Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 500-204-4 | CAS number: 68334-05-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 17 Dec 1992 - 05 Apr 1993
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Basic data given. Only four strains tested.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 993
- Report date:
- 1993
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted September 19, 1984
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- insufficient strain selection; analytical purity of test substance not reported;
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Environmental Safety Laboratory, Unilever Research
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., dimers
- EC Number:
- 500-148-0
- EC Name:
- Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., dimers
- Cas Number:
- 61788-89-4
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable, UVCB substance
- IUPAC Name:
- 61788-89-4
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Dimer Acid
- Physical state: viscous liquid
- Analytical purity: no data
- Storage condition of test material: ambient conditions in the dark
- Other: golden color
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- his operon
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 liver homogenate from Sprague-Dawley rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Toxicity assay: 0.5, 5, 50, 500, 5000 μg/plate
Mutation assay:
50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 μg and 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000 μg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- ethanol
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: +S9: 2-aminoanthracene (1 and 2 µg/plate); -S9: 2-nitrofluorene (5 µg/plate), sodium azide (2 µg/plate), 9-aminoacridine (20 µg/plate)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3 days
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicate performed at least twice
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: microcolony formation method
- Evaluation criteria:
- The average number of mutant colonies per plate was compared with the average number of spontaneous revertants in the control. A dose-related increase in the number of colonies which reaches at least a doubling of the control values is usually considered to be a positive response.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
For tables of results refer to attached background material.
Preliminary toxicity assay
For all strains tested, the top dose level of 5000 µg/plate could not be scored as the bacterial lawn was obscured by precipitate. However, this dose was included in the mutagenicity test as it was considered unlikely that the precipitate would interfere with scoring of revertant colonies. No evidence of significant toxicity was seen in the presence or absence of metabolic activation at the lower doses.
Mutagenicity assay
The mutagenicity assay was performed twice both with and without addition of S9 for all four strains. Third, fourth and fifth assays were performed for TA1537 and TA98 as the results of the first two assays were contradictory.
No increase in the number of revertant colonies was seen with strains TA1535, or TA100 in either assay in the presence or absence of S9. Strain 1537 showed a significant increase in revertant colonies in the first assay at 5000 µg/plate and 30% S9 only. However, this response was not reproducible in four further assays and is thought to be a spurious result. No increase was seen in the presence of 10% S9 or in the absence of S9. A significant increase in revertant colonies was also seen in a fourth assay with TA1537 at 2000 µg/plate with 30% S9. However, this was not dose-related or reproduced in two other assays at this dose level. Therefore, this increase was also considered to be spurious. In the first assay with strain TA98, a significant increase in the number of revertants was seen at 5000, 1500, and 500 µg/plate with 30% S9 and at 5000, 1500, 500 and 150 µg/plate with 10% S9. This was not reproduced in a further four assays and was also thought to be a spurious result.
In the first and fourth assays with strain TA1537 the positive control mutagen at 30% S9 mix did not induce a doubling of revertant colonies over the control value. As high S9 levels are known to reduce the potency of 2-aminoanthracene, a positive response was indicated at the 10% S9 level for the first assay and the number of revertant colonies was noticeably increased for the fourth assay, these results are considered acceptable.
The reason for the spurious results seen with the test substance in the presence of metabolic activation with strains TA1537 and TA98 are unclear. The test substance is a viscous liquid which forms a precipitate at high dose levels on the agar plates used in this study. The precipitate closely resembles bacterial colonies and great care was needed to differentiate between precipitate and revertant colonies. It was possible that some precipitate was scored as revertant colonies in some assays.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
As some significant increases seen in revertant colonies were irreproducible, it is concluded that under the conditions of this study Dimer Acid did not induce mutations in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA100 and TA98.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.