Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 248-299-9 | CAS number: 27178-16-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
The toxicity to reproduction of read-across substance, bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (CAS 103-23-1), has been investigated in a one-generation reproduction toxicity study similar to OECD 415.
The effect of bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate on the fertility of Alpk:APfSD (Wistar-derived) rats was investigated in a GLP study similar to OECD guideline 415 (Tinston, 1988). Groups of 15 male and 30 female parental animals were exposed daily to the test substance at dietary concentrations of 300, 1800 or 12000 ppm, corresponding to mean achieved dose levels of 52, 178 and 2102 mg/kg bw/day for males and 61, 203 and 2399 mg/kg bw/day for females, respectively. A similar constituted group of animals received the plain diet and served as controls. After 10 weeks of treatment the animals were mated to produce a single litter (F1), which were reared until Day 36 post partum. Male parents were killed after completion of mating and female parents were killed after weaning their litter. There was no evidence for any clear effect on bodyweight or food consumption during the premating phase of the study apart a marginal reduction in bodyweight gain for female rats in the 12000 ppm test group. This decrease in body weight continued through gestation in the female animals of the highest dose group compared to controls. There were no treatment-related effects on pre-coital interval, length of gestation, or on male and female fertility. Offspring weight gain, total litter weight and litter size in the 12000 ppm test group were reduced compared to controls, but there was no effect on the number of pups born live or on their survival at any dose level of the test substance. An increase in absolute and relative liver weight was observed in both male and female parents receiving dietary levels of 12000 ppm. No treatment-related findings were observed at gross pathology, except for accentuated lobular pattern in the liver of two female rats fed diets containing 12000 ppm of the test substance. No histological changes were noted in the reproductive organs of those males and females which failed to breed and were thus suspected of being infertile. Based on the results of this study the NOAEL for fertility was set at >= 12000 ppm in the diet, which corresponded to mean achieved dose levels of 2102 and 2399 mg/kg bw/day in males and females, respectively. The NOAEL for systemic toxicity for parental animals (P) and offspring (F1) was considered to be at 1800 ppm, equivalent to dose levels of 178 and 203 mg/kg bw/day in males and females, respectively.
In summary, the NOAEL for fertility from the one-generation reproduction toxicity study of read-across substance, bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate, was set at ≥ 12000 ppm in the diet, which corresponded to mean achieved dose levels of ≥ 2102 and ≥ 2399 mg/kg bw/day in males and females, respectively.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- one-generation reproductive toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 10 Aug 1987 - 12 Jan 1988
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP - Guideline study. According to the ECHA guidance document "Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (March 2010)", the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 415 [One-Generation Reproduction Toxicity Study (before 9 October 2017)]
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Alpk:APfSD (WIstar-derived)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Barriered SPF area at ICI Central Toxicology Laboratory, Alderley Park, Cheshire, UK.
- Age at study initiation: (P) 3 wks;
- Housing: two female or one male per cage, individually during gestation and lactation
- Diet: Pasteurised CTI diet, Special Diets Services Ltd., Essex, UK, ad libitum
- Water: Filtered tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6-7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-21
- Humidity (%): 40-60
- Air changes (per hr): 15-25
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: Treatment of parental animals started on 10 Aug 1987. - Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
An appropriate quantity of test compound was added to 1 kg of CTI diet and mixed in a pestle and mortar before being made up into a premix.
The amount of DEHA to be added to the 30 kg diet to obtain the required concentrations were 9.07 g for the 300 ppm group, 54.44 g for the 1800 ppm group and 362.9 g for the 12000 ppm group.
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): Diets were fed for no longer than 21 days after preparation. - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1/2
- Length of cohabitation: 10 days
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 1 of pregnancy
- After 10 days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility.
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: no
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): individually
In all pairings brother sister mating was avoided. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Samples of the first batches of all dietary levels were taken from the food jars, prior to feeding, for quantitative analysis.
Further samples were taken at regular intervals for full quantitative analysis by Vortex extration and Soxhlet extraction.
Mean concentrations of all diets analysed were within 2% of target concentration for all dose groups. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- (P) Males: 10 weeks before mating.
(P) Females: 10 weeks before mating
After 10 weeks, the animals were mated to produce a single litter (F1A) which were reared to day 36 post partum.
Test diets were fed continuously throughout the study. - Frequency of treatment:
- continuously
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
300, 1800 and 12000 ppm
Basis:
nominal in diet - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
304, 1038 and 11840 ppm
Basis:
other: analytical - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
approx. 52, 178 and 2102 mg/kg bw/day for males and 61, 203 and 2399 mg/kg bw/day for females
Basis:
other: The values were calculated by the mean body weights and the mean food consumption with the analytical compound values - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 15 males
30 females - Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Details on study design:
- - Strain selection rationale: Historical data on the used rat strain were available in the laboratory.
- Dose selection rationale: The dose levels for this study were based on data from the literature (NTP, 1982) and included an anticipated no effect level and a level at which toxic effects of the test substance were expected at some stage during the course of the study. - Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: weekly
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Weekly throughout the premating period (10 weeks). Female rats were weighed on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of pregnancy and at termination.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes
Food consumption for each cage of rats was recorded throughout the premating periods and calculated on a weekly basis, with the exception of several femal cages where a set of residue and top up values were not recorded during the first week of the study.
- Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Not measured
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Not measured
- Litter observations:
- Litters were examined for dead or moribund pups at least once daily and any such pups were subjected to a gross post mortem examination.
A count of all live and dead pups was made within 24 hours of parturition (day 1) and thereafter at days 5, 11, 22, 29 and 36 post partum. The sexes of the pups were also recorded at these times. Any clinical abnormalities seen in the pups were recorded.
Individual pup bodyweights were recorded within 24 h of birth (day1) and at days 5, 11, 22, 29 and 36 post partum.
The litters were weaned at day 22 post partum.
Since pups were not individually identified, data were recorded by sex and litter. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals after completion of mating.
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals after weaning their litters.
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of full necropsy.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
The following tissues were prepared for microscopic examination:
Cervix, Prostate, Epididymis, Seminal vesicle, Liver, Testis, Mammary Gland, Uterus, Ovary, Abnormal tissues.
The number of implantation sites in each uterine horn was recorded for each mated female.
Liver weights were recorded from F0 animals with exception of those killed intercurrently. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
All surviving pups were killed as soon as possible after day 36 post partum.
GROSS NECROPSY
Any pups up to and including 18 days of age found dead or with behavioural, functional, or morphological abnormalities were examined by free hand dissection; abnormalities were recorded and the pups were discarded. Pups over 18 days of age found either dead or requiring euthanasia were subjected to a post mortem examination.
All clinical abnormal pups and further normal pups received a gross necropsy so that a minimum of 2 pups of each sex were examined from each litter where possible. All remaining normal pups were killed and discarded after clinical examination.
- Statistics:
- The following parameters were assessed using appropriate statistical tests:
mean bodyweight gain, food consumption and food utilisation during the premating period, female bodyweight gain during pregnancy, parental liver weights and pup (litter) bodyweight gain until day 36 post partum. Male and female fertility indices, mean length of gestation, mean pre-coital interval, mean live born index, mean survival index, mean litter size, total litter weight and whole litter losses. - Reproductive indices:
- - The reproductive performance of the parents was assessed from the records of mating and parturition.
- The fertility of the parents was established by the success of each mating (production of a viable litter).
- The length of gestation was measured in days from date of positive smear to date of birth (but only in fertile females fulfilling the criterion above)
- The pre-coital interval, the time in days between the date of pairing and the date of positive vaginal smear, was measured, and mean value per group was estimated from all pairings with a positive smear. - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- marginal reduction in body weight gain in females of the highest dose group during premating phase; reduction in body weight in week 3 and 4 of pregnancy in females at highest dose; slight increase in food consumption in males at highest dose
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- marginal reduction in body weight gain in females of the highest dose group during premating phase; reduction in body weight in week 3 and 4 of pregnancy in females at highest dose; slight increase in food consumption in males at highest dose
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Test substance intake: slightly less efficient food utilisation in males of highest dose group
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- fertility
- Effect level:
- >= 2 102 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- fertility
- Effect level:
- >= 2 399 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic
- Effect level:
- 178 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: The nominal dose was 1800 ppm in diet.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic
- Effect level:
- 203 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: The nominal dose was 1800 ppm in diet.
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic
- Effect level:
- 2 102 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: The nominal dose was 12000 ppm in diet. An increase in liver weight was observed in both male and female parents receiving 12000 ppm DEHA.
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic
- Effect level:
- 2 399 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: The nominal dose was 12000 ppm in diet. An increase in liver weight was observed in both male and female parents receiving 12000 ppm DEHA. Reduction in bodyweight gain during gestation in the 12000 ppm DEHA group compared with controls.
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- mean litter size was slightly reduced at highest dose group (statistically not significant)
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- reduction in mean pup weight for male and female offspring in the highest dose group
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 178 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Mean pup weight gain and total litter weight were reduced at the highest dose. Litter size was slightly reduced throughout the post-partum period at the highes dose.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 203 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Mean pup weight gain and total litter weight were reduced at the highest dose. Litter size was slightly reduced throughout the post-partum period at the highest dose.
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 2 102 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Mean pup weight gain and total litter weight were reduced. Slighly reduction in litter size throughout the post-partum period.
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 2 399 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Mean pup weight gain and total litter weight were reduced. Slighly reduction in litter size throughout the post-partum period.
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Endpoint:
- one-generation reproductive toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Justification for type of information:
- Please see Section 13 below.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Frequency of treatment:
- continuously
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- fertility
- Effect level:
- >= 2 102 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- fertility
- Effect level:
- >= 2 399 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic
- Effect level:
- 178 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: The nominal dose was 1800 ppm in diet.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic
- Effect level:
- 203 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: The nominal dose was 1800 ppm in diet.
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic
- Effect level:
- 2 102 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: The nominal dose was 12000 ppm in diet. An increase in liver weight was observed in both male and female parents receiving 12000 ppm DEHA.
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic
- Effect level:
- 2 399 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: The nominal dose was 12000 ppm in diet. An increase in liver weight was observed in both male and female parents receiving 12000 ppm DEHA. Reduction in bodyweight gain during gestation in the 12000 ppm DEHA group compared with controls.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 178 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Mean pup weight gain and total litter weight were reduced at the highest dose. Litter size was slightly reduced throughout the post-partum period at the highes dose.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 203 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Mean pup weight gain and total litter weight were reduced at the highest dose. Litter size was slightly reduced throughout the post-partum period at the highest dose.
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 2 102 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Mean pup weight gain and total litter weight were reduced. Slighly reduction in litter size throughout the post-partum period.
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 2 399 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Mean pup weight gain and total litter weight were reduced. Slighly reduction in litter size throughout the post-partum period.
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
Referenceopen allclose all
There were no clinical abnormalities which could be attributed to treatment.
BODY WEIGHT AND FOOD CONSUMPTION (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
Bodyweight gain was marginally reduced for females receiving 12000 ppm DEHA during the premating phase.
At the start of pregnancy, the body weight of the females treated with 12000 ppm DEHA was marginally lower than controls and there was reduced body weight gain in this treatment group throughout pregnancy, the effect being most marked at weeks 3 and 4 (6% lower on day 22 compared to controls). There was no effect on bodyweight or body weight gain in any other treatment group during the premating period and during pregnancy, respectively.
A slight increase in food consumption in males treated with 12000 ppm DEHA was observed at week 6 to 10, the effects being statisticaly significant at weeks 6-9. The food consumption was unaffected for males receiving 1800 ppm and 300 ppm and for females of all dose groups.
TEST SUBSTANCE INTAKE (PARENTAL ANIMALS) Food utilisation was slightly less efficient overall for males receiving 12000 ppm.
REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
There was no effect on either male or female fertility, gestation length or pre-coital interval in any dose group which could be attributed to treatment with DEHA.
ORGAN WEIGHTS (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
Absolute liver weights were increased in both males and females receiving 12000 ppm, by approximately 18%.
Relative to the bodyweights these liver weight increases were 18.9% in males and 19.7% in females.
No effects were seen in any other dose group.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
There were no gross changes detected in adults which could be attributed to treatment with exception of accentuated lobular pattern in the liver of two rats fed 12000 ppm DEHA.
HISTOPATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
No microscopic changes were detected in reproductive organs of those animals which failed to breed and were thus supected infertile.
The incidence of whole litter losses was not attributed to the treatment with DEHA, although there were four whole litter losses. None in the control group, one in the 300 ppm group, two in the 1800 ppm group and one in the 12000 ppm group. The low incidence and no clear dose-relation was considered as non treatment-related effects.
Mean litter size was slightly (without statistically significance) reduced at 12000 ppm throughout the post partum period. The number of live born pups was unaffected by treatment.
The pup survival rate was not different from control group, when the four whole litter losses were excluded from calculation.
CLINICAL SIGNS (OFFSPRING)
The pups were in good clinical condition. The observed clinical signs were of low incidence with no relationship to DEHA-treatment.
BODY WEIGHT (OFFSPRING)
Mean pup weight gain and total litter weight for both male and female offspring receiving 12000 ppm of the test substance were reduced throughout the whole of the post partum phase in days 1 - 36. No effects were observed in any other dose group.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (OFFSPRING)
There were no findings, which could be considered to be treatment-related.
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 178 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Klimisch 2 study
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
In a prenatal developmental toxicity study according to OECD guideline 414, the effects of read-across substance, bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (CAS 103-23-1) on mated female Alpk:APfSD (Wistar derived) rats were investigated during Days 1 to 22 of gestation (Hodge, 1988). Groups of 24 females received the test substance at dietary concentrations of 300, 1800 and 12000 ppm, which approximately corresponded to dose levels of 28, 170 and 1080 mg/kg bw/day. A further group of 24 mated females received the plain diet and served as controls. On Day 22 of gestation, dams were sacrificed and maternal as well as foetal examinations were performed. Maternal toxicity occurred at 12000 ppm and involved a small, but statistically significant decrease in body weight gain compared to controls. This effect was accompanied by slight, statistically significant reduction in food consumption between Days 2 to 18 of gestation. No treatment-related clinical signs were observed during the study and no adverse findings were noted at macroscopic examination of dams. There was no effect at any dose level on fetal weight, litter weight, gravid uterus weight, numbers of intra-uterine deaths or numbers of external abnormalities. At 12000 ppm, a minimal increase of pre-implantation loss associated with a decrease in litter size was observed. Six major abnormalities (in five fetuses) were seen in the treated groups and eight in the control group (of which seven consisted of multiple minor skull defects in one litter). There was no evidence that the type or distribution of these abnormalities was related to test substance treatment . Overall, minor skeletal defects were increased in a dose-related manner at 1800 and 12000 ppm, while skeletal variants (as a percentage of fetuses affected) were increased at the 12000 ppm only. These findings indicated slightly poorer ossification at dose levels of 1800 and 12000 ppm, which were considered to be the result of slight fetotoxicity. However, the slightly poorer ossification is not considered as adverse effect. There was no evidence at any dose level, that the test substance was teratogenic in rats.
Based on the results of the study, the NOEL for developmental toxicity in male and female Alpk:APfSD (Wistar derived) rats was established at 300 ppm, which approximately corresponded to 28 mg/kg bw/day. The NOAEL for developmental toxicity in Alpk:APfSD (Wistar derived) rats was ≥ 12000 ppm, which is equivalent to ca. ≥ 1080 mg/kg bw/day. The NOAEL for maternal toxicity in Alpk:APfSD (Wistar derived) rats was 1800 ppm, which is equivalent to ca. 170 mg/kg bw/day.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Justification for type of information:
- Please see Section 13 below.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 170 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 1 080 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 080 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity. Equivalent to 12000 ppm in diet. No relevant developmental effects.
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 28 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity. Equivalent to 300 ppm in diet.
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 170 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity. Equivalent to 1800 ppm in diet. Reduced ossification, non-adverse effect, typically reversible.
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15 Sep - 16 Oct 1987
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP - Guideline study. According to the ECHA guidance document "Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (March 2010)", the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Alpk:APfSD (Wistar derived)
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: SPF colony maintained at the Animal Breeding Unit, ICI Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, Cheshire, UK.
- Age at study initiation: 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 218-278 g
- Housing: individually in stainless steel cages with absorbent paper over collecting trays.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): CTI diet, Special Diets Services Ltd., Essex, UK.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): yes
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-24
- Humidity (%): 44-70
- Air changes (per hr): 12
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 15 Sept - 16 Oct 1987. - Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The experimental diets were prepared in 30 kg batches from premixes. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Chemical stability was observed at 300 ppm up to at least 32 days. This interval was in excess of the maximum period of use of the first batch of diet (21 days from preparation). The achieved concentration was within 8% of target and the doses received by the test groups were approximately 28, 170 and 1080 mg/kg bw/day.
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: not reported
- Length of cohabitation: overnight
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 1 of pregnancy
Successfully mated females were delivered to the experimental unit.
A total of 96 mated females was supplied over a two week period. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- days 1-22 of gestation.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Continuous feeding
- Duration of test:
- 22 days
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 28, 170 and 1080 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
other: approximately received doses (as given in study report) - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 300, 1800 and 12000 ppm
Basis:
nominal in diet - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: on arrival and daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: daily during days 1-22 of gestation
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 22
- Organs examined: uterus, ovaries, liver, spleen, kidney, stomach, rectum, abdominal cavity, pelvic cavity, - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes, in each ovary.
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes (early intra-uterine deaths)
- Number of late resorptions: Yes (late intra-uterine deaths)
- Other: Each foetus was weighed and individually identified within the litter by means of a cardboard tag. After weighing the foetuses were killed with an intra-cardiac injection of pentobarbitone. - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations and cleft palate: Yes, each foetus
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes, all
- Skeletal examinations: Yes, all
- Head examinations: Yes, the head of each foetus was cut along the fronto-parietal suture line and the brain was examined for macroscopic abnormalities. - Statistics:
- Analysis of variance, Student's t-test, Fisher's Exact Test
- Indices:
- - Pre-implantation loss (No. of corpora lutea / No. of implantations)
- Post implantation loss (No. of implantations / No. of live foetuses) - Historical control data:
- Yes, data on variants and frequency of occurence in rats of this strain were given.
Defects like bipartite 5th sternebrae, slightly dilated ureters and kinked ureters were seen in historical controls of this strain. - Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes
Details on maternal toxic effects:
At 12000 ppm a small but statistically significant reduction in maternal bodyweight gain was observed.
There was also a small but statistically significant reduction in food consumption at this dose level from days 2-18 inclusive of gestation.
There was no evidence of maternal toxicity at 300 or 1800 ppm. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 170 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 1 080 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:yes. Remark: (non-adverse)
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
There was no effect at any dose on foetal weight, litter weight, gravid uterus weight, numbers of intra-uterine deaths or numbers of external abnormalities. At 12000 ppm there was a minimal increase of pre-implantation loss with an associated decrease in litter size.
Six major abnormalities (in five foetuses) were seen in the treated groups and eight in the control group (of which seven consisted of multiple minor skull defects in one litter). There was no evidence that the type or distribution of these abnormalities was related to treatment with the test substance.
Overall, minor skeletal defects were increased in a dose-related manner at 1800 and 12000 ppm of the test substance, while skeletal variants (as a percentage of foetuses affected) were increased at the top dose only. These findings indicated slightly poorer ossification at dose levels of 1800 and 12000 ppm, which were considered to be the result of slight fetotoxicity. However, the slightly poorer ossification is not considered as adverse effect. - Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 080 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity. Equivalent to 12000 ppm in diet. No relevant developmental effects.
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 28 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity. Equivalent to 300 ppm in diet.
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 170 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity. Equivalent to 1800 ppm in diet. Reduced ossification, non-adverse effect, typically reversible.
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Foetal defects and variants - Intergroup comparison of foetal defects and variants
|
Dietary conc. of DEHA (ppm) |
|||
0 |
300 |
1800 |
12000 |
|
No. of litters examined |
24 |
23 |
24 |
23 |
External and visceral defects |
||||
No. of foetuses examined |
282 |
263 |
278 |
243 |
No. of foetuses showing major defects |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
No. of foetuses showing minor defects only |
7 |
8 |
9 |
3 |
Variants |
||||
No. of foetuses showing variants |
69 |
69 |
81 |
78* |
Skeletal defects |
||||
No. of foetuses examined |
282 |
263 |
278 |
243 |
No. of foetuses showing major defects |
7 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
No. of foetuses showing minor defects only |
70 |
78 |
97** |
120** |
Variants |
||||
No. of foetuses showing variants |
270 |
257 |
268 |
243** |
Table 2: Summary of the type and incidence of major defects
|
Dietary conc. of DEHA (ppm) |
|||
0 |
300 |
1800 |
12000 |
|
External/Visceral |
||||
Situs inversus totalis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Left adrenal, kidney and ureter absent |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Cysts attached to liver |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Small right kidney |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Umbilical hernia |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Skeletal |
||||
Skull: Multiple minor defects |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3rdand 7thribs (left) not ossified0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1strib (right) partially ossified |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
There was no evidence that the test substance is teratogenic to the rat at any of the dose levels tested (up to 12000 ppm -approximately 1000 mg/kg/day). Administration of 12000 ppm DEHA resulted in slight maternal toxicity and slight foetotoxicity.
At 1800 ppm, there was no evidence of maternal toxicity although minimal foetotoxicity was observed. A dietary level of 300 ppm DEHA was a clear no-effect level for embryonic development.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 170 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Klimisch 2 study
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Toxicity to reproduction: other studies
Description of key information
No further studies are available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on these above considerations, diisodecyl adipate does not need to be classified for reproductive toxicity according to the CLP Regulation(EC) 1272/2008.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.