Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-929-3 | CAS number: 76-05-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.67 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 16 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 12.5
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
1. Introduction:
In this dossier, all the toxicological information on Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) are examined and analyzed in order to define a DNEL (s)/DMEL (s) for each human health endpoints if possible. The followed method is that proposed in the guidance for the implementation of Reach (Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose (concentration)-response for human health, May 2008).
2. Classification according to the Directive 67/548/EEC and to the CLP Regulation (Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008)
Trifluoroacetic acid is classified as Skin Corr. 1A (H314, Cause severe skin burns and eye damage) and as Acute Tox. 4 (H332, Harmful if inhaled) according to the CLP regulation (1272/2008 ATP1). Based on the above data no additional self-classification is proposed.
3. DNELs derivation according to the toxicological profile of TFA
According to the physico-chemical and toxicological properties, TFA will induce local effect by all routes of exposure before systemic effects are expected. As determined in the acute toxicity study by inhalation, only local effects were observed (see below § 3.1.2). Hence, extrapolation of the DNEL for systemic effects is not useful to protect human health. In fact, DNEL for local effects is protecting from both local effects and systemic effects as this DNEL is likely to be lower than the DNEL for systemic effect. Moreover, route to route extrapolation cannot be used for the DNEL calculation considering local effects.
3.1 DNEL for acute exposure - local effects
3.1.1 Dermal route
The pH of a trifluoroacetic acid aqueous solution at 10% (w/w) is 0.45 and the measure of the alkali reserve is 35 g NaOH/g substance. Following the pH-acid/alkali reserve method, the classification as corrosive is predicted for TFA. Hence, in accordance with column 2 of REACH Annex VIII, the in vivo skin irritation study (required in section 8.1.1) and the in vivo eye irritation study (required in section 8.2.1) do not need to be conducted as the substance is a strong acid (pH = 0.45; see § 4.20).
In the absence of irritation study, it is impossible to derive a threshold for the local effects and to set a DNEL. Hence, only qualitative assessment can be performed following the approach described in the dossier to define the risk management measures (RMMs) and operational conditions (OCs).
3.1.2 Inhalation route
The concentration descriptor has been obtained from the acute toxicity study by inhalation conducted according to an adapted OECD 403 study plan (see § 7.2.2). The purpose of this acute inhalation study was focussed on the determination of the irritant potential of TFA on the upper respiratory tract in rat rather than the determination of the LC50 parameter.
After 4h inhalation exposure to vapors of TFA, the microscopic examination revealed treatment-related histopathological changes at the second and third levels of the rat nasal cavity within the day following the end of exposure. The histopathological lesions consisted of very slight focal degeneration of the respiratory epithelium lining the dorsal part of the septum. This observed effect was considered as the consequence of irritating local effects of the TFA vapours and was only observed at the highest tested concentration (300 mg/m3) in 4/5 animals for the second level of the nasal cavity and in 1/5 animal for the third level. Furthermore, this effect was reversible as there was no irritation of the nasal cavity (all levels considered) in the animals necropsied 14 days after treatment. Therefore, considering both the kind of effects and their reversibility, the highest concentration is considered as a NOAEC based on the local irritation observed effects.
Hence, the dose descriptor (see above: NOAEC) is not modified for the 15-minute human occupational exposure and the NOAEC of 300 mg/m3 (nominal concentration considered as a worst-case) is considered.
TFA is corrosive based on the pH (pH=0.45, see §4.20) and the alkali reserve (35 g NaOH/100g substance). Therefore, considering the strong corrosive properties of TFA, it is scientifically unjustified to perform a repeated dose toxicity by inhalation at concentrations recommended by the guidelines, i.e. the limits of concentration leading to classification for target organs. In fact, strong corrosive effects would be observed at these concentrations.
Therefore, an extended acute toxicity study by inhalation has been performed including three concentrations of exposure for NOAEC determination and relevant additional examinations including broncho-alveolar lavage analysis and upper respiratory tract histopathology. Considering that the local effects (irritation inducing destruction of membrane) are mainly driven by concentration rather than by time of exposure, it is assumed that a long-term DNEL for local effects could be derived from the acute DNEL for local effects derived from the acute toxicity study by inhalation, applying a worst-case assessment factor of 6. Moreover, the long-term DNEL for local effects would be protecting from the potential systemic effects since the local effects would be likely observed at lower concentrations taking into account the effects observed in the overall toxicity studies listed in this dossier.
The following Table 3.1.2/1 indicates the acute DNEL by inhalation for local effects calculation.
Table 3.1.2/1:Calculation of acute DNEL by inhalation for local effects for Trifluoroacetic acid
Worker | Acute DNEL / inhalation / Local effects |
Step a : determination of the critical dose | |
Key study | Muijser, 2010 / OECD 403, Kr. 2 |
Relevant dose descriptor | NOAEC = 300 mg/m3(nominal concentration considered as a worst-case) |
Step b : Correct starting point – factor for uncertainties | |
Differences in absorption depending on route of exposure (route-route extrapolation, human/animal) | - (same route of exposure rat/human) |
Modification for exposure (experiment in animal and human) | - (adverse effects mainly driven by exposure concentration) |
Modification for the respiratory volume | 0.210 / 0.315 (respiratory rate difference under standard conditions and under conditions of light activity for 15 minutes) |
Correct starting point = relevant dose descriptor / overall factor for uncertainties | 200 mg/m3 |
Step c : assessment factors | |
Interspecies differences - Differences in metabolic rate per b.w. (allometric scaling) - Remaining differences (toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics) |
- (local effects) 2.5 (remaining differences) |
Intraspecies differences | 5 (worker) |
Duration extrapolation (sub-acute/sub-chronic/chronic) | - |
Issues related to dose-response | 1 |
Quality of the whole database | 1 |
Overall assessment factor | 12.5 |
DNEL calculation | 16 mg/m3 |
3.37 ppm* |
*DNEL (ppm) = 16 * 24.05 / 114.03 at 20°C
The acute DNEL by inhalation for local effects by inhalation is 16 mg/m3in the worker corresponding to 3.37 ppm.
3.2 DNEL for long-term exposure - local effects
3.2.1 Dermal route
Regarding both the corrosive properties to Trifluoroacetic acid and the absence of irritation study, it is impossible to derive a threshold for the local effects and to set a DNEL. Hence, only qualitative assessment can be performed following the approach described in the dossier to define the risk management measures (RMMs) and operational conditions (OCs).
3.2.2 Inhalation route
According to the physico-chemical and toxicological properties, trifluoroacetic acid will induce local effect by all routes of exposure before systemic effects are expected. As determined in the acute toxicity study by inhalation, only local effects were observed. Hence, extrapolation of the DNEL for systemic effects is not useful to protect human health. In fact, DNEL for local effects is protecting from both for local effects and systemic effects as this DNEL is likely to be lower than the DNEL for systemic effect. Therefore, route to route extrapolation cannot be used for the DNEL calculation considering local effects.
The long-term DNEL inhalation exposure for local effects cannot be derived from repeated dose toxicity study by inhalation since this study is not available. As the acute DNEL for inhalation was not based on the lethality data involving too large uncertainties but was derived from NOAEC for reversible local effects on the respiratory tract, the long-term inhalation DNEL for local effects can be extrapolated from the acute inhalation DNEL for local effects (16 mg/m3) by dividing by a worst-case factor of 6 (subacute to chronic duration extrapolation) although the observed adverse effects are mainly driven by the exposure concentration to Trifluoroacetic acid (see above explanation).
Hence, the long-term DNEL for local effects by inhalation is 2.67 mg/m3 for the workers corresponding to 0.56 ppm.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.042 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not required, starting point is NOAEC
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Extrapolation from sub-chronic to chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Extrapolation rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default factor for remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default AF for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
1. Introduction
In this dossier, all the toxicological information on Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is re-examined and analyzed in order to define a DNEL (s)/DMEL (s) for each human health endpoint if possible. The followed method is that proposed in the guidance for the implementation of Reach (Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose (concentration)-response for human health, May 2008).
2. Classification according to the Directive 67/548/EEC and to the CLP Regulation (Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008)
Trifluoroacetic acid is classified as Skin Corr. 1A (H314, Cause severe skin burns and eye damage) and as Acute Tox. 4 (H332, Harmful if inhaled) according to the CLP regulation (1272/2008 ATP1).
3. DNELs derivation according to the toxicological profile of TFA
According to the physico-chemical and toxicological properties, TFA will induce local effect by all routes of exposure before systemic effects are expected. However, considering the low concentration exposure via the environment, local effects are very unlikely to occur. Therefore, only DNELs for systemic effects are considered. Moreover, as acute exposure is not relevant for the general population, only long-term DNEL for systemic effects are considered below.
3.1 DNEL for long-term toxicity - systemic effects:
3.1.1 Dermal route:
It is assumed that the general population is not exposed to TFA via the dermal route.
3.1.2 Inhalation route:
It is assumed that the general population is not exposed to TFA vapours at ambient temperature.
3.1.3 Oral route:
The concentration descriptor has been obtained from a GLP compliant sub-chronic toxicity study according to OECD TG 408. In this study the neutral salt sodium trifluoroacetate was administered to male and female rats at 160, 1600 and 16000 ppm via dietary administration. Based on the observed effects (increase in liver weight, histopathological changes in the liver and changes in haematological parameters, clinical biochemistry and urinalysis), the NOAEL was set at 160 ppm in both sexes (equating approximately to 8.4 mg TFA/kg body weight/day in males and 10.1 mg TFA/kg body weight/day in females). The lowest NOAEL from the 90 -day study is taken forward for DNEL derivation.
Table: Calculation of long-term DNEL by oral route for systemic effects of Trifluoroacetic acid
General population | Long-term DNEL / oral / Systemic effects |
Step a : determination of the critical dose | |
Key study | Bayer, 2007 / rel. 1 (key study) |
Relevant dose descriptor | NOAEL = 8.4 mg/kg bw |
Step b : Correct starting point – factor for uncertainties | |
Differences in absorption depending on route of exposure (route-route extrapolation, human/animal) | - (same route of exposure rat/human) |
Modification for exposure (experiment in animal and human) | - |
Correct starting point = relevant dose descriptor / overall factor for uncertainties | 8.4 mg/kg bw |
Step c : assessment factors | |
Interspecies differences - Differences in metabolic rate per b.w. (allometric scaling) - Remaining differences (toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics) |
4
2.5 (remaining differences) |
Intraspecies differences | 10 (general population) |
Duration extrapolation (sub-acute/sub-chronic/chronic) | 2 (subacute to chronic) |
Issues related to dose-response | 1 (NOAEL) |
Quality of the whole database | 1 |
Overall assessment factor | 200 |
DNEL calculation | 0.042 mg/kg bw/d |
Hence, the long-term DNEL for systemic effects by oral route is 0.042 mg/kg bw/d for the general population.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.