Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-535-4 | CAS number: 84-51-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Three Ames tests are available. 2 -Ethylanthraquinone did not induce gene mutations in bacteria in any of these tests. However, 2-ethylanthraquinone induced chromosomal aberrations in cultured cells in an in vitro chromosomal aberration study. Therefore, an in vivo micronucleus test according to OECD TG 474 was conducted.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2001
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The study is described in the SIDS Initial Assessment Report for SIAM 30 which is peer-review by the Japanese government. The study followed OECD TG 471 and was performed under GLP. The Klimisch rating was taken over from the SIDS dossier. However as the full study report and full individual data were not available for full reliability assessment, a Klimisch 2 reliability for this study is proposed in the dossier.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100, E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver, induced with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- -S9 mix; 0, 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 μg/plate(all strains)
+S9 mix; 0, 2.44, 4.88, 9.77, 19.5, 39.1, 78.1, 156 μg/plate(TA100)
+S9 mix; 0, 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 μg/plate(TA1535, TA98, TA1537)
+S9 mix; 0, 39.1, 78.1, 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 μg/plate(WP2 uvrA)
+S9 mix(confirmative test, 1st); 0, 2.44, 4.88, 9.77, 19.5, 39.1, 78.1, 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 μg/plate(TA100)
+S9 mix(confirmative test, 2nd); 0, 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 μg/plate(TA100) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: -S9 mix: 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide (TA100, TA98 and WP2 uvrA), Sodium azide (TA1535) and 9-Aminoacridine hydrochloride (TA1537). +S9 mix: 2-Aminoanthracene (all strains)
- Remarks:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION
pre-incubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes
- Exposure duration: 48 hours
- plate/dose: 3 - Evaluation criteria:
- The chemicals were considered to be mutagenic when a dose-related increase in revertant colony count was observed and the number of revertant colonies per plate with the test substance was more than twice that of the negative control and when a reproducibility of test result was observed.
- Statistics:
- Not conducted
- Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100. E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
2-ethylanthraquinone did not induce gene mutations in bacteria under the conditions of this study. - Executive summary:
Reverse mutation assays using microorganisms (Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli) were conducted to assess the potential of 2-ethylanthraquinone to induce gene mutations. 2-ethylanthraquinone did not induce gene mutations in bacteria under the conditions of this study.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2000
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The study is described in the SIDS Initial Assessment Report for SIAM 30 which is peer-review by the Japanese government. The study followed OECD TG 473 and was performed under GLP. However as the full study report and full individual data were not available for full reliability assessment, a Klimisch 2 reliability for this study is proposed in the dossier.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: CHL cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver, induced with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary Test:
Without S9 mix: 23.8, 39.7, 66.1, 110, 184, 306, 510 µg/mL
With S9 mix: 23.8, 39.7, 66.1, 110, 184, 306, 510, 850, 1417, 2362 µg/mL
Main Test:
Without S9 mix(short-term treatment); 0, 40.0, 80.0, 160, 320, 640 μg/mL
With S9 mix(short-term treatment); 0, 591, 1181, 2362 μg/mL
With S9 mix(short-term treatment, confirmative test); 0, 37.5, 75.0, 150, 300, 600 μg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Without S9: Mitomycin C. With S9: Cyclophosphamide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 6 hours
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colcemid solution
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 plates/dose level
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 per plate (200 per dose level)
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
PREPARATION OF THE CULTURES
Two hours before preparation of chromosome specimens, Colcemid solution was added to stop cell division in metaphase. Then all of the culture medium was transferred to a centrifuge, then the cells were detached from the plate using 0.25 % trypsin solution and added to the culture medium in the centrifuge. The cell suspension was centrifuged for 5 minutes at 1000 r/min and the culture medium was removed, then 5 mL of 75-mmol/L potassium chloride aqueous solution which had been warmed to 37ºC was added and hypotonic treatment was conducted at 37ºC for 16 minutes. The hypotonic solution was removed by centrifugation, and the cells were fixed in fixative (3 volumes of methanol:1 volume of acetic acid) which had been
cooled to 4ºC. The fixative was replaced 3 times, an appropriate amount of new fixative added to make the cell suspension, of which 1-2 drops were placed on a degreased glass slide. The slide specimen was fully dried, then stained for 12 minutes with 1.2 % Giemsa stain diluted with 1/100-mol/L sodium phosphate buffer solution. The slide was gently rinsed with water and dried. - Evaluation criteria:
- Final evaluation was conducted excluding cells having only gaps.
And incidence of abnormal cells of less than 5 % was judged to be negative, 5 % or more to less than 10 % was regarded as equivocal, and 10 % or more with reproducibility or dependence on the dose level of the test substance was judged to be positive. - Statistics:
- The D20 value is the concentration (mg/mL) of the test substance required to induce some kind of abnormality in 20% of metaphases, which was calculated by the least squares method.
- Species / strain:
- other: CHL
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Without S9: 47.4 % survival cells at highest concentration. With S9: tested up to limit concentration.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: Precipitation such as white membrane was observed at the end of exposure to the test substance at all dose levels. Because treatment in the higher dose groups was with suspensions of the test substance, there was residue of white powder of the test substance.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: The concentration of 50% cell growth inhibition was calculated as 161 μg/mL for short-term treatment without S9. In treatment with S9, although a weak inhibition of cell growth was observed, inhibition of 50 % or more was not seen even at the highest dose of 2362 μg/mL (equivalent to 10 mM).
At the end of exposure to the test substance, white membrane was observed at 23.8 μg/mL and more without S9 and at 66.1 μg/mL and more with S9, white powder at 306 μg/mL and more without S9 and at 184 μg/mL and more with S9, and precipitation of white clumps at 306 μg/mL and more with S9. Because treatment in the higher dose groups was with suspensions of the test substance, there was residue of the test substance in the culture medium at 510 μg/mL and more by both treatment methods.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The incidences of chromosome aberrations in the positive control and negative control were both within the range of this center’s historical data, indicating that this study is valid. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
positive
Slight increase in chromosomal aberrations was observed in the test with the short-term treatment (-S9 and +S9). - Executive summary:
In order to investigate the mutagenicity of 2-ethylanthraquinone, specifically the potential to induce chromosome aberrations, an in vitro chromosome aberration test was conducted using Chinese hamster lung fibroblast (CHL) cells. The method used was equivalent to the one described in OECD TG 473.
Based on the results of the cell growth inhibition test, doses that inhibit cell growth in short-term treatment without S9 were examined. For treatment with S9, no dose inhibiting cell growth could be determined and doses up to the limit concentration of 2362 μg/mL, (equivalent to 10 mM) were examined. The results showed induction of polyploid cells in treatment with 2 -ethylanthraquinone without S9, and it was judged to be positive since dose-dependence was also observed. For treatment with S9, very slight induction of structural chromosome aberrations was judged to be equivocal and a confirmatory test was conducted. In the confirmatory test, although the positive criterion of exceeding 10% was not met, reproducibility of the induction of structural chromosome aberrations was observed. The incidences of chromosome aberrations in the positive control and negative control were both within the range of this center’s historical data, indicating that this study is valid.
From these results, 2 -ethylanthraquinone was judged to be positive for induction of chromosome aberrations (numerical aberrations) in cultured mammalian cells under the conditions of this study.
Referenceopen allclose all
See "attached background material"
Short-term Treatment without S9
The incidence of structural chromosome aberrations in the test substance treatment groups was comparable to the negative control. The incidence of polyploid cells was 1.5% at 40.0 μg/mL, 8.0% (±) at 80.0 μg/mL and 10.5% (+) at 160 μg/mL. Dose-dependent inhibition of cell growth was also observed, and the survival rate decreased to 10.1% at 320 μg/mL, and only 171 cells could be observed for chromosome aberrations. The survival rate at the highest dose of 640 μg/mL increased because some of the precipitate floated. Precipitation such as white membrane was observed at the end of exposure to the test substance at all dose levels. Because treatment in the higher dose groups was with suspensions of the test substance, there was residue of white powder of the test substance.
Short-term Treatment with S9
The incidence of structural chromosome aberrations in the test substance treatment groups was 6.5% (±) at 591 μg/mL, 4.5% at 1181 μg/mL and 5.0% (±) at 2362 μg/mL. The incidence of polyploid cells was comparable to the control at all dose levels. Strong inhibition of cell growth due to treatment with the test substance was not observed.
Precipitation such as white membrane was observed at the end of exposure to the test substance at all dose levels. Because treatment in the higher dose groups was with suspensions of the test substance, there was residue of white powder of the test substance.
Confirmatory test
The incidence of structural chromosome aberrations in the test substance treatment groups was 1.0% at 37.5 μg/mL, 3.0% at 75.0 μg/mL, 7.0% (±) at 150 μg/mL, 7.5% (±) at 300 μg/mL and 6.5% (±) at 600 μg/mL. The incidence of polyploid cells was comparable to the control at all dose levels. Strong inhibition of cell growth due to treatment with the test substance was not observed. Although the positive criterion of exceeding 10% was not met, reproducibility of the induction of structural chromosome aberrations was observed.
Precipitation such as white membrane was observed at the end of exposure to the test substance at 75.0 μg/mL or more. Because treatment in the higher dose groups was with suspensions of the test substance, there was residue of white powder of the test substance.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
The ability of the test item to produce damage to chromosomes or aneuploidy when administered to rats was determined in an in vivo mouse micronucleus test.
Under the conditions of the test performed there was no evidence of any significant increases in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in animals dosed with the test item when compared to the vehicle control group and the test item was considered to be non-genotoxic under the conditions of the test.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 02 March 2016 to 25 May 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- Some of the animals in the main study had body weights that marginally exceeded the upper range quoted in the General Study Plan (200g). However, the animals were within the age range quoted and individual dose group weight variation did not exceed 20% of the mean weight. The animals were therefore considered acceptable for use in the study This minor deviation to the GSP was considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity
of the Study. - Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- This minor deviation to the GSP was considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity of the Study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- Some of the animals in the main study had body weights that marginally exceeded the upper range quoted in the General Study Plan (200g). However, the animals were within the age range quoted and individual dose group weight variation did not exceed 20% of the mean weight. The animals were therefore considered acceptable for use in the study.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- This minor deviation to the GSP was considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity of the Study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5395 (In Vivo Mammalian Cytogenetics Tests: Erythrocyte Micronucleus Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- Some of the animals in the main study had body weights that marginally exceeded the upper range quoted in the General Study Plan (200g). However, the animals were within the age range quoted and individual dose group weight variation did not exceed 20% of the mean weight. The animals were therefore considered acceptable for use in the study.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- This minor deviation to the GSP was considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity of the Study.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- endogenous gene animal assay
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: approximately 7 to 12 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 182.6 to 214.4 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Housing: solid-floor polypropylene cages with wood-flake bedding
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Free access to mains food was allowed throughout the study
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Free access to mains drinking water was allowed throughout the study
- Acclimation period: minimum acclimatisation period of five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 to 25ºC
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr): fifteen changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): twelve hours light and twelve hours darkness
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Details on exposure:
- Groups, each of five rats, were dosed twice at time 0 and 24 hours via the oral route with the test item at 400, 200 or 100 mg/kg.
Two further groups of rats were included in the study; one group (five rats) was dosed via the oral route with the vehicle alone (arachis oil) and a second group (five rats) was dosed orally with cyclophosphamide. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- 0 and 24 hours
- Post exposure period:
- 48 hours
- Dose / conc.:
- 400 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone Marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Immediately following termination, both femurs were dissected from each animal and bone marrow smears prepared following centrifugation and re-suspension. The smears were air-dried, fixed in absolute methanol, stained, allowed to air-dry and a cover slip applied using mounting medium.
- Evaluation criteria:
- Comparison was made between the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes occurring in each of the test item groups and the number occurring in the vehicle control group.
A positive mutagenic response is demonstrated when a statistically significant, dose-responsive, toxicologically relevant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes is observed for either the 24 or 48-hour kill times when compared to the vehicle control group.
If these criteria were not fulfilled, then the test item was considered to be non-genotoxic under the conditions of the test.
A positive response for bone marrow toxicity was demonstrated when the dose group mean polychromatic to normochromatic ratio was shown to be statistically significantly lower than the vehicle control group. - Statistics:
- The data was analysed following a transformation using Student's t-test (two tailed) and any significant results were confirmed using the one way analysis of variance.
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- See Table 1.
- Conclusions:
- The test item was considered to be non-genotoxic under the conditions of the test.
- Executive summary:
The ability of the test item to produce damage to chromosomes or aneuploidy when administered to rats was performed according to OECD TG 474.
The micronucleus test was performed with only male rats using the oral route. Groups of five rats were treated at the maximum tolerated dose of 400 mg/kg, with 200 and 100 mg/kg as the two lower dose levels and using arachis oil as the vehicle. Animals were dosed twice at time 0 and 24 hours. Bone marrow was extracted and smear preparations were made and stained. Polychromatic (PCE) and normochromatic (NCE) erythrocytes were scored for the presence of micronuclei and PCE/NCE ratio was calculated as an indicator for toxicity.
There was no evidence of any significant increases in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in animals dosed with the test item when compared to the vehicle control group and the test item was considered to be non-genotoxic under the conditions of the test.
Reference
Table 1 Micronucleus Test–Summary of Group Mean Data
Treatment Group | Number of PCE with Micronuclei per 4000 PCE | PCE/NCE Ratio | ||
Group Mean | SD | Group Mean | SD | |
Vehicle Control 10 ml/kg 48-hour Sampling Time |
5.0 | 3.2 | 2.31 | 0.81 |
Positive Control 25 mg/kg 24-hour Sampling Time |
61.0*** | 16.9 | 1.78 | 1.27 |
2-Ethylanthraquinone (CAS No. 84-51-5) 400 mg/kg 48-hour Sampling Time |
2.4 | 2.5 | 1.25* | 0.23 |
2-Ethylanthraquinone (CAS No. 84-51-5) 200 mg/kg 48-hour Sampling Time |
4.8 | 1.6 | 1.02** | 0.20 |
2-Ethylanthraquinone (CAS No. 84-51-5) 100 mg/kg 48-hour Sampling Time |
4.8 | 1.3 | 1.53 | 0.45 |
PCE |
= |
Polychromaticerythrocytes |
NCE |
= |
Normochromaticerythrocytes |
SD |
= |
Standard deviation |
* |
= |
P<0.05 |
** |
= |
P<0.01 |
*** |
= |
P<0.001 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Additional information from genetic toxicity in vitro:
Three Ames tests and one in vitro chromosomal aberration test using Chinese hamster cells (CHL/IU) are available to assess the genotoxic potential of 2-ethylanthraquinone.
In vitro bacterial tests
In the OECD SIDS report, in vitro reverse mutation assays using tester strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and WP2 uvr A are described that were performed in accordance with OECD TG 471 and under GLP. The study is rated as Klimisch 2 in the present dossier due to the fact that the full report is not available to the registrant. However, the Japanese Ministry for Foreign Affairs evaluated the corresponding study as reliable without restrictions. The in vitro studies with Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli showed that the substance did not induce gene mutations in bacteria under the conditions of the studies.
Scheres (1991) tested the substance in the Salmonella/microsome plate test up to 3330 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Only 4 strains were tested instead of 5 as requested by OECD TG 471, adopted on July 21, 1997 (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100). The test substance did not induce a dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains. These results were confirmed in a repeated, independent experiment. The test substance can be considered as not mutagenic in this test system in the absence and presence of a metabolic activation system.
Cascieri (1978) performed a Salmonella plate incorporation mutagenesis assay using five tester strains - TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538 - with and without metabolic activation by rat liver microsomes. The experimental protocol followed by Cascieri (1978) is a modification of the techniques described by Ames (1975). The test substance in this in vitro assay did not cause a significant increase in the reversion index of any of the tester strains with or without metabolic activation.
In vitro mammalian cell test
In the OECD SIDS report, an in vitro chromosomal aberration test using cultured Chinese hamster cells (CHL/IU) is described. The study is rated as Klimisch 2 in the present dossier due to the fact that the full study report was not available to the registrant. However, the Japanese Ministry of Foreign affairs evaluated the study as reliable without restriction. The chromosomal aberration test followed OECD TG 473 and was performed under GLP. 2-ethylanthraquinone was tested in the absence and presence of the metabolic activation S9-mix and induced chromosomal aberrations in cultured cells under the conditions of this study.
In vivo micronucleus test
An in vivo micronucleus assay was performed according to OECD TG 474. The study is rated Klimisch 1. In this study, carried out on Wistar rats, there was no evidence of any significant increases in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in animals dosed with the test item when compared to the vehicle control group and the test item was considered to be non-genotoxic under the conditions of the test.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
Slight increase in chromosomal aberrations were observed in the
selected in vitro study. All other in vitro studies on genotoxicity gave
negative results.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test item did not induce gene mutations in bacteria in any of three Ames tests. Although chromosomal aberrations in cultured cells were seen in an in vitro chromosomal aberration study, the test item gives a negative repsonse in an in vivo cytogenicity study. According to table R.7.7 -1.10 of ECHA Endpoint Specific Guidance Chapter 7., the negative result in an in vivo cytogenicity study indicates that the test item is not genotoxic and no further testing is required.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.