Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 907-131-0 | CAS number: -
Toxicological Summary
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 50 mg/m³
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- irritation (respiratory tract)
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
No specific toxicology data have been obtained for this reaction mass. The systemic toxicology for this material, however, may be cross-read from structurally overlapping and/or closely related materials such as Tri- and Tetraethylene glycol, which are major parts of this mass, and Polyethylene glycol 200 and 400. The systemic DNEL therefore can be cross-read basically from Tri- and Tetraethyleneglycol.
The reaction mass may, dependend on the supplyer, also contain up to 3% NaOH. In that case the material has to be classified as Skin Corr. 1B and the acute local DNEL of NaOH (2 mg/m 3; US TLV) has to be observed.
The following DNELs were not derived:
Acute systemic inhalation: The reaction mass material needs not to be classified in terms of systemic inhalation toxicity. The LC50 of a related material (Triethylene glycol) was > 5200 mg/m3 (BRRC, 1991). Another related material (PEG 200) showed an LC 50 (6 hrs) of > 2500 mg/m3, the highest feasible concentration (Crook et al., 1981). 500 mg/m3 was the NOAEC in a 9-day inhalation study with TriEG (Ballantyne et al., 2006). There is also no oral toxicity in rats and no significant irritation potential. For TriEG there was a low potential of sensory irritation with an RD 50 in mice of 5140 mg/m3 (Ballantyne et al., 2006). The NaOH content (up to 3%) limits the exposure for acute inhalation. For this case, an acutelocal inhalation DNEL is proposed on the basis of the properties of NaOH considering the US TLV of 2 mg/m3.
Dermal exposure (acute and chronic; local and systemic): No classification for dermal toxicity is warranted. On the other hand, the material may contain up to 3 % NaOH and in that case is to be classified as corrosive. No data are available which allow to propose a firm chronic DNEL for NaOH
Oral exposure: No classification for oral toxicity. The repeated dose toxicity has been investigated in oral (gavage) studies. No pronounced effects were noted with TetraEG in the course of a 28-day study with doses up to 2000 mg/kg bw/day (Schladt et. al., 1998) or in a 90-day study with PEG 400 (Hermansky et al., 1995) up to 5640 mg/kg bw/day and a NOAEL of 1128 mg/kg bw/day. Furthermore, there is no designed oral exposure; the reaction mass is not foreseen for an oral uptake in humans
DNEL- acute, inhalation, local:
Local irritation appears to be the effect which determines a DNEL for chronic exposure (see below). The local DNEL, however, should also be protective from systemic effects and this can be shown by the following consideration: subchronic dietary studies with Triethylene glycol and Tetraethylene glycol and PEG 400 are available. No pronounced effects were noted with TetraEG in the course of a 28 days study (NOAEL probably 2000 mg/kg bw and day; Schladt et al., 1998) nor with PEG 400 in a 90 days study (NOAEL was 1128 mg/kg bw and day; Hermansky et al.,1995) nor with TriEG in a 90 day study (NOAEL 1522 mg/kg bw and day; van Miller and Ballantyne, 2001). If 1128 mg/kg are combined with standard assessment factors (2 for time, 4 for allometric inter-species extrapolation and 5 for intra-species variation; resulting overall assessment factor 40) a virtual oral DNEL of 28 mg/kg bw/day would result. This dose, if distributed into the ambient air of an 8 hrs work-shift, is equivalent to a concentration of approximately 250 mg/m3, an aerosol of very high density. The local DNEL has to take into account a possible 3% NaOH content. For NaOH no chronic DNEL is available, therefore an acute inhalation DNEL for NaOH (2 mg/m3) is proposed on the basis of the US TLV for NaOH.
DNEL- long-term, inhalation, systemic:
TriEG has been investigated in a 9 days inhalation study and a NOAEC of 500 mg/m3 was recorded (Ballantyne et al., 2006). For the structurally related PEG 200 a NOAEC of 1000 mg/m3 has been obtained in a 90 days inahalation study (Crook et al., 1981). A comparison between both study indicates that exposure time does not play a major role and the time extrapolation factor may be kept low. A factor of 3 on the NOAEC in the Ballantyne study should be sufficiently conservative. The interspecies factor is 1 due to the inhalation route employed for these studies. The intrsspecies factor may be limited to 3 for the work place since the local effects are assumed to result from unspecific aerosol exposure without much enzymic involvement and interindividual variation. The resulting total assessment factor of 9 generates a DNEL of 50 mg/m3 /which is also the DNEL of TriEG on a a mg/m3 basis. This values appears to be compatible also with a chemosensory irritation study in which TriEG showed an RD50 in mice of 5140 mg/m3 (Ballantyne et al., 2006). It is pointed out that the pH of this material can be higher than 7 due to an NaOH content of up to 3%; under those conditions the US TLV for NaOH (2 mgm/m3; STEL value) is proposed as an acute DNEL. References: - Ballantyne et al., J.Appl.Toxicol. 26, 387 -396 (2006).- - Ballantyne and Snellings, J.Appl.Toxicol. 27, 291 -299 (2007).- - BRRC, Rep. 53 -139 (1991).- - Crook et al., Chemical Systems Laboratory, Rep.1L62622A554 (1981).- - Hermansky et al., Fd.Chem.Toxicol. 2, 139 -149 (1995).- - Schladt et al., Exp.Toxic.Pathol. 50, 257 -265 (1998).- - Van Miller and Ballantyne, Vet.Human.Toxicol. 43 (2001).
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Additional information - General Population
No DNELs for the general population were proposed since there is no designed exposure of the public to this material.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Route: .live1