Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Sensitisation data (human)

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sensitisation data (humans)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Published review of the medicinal use of urea.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
[Results and consequences of long-term urea therapy for clinical practice]
Author:
Stuttgen, G.
Year:
1992
Bibliographic source:
Der Hautarzt 43, Suppl 11: 9-12

Materials and methods

Type of sensitisation studied:
skin
Study type:
survey
Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Published review of the medicinal use of urea in skin creams, focussing on dermal irritation and sensitisation
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
: published study

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Urea
EC Number:
200-315-5
EC Name:
Urea
Cas Number:
57-13-6
Molecular formula:
CH4N2O
IUPAC Name:
urea
Details on test material:
Urea formulated into skin cream / ointments for medical use

Method

Type of population:
general
Route of administration:
dermal

Results and discussion

Results of examinations:
The author reviews the experience of the use of urea skin creams in 1905 patients. The acute and long-term medical use of urea for the treatment of dermatitis is not associated with any irritant or sensitisation effects.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Hydrocortisone-urea ointment represented an effective and low-side effect therapy. 84% patients showed very good to good results. No long-term side effects were found and no reports of contact allergy were located. No epidermal or dermal atrophy is reported.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The long-term medical use of urea for the treatment of dermatitis is not associated with any irritant or sensitisation effects.
Executive summary:

The author reviews the experience of the use of urea skin creams in 1905 patients. The acute and long-term medical use of urea for the treatment of dermatitis is not associated with any irritant or sensitisation effects.