Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
28 Nov. - 22 Dec. 1989
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study. Read-across to synthetic amorphous silica.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1989
Report date:
1989

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 482 (Genetic Toxicology: DNA Damage and Repair, Unscheduled DNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells In Vitro)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
William, G. M.: Chemical Mutagens, 4, 61-79, 1979
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
DNA damage and repair assay, unscheduled DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in vitro

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Silicon dioxide
EC Number:
231-545-4
EC Name:
Silicon dioxide
Cas Number:
7631-86-9
IUPAC Name:
dioxosilane
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Cab-O-Sil EH-5:
CAS-Name: Silica, amorphous, fumed, cryst.-free;
CAS-No.: 112945-52-5

- Substance type: inorganic
- Physical state: solid
- Analytical purity: >99%
- Lot/batch No.: 1H049
- Stability under test conditions: stable

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
hepatocytes: primary culture, rat
Metabolic activation:
without
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
10, 30, 100, 300, and 1000 µg/ml (5 concentrations tested)
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO, 1 % final concentration
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: No data
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
untreated media control
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3

INCUBATION TIME: 18 to 20 h in  the presence of silica

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 150 (3 x50)

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- LDH release

Evaluation criteria:
Validity: Positive control with significant increases in net nuclear grain count, and negative control with less than 15 % of the cells in repair state
and solvent control with net nuclear grain count of less than 1.
Statistical significance: increase in mean nuclear count by at least 5 counts over control ==> significant for the specific dose level.
Positive: dose-related increase and at least one dose with significant increase or
positive: significant increases at two successive doses in the absence of a dose response.
Equivocal: significant increase at one doses in the absence of a dose response.

Results and discussion

Test results
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
other: 260 - 500 µg/ml: rel. toxicity approx. 50 %
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: other: Primary rat hepatocytes
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

No dose response was observed.

Average net grain counts per nucleus were <1 in the negative controls and ranged from <1 to 2.1 in the treated cultures.

Average net grain counts per nucleus were 30 - 32 in the positive control.

Average net grain counts per nucleus ranged from 1 to 2.1 in the treated cultures.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative