Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 912-631-7 | CAS number: 12022-95-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Quality of whole database:
- No studies available on ferrosilicon. Read-across to amorphous silicon dioxide is justified.
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
There are no substance-specific data on reproductive toxicity of ferrosilicon. Therefore the assessment has to be based on the data on surface composition, dissolution of the main components and the toxicity of these dissolved components.
Dissolution of main constituents from the ferrosilicon matrix is the main determinant affecting the systemic toxicity (including reproductive toxicity) of ferrosilicon. The surface of the ferrosilicon restricts the dissolution of many elements from ferrosilicon matrix. According to comparative dissolution studies with FeSi and synthetic amorphous silica, the release of silicon, iron, aluminium, copper, manganese, titanium and zirconium from both substances is very similar although ferrosilicon contains significantly higher levels of many of these elements than synthetic amorphous silica. Therefore, synthetic amorphous silica can be used for read-across to cover the possible effects of these components to the reproductive effects of ferrosilicon. Since the surface of different ferrosilicon grades is composed of metal oxides (especially oxides of silicon) and silicates, including calcium and aluminium silicates, the data on these silicates can also provide important data for the assessment of reproductive toxicity of ferrosilicon. Some consideration also has to be given to barium and strontium which are released from certain grades of ferrosilicon in higher amounts than from amorphous silica. A detailed description of the justifications for read-across is available in Section 13 of the Iuclid dossier.
Synthetic amorphous silica was tested in a guideline two-generation study with rats. The study results indicated no effects on fertility. Furthermore, a dominant lethal study on calcium silicate did not show effects on male fertility.
Based on the acute and repeated dose toxicity data on synthetic amorphous silica, the silicon ion is virtually non-toxic, showing no systemic toxic effects even at very high oral doses (see Chapter Repeated Dose Toxicity). No harmful effects on reproductive organs have been described in repeated dose toxicity tests. After ingestion, synthetic amorphous silica is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, but it usually has very little effect on systemic silicon (H3SiO4)- ion levels, i.e., the levels of silicon in blood, urine or tissues.
No indications of endocrine disrupting effects have been observed.
Silicon in different forms is ubiquitous in nature. Diet is the main factor affecting the blood/urine silicon levels. Diet also causes large inter-individual variability in blood/urine silicon levels. Silicon in different forms is a commonly used food additive, and EFSA (2009) has concluded that the use of silicon dioxide up to 1,500 mg SiO2/day (equal to 700 mg/day) added to food supplements is of no safety concern. OECD (2004) concluded on the basis of weight of evidence that prolonged exposure to synthetic amorphous silica, applied before and during pregnancy at high doses, is not expected to produce harmful effects on the reproductive performance in experimental animals. The inherent physico-chemical properties and ubiquitous nature of amorphous silicas suggest that there is no structural alert to indicate any potential for reproductive toxicity.
Ferrosilicon contains some additional constituents, which are released from the matrix and which possible impact on reproductive toxicity should be assessed. Main impurities include strontium metal and barium metal, which are present in ferrosilicon at levels over 0.3% and released from it at levels higher than they are released from synthetic amorphous silica particles during one week incubation in synthetic biological fluids. Strontium or barium have not shown effects on fertility and are not classified for reprotoxicity. In addition, the dissolution and therefore the bioavailability of barium metal and strontium metal from ferrosilicon are limited.
No indications of endocrine disrupting effects have been observed.
Short description of key information:
A two-generation oral study with synthetic amorphous silica and a dominant lethal study with calcium silicate have failed to demonstrate any effects on fertility. The inherent physico-chemical properties and ubiquitous nature of silicon ion suggest that there is no structural alert to indicate any potential for reproductive toxicity. The main impurities of ferrosilicon, strontium metal and barium metal, are not classified for reprotoxicity. No indications of endocrine disrupting effects have been observed.
Justification for selection of Effect on fertility via oral route:
Read-across to guideline study performed with synthetic amorphous silica.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Animal data on developmental toxicity of synthetic amorphous silica, calcium silicate and sodium aluminium silicate, which can be used for read-across, do not suggest developmental toxicity or teratogenicity. The inherent physico-chemical properties and ubiquitous nature of silicon ion suggest that there is no structural alert to indicate any potential for developmental toxicity. The other main components of ferrosilicon have not shown any signs of causing developmental toxicity. No indications of endocrine disrupting effects have been observed.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Quality of whole database:
- No studies available on ferrosilicon. Read-across to amorphous silicon dioxide and silicates is justified.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
There are no substance-specific data on reproductive toxicity of ferrosilicon. The assessment has therefore to be based on the data on surface composition, dissolution of the main components and the toxicity of these dissolved components.
Dissolution of main constituents from ferrosilicon matrix is the main determinant affecting the potential systemic toxicity (including reproductive toxicity) of ferrosilicon. The surface of the ferrosilicon restricts the dissolution of many elements from ferrosilicon matrix. According to comparative dissolution studies with ferrosilicon and synthetic amorphous silica, is the release of silicon, iron, aluminium, copper, manganese, titanium and zirconium from both substances fairly similar although ferrosilicon contains significantly higher levels of many of these elements than synthetic amorphous silica. Synthetic amorphous silica can be used for read-across to cover the possible effects of these components to the developmental toxicity of ferrosilicon. Since the surface of different ferrosilicon grades is composed of metal oxides (especially oxides of silicon) and silicates, including calcium and aluminium silicates, the data on these silicates can also provide important data for the assessment of reproductive toxicity of ferrosilicon. Some consideration also has to be given to barium metal and strontium metal, which may be released from certain grades of ferrosilicon in higher amounts than from synthetic amorphous silica. A detailed description of the justifications for read-across is available in Section 13 of the Iuclid dossier.
No treatment-related effects were observed in a guideline prenatal developmental toxicity stydy on synthetic amorphous silica. The data from studies on high-dose oral administration of hydrophilic silica gel, calcium silicate and sodium aluminium silicate support the conclusion that no toxic effects on development are expected. All tests showed negative results at high doses.
No indications of endocrine disrupting effects have been observed.
Also OECD (2004) concluded in its assessment on the hazards of synthetic amorphous silica that on the basis of weight of evidence prolonged exposure to synthetic amorphous silica is not expected to produce harmful effects on the embryonic/foetal development in experimental animals.
Main impurities of FeSi include strontium metal and barium metal, which are present in ferrosilicon at levels over 0.3% and released from it at levels higher than they are released from synthetic amorphous silica particles during one-week incubation in synthetic biological fluids. Studies reporting developmental toxicity of strontium have been conducted with soluble strontium compounds at very high dose levels (e.g., 1.5-2 g/kg bw/d). Thus, these effects are not considered relevant in the case of ferrosilicon. Strontium has not been classified as a developmental toxicant. Limited data is available on the developmental toxicity of barium metal and it is not classified as a developmental toxicant. In addition, the dissolution of barium and strontium from ferrosilicon are very limited.
Justification for selection of Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route:
Read-across to oral studies with silicates and amorphous silica in several animal species.
Justification for classification or non-classification
No classification of ferrosilicon is suggested.
A two-generation oral study with synthetic amorphous silica, as well as subchronic studies with silicon, synhetic amorphous silica and a dominant lethal study with calcium silicate have not demonstrated any indications of fertility effects or histopathological changes or deleterious effects in the reproductive organs of treated animals.
Animal data on developmental toxicity of synthetic amorphous silica, calcium silicate and sodium aluminium silicate, which can be used for read-across, do not suggest developmental toxic effects.
The inherent physico-chemical properties and the ubiquitous nature of silicon ion suggest that there is no structural alert to indicate any potential for reproductive and developmental toxicity.
Other relevant components of ferrosilicon, i.e. strontium metal and barium metal, have not been classified as reproductive toxicants.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
