Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 800-172-4 | CAS number: 398141-87-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
SKIN
Not irritating; study performed in line with US 16 CFR 1500.3 Federal Hazardous Substances Act; Gabriel (1975b)
EYE
Not irritating; study performed in line with US 16 CFR 1500.3 Federal Hazardous Substances Act; Gabriel (1975c)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 30 March 1975 - 21 April 1975
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP, guideline study with limited details.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: US 16 CFR 1500.41 Federal Hazardous Substances Act
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- A 0.5 ml portion of the test material was applied to the intact and abraded skin of six rabbits and covered with gauze patches and wrapped with an impervious material. After 24 hours the wrapping was removed and the treated areas were examined. Readings were also made at 72 hours.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Study predates GLP regulations.
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: Abraded and intact
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5ml/site
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period:
- 24 and 72 hours
- Number of animals:
- 6 rabbits
- Details on study design:
- A 0.5 ml portion of the test material was applied to the intact and abraded skin of rabbits and covered with gauze patches and wrapped with an impervious material. After 24 hours the wrapping was removed and the treated areas were examined. Readings were also made at 72 hours.
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Remarks:
- Intact skin
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24-72 hours
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks:
- within 72 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Remarks:
- Abraded skin
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24-72 hours
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks:
- within 72 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Remarks:
- Intact skin
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24-72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: No edema observed
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Remarks:
- Abraded skin
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24-72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: No edema observed
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- In accordance with EU CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification is not required for skin irritation.
- Executive summary:
The skin irritation potential of this substance was evaluated in rabbits. A 0.5 ml portion of the test material was applied to the intact and abraded skin of six rabbits and covered with gauze patched and wrapped with an impervious material. After 24 hours the wrapping was removed and the treated areas were examined. Readings were also made at 72 hours. Mean 24 -72 hours scores were determined to be 1.5 and 0 erythema, respectively, in both intact and abraded skin. In accordance with EU CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification is not required for skin irritation.
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 30 March 1975 - 21 April 1975
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP, guideline study with limited details.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: US 16 CFR 1500.42 Federal Hazardous Substances Act
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Test material was instilled into one eye of the test animal while the other eye remained untreated to serve as a control. The test material was not washed from the eyes.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Study predates GLP regulations.
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- No data
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Test material was instilled into one eye of the test animal while the other eye remained untreated to serve as a control. The test material was not washed from the eyes.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 1, 2, and 3 days after administration (24, 48, and 72 hours)
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6 rabbits
- Details on study design:
- A dose of 0.1 ml of the test material was instilled in the right eyes of six healthy young adult albino rabbits. The untreated left eyes served as controls. The treated eyes were examined at 1, 2, and 3 days following instillation of the test material in accordance with the Draize method.
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Remarks on result:
- other: Conjunctival redness and chemosis were not differentiated but were just grouped as conjunctival scores. The maximum score for chemosis is 4.
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- In accordance with EU CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification of this substance is not required for eye irritation.
- Executive summary:
The eye irritation potential of the test substance was evaluated in rabbits. A dose of 0.1 ml of the test material was instilled in the right eyes of six healthy young adult albino rabbits. The untreated left eyes served as controls. The treated eyes were examined at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 days following instillation of the test material in accordance with the Draize method. No corneal opacity, iritis, conjunctival irritation was observed in any animal at any observation period. In accordance with EU CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification of this substance is not required for eye irritation.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin
The skin irritation potential of this substance was evaluated in rabbits. A 0.5 ml portion of the test material was applied to the intact and abraded skin of six rabbits and covered with gauze patched and wrapped with an impervious material. After 24 hours the wrapping was removed and the treated areas were examined. Readings were also made at 72 hours. Mean 24-72 hours scores were determined to be 1.5 and 0 for erythema and edema, respectively, in both intact and abraded skin. In accordance with EU CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification is not required for skin irritation.
Eye
The eye irritation potential of the test substance was evaluated in rabbits. A dose of 0.1 ml of the test material was instilled in the right eyes of six healthy young adult albino rabbits. The untreated left eyes served as controls. The treated eyes were examined at 1, 2 and 3 days following instillation of the test material in accordance with the Draize method. No corneal opacity, iritis, conjunctival irritation was observed in any animal at any observation period. In accordance with EU CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification of this substance is not required for eye irritation.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion
endpoint:
The available study is reliable and can support the development of a
chemical safety assessment.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
The available study is reliable and can support the development of a
chemical safety assessment.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The substance does not require classification in accordance with the criteria specified in either Regulation 1272/2008 or Directive 67/546/EEC.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.