Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 216-032-5 | CAS number: 1477-55-0
Toxicological Summary
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.2 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 30 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- Not required
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not required, starting point is NOAEC
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- extrapolation from subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not for concentrations
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default factor for remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default factor for worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.2 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required, starting point is NOAEC
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- extrapolation from subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not for concentrations
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default factor for remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default factor for worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.33 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 300
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- assumed that oral and dermal absorptions are equal to human oral and dermal absorption
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required, starting point is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- extrapolation from subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- allometric scaling factor rat-human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- defaul factor for remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default factor for worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
The long-term inhalation DNEL fos systemic effects is derived from the subchronic inhalation toxicity study (13 -week study), where the NOAEC is 5 mg/m^3. The calculated DNEL is 0.2 mg/m^3, applying the assessment factor of 25.
The acute/short term inhalation DNEL for systemic effects was not calculated, since the substance is classified into category 4 of CLP and is unlikely to exibit significant acute inhalation toxicity.
The inhalation long- and acute/short term DNELs for local effects were not calculated, since a medium hazard was identified based on skin irritation/corrosion properties of the compound.
The long-term dermal DNEL for systemic effects is derived from an oral (gavage) prenatal developmental toxicity study. For the route-to-route extrapolation it was assumed that oral and dermal absorption in the rat are equal to human oral and dermal absorption. The calculated DNEL is 0.33 mg/kg bw/day, applying the assessment factor of 300.
The acute/short term exposure dermal DNEL for systemic effects was not assessed, since no hazard was identified for acute dermal toxicity, LD50 = 2000 mg/kg bw.
The long- and acute/short term dermal DNELs for local effects were not calculated, since a medium hazard was identified based on skin irritation/corrosion properties of the compound.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
