Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 695-022-6 | CAS number: 473278-76-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 24 Aug - 4 Dec 2004
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted Jul 2016
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2000 immature erythrocytes were counted per animal, should be 4000
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese METI/MHLW/MAFF guidelines for testing of new chemical substances
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- other: in vivo micronucleus test in the mouse
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-{2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-3-[(tetrahydrofuran-2-ylmethoxy)methyl]benzoyl}cyclohexane-1,3-dione
- Cas Number:
- 473278-76-1
- Molecular formula:
- C20 H23 Cl O7 S
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-{2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-3-[(tetrahydrofuran-2-ylmethoxy)methyl]benzoyl}cyclohexane-1,3-dione
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: Crl:CD-1(ICR)BR
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (UK) Limited, Margate, UK
- Age at study initiation: 7 - 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 22 - 30 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: the animals were housed in groups of up to 7 in solid-floor polypropylene cages with wood-flake bedding
- Diet: Certified Rat and Mouse Diet (Code 5LF2, IPS Limited, London, UK), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 25
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: arachis oil
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: 25, 50, 100 mg/mL
- Lot/batch no. (if required): M112
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
A suspension of test substance in arachis oil was freshly prepared as required..
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Not applicable
- Frequency of treatment:
- Single treatment
- Post exposure period:
- 24 and 48 h after last treatment
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw (total dose)
- Remarks:
- 24 h post-exposure period
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw (total dose)
- Remarks:
- 24 h post-exposure period
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw (total dose)
- Remarks:
- 24 and 48 h post-exposure period
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 7 males
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide;
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): cyclophosphamide is known to produce micronuclei under the conditions of this test
- Route of administration: oral
- Doses / concentrations: 50 mg/kg bw (5 mg/mL), 24 h post-exposure period
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Tissue: bone marrow
Cell type: bone marrow cells - Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
A range-finding toxicity test was performed to determine a suitable dose level and route of administration for the main study, and whether a differences in effects is observed between males and females. The dose level of the main study should be the maximum tolerated dose level. 1 male and 1 female per group were administered 1000, 1500 and 2000 mg/kg bw per oral, and 1000 mg/kg bw intraperitoneal. the animals were observed for mortality and evidence of overt toxicity 1 h after dosing and once daily for 2 days thereafter.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields):
The animals were dosed once only with 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw test substance via the intraperitoneal route. One group of mice from each dose level was sacrificed by cervical dislocation 24 h after test substance administration, and a second group administered 1000 mg/kg bw were sacrificed 48 h after administration.
Both femurs were aspirated with fetal calf serum and bone marrow slides were prepared following centrifugation and re-suspension of the cells.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
The samples were air-dried, fixed in absolute methanol, stained in May-Gruenwald/Giemsa solution, allowed to air-dry and cover-slipped using mounting medium.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
The slides were coded and examined blindly using light microscopy at x1000 magnification. The incidence of micronucleated cells per 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) per animal was scored. The number of normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) associated with 1000 erythrocytes was counted and scored for incidence of micronuclei. - Evaluation criteria:
- A positive mutagenic response was demonstrated when a statistically significant, dose-responsive, toxicologically relevant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed for either the 24- or 48 h groups when compared to the corresponding control group. If these criteria were not fulfilled, then the test substance was considered to be non-genotoxic under the conditions of the test.. A positive response for bone marrow toxicity was demonstrated when the dose group mean polychromatic to normochromatic ratio shown to be significantly lower than the concurrent vehicle control group.
- Statistics:
- All data was statistically analysed using appropriate statistical methods as recommended by the UKEMS Sub-committee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing Report, Part III (1989). The data was analysed following a √(x + 1) transformation using Student's t-test (two-tailed) and any significant results were confirmed using the one-way analysis of variance.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- clinical signs (hunched posture, ptosis, lethargy, ataxia) were observed in an unspecified number of animals in all treatment groups, at the 24 and 48 h post-exposure periods
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 1000, 1500 and 2000 mg/kg bw via the oral route; 1000 mg/kg bw via the intraperitoneal route
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: the animals in the 1000 mg/kg bw intraperitoneal group showed hunched posture, ptosis, lethargy and ataxia. There was no difference between males and females. No clinical signs were observed in the animals exposed via the oral route. Therefore the animals in the main study were administered 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw test substance via the intraperitoneal route.
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): There were no significant increases in the frequency of micronuclei in any of the treatment groups, compared with their respective control groups (see Table 1 under 'Any other information on results incl. tables').
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): There were no significant decreases in the PCE/NCE ratio of the treatment groups compared with their respective control groups. A small, though non-significant, reduction in the PCE/NCE ratio was observed in the 48-h high-dose group compared with the control.
- Appropriateness of dose levels and route: Clinical signs (hunched posture, ptosis, lethargy, ataxia) were observed in an unspecified number of animals in all treatment groups, at the 24 and 48 h post-exposure periods. No data on clinical signs was given for individual animals. Based on the systemic effects observed, the dose levels are considered to be appropriate. In the range-finding study, clinical signs were observed in animals exposed via the intraperitoneal route, while no clinical signs were observed in the animals exposed via the oral route. This indicates that little or no absorption may have occurred via the oral route, and that the intraperitoneal route is more suitable exposure route.
- Other: the results of the vehicle control fell within the range of the historical vehicle control data (see Table 2-4 under 'Any other information on results incl. tables')
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Results of the in vivo micronucleus assay
|
Mean PCE /NCE ratio at sampling time |
Total micronuclei per 2000 PCEs at sampling time |
||||
Exp group |
Number of animals |
Dose [mg/kg bw] |
24 h |
48 h |
24 h |
48 h |
Vehicle control (arachis oil) |
7 |
- |
0.73 ± 0.10 |
0.91 ± 0.25 |
2.1 ± 1.9 |
0.9 ± 0.9 |
Positive control (cyclophosphamide) |
5 |
50 |
0.98 ± 0.43 |
n.d. |
55.6 ± 17.6** |
n.d. |
Test substance |
7 |
250 |
0.79 ± 0.31 |
n.d. |
1.7 ± 1.4 |
n.d. |
Test substance |
7 |
500 |
0.86 ± 0.28 |
n.d. |
3.9 ± 2.5 |
n.d. |
Test substance |
7 |
1000 |
0.70 ± 0.23 |
0.70 ± 0.18 |
3.7 ± 2.9 |
2.4 ± 1.8 |
n.d. = not determined; **statistically significant (p < 0.001)
Table 2: Historical vehicle control data,
relative group frequency categories of micronuclei per 1000 PCEs, 48 h group (60 groups)
Frequency categories |
Groups [number and %] |
0.0 – 0.4 |
21 (35%) |
0.5 – 0.9 |
18 (30%) |
1.0 – 1.4 |
14 (23%) |
1.5 – 2.0 |
7 (12%) |
2.1 – 2.5 |
0 (0%) |
Table 3: Historical vehicle control data,
relative group frequency categories of micronuclei per 1000 PCEs, 24 h group (60 groups)
Frequency categories |
Groups [number and %] |
0.0 – 0.4 |
15 (25%) |
0.5 – 0.9 |
25 (42%) |
1.0 – 1.4 |
14 (23%) |
1.5 – 2.0 |
3 (5%) |
2.1 – 2.5 |
3 (5%) |
Table 4: Historical vehicle control data, relative group frequency categories of
micronuclei per 1000 PCEs, combined 24 and 48 h (120 groups)
Frequency categories |
Groups [number and %] |
0.0 – 0.4 |
36 (30%) |
0.5 – 0.9 |
43 (36%) |
1.0 – 1.4 |
28 (23%) |
1.5 – 2.0 |
10 (8%) |
2.1 – 2.5 |
3 (3%) |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.