Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 940-510-9 | CAS number: 103043-58-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 014
- Report date:
- 2014
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD test guideline 487
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Commission Regulation (EC) No 640/2012; B.49
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- XBP 115
- IUPAC Name:
- XBP 115
- Reference substance name:
- hexanedioic acid, bis(2-propylheptyl) ester
- IUPAC Name:
- hexanedioic acid, bis(2-propylheptyl) ester
- Reference substance name:
- 1,6-bis(2-propylheptyl) hexanedioate
- EC Number:
- 940-510-9
- Cas Number:
- 103043-58-9
- Molecular formula:
- C26 H50 O4
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,6-bis(2-propylheptyl) hexanedioate
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
- Details on test material:
- refer to confidential test material details
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
Method
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1st experiment: 6.3, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 and 200 µg/ml (with and without S9 mix)
2nd experiment: 12.5, 25, 50, 100 and 200 µg/ml (with and without S9 mix) - Vehicle / solvent:
- acetone; test substance is insoluble in water
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4h with and without S9 (1st experiment), 24h without and 4h with S9 (2nd experiment)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 20h (+/- S9; 1st experiment); 0 / 40h (with / without S9, 2nd experiment)
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24h (+/- S9, 1st experiment); 24 / 44h (with / without S9, 2nd experiment)
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): cytochalasin B
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) and propidium iodide in Fluoroshield™
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: harvest time of 24 hours is about 2 times the normal cell cycle length
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: at least 1 000 cells per culture, means at least 2 000 cells per test group
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cell count, proliferation index, microscopical examination of cell morphology
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Other: pH value, osmolarity, solubility - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptance criteria
The in vitro micronucleus assay is considered valid if the following criteria are met:
• The quality of the slides allowed the evaluation of a sufficient number of analyzable cells.
• The number of cells containing micronuclei in the vehicle control was within the range of
our laboratory’s historical negative control data
• The positive control substances both with and without S9 mix induced a distinct increase
in the number of micronucleated cells
Assessment criteria
A test substance is considered "positive" if the following criteria are met:
• A significant, dose-related and reproducible increase in the number of cells containing
micronuclei was observed.
• The number of micronucleated cells exceeded both the value of the concurrent vehicle
control and the range of our laboratory’s historical negative control data.
A test substance generally is considered "negative" if the following criteria are met:
• The number of micronucleated cells in the test groups is not distinctly increased above the
concurrent vehicle control and is within our laboratory’s historical negative control data
range. - Statistics:
- The statistical evaluation of the data was carried out using the MUVIKE program system
(BASF SE). The proportion of cells containing micronuclei was calculated for each group. A
comparison of each dose group with the concurrent vehicle control group was carried out
using Fisher's exact test for the hypothesis of equal proportions. This test is Bonferroni-Holm
corrected versus the dose groups separately for each time and was performed one-sided.
If the results of this test were statistically significant compared with the respective vehicle
control, labels (* p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01) have been printed in the tables.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: not influenced by test substance
- Effects of osmolality: not influenced by test substance
- Precipitation: Test substance precipitation (macroscopical assessment) in culture medium at the end of exposure period was observed from 50 μg/mL onward in the 1st Experiment with and without S9 mix and from 100 μg/mL onward in the 2nd Experiment with and without S9 mix.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: performed with concentrations up to 10 mM (= 4400 µg/ml) with (4h) and without (4h and 24h) S9 mix
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: performed as part of the acceptance and assessment criteria - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
In this study, no biologically relevant increase in the number of micronucleated cells was observed either without S9 mix or after the addition of a metabolizing system. In both experiments in the absence and presence of metabolic activation after 4 and 24 hours treatment with the test substance the values (0.3 – 0.8% micronucleated cells) were close to the concurrent vehicle control values (0.2 – 0.6% micronucleated cells) and clearly within our historical negative control data range (0.1 - 1.8% micronucleated cells). Besides, in the 1st Experiment in the absence of S9 mix a single statistically significant value (0.8% micronucleated cells) compared to the respective vehicle control value was obtained at an intermediate concentration of 50 μg/mL. However, this observation occurred due to the low rate of micronucleated cells in the concurrent vehicle control group. This value was clearly within our historical negative control data range and, therefore, this finding has to be regarded as biologically irrelevant. The positive control substances EMS (without S9 mix; 400 and 500 μg/mL) and CPP (with S9 mix; 0.5 μg/mL) induced statistically significant increased micronucleus frequencies in both independently performed experiments. However, in the experimental part without S9 mix of the 1st Experiment the positive control EMS 400 μg/mL did not lead to the expected clear increase of micronucleated cells (2.0%). Therefore, for this experimental part the positive control EMS 500 μg/mL was evaluated additionally. Finally, in this study, in at least one positive control group per experimental part in the absence and presence of metabolic activation the frequency of micronucleated cells (2.6 – 4.9% micronucleated cells) was clearly above the range of our historical negative control data range (0.1 - 1.8% micronucleated cells) and within our historical positive control data range (2.3 – 26.6% micronucleated cells).
In addition, in both main experiments in the absence and the presence of S9 mix no growth inhibition indicated by reduced cell counts was observed and no relevantly reduced proliferative activity was observed either after 4 hours exposure interval in the absence and presence of S9 mix or after 24 hours continuous test substance treatment in the test groups scored for cytogenetic damage. Cell morphology/attachment was not adversely influenced at any test group tested for the occurrence of micronuclei. Osmolarity and pH values were not influenced by test substance treatment. Test substance precipitation (macroscopical assessment) in culture medium at the end of exposure period was observed from 50 μg/mL onward in the 1st Experiment with and without S9 mix and from 100 μg/mL onward in the 2nd Experiment with and without S9 mix .
Summary result table: experiments without S9 mix
Experiment |
Exposure /Preparation interval |
Test group |
Genotoxicity |
Cytotoxicity |
|
Relative number of binucleated cells with micronuclei per 2 000 cells scored per test group |
Proliferation Index cytostasis (CBPI) in % |
Cell count |
|||
1 |
4/24h |
Vehicle control |
0.2 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
6.3 μg/mL |
Not determined |
Not determined |
92.6 |
|
|
12.5 μg/mL |
Not determined |
Not determined |
91.5 |
|
|
25.0 μg/mL |
0.5 |
0.4 |
78.3 |
|
|
50.0 μg/mL |
0.8* |
-0.8 |
83.4 |
|
|
100.0 μg/mL |
0.5 |
0.6 |
88.9 |
|
|
200.0 μg/mL |
Not determined |
Not determined |
73.6 |
|
|
Positive control(EMS 400µg/ml) |
2.0* |
4.7 |
90.1 |
|
|
Positive control(EMS 500µg/ml) |
2.6* |
8.4 |
90.4 |
2 |
24/24h |
Vehicle control |
0.3 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
12.5 μg/mL |
Not determined |
Not determined |
106.4 |
|
|
25.0 μg/mL |
Not determined |
Not determined |
80.9 |
|
|
50.0 μg/mL |
0.3 |
-6.9 |
100.9 |
|
|
100.0 μg/mL |
0.3 |
-4.5 |
96.5 |
|
|
200.0 μg/mL |
0.3 |
1.2 |
109.2 |
|
|
Positive control(EMS 500µg/ml) |
2.7* |
4.7 |
121.5 |
*Frequency statistically significant higher than corresponding control values
Summary result table: experiments with S9 mix
Experiment |
Exposure /Preparation interval |
Test group |
Genotoxicity |
Cytotoxicity |
|
Relative number of binucleated cells with micronuclei per 2 000 cells scored per test group |
Proliferation Index cytostasis (CBPI) in % |
Cell count |
|||
1 |
4/24h |
Vehicle control |
0.6 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
6.3 μg/mL |
Not determined |
Not determined |
80.9 |
|
|
12.5 μg/mL |
Not determined |
Not determined |
100.3 |
|
|
25.0 μg/mL |
0.4 |
-1.4 |
102.8 |
|
|
50.0 μg/mL |
0.8 |
-11.2 |
79.4 |
|
|
100.0 μg/mL |
0.6 |
-5.4 |
82.9 |
|
|
200.0 μg/mL |
Not determined |
Not determined |
81.2 |
|
|
Positive control(CPP 0.5 µg/ml) |
3.0* |
21.3 |
82.1 |
2 |
4/44h |
Vehicle control |
0.6 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
12.5 μg/mL |
Not determined |
Not determined |
75.9 |
|
|
25.0 μg/mL |
Not determined |
Not determined |
76.0 |
|
|
50.0 μg/mL |
0.7 |
4.5 |
77.2 |
|
|
100.0 μg/mL |
0.4 |
3.8 |
90.9 |
|
|
200.0 μg/mL |
0.5 |
2.6 |
74.9 |
|
|
Positive control(CPP 0.5 µg/ml) |
4.9* |
-11.5 |
81.2 |
*Frequency statistically significant higher than corresponding control values
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.