Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 212-990-3 | CAS number: 903-19-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Data based on the inhibition control of a ready biodegradability study. This approach is in accordance with the Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment (Chapter R.7b: Endpoint specific guidance, ECHA 2012).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 17 Jul 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Landesamt für Umwelt, Wasserwirtschaft und Gewerbeaufsicht, Mainz, Germany. 08 Apr 2015.
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Composition of medium: Mineral medium prepared from stock solutions a (KH2PO4), b (CaCl2), c (MgSO4*7H2O), and d (FeCl3*6H2O)
- Test temperature: 19.5 - 21.6 °C
- pH: 6.7 - 7.3 (pH at the end of the test, before addition of HCl)
- Suspended solids concentration: 25.0 mg dry matter/L
- Continuous darkness: Yes. - Test organisms (species):
- other: activated sludge, domestic (adaptation not specified)
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge: The sludge was taken from the activation basin of the ESN (Stadtentsorgung Neustadt) sewage treatment plant, NW-Lachen-Speyerdorf, Germany. The plant treats mostly domestic sewage. Date of collection: 28 Oct 2016.
- Pretreatment: The sludge was filtered, washed with tap water (2x), then washed with and re-suspended in test medium. It was then aerated until use.
- Concentration of sludge: The dry matter was determined as 3700 mg suspended solids/L.
- Initial inoculum concentration: 25.0 mg/L - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 14 d
- Test temperature:
- 19.5 - 21.6 °C
- pH:
- 6.7 - 7.1
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: Mineral medium prepared from stock solutions a (KH2PO4), b (CaCl2), c (MgSO4*7H2O), and d (FeCl3*6H2O)
- Test temperature: 19.5 - 21.6 °C
- pH: 6.7 - 7.3 (pH at the end of the test, before addition of HCl)
- Suspended solids concentration: 25.0 mg dry matter/L
- Continuous darkness: Yes.
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: Schott-flasks and 100 mL scrubber flasks as CO2 absorbend vessels.
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: 2
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: The test vessels were aerated for 72 h with purified (by activated charcoal), CO2-free (CO2-scrubbed), moistened air to purge the sysem of CO2.
- Measuring equipment: Carbon analyser TOC multi N/C 2100S, Analytik Jena
- Test performed in open system: Yes.
- Details of trap for CO2 and volatile organics if used: The emitted CO2 was trapped in 0.25 M NaOH. Two scrubbers containing 100 mL each were connected in series to the test vessels. The initial IC value of the 0.25 M NaOH was separately determined in each flask.
- Other: The scrubbing of carbon dioxide was achieved by bubbling the purified air through a flask containing 1.5 M NaOH. To control the absence of CO2, the air was then led through a flask containing a solution of Ba(OH)2 before reaching the test vessels.
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: Samples were taken on Day 0, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 14, 18, 23, and 29.
- Sampling method: 1 mL was collected. The resulting change in the volume of the front flask was considered in the calculation of emitted CO2.
- Other: On Day 28, 5 mL HCl 2 M was added to each test flask in order to drive off dissolved CO2. On Day 29, samples from both scrubber flasks were taken.
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: 2, containing mineral medium and inoculum
- Apparatus blanks: 2, containing mineral medium only
- Abiotic sterile control: 1, containing test item, mineral medium and HgCl2
- Toxicity control: 1, containing test item, positive control, mineral medium and inoculum.
- Positive control: 2, containing positive control, mineral medium and inoculum - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- aniline
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 25.5 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: Result of toxicity control from ready biodegradability test
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Degradation of the positive control was 70 % after 9 days.
Reference
The toxicity control attained 45.1% degradation after 14 days of incubation. According to the guideline a substance can be considered as not inhibitory if more tahn 35% (based on total DOC) occured within 14 days.
Since the substance was degraded by 45.1% after 14 days it is with high probability not toxic to aquatic microorganisms. The test item concentration in the toxicity control of 25.5mg/L can be used as NOEC value for the toxicity to aquatic microorganisms.
Table 1: Degradation toxicity control
Day |
Toxicity Control [%] |
2 |
0.7 |
4 |
21.2 |
7 |
35.6 |
9 |
38.7 |
11 |
43.0 |
14 |
44.1 |
18 |
44.6 |
23 |
45.5 |
29 |
45.7 |
Description of key information
Not toxic to aquatic microorganisms
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Studies on the toxicity of 2,5-bis(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)benzene-1,4-diol to aquatic microorganisms are not available. Therefore the assessment is based on the results of an inhibition control of the available ready biodegradability study according to OECD 301B. The test substance concentration in the inhibition control is used to derive a NOEC for the toxicity to aquatic microorganisms. This approach is in accordance with the Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment (Chapter R.7b: Endpoint specific guidance, ECHA 2017). A substance can be assumed to be not inhibitory to aquatic microorganisms, if in the inhibition control of a ready biodegradation test, more than 25% degradation based on [oxygen demand (BOD/ThOD) or CO2 evolution (CO2/ThCO2)] occurred within 14 days (OECD guideline 301). The inhibition control of the available test contained 25.5 mg/L test substance and 26.2 mg/l reference substance (aniline). The degradation rate was 45.1% after 14 days. The test substance concentration of 25.5 mg/L is taken as NOEC (14 d).
Based on the results the substance is considered to be not toxic to microorganisms.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.