Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 219-983-4 | CAS number: 2591-76-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The test substance is not considered irritating to the skin (BASF 1988, 18H0172/882097).
The test substance is considered to cause irreversible damage to the eye (BASF 1988, 11H0172/882139).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1988-04-11 to 1988-04-26
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- 1981
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Gaukler, 6050 Offenbach/Main, Germany
- Weight at study initiation: 2.77
- Housing: Single housing in stainless steel cages with wire mesh walk floors (floor area: 40 cm x 51 cm).
- Diet: Standardized animal laboratory diet (about 130 g/animal/day Kliba 341, Firma Klingentalmuehle AG, 4303 Kaiseraugst, Switzerland)
- Water: About 250 mL tap water/animal/day
- Acclimation period: At least 15 hours before study start
- Animal identification: Ear tattoo
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 20 - 24 °C
- Humidity: 30 - 70 %
- Photoperiod: 12 hours darkness/12 12 hours light - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: untreated skin of the same animal
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 mL
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 h
- Observation period:
- 8 d
- Number of animals:
- 3 females
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Upper third of the back flanks (2.5 cm x 2.5 cm)
- Type of wrap if used: Test patches were secured in position with a porous dressing (four layers of absorbent gauze and porous bandage)
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: At the end ot the exposure period with lutrol and lutrol/water (1:1)
- Readings: 30 - 60 min after removal of the test patches and 24, 48, 72 h and 8 d after beginning of the study - Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1.2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Based on this results, the test substance is not considered to be irritating to the skin.
Reference
Reading |
Animal |
Erythema |
Edema |
Symptoms |
1h |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
24 h |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
48 h |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
72 h |
1 |
2 |
0 |
S |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
S |
|
8 d |
1 |
0 |
0 |
S |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
S |
|
Mean |
1 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
|
2 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
|
|
3 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
Mean |
|
1.2 |
0.0 |
|
S: scaling
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1988-05-16 to 1988-06-27
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Gaukler, 6050 Offenbach/Main, Germany
- Age at study initiation:
- Weight at study initiation (mean): 2.92 kg
- Housing: Singly housing in stainless steel cages with wire mesh walk floors.
- Diet: Standardized animal laboratory diet (ca. 130 g/animal/day Kliba 341, Firma Klingentalmuehle AG, 4303 Kaiseraugstr, Switzerland)
- Water: About 250 mL tap water/animal/day
- Acclimation period: At least 8 days before the beginning of the study
- Animal identification. Ear tattoo
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 20 -24 °C
- Humidity: 30 - 70 %
- Photoperiod: 12 hours dark/ 12 hours light - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: untreated eye of the same animal
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 mL to the conjunctival sac of the right eye
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 21 d
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 males
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- The substance was not washed out - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 d
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1.6
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 d
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 0.9
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 d
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 d
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1.7
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 d
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Based in the effects of the test substance to the cornea, the test substance is regarded as causing irreversible damage to the eye.
Reference
Readings |
Animal |
Cornea |
Iris |
Conjunctiva |
Symptoms |
|||
op |
ar |
red |
sw |
di |
||||
1 h |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
||
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
||
24 h |
1 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
||
3 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
||
48 h |
1 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
PC/RE/S/LC |
2 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
||
3 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
||
72 h |
1 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
PC/RE/S/LC |
2 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
||
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
||
8 days |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
PC/RE/LC/MV |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
||
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
15 days |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
RE/LC/MV |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
||
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
21 days |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
RE/LC/MV |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Mean |
1 |
1.0 |
|
0.3 |
1.7 |
1.0 |
|
|
2 |
1.0 |
|
0.7 |
2.0 |
1.7 |
|
||
3 |
1.0 |
|
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
||
Mean |
|
1.0 |
|
0.3 |
1.6 |
0.9 |
|
|
LC - Loss of corneal tissue
MV - Marginal vascularization of the cornea
PC - Pupil contracted
RE - Small retractions in the eyelids
S - Suppuration
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation:
In a primary dermal irritation study (BASF 1988, 18H0172/882097) according to OECD 404, three female Vienna White rabbits were dermally exposed to 0.5 mL of the unchanged test item. The test substance was applied in a single dose to the clipped upper third of the back or flanks of an experimental animal for 4 hours (2.5 cm x 2.5 cm). At the end of the exposure period the test substance was washed off. Untreated skin areas served as the control. The degree of irritation was observed after 4 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 8 d. For the evaluation of the results, the scheme was converted to the OECD Draize scheme. The test item did not cause edema in the test animals (mean edema score (24, 48, 72 h) = 0). A mean erythema score (24, 48, 72h) of 1.2 was observed, but all effects were fully reversible within 8 days. The highest mean erythema score (24, 48, 72 h) observed in one test animal was 2 (slight redness), the other two test animals showed mean erythema scores of 0.7 and 1. Based on this results, the test substance is not considered to be irritating to the skin.
Eye irritation:
In a primary irritation study (BASF 1988, 11H0172/882139) according to OECD 405, 0.1 mL of the unchanged test item were instilled to the conjunctival sac of the right eye of three male Vienna White rabbits. The left eye served as the untreated control for each rabbit. The test substance was not washed out. The animals were then observed after 1 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 8 d, 15 d and 21 d. For the evaluation of the results, the BASF scheme was converted into the OECD Draize scheme. The highest mean (24. 48, 72 h) iris score observed in one animal was 0.7. 1/3 animals showed a mean (24, 48, 72 h) conjunctivae score of 2 and the maximum mean (24, 48, 72 h) chemosis score determined was 1.7. All these effects were fully reversible within the observation period. 3/3 animals showed a mean (24, 48, 72 h) cornea score of 1 and in one animal this effect was not reversible within 21 days. Based in the effects of the test substance to the cornea, the test substance is regarded as causing irreversible damage to the eye.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion
endpoint:
Only available study for this endpoint performed according to
guideline criteria.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Only available study for this endpoint performed according to
guideline criteria.
Effects on eye irritation: corrosive
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. As a result the substance needs to be classified and labelled as eye irritating cat. 1, H318 "Causes serious eye damage" under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the sixth time in Regulation (EC) No 605/2014.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.