Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2010-01-11 - 2010-02-22
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Recombinant spider silk protein eADF4(C16) derived from E. Coli by fermentation
Molecular formula:
not applicable, UVCB
IUPAC Name:
Recombinant spider silk protein eADF4(C16) derived from E. Coli by fermentation
Test material form:
liquid

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethyl sulphoxide
Concentration:
25%, 50% (diluted with DMSO) and 100%.
No. of animals per dose:
3 test groups (3 different concentrations) and 1 negative control group (vehicle) were tested.
Positive control substance(s):
other: P-Phenylenediamine (CAS 106-50-3)

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.8
Variability:
SD: 0.6
Test group / Remarks:
100 %
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.9
Variability:
SD: 0.3
Test group / Remarks:
50 %
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.2
Variability:
SD: 0.3
Test group / Remarks:
25%

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item was not a skin sensitiser under the test conditions of this study.
Executive summary:

The test item was not a skin sensitiser under the test conditions of this study.