. [...] The comparison is therefore directly done by comparing the soluble fraction measured after transformation/dissolution with the ecotoxicity reference values of the soluble metal ion (based on the UN GHS, 2009).”
In the current case of TiC, the ecotoxicity reference values (ERVs) are based on available ecotoxicity data of TiO2. However, the ERVs are in this case not derived from and/or normalized to the soluble Ti ions released from TiO2 (3.4 µg/L at 21.9 °C and pH 6), but from the nominal TiO2 concentrations applied in the different tests. This is due to the fact that the toxic mode of action of TiO2 is not solely based on the Ti ions released, but also on indirect and physical effects (photocatalytic activity or biological surface coating) of non-dissolved, dispersed TiO2 in solution.
TiO2, especially nano-sized material, is a well-known photocatalyst. “Namely, the TiO2 crystalline forms are semiconductors, meaning that they can be photo-excited to generate electron-hole pairs on their surfaces, which results in their strong oxidizability. This characteristic enhances the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which is among the main toxic mechanisms proposed for the observed toxic effects of photo-irradiated, nano-sized TiO2.” (Hirakawa et al., 2004, cited in Jemec et al., 2008). But this mechanism for (nano-sized) TiO2 has also been described without photo-activation. “The ability of nano-sized TiO2to induce ROS formation without photo-activation has been related to its crystallinity and electronic configurations and to an indirect effect on the antioxidant system of the cell” (Xia et al., 2006, and Hussain et al., 2001, cited in Jemec et al., 2008).
This photocatalytic effect is not anticipated for TiC, and significant release of Ti ions from TiC could not be demonstrated in the T/D test (Ti ionic release < 0.4 µg/L), showing that TiC is practically insoluble. Therefore, using nominal TiO2 concentrations as ERVs is considered adequately protective.
The T/D values obtained for titanium carbide were compared to the corresponding acute (based on the ErC50) and chronic (based on the ErC10) aquatic toxicity reference values derived from testing titanium dioxide in algae, as the most sensitive standard aquatic species for titanium dioxide. The results of this comparison demonstrate that titanium carbide does not require classification for aquatic toxicity (see table below).
Classification of titanium carbide using T/D data comparison to toxicity data according to the CLP technical guidance (European Chemicals Bureau, 2009):
Test type/duration |
T/D loading amount as TiC [mg/L] |
T/D results [µg Ti/L] pH 6 |
Toxicity reference value [µg Ti/L] |
Comparison of T/D and toxicity values [µg Ti/L] |
Aquatic toxicity classification result |
Screening test / 24 h |
100 |
BDL |
Acute = 36600 (ErC50 = 61 mg TiO2/L) |
BDL < 36600 |
Refer to full T/D test for classification |
Acute full test / 7 d |
10 |
0.2 (control: 0.2) |
Acute = 36600 (ErC50 = 61 mg TiO2/L) |
0 < 36600 |
No Chronic 2 classification |
Acute full test / 7 d |
100 |
0.2 (control: 0.2) |
Acute = 36600 (ErC50 = 61 mg TiO2/L) |
0 < 36600 |
No Chronic 3 classification |
Chronic full test / 28 d |
1 |
0.5 (control: 0.5) |
Chronic = 3940 (ErC10 = 9.9 mg TiO2/L) |
0 < 5940 |
No Chronic 2 classification |
BDL = below detection limit
The CLP classification scheme for evaluating aquatic toxicity of metals and metal compounds is the same as that used to classify metals and metal compounds under the Dangerous Substances Directive (DSD), with the exception of the name of the classifications (e.g. DSD cites R phrases, CLP uses acute and chronic categories). Although the DSD does not specifically cite the classification scheme for metals and metal compounds, the scheme was outlined in the ECB documents used in the classification of nickel metal (massive and powder). In addition, this classification scheme was used to evaluate aquatic toxicity of nickel metal and some copper compounds (ECB, 2001; ECB, 2005).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.