Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Data waiving:
study technically not feasible
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Justification for type of information:
According to hydrolysis test results, the hydrolysis rate is estimated to be within 30 minutes. The hydrolysis products have been identified to be ethanol, 2-propanol, acetylacetone and titanium dioxide.
The properties of the target substance would lie in the hydrolysis products.
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Mouse ear swelling test. Substance applied to mouse ear with adjuvant with measure of subsequent swelling used to indicate hypersensitivity.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
mouse ear swelling test
Species:
mouse
Strain:
Swiss
Sex:
male/female
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
No. of animals per dose:
10
Key result
Parameter:
other: ear swelling
Value:
ca. 26.94
Variability:
1.02
Test group / Remarks:
male
Key result
Parameter:
other: ear swelling
Value:
ca. 24.3
Variability:
1.38
Test group / Remarks:
female
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
An ear swelling study was used to examine the skin sensitising potential of ethanol. Ethanol was concluded as not sensitizing under conditions of this study.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

According to hydrolysis test results, the hydrolysis rate is estimated to be within 30 minutes. The hydrolysis products have been identified to be ethanol, 2-propanol, acetylacetone and titanium dioxide.

The properties of the target substance would lie in the hydrolysis products.

Ehtanol, 2 -propanol are classified as non-senstising according to CLP databased.

There is no reliable existing studies on 2,4-PD regarding sensitization. One reliable study indicated not sensitizing (Disseminated dossier, Source: European Chemicals Agency, http: //echa. europa. eu/)

Based on these findings, the target substance was considered not skin sensitizing.  

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

The target substance is not classified as skin sensitizer according to CLP Regulation.