Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 212-990-3 | CAS number: 903-19-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 31 Oct - 29 Nov 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 17 Jul 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-C (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Carbon Dioxide Evolution Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 30 May 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Landesamt für Umwelt, Wasserwirtschaft und Gewerbeaufsicht, Mainz, Germany. 08 Apr 2015.
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic (adaptation not specified)
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge: The sludge was taken from the activation basin of the ESN (Stadtentsorgung Neustadt) sewage treatment plant, NW-Lachen-Speyerdorf, Germany. The plant treats mostly domestic sewage. Date of collection: 28 Oct 2016.
- Pretreatment: The sludge was filtered, washed with tap water (2x), then washed with and re-suspended in test medium. It was then aerated until use.
- Concentration of sludge: The dry matter was determined as 3700 mg suspended solids/L.
- Initial inoculum concentration: 25.0 mg/L - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 20 mg/L
- Based on:
- DOC
- Initial conc.:
- 25.3 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: Mineral medium prepared from stock solutions a (KH2PO4), b (CaCl2), c (MgSO4*7H2O), and d (FeCl3*6H2O)
- Test temperature: 19.5 - 21.6 °C
- pH: 6.7 - 7.3 (pH at the end of the test, before addition of HCl)
- Suspended solids concentration: 25.0 mg dry matter/L
- Continuous darkness: Yes.
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: Schott-flasks and 100 mL scrubber flasks as CO2 absorbend vessels.
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: 2
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: The test vessels were aerated for 72 h with purified (by activated charcoal), CO2-free (CO2-scrubbed), moistened air to purge the sysem of CO2.
- Measuring equipment: Carbon analyser TOC multi N/C 2100S, Analytik Jena
- Test performed in open system: Yes.
- Details of trap for CO2 and volatile organics if used: The emitted CO2 was trapped in 0.25 M NaOH. Two scrubbers containing 100 mL each were connected in series to the test vessels. The initial IC value of the 0.25 M NaOH was separately determined in each flask.
- Other: The scrubbing of carbon dioxide was achieved by bubbling the purified air through a flask containing 1.5 M NaOH. To control the absence of CO2, the air was then led through a flask containing a solution of Ba(OH)2 before reaching the test vessels.
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: Samples were taken on Day 0, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 14, 18, 23, and 29.
- Sampling method: 1 mL was collected. The resulting change in the volume of the front flask was considered in the calculation of emitted CO2.
- Other: On Day 28, 5 mL HCl 2 M was added to each test flask in order to drive off dissolved CO2. On Day 29, samples from both scrubber flasks were taken.
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: 2, containing mineral medium and inoculum
- Apparatus blanks: 2, containing mineral medium only
- Abiotic sterile control: 1, containing test item, mineral medium and HgCl2
- Toxicity control: 1, containing test item, positive control, mineral medium and inoculum.
- Positive control: 2, containing positive control, mineral medium and inoculum - Reference substance:
- aniline
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 0
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Results with reference substance:
- Degradation of the positive control was 70 % after 9 days.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Please refer to table 1 in "Any other information on results incl. tables"
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
Reference
VALIDITY CRITERIA
All validity criteria were fulfilled and the result of the test can be considered valid. The degradation behaviour of the positive control and toxicity control was normal. Abiotic degradation reached 0.7%. Both replicates of the test item showed very good correspondence.
TOXICITY CONTROL
Degradation in the toxicity control was 44% after 14 d. Therefore, the test item can be graded as "not toxic towards the inoculum at a concentration of 25.5 mg/L".
Table 1: Validity criteria for OECD 301B.
Criterion from the guideline |
Outcome |
Validity criterion fulfilled |
Difference of extremes of replicate values of the removal of the test chemical at the plateau, at the end of the test or at the end of the 10-d window, as appropriate, is less than 20%. |
2.3% |
yes |
Percentage degradation of the reference compound reached the pass level by day 14 (≥ 60%). |
84.9% |
yes |
The toxicity control should degrade to at least 35% (based on DOC) or at least 25% (based on ThOD or ThCO2) within 14 d. |
44.1% |
yes |
The IC content of the test substance suspension in the mineral medium at the beginning of the test must be less than 5% of the TC. |
3.98% |
|
The total CO2 evolution in the inoculum blank at the end of the test should not normally exceed 40 mg/L medium. |
15.0mg/L |
yes |
Description of key information
Degradation rate: 0% after 28 days (OECD 301B)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
Additional information
There is one study available investigating the ready biodegradability of the substance according to the OECD guideline 301 B and GLP.
A nominal concentration of 25.3 mg/L test item (corresponding to 20 mg organic carbon/L) was inoculated with 25.0 mg dry matter/L of activated sludge for 28 d under aerobic conditions. The test vessels were aerated with CO2 free air and the CO2 emitted during the test was trapped in scrubber flasks filled with 0.25 M NaOH. Degradation was followed by determining the carbon dioxide produced in regular intervals. The produced CO2 was calculated from the measured dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) in the CO2 absorber bottles using a TOC analyser. A toxicity control and apparatus blanks were run in parallel.
After 28 d no biodegradation of the test item was observed. Degradation of the positive control was 70% after 9 d, thereby meeting the validity criteria (> 60%, ≤ 14 d). Abiotic degradation reached 0.7% after 28 d and the toxicity control reached a degradation of 44% after 14 d. Therefore, the test item is considered to be not readily biodegradable and not toxic towards the inoculum at a nominal concentration of 25.5 mg/L test item.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
