Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-843-4 | CAS number: 7758-94-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Additional information
- Johnson I, Sorokin N, Atkinson C, Rule K, Hope S-J (2007). Proposed EQS for Water Framework Directive Annex VIII substances: iron (total dissolved). ISBN: 978-1-84432-660-0. Science Report: SC040038/SR9. SNIFFER Report: WFD52(ix). Product Code SCHO0407BLWB-E-E. Self-published by Environment Agency, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD, U.K. 65 p.
- Vangheluwe M, Versonnen B (2004). Critical review on acute and chronic aquatic ecotoxicity data to be used for classification purposes of iron sulfate. Commissioned by ARCELOR SA, CEFIC, EUROFER, RIO TINTO plc. Final report - 25 August 2004. Prepared by EURAS, Rijvisschestraat 118, box 3. B-9052 Gent, Belgium. 76 p.
- OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). SIDS Initial Assessment Report for SIAM 24. Chemical Category: Iron Salts. Self-published, Paris, France, 17-20 April. 138 p.
- Biesinger KE, Christensen GM (1972). Effects of various metals on survival, growth, reproduction and metabolism of Daphnia magna. Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada 29: 1691-1700.
- Birge WJ, Black JA, Westerman AG, Short TM, Taylor SB, Bruser DM, Wallingford ED (1985). Recommendations on numerical values for regulating iron and chloride concentrations for the purpose of protecting warmwater species of aquatic life in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Memorandum of Agreement No. 5429, Kentucky Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet.
- Calleja MC, Persoone G, Geladi P (1994). Human acute toxicity prediction of the first 50 MEIC chemicals by a battery of ecotoxicological tests and physicochemical properties. Food Chemistry and Toxicology 32:173-187.
- Lilius H, Hästbacka T, Isomaa B (1995). A comparison of the toxicity of 30 reference chemicals to Daphnia magna and Daphnia pulex. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14:2085-8.
- LISEC 1999. Acute toxicity of FeSO4.7H2O. LISEC study no. WE-01-225. Draft report.
- Mattock S (2002). Iron sulphate heptahydrate: acute toxicity to Oncorhynchus mykiss. Covance report number 1934/1 D2149.
Effects to aquatic organisms
The effects of ferric or ferrous salts on aquatic organisms in reliable short-term tests as collected in the existing reviews (Vangheluwe & Versonnen 2004, Johnson et al. 2007 and OECD 2007) were observed at nominal exposure concentrations in the range 1 – 1000 mg/L salt with the majority being in the range 10 – 100 mg/L. Effects arising from reliable long-term exposures are observed at nominal concentrations > 1 mg/L.
Given the half-time for oxidation and precipitation detailed in the section on Stability it is anticipated that a significant proportion of any ferrous salts added to oxygenated aqueous test media will have converted to ferric within the timescale of the standard OECD test protocols. The available LC50, EC50 and NOEC for the substance, expressed in terms of iron concentration, significantly exceed the equilibrium concentrations of dissolved ferrous and ferric iron, given in the section on Hydrolysis as these kations are in equilibrium with other hydrolysis products. In any case the molarity of elemental iron cannot exceed the low solubility of the ferric kation (see section on Hydrolysis) under aerobic conditions unless precipitation/flocculation occurs, which causes secondary effects rather than intrinsic toxicity. None of the available and reliable studies from the literature searches (Vangheluwe & Versonnen 2004, Johnson et al 2007 and OECD 2007) report effects at such low levels. The necessary conditions for harmful effects (of the more soluble and thus more toxic ferrous kation) to be expressed are very specific (low pH and low dissolved oxygen) and are, in themselves, intrinsically unfavourable to many aquatic species and the results of any such tests would not be a suitable basis for setting regulatory parameters for hazard and risk assessment for ecosystems under normal environmental conditions.
Were the effects observed in the tests to have arisen from exposure to the presence of the dissolved ferric iron this would have placed the substance on a par with some of the most toxic substances that are known. This is unrealistic given that iron is an essential trace element for plants and animals that is widely distributed and abundant in nature.
In view of the low equilibrium concentrations of dissolved ferric iron it can therefore be expected that most of the iron to which test organisms are exposed will be present as undissolved and precipitated ferric hydroxide. Effects arising from exposure to undissolved iron, such smothering or clogging of the gills or respiratory membranes in fish and invertebrates and restriction of plant growth by impairment of photosynthesis or nutrient chelation (in particular phosphorous), are not toxic effects and should not be used as the basis for deriving a PNEC.
Iron salts may present only a hazard to environmental species but only under very specific geochemical conditions and as a consequence of release to iron deficient areas.
Notwithstanding the methodological objections expressed in the waiving argumentations the following toxicity data were deemed “reliable“ according to the literature search and evaluation of Vangheluwe & Versonnen (2004, table 6, p 24). Because the values were used in ECHA (2012, Table IV.7.2, p 537, Example D) Guidance on the Application of the CLP Criteria Version 2.0 the overview of these data is given here for completeness. It must be emphasized that the actual toxicity is considered significantly lower and these values should not be used as starting point for PNEC derivation. Nonetheless the overview demonstrated that even in case these data would be used for classification the conclusion must be that soluble iron salts are not classifiable.
Table: By the authors for the purpose of classification selected acute and chronic ecotoxity data on Fe from the EURAS critical review (Vangheluwe & Versonnen 2004)
Test substance |
pH |
Test organism |
Test |
Effect [mg Fe/L] |
Reference |
FISH |
|||||
Short-term exposure |
|||||
FeCl3.6H2O |
6.3 |
Lepomis macrochirus |
acute 96h |
LC50 = 20.3 (M) |
Birge et al. 1985 |
FeCl3.6H2O |
6.7 |
Pimephales promelas |
acute 96h |
LC50 = 21.8 (M) |
Birge et al. 1985 |
FeSO4.7H2O |
7.35 |
Oncorhynchus mykiss |
acute 96h |
LC50 = 16.6 |
Mattock 2002 |
Long-term exposure |
|||||
FeCl3.6H2O |
7.7 |
Pimephales promelas |
chronic 33d |
LOEC = 1.61 (M) |
Birge et al. 1985 |
DAPHNIDS AND OTHER INVERTEBRATES |
|||||
Short-term exposure |
|||||
FeCl3.6H2O |
6.1 |
Daphnia pulex |
acute 48h |
EC50 = 12.9 (M) |
Birge et al. 1985 |
FeSO4.7H2O |
6.25 |
Daphnia magna |
acute 48h |
EC50 = 1.29 |
LISEC study no. WE-01-225. Draft |
FeSO4 |
7.6 |
Daphnia magna |
acute 24h |
EC50 = 5.25 |
Lilius et al. 1995 |
FeSO4 |
7.6 |
Daphnia pulex |
acute 24h |
EC50 = 36.9 |
Lilius et al. 1995 |
FeCl3.6H2O |
7.7 |
Daphnia magna |
acute 48h |
EC50 = 9.6 |
Biesinger & Christensen 1972 |
FeSO4 |
n.r. |
Daphnia magna |
acute 24h |
EC50 = 17 |
Calleja et al. 1994 |
FeSO4 |
n.r. |
Brachionus calyciflorus |
acute 24h |
EC50 = 12 |
Calleja et al. 1994 |
Long-tern exposure |
|||||
FeCl3.6H2O |
7.6 |
Daphnia pulex |
chronic 21d |
LOEC = 1.26 |
Birge et al. 1985 |
FeCl3.6H2O |
7.7 |
Daphnia magna |
chronic 21d |
LOEC = 5.2 |
Biesinger & Christensen 1972 |
BACTERIA |
|||||
FeSO4 |
n.r. |
Vibrio fischeri |
acute 15min |
EC50 = 40 |
Calleja et al. 1994 |
n.r. not reported; M: calculated as total measured mg Fe/L
The information is summarized by the authors (Vangheluwe & Versonnen 2004)) as follows: “The range of reliable acute L(E)C50 values is 1.29 – 40 mg Fe/L, chronic LOECs range from 1.26 – 5.2 mg Fe/L. For acute fish tests the reported LC50 values are very similar. On average fish and invertebrates appear to be equally sensitive towards Fe. There is no clear explanation for Daphnia pulex being 7 times less sensitive towards Fe than D. magna in Lilius et al. (1995). The range for invertebrate acute EC50 values is 1.29 - 17 mg Fe/L. Some of the differences reported for daphnids might well be due to differences in the test media (pH, hardness). The least sensitive species was the bacterium Vibrio fischeri. No clear pH related shifts in toxicity are noted.
Compared with the data reliable with restrictions, effect concentrations of the reliable data are in the same order of magnitude, albeit somewhat higher for the fish. Compared with nonstandard test species, standard species appear to be more sensitive.”
In conclusion the authors state: “However, it should be noted that most of the effects observed are due to the particulate nature of the formed iron hydroxide (ferric form) rather than the toxic properties of the dissolved Fe (II) ion as such.
No evidence of systemic toxicity by iron to aquatic organisms has been found.”
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.