Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1988-04-11 to 1988-04-26
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1988
Report date:
1988

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
1981
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N,N-bis(2-methylpropyl)formamide
EC Number:
219-983-4
EC Name:
N,N-bis(2-methylpropyl)formamide
Cas Number:
2591-76-6
Molecular formula:
C9H19NO
IUPAC Name:
N,N-bis(2-methylpropyl)formamide
Details on test material:
Name of the test substance used in the study report: Diisobutylformamid
- Purity: Please refer to section 1.2 for purity information.

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Vienna White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Gaukler, 6050 Offenbach/Main, Germany
- Weight at study initiation: 2.77
- Housing: Single housing in stainless steel cages with wire mesh walk floors (floor area: 40 cm x 51 cm).
- Diet: Standardized animal laboratory diet (about 130 g/animal/day Kliba 341, Firma Klingentalmuehle AG, 4303 Kaiseraugst, Switzerland)
- Water: About 250 mL tap water/animal/day
- Acclimation period: At least 15 hours before study start
- Animal identification: Ear tattoo

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 20 - 24 °C
- Humidity: 30 - 70 %
- Photoperiod: 12 hours darkness/12 12 hours light

Test system

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: untreated skin of the same animal
Amount / concentration applied:
0.5 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h
Observation period:
8 d
Number of animals:
3 females
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Upper third of the back flanks (2.5 cm x 2.5 cm)
- Type of wrap if used: Test patches were secured in position with a porous dressing (four layers of absorbent gauze and porous bandage)

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: At the end ot the exposure period with lutrol and lutrol/water (1:1)
- Readings: 30 - 60 min after removal of the test patches and 24, 48, 72 h and 8 d after beginning of the study

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
1.2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 8 d
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 8 days
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
0.7
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours

Any other information on results incl. tables

Reading

Animal

Erythema

Edema

Symptoms

1h

1

1

0

 

2

1

0

 

3

1

0

 

24 h

1

2

0

 

2

1

0

 

3

2

0

 

48 h

1

2

0

 

2

1

0

 

3

1

0

 

72 h

1

2

0

S

2

0

0

 

3

0

0

S

8 d

1

0

0

S

2

0

0

 

3

0

0

S

Mean

1

2.0

0.0

 

2

0.7

0.0

 

3

1.0

0.0

 

Mean

 

1.2

0.0

 

S: scaling

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on this results, the test substance is not considered to be irritating to the skin.