Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 800-172-4 | CAS number: 398141-87-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Hydrolysis
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- hydrolysis
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Testing was conducted between 27 October 2011 and 9 November 2011.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 111 (Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.7 (Degradation: Abiotic Degradation: Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Radiolabelling:
- no
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Analysis of sample solutions
Duplicate sample solutions were taken from the water bath at various times and the pH of each solution recorded. The concentration of the sample solution was determined by gas chromatography (GC). - Buffers:
- Due to the tabular nature of this information please see Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables section.
- Details on test conditions:
- Preparation of samples
Stock solutions were prepared in glass flasks at a nominal concentration of 2.5 x 10-2g/l in the three buffer solutions. A 1% co-solvent of tetrahydrofuran was used to aid solubility.
The stock solutions were split into individual vessels for each data point.
The solutions were shielded from light whilst maintained at the test temperature.
Preliminary test/Tier 1
Sample solutions at pH 4, 7 and 9 were maintained at 50.0 ± 0.5°C for a period of 120 hours.
Samples
An aliquot of sample solution was diluted by a factor of 2 using tetrahydrofuran.
Standards
Duplicate standard solutions of test item were prepared in tetrahydrofuran:water (1:1 v/v) at a nominal concentration of 12.5 mg/l.
Matrix blanks
Tetrahydrofuran:water (1:1 v/v). - Duration:
- 120 h
- pH:
- 4
- Temp.:
- 50
- Initial conc. measured:
- 12.5 mg/L
- Duration:
- 120 h
- pH:
- 7
- Temp.:
- 50
- Initial conc. measured:
- 12.5 mg/L
- Duration:
- 120 h
- pH:
- 9
- Temp.:
- 50
- Initial conc. measured:
- 12.5 mg/L
- Number of replicates:
- Duplicate standard solutions of test item were prepared in tetrahydrofuran:water (1:1 v/v) at a nominal concentration of 12. 5 mg/I.
- Positive controls:
- no
- Negative controls:
- no
- Test performance:
- The linearity of the detector response with respect to concentration was assessed over the nominal concentration range of 5 to 50 mg/l. This was satisfactory with a correlation coefficient (r2) of 0. 991 being obtained.
- Transformation products:
- not specified
- pH:
- 4
- Temp.:
- 50 °C
- Duration:
- 0 h
- % Recovery:
- 107
- pH:
- 4
- Temp.:
- 50 °C
- Duration:
- 72 h
- % Recovery:
- 93.1 - 96.5
- pH:
- 4
- Temp.:
- 50 °C
- Duration:
- 120 h
- pH:
- 7
- Temp.:
- 50 °C
- Duration:
- 0 h
- % Recovery:
- 105 - 108
- pH:
- 7
- Temp.:
- 50 °C
- Duration:
- 72 h
- % Recovery:
- 99.5 - 102
- pH:
- 7
- Temp.:
- 50 °C
- Duration:
- 120 h
- pH:
- 9
- Temp.:
- 50 °C
- Duration:
- 0 h
- % Recovery:
- 103 - 104
- pH:
- 9
- Temp.:
- 50 °C
- Duration:
- 72 h
- % Recovery:
- 90.6 - 94.2
- pH:
- 9
- Temp.:
- 50 °C
- Duration:
- 120 h
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- DT50:
- > 1 yr
- Type:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: The estimated half-life of the test item at pH 4, pH 7 and pH 9 was greater than 1 year at 25°C.
- Details on results:
- Due to the tabular nature of this information & to retain the integrity & coherence of the original Harlan Laboratories Ltd. Study report please see section “Any other information on results including tables”
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The estimated half-life of the test item at pH 4, pH 7 and pH 9 was greater than 1 year at 25°C.
- Executive summary:
The estimated half-life of the test item at pH 4, pH 7 and pH 9 was greater than 1 year at 25°C. Assessnt of hydrolytic stability was carried out using a procedure designed to be compatible with Method C7 Abiotic Degradation, Hydrolysis as a Function of pH of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 and Method 111 of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, 13 April 2004.
Reference
Solution |
Mean total Peak Area |
Standard 12.5 mg/l |
7.164 x 105 |
Standard 12.7 mg/l |
7.122 x 105 |
Initial Sample A, pH 4 |
8.720 x 105 |
Initial Sample B, pH 4 |
7.148 x 105 |
Initial Sample A, pH 7 |
6.873 x 105 |
Initial Sample B, pH 7 |
7.051 x 105 |
Initial Sample A, pH 9 |
7.006 x 105 |
Initial Sample B, pH 9 |
6.843 x 105 |
Standard 12.8 mg/l |
7.317 x 105 |
Standard 12.5 mg/l |
7.380 x 105 |
72 Hour Sample A, pH 4 |
7.893 x 105 |
72 Hour Sample B, pH 4 |
7.865 x 105 |
72 Hour Sample A, pH 7 |
7.750 x 105 |
72 Hour Sample B, pH 7 |
7.507 x 105 |
72 Hour Sample A, pH 9 |
7.301 x 105 |
72 Hour Sample B, pH 9 |
7.407 x 105 |
Standard 13.2 mg/l |
6.101 x 105 |
Standard 12.6 mg/l |
5.999 x 105 |
120 Hour Sample A, pH 4 |
5.521 x 105 |
120 Hour Sample B, pH 4 |
5.721 x 105 |
120 Hour Sample A, pH 7 |
5.745 x 105 |
120 Hour Sample B, pH 7 |
5.866 x 105 |
120 Hour Sample A, pH 9 |
5.409 x 105 |
120 Hour Sample B, pH 9 |
5.205 x 105 |
The test item concentrations at the given time points are shown in the following tables:
pH 4 at 50°C
Time (Hours) |
Concentration (g/l) |
% of initial concentration |
||
A |
B |
A |
B |
|
0 |
3.08 x 10-2* |
2.52 x 10-2 |
- |
- |
72 |
2.71 x 10-2 |
2.70 x 10-2 |
107 |
107 |
120 |
2.35 x 10-2 |
2.44 x 10-2 |
93.1 |
96.5 |
pH 7 at 50°C
Time (Hours) |
Concentration (g/l) |
% of initial concentration |
||
A |
B |
A |
B |
|
0 |
2.43 x 10-2 |
2.49 x 10-2 |
- |
- |
72 |
2.66 x 10-2 |
2.58 x 10-2 |
108 |
105 |
120 |
2.45 x 10-2 |
2.50 x 10-2 |
99.5 |
102 |
pH 9 at 50°C
Time (Hours) |
Concentration (g/l) |
% of initial concentration |
||
A |
B |
A |
B |
|
0 |
2.47 x 10-2 |
2.42 x 10-2 |
- |
- |
72 |
2.51 x 10-2 |
2.54 x 10-2 |
103 |
104 |
120 |
2.30 x 10-2 |
2.22 x 10-2 |
94.2 |
90.6 |
Result: Less than 10% hydrolysis after 5 days at 50°C, equivalent to a half-life greater than 1 year at 25°C.
*Not used in further calculations as considered high and inconsistent
Description of key information
The estimated half-life of the substance at pH 4, pH 7 and pH 9 was greater than 1 year at 25°C; study conducted in accordance with OECD 111 and EU Method C.7; Fox and White (2011)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
In a GLP compliant hydrolysis study conducted in accordance with standardised guidelines, the hydrolysis of the test substance was determined. Under the conditions of the test, the half-life of the substance at pH 4, pH 7 and pH 9 was determined to be greater than one year at 25ºC.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
