Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Acute oral toxicity:


The amino acids in the spider silk protein are found in foods, and the daily exposure from food use would result in a much larger systemic dose than that resulting from use of spider silk proteins. Therefore, additional testing (in experimental animals) would provide no additional toxicological knowledge about the safe use of the substance.


Acute dermal toxicity:


Dermal absorption can be excluded. Dermal toxicity is therefore unlikely to occur.


Acute toxicity inhalation:


For MW ≥ 40 kDa there is a low likelihood that an inhaled protein would cross into the systemic circulation to potentially cause pharmacological effects.


 

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Remarks:
Literature data, GLP not stated
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
not specified
Doses:
silkworm powder from 3 races at dose of 1,000, 1,500 and 2,000 mg/kg b.w.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10 groups, 6 rats per group
Control animals:
yes
Key result
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
none
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The LD50 was reported as > 2000 mg/kg bw.
Executive summary:

The LD50 was reported as > 2000 mg/kg bw.

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
2016
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified
Remarks:
not reported, publication
Test type:
fixed dose procedure
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
not specified
Doses:
16 g/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10
Control animals:
not specified
Key result
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 16 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
none
Clinical signs:
lethargy (hypoactivity)
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Citation from CIR-Report: "Ten male Sprague-Dawley rats were dosed orally (16 g/kg) with silk.42 The form of silk administered, test concentration, vehicle, and dosing method were not stated. Dosing was followed by a 14-day observation period. None of the animals died, and, except for slight lethargy, there were no signs of toxicity during the observation period. The oral LD50 was > 16 g/kg, and silk was considered nontoxic in this study."
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Justification for type of information:
Acute oral toxicity:

Proteins are large complex macromolecules, consisting of amino acid structural units linked together by peptide bonds. A total of 20 different amino acids exist in proteins and hundreds to thousands of these amino acids are attached to each other in long chains to form a protein.

The amino acids in the spider silk protein are found in foods, and the daily exposure from food use would result in a much larger systemic dose than that resulting from use of spider silk proteins.

Therefore, additional testing (in experimental animals) would provide no additional toxicological knowledge about the safe use of the substance.

Furthermore, acute oral toxicity studies with silk protein from the silk worm, Bombyx mori in rats and mice showed no signs of toxicity during the observation period. The LD50 values ranged from > 2 to > 16 g/kg body weight. The silk substances were found to be practically non-toxic.

In conclusion, from the available data combined with the knowledge of the fate of proteins in the gastrointestinal system, it can be concluded that absorption of proteins in toxicological significant amounts through the gastrointestinal tract is unlikely. Proteins, in general, are a natural and necessary part of human and animal diets, and are subjected to rapid degradation by digestive enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract into individual amino acids and small peptides that can be absorbed by the body to support nutritional needs. Large proteins are not known to be absorbed by the intestinal epithelium.

Therefore, testing for acute oral toxicity is not considered to provide additional (see attached justification).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
> 2 000 - <= 16 000 mg/kg bw

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Justification for type of information:
The MW of recombinant eADF4(C48-CS25C) protein is 142.8 kDa and therefore the likelihood that the substance is capable of crossing biological membranes like the alveoli epithelial cell layer, interstium and the capillary endothelial cell layer very low.
Therefore. there is a low likelihood that an inhaled protein would cross into the systemic circulation to potentially cause pharmacological effects.

In addition,inhalation exposure during manufacturing is unlikely to occur (see attached justification).



Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Physical form:
inhalation: dust

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
the study does not need to be conducted because the physicochemical and toxicological properties suggest no potential for a significant rate of absorption through the skin
Justification for type of information:
The recombinant spider silk protein eADF4(C48-CS25C) has a molecular weight of 142.8 kDa and therefore dermal absorption can be excluded. Dermal toxicity is unlikely to (see attached justification).
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
2011
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified
Test type:
other: patch test with silk protein film
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Duration of exposure:
24 hours
Doses:
patch test with films of silk proteins
No. of animals per sex per dose:
6
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Mortality:
no
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Silk proteins did not cause acute dermal toxicity in rats.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the absent acute oral toxicity , the low likelihood of absorption through the skin due to the physico-chemical properties of the protein and the low exposure by inhalation , the substance is not to be classified.