Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 912-631-7 | CAS number: 12022-95-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.3 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 6
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- NOAEC used as starting point.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default value subchronic-chronic.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Inhalation; no need for allometric scaling.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- Local lung effects, overload situation with poorly soluble particles, rat very sensitive for this kinds of effects (see justifications and comments)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 3
- Justification:
- Local inflammatory effects, thus justified to use a lower AF than the default value (see justifications and comments)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Robust study.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No additional uncertainties.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
Based on the available data on synthetic amorphous silica, ferrosilicon is expected to have low toxicological activity after repeated oral exposure; even doses up to 2,500 mg/kg bw/day (in rats) and 10,000 mg/kg bw/day (in mice) did not cause any effects attributable to silicon in one chronic study with silica gel. Because of the low toxicological activity of silicon ion after ingestion, no oral DNEL is set. Also dermal DNEL is not considered relevant.
Although ferrosilicon is mainly handled in the form of lumps, inhalable and respirable silicon may be formed in some uses. Respirable dust is more important when considering the lung or lower respiratory tract effects.
Based on a subchronic inhalation study in rats, silicon particles in the respiratory size range (MMAD 2.6 µm) caused only very mild, local inflammatory effects in the lungs of the exposed animals. On the basis of read-across to that study, a DNEL-value of 0.3 mg/m3was derived for worker exposure to respirable ferrosilicon particles.
For the inhalable fraction of ferrosilicon there is no substance specific data available in relation to adverse effects after repeated exposure. However, it is relevant to set a long-term inhalation DNEL for workers also for that fraction. For inhalable ferrosilicon it is thus justified to follow the currently lowest occupational exposure limit value for inert dust (poorly soluble inert particles) in Europe, which is the German value (DFG 1997, 2014) of 4 mg/m3.
The recent epidemiological data from the silicon/ferrosilicon manufacturing have shown only effects attributable to general dust exposure. It has been shown in different industries that dust exposure may increase the risk of chronic bronchitis or COPD. In the recent study in Norwegian ferroalloy industry (Johnsen et al. 2010), an annual additional decline in lung function resembling the decline caused by smoking (6.4 ml fora non-smoking employee of average height estimated on the basis of linear mixed effects model) was suggested at median exposure level of 2.3 mg/m3of general dust (representing thoracic fraction).This is close to the current view that occupational exposure to dust in general results in an extra decline in FEV1 of 7 to 8 ml/year (Toren and Balmes, 2007). For an exposure level of 1 mg/m3 Johnsen and co-workers (2010) calculated an additional decline of 2.7 ml for non-smokers. However, when the absolute annual decline in FEV1was examined by exposure groups (tertiles of exposure level: <1, 1.1 to 3.0 and >3.1 mg/m3) and controlled by age the values at the two lowest exposure group were close to the predicted, physiological annual decline of FEV1. Thus, this study suggests that 1 mg/m3 (thoracic fraction) can be regarded as a NOAEChumanfor the effects of dust exposure at FeSi/Si industry.According to the data from 7 of these FeSi/Si plants, the median levels of respirable dust in this industry varied between 0.4-2.1 mg/m3(Elkem 2005), being highest at furnace department. Median levels of respirable amorphous silica (representing silica fume) were ~0.1-1.3 mg/m3. No signs of fibrosis in workers were seen in these studies. However, since ferrosilicon particles are only a minor component of these dusts present in silicon/ferrosilicon factories no firm conclusions on the inhalation toxicity and dose-response of ferrosilicon can be made.
Conclusion: Because of the low toxicological activity of silicon ion after ingestion, no oral DNEL is set for ferrosilicon. Also dermal DNEL is not considered relevant. For inhalation, the DNEL for respirable ferrosilicon is set at 0.3 mg/m3, and for inhalable ferrosilicon set at 4 mg/m3.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Since there is no exposure of the general population to ferrosilicon, no DNEL for general population is set.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.