Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
31.05.2021-15.07.2021
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Performed to guidelines

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2021

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
the study was carried out in accordance with microplate format of the Ames fluctuation assay, which differs from the methods described in details in the OECD 471 Guideline and EU Method B.13/14.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
22/2020/DPL
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sodium O-isobutyl dithiocarbonate
EC Number:
246-805-2
EC Name:
Sodium O-isobutyl dithiocarbonate
Cas Number:
25306-75-6
Molecular formula:
C5H10OS2.Na
IUPAC Name:
sodium [(2-methylpropoxy)methanethioyl]sulfanide
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Sodium isobutyl xanthate
IUPAC Name:
Sodium isobutyl xanthate
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
94±1%

Method

Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
The following components from Xenometrix were used to prepare the metabolic activity system:
◆ phenobarbital/β-naphtoflavone induced S9 fraction (cat. no. PRS-PB02, lot. no. F1903114). The Certificate of Analysis of Phenobarbital/β-naphtoflavone induced S9 – Postmitochondiral Supernatant was presented in Appendix no. 5.
◆ S9-Buffer Salts (cat. no. PCO-0800, lot. no. ND09648P), containing 0.20 M NaH2PO4, and 0.25 M MgCl*6H2O and 1 M KCl.
◆ 0.04 M S9-NADP (cat. no. PCO-0830, lot. no. X1904SNAA),
The metabolic activity system was supplemented with 0.20 M glucose-6-phosphatase solution (G-6-P; Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. G7879, lot. no. SLBZ7814).
The defrosted reagents were stored on ice. To prepare 30 % mixture of the S9 fraction, the following volumes of the reagents were mixed (for 5 strains): 3.106 mL S9 – buffer – salts, 0.136 mL G-6-P, 0.540 mL S9 – NADP and 1.620 mL phenobarbital/β-naphtoflavone induced S9 fraction. This mixture was prepared immediately before use and added to the bacteria in the exposure media. The final concentration of S9 in culture was 4.5%.
The S9 fraction can be toxic for Escherichia coli strains. So, the number of positive wells may be lower than in other strains
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
5.000 mg/mL, 1.581 mg/mL, 0.500 mg/mL, 0.158 mg/mL, 0.050 mg/mL, 0.016 mg/mL.
There were three replicates of each concentration.
Vehicle / solvent:
Water
Controls
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
other: N4-aminocitidine, 2-aminoanthracene

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The test item (Sodium isobutyl xanthate (Sodium O-isobutyl dithiocarbonate)) was tested in Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test to indicate potential mutagenic risk. The bacterial reverse mutation test is commonly employed as an initial screen for genotoxic activity and for point mutation-inducing activity. There was demonstrated that many chemicals that are positive in this test also exhibit mutagenic activity in other tests, but the correlation is not absolute [5]. The test was performed with Ames MPFTM Penta I Microplate Format Mutagenicity Assay kit (Xenometrix).
Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was noticed in only one result. This result was also outside the historical data of Negative Control. However, the average number of positive wells were not bigger than twice the baseline value and no concentration-response correlation was observed (r≥0.75). Therefore, genotoxic properties of the test item were not detected.
Hence, it may be concluded that the test item under the test conditions is not a mutagenic in the tested species.