Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Phototransformation in water

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
phototransformation in water
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Remarks:
Non-GLP non-guideline experimental study, published in peer reviewed literature, notable limitations in design and/or reporting, but adequate for assessment
Study type:
direct photolysis
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Aliquots of 15 ml 1.00 ppm solution were placed in quartz tubes, which were placed horizontally on a tray on the roof of the laboratory.
The tubes were washed once a week during the entire experiment. Tubes were removed periodically for analysis by a hollow fiber-mass spectroscopic method.
GLP compliance:
no
Radiolabelling:
no
Analytical method:
other: hollow fiber-mass spectroscopy
Light source:
sunlight
Type of sensitiser:
not specified
Details on test conditions:
15 ml of the test solution was placed in 22-mm i.d. x 53-mm quartz tubes. The ice cooled tubes, previously constricted at the neck, were sealed. The tubes were placed horizontally on a tray on the roof of the laboratory. The tubes were washed once a week during the entire experiment to remove soot and (or) snow and shaken once a week during the entire year. The temperature range of these tube was estimated to be between -20 and 40 oC. Tubes were removed periodically for analysis.
Duration:
1 yr
Initial conc. measured:
1 mg/L
Dark controls:
yes
Key result
% Degr.:
>= 70 - < 79
Sampling time:
1 yr
Test condition:
outdoor exposure
Rate constant (for indirect photolysis):
0.105 other: month-1
Key result
DT50:
6.6 mo
Test condition:
outdoor conditions
Transformation products:
not specified
Conclusions:
Trichloroethylene (1 mg/l) in water was degraded by 52-56% after one year in the dark and by 70-79% in the presence of sunlight.

Description of key information

Degradation of trichloroethylene in water by photolysis is slow, with a half-life of 201 days (6.6 month)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Half-life in water:
201 d

Additional information

Photolysis is not likely to be a significant removal process for trichloroethylene.

Trichloroethylene (1 mg/l) in water was degraded by 52-56% after one year in the dark and by 70-79% in the presence of sunlight (Dilling et al., 1975).