Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://www.echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
For genetic toxicity of the protein, the substance will have to be made bioavailable to the target gene in sufficient concentration to cause the mutagenic effect. This requires that the protein will have to be bioavailable by absorption via relevant routes of exposure. Therefore genetic toxicity of the spider silk protein is not to be expected. In addition, additional in vitro and in vivo data are available from studies with a parent spider silk protein, silk powder and fibroin from the silkworm Bombix Mori. No genetic toxicity was observed in all descibed studies.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 010-01-12 - 2010-01-29
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- uvrB gene
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Mammalian Microsomal Fraction S9 Mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.0316, 0.100, 0.316, 1.0, 2.5 and 5.0 µl./plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- 0.9% NaCl
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 2-aminoanthracene, 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Pre-Experiment for Toxicity
The toxicity of the lest item was determined with tester strains TA 98 and TA 100 in a pre-experiment. Eight concentrations were tested for toxicity and induction of mutations with three plates each. The experimental conditions in this pre¬experiment were the same as described below for the main experiment 1 (plate incorporation test).
Toxicity may be delected by a clearing or rather diminution of the background lawn or a reduction in the number of revertants down to a mutation factor of approximately < 0.5 in relation to the solvent control.
The test item was tested in the pre-experirnent with the following concentrations:
0.00316, 0.0100, 0.0316, 0.100, 0.316, 1.0. 2.5 and 5.0 µL/plate
Exposure Concentrations
The lest item concentrations to be applied in the main experiments were chosen according to the results of the pre-experiment. 5.0 µL/plate was selected as the maximum concentration. The concentration range covered two logarithmic decades. Two independent experiments were performed with the following concentrations:
0.0316, 0.100, 0.316, 1.0, 2.5 and 5.0 µL/plate
Experimental Performance
For the plate incorporation method the following materials were mixed in a test tube and poured over the surface of a minimal agar plate:
100 µl: Test solution at each dose level, solvent control, negative control or reference mutagen solution (positive control).
500 µL: S9 mix (for testing with metabolic activation) or S9 mix substitution buffer (for testing without metabolic activation).
100 µL: Bacteria suspension (cf. Preparation of Bacteria, pre¬culture of the strain).
2000 µL: Overlay agar.
For the pre-incubation method 100µ L of the test item preparation was pre¬incubated with the tester strains (100 pL) and sterile buffer or the metabolic activation system (500 µL) for 60 minutes al 37 °C prior Io adding the overlay agar (2000µL) and pouring onto the surface of a minimal agar plate.
For each strain and dose level, including the controls, three plates were used.
After solidification the plates were inverted and incubated at 37 °C for at least 48 h in the dark.
Data Recording
The colonies were counted using a ProtoCOL counter. If precipitation of the test item precluded automatic counting the revertant colonies were counted by hand. In addition, tester strains with a low spontaneous mutation frequency like TA 1535 and TA 1537 were counted manually. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered as mutagenic if:
- a clear and dose-related increase in the number of revertants occurs and/or
- a biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the dose groups occurs
in al least one tester strain with or without metabolic activation.
A biologically relevant increase is described as follows:
- if in tester strains TA 100 and TA 102 the number of reversions is al least twice as high
- if in tester strains TA 98. TA 1535 and TA 1537 the number of reversions is at least three times higher than the reversion rate of the solvent control. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, eADF4(C16) did not cause gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the tester strains used.
Therefore, eADF4(C16) is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay. - Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
- Justification for type of information:
- The amino acids in the spider silk protein are found in foods, and the daily exposure from food use would result in a much larger systemic dose than that resulting from use of spider silk proteins.
Therefore, additional testing would provide no additional toxicological knowledge about the safe use of the substance.
In conclusion, from the available data combined with the knowledge of the fate of proteins in the gastrointestinal system, it can be concluded that absorption of proteins in toxicological significant amounts through the gastrointestinal tract is unlikely. Proteins, in general, are a natural and necessary part of human and animal diets, and are subjected to rapid degradation by digestive enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract into individual amino acids and small peptides that can be absorbed by the body to support nutritional needs. Large proteins are not known to be absorbed by the intestinal epithelium.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 2021
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- not reported, publication
- Type of assay:
- mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Swiss
- Sex:
- male/female
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- twice per day at 1,000 mg/kg/day
- Frequency of treatment:
- twice on day 1 and 2
- Post exposure period:
- 48 hours
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- five males and five females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- erythrocytes
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Silk fibroin is not considered to be genotoxic with respect to micronucleus induction in the Mouse Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test.
- Executive summary:
Silk fibroin is not considered to be genotoxic with respect to micronucleus induction in the Mouse Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
The substance has not to be classifed for germ cell mutagenicity based an all available data.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)