Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-245-8 | CAS number: 80-05-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- not detailed
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with national standard methods
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA-600/9-78-018
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Bisphenol A with a purity of 99.93 %.
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- The test alga, Selenastrum capricornutum Printz, is a freshwater, unicellular, green algae (Chlorophaceae) of the order Chlorococcales. The culture was obtained from the Environmental Research Laboratory - U.S. EPA, Corvallis, Oregon and received December31, 1979. The algal stock culture was maintained by means of weekly aseptic transfers to fresh sterile algal assay medium. Old cultures were diluted approximately 1:400 (e.g. 0.5 mL of old culture in 200 mL fresh medium).
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Hardness:
- no data provided
- Test temperature:
- no data provided
- pH:
- no data provided
- Dissolved oxygen:
- no data provided
- Salinity:
- no data provided
- Conductivity:
- no data provided
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal Test Concentration of 0 (control), 0.78, 1.30, 2.16, 3.60, 6.00, and 10.0 mg/L, corresponded to analyzed test concentrations of ND (0.05)+/-0.00, 0.69+/-0.02, 1.17+/-0.10, 1.99+/-0.16, 3.41+/-0.13, 5.86+/-0.11, and 9.74+/-0.06 mg/L.
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 1.41 mg/L
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Key result
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 3.1 mg/L
- Basis for effect:
- other: cell volume
- Key result
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 2.73 mg/L
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- cell count
- Key result
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 1.36 mg/L
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- cell count and cell volume
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- The EC10 was delineated in the EU Risk Assessment Report of BPA, 2008, not in the study report.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- No positive control used.
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Percent inhibition values and log10 of the concentration were used to estimate the EC50 concentration values, using non-linear interpolation between the two concentrations which bracketed the 50 percent inhibition response. Unweighted replicate means of 96 hour cell count and total cell volume data were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance procedure. The Dunnett's one-tailed t-test was used to compare treatment means to control means at a = 0.05.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The study followed a validated test method and was GLP documented. The toxicity of Bisphenol A to, the freshwater green algae, Selenastrum capricornutum Printz was determined. The EC50 values are based on 50% inhibition of' cell count and total cell volume compared to the controls. The 96 hour EC50 values based on cell count and total cell volume using analyzed test concentrations were 2.73 mg/L and 3.10 mg/L. Bisphenol A, respectively. Algal growth was inhibited at concentrations of 1.99 mg/L and higher. Therefore, this study is considered relevant and reliable for regulatory purposes. Based on the dose-response data reported by the authors, a robust EC10 was calculated using the Trap software, which was determined to be 1.41 mg/l. This EC10 is considered to be valid and robust and was thus used for evaluation under the SSD approach. EC10 values were derived in accordance with Moermond et al. (2016) and ECHA (2008).
- Executive summary:
The acute toxicity to the planktonic alga Selenastrum capricornutum was determined in a 4 day growth test using a validated test system and GLP documentation. Nominal concentrations ranged from 0 to 1000 mg/L and as BPA concentrations were stable results are expressed as nominal concentrations. Flasks containing 100 mg/L and greater were excluded from the assessment due to a complete loss of algae in the test system. Cell number in the 1.0, 2.2, 4.6, 10, 22, and 46 mg/L nominal test concentration flasks, reported as a % of mean control cell number on day 4 were 91, 50, 26, 1, 0, and 0, respectively. The 96 hr EC50, based on cell counts on day 4 was calculated to be 2.5 mg/L (95 % confidence limits 2.2 - 2.8 mg/L). The study is considered sufficiently valid to be ranked as Klimisch 1 and adequate to be used for regulatory purposes. Based on the dose-response data reported by the authors, a robust EC10 was calculated using the Trap software, which was determined to be 1.41 mg/l. This EC10 is considered to be valid and robust and was thus used for evaluation under the SSD approach. For the purpose of developing a SSD in support of PNEC setting, the toxicity values for the most sensitive endpoint are selected. The toxicity values are determined on the basis of the geometric mean if more than one value for the same endpoint and exposure time is available. EC10 values were derived in accordance with Moermond et al. (2016) and ECHA (2008).
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA-560/6-82-002
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- Skeletonema costatum
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- saltwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1.1 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- other: cell count and relative fluorescence (measure of chlorophyll a)
- Remarks on result:
- other: The EC50 in the original study was 1.0 mg/L. In the EU risk assessment report 2003 the data was statistically re-evaluated based on more appropriate statistical methods and the EC50 was determined to be 1.1 mg/L.
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1.4 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- other: chlorophyll A inhibition
- Remarks on result:
- other: The EC50 in the original study was 1.0 mg/L. In the EU risk assessment report 2003 the data was statistically re-evaluated based on more appropriate statistical methods and the EC50 was determined to be 1.4 mg/L.
- Key result
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 0.4 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- cell number
- Remarks on result:
- other: In the EU risk assessment report 2003 the data was statistically re-evaluated and additionally an EC10 of 0.4 mg/L was derived.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Based on the analysed concentration and the observed effects, the EC50s for cell count inhibition and chlorophyll A inhibition, calculated by probit analysis, were 1.1 mg/L and 1.4 mg/L, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The marine algae Skeletonema costatum was tested in a 96-h test with nominal concentrations of Bisphenol A of 0, 0.72, 1.1, 1.9, 3.2, 5.4, 9.0, and 15 mg/L. These corresponded to analysed test concentrations of 0, 0.66, 1.1, 1.6, 2.8, 5.2, 8.8, and 15 mg/L, respectively. At the end of the exposure, chlorophyll A concentration and cell counts were significantly reduced at all Bisphenol A test concentrations. Based on the analysed concentration and the observed effects, the EC50s for cell count inhibition and chlorophyll A inhibition, calculated by probit analysis, were 1.1 mg/L and 1.4 mg/L, respectively.
Referenceopen allclose all
The 96-hr EC50 for cell count was 2.73 mg/L and the 96-hr EC50 for total cell volume was 3.10 mg/L.
Nominal Test Concentrations were Control, 0.72, 1.1, 1.9, 3.2, 5.4, 9.0, and 15 mg/L which corresponded to analysed test concentrations of 0.66, 1.1, 1.6, 2.8, 5.2, 8.8, and 15 mg/L. Test concentrations were found to be stable over the course of the study and the blind tests showed that satisfactory control over the accuracy and precision of the Bisphenol A concentration measurements were achieved. Chlorophyll A concentration and cell counts were significantly reduced at all Bisphenol A test concentrations. Based on the analysed concentration and the observed effects, the EC50s for cell count inhibition and chlorophyll A inhibition, calculated by probit analysis, were 1.1 mg/L and 1.4 mg/L, respectively.
Description of key information
- Stephenson, 1983, reports an EC50 of 2.5 mg/L based on growth rate in a study conducted according to test method E09-04 with the fresh water species Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata.
- Liu et al., 2010, report an EC50 of 3.73 mg/L based on growth rate in a study performed similar to OECD 201 with the marine species Navicula incerta.
There are two key studies for exposure of algae to Bisphenol A (both rated Klimisch 1, i.e., reliable without restriction) for both compartments, freshwater and marine water. The key study by Alexander et al. (1985; published in Alexander 1988) which was conducted in accordance with EPA-600/9-78-018 test method reported the 96-h EC50 value of 2.73 mg/L for the freshwater algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata based on cell count. Furthermore, an EC10 of 1.36 mg/L was derived for this study. This was further cemented by data from van Sprang et al. (2022), who calculated an EC10 value of 1.41 mg/L for the data set as reported by Alexander et al based on the dose-response data. The other key study conducted by Suprenant (1985; published as Alexander et al., 1988) was performed on marine Skeletonema costatum following test method EPA 560/6-82-002. At the end of the exposure, chlorophyll A concentration and cell counts were significantly reduced at all Bisphenol A test concentrations. Based on the analysed concentration and the observed effects, the EC50s for cell count and chlorophyll A content, calculated by probit analysis (re-analysed by the UK rapporteur in the EU Risk Assessment update in 2008 in accordance with the OECD Guideline), were 1.1 mg/L and 1.4 mg/L, respectively. The 96-hr EC10 for the most sensitive endpoint, cell count, was calculated by probit analysis to be 0.4 mg/L.
Furthermore, there are two Klimisch 2 studies with algae, which support the Klimisch 1 studies.
Concluding, the lowest EC50 of 2.73 mg/L and EC10 of 1.41 mg/L for fresh water algae was reported in Alexander et al., 1985. The lowest EC50 of 1.1 mg/L and the lowest EC10 of 0.4 mg/L for marine water was reported in Suprenant, 1985.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 2.73 mg/L
- EC50 for marine water algae:
- 1.1 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 1.41 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for marine water algae:
- 0.4 mg/L
Additional information
There are two key studies for exposure of algae to Bisphenol A (both assigned to Reliability 1, i.e. reliable without restriction) for both compartments, freshwater and marine water.
The freshwater algae, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (formerly known as Selenastrum capricornutum), was exposed for 96 h to nominal concentrations of Bisphenol A of 0, 0.78, 1.30, 2.16, 3.6, 6.0, and 10.0 mg/L (Alexander et al., 1985; published in Alexander et al., 1988). These corresponded to mean measured concentrations of 0, 0.69, 1.17, 1.99, 3.41, 5.86, and 9.74 mg/L, respectively. The 96-h EC50 for cell count was 2.73 mg/L and the 96-h EC50 for total cell volume was 3.10 mg/L. The EC10 for the most sensitive endpoint, cell count, was calculated by probit analysis to be 1.36 mg/L.
The marine diatom, Skeletonema costatum, was exposed for 96 h to nominal concentrations of Bisphenol A of 0, 0.72, 1.1, 1.9, 3.2, 5.4, 9.0, and 15 mg/L (Suprenant, 1985c; published as Alexander, 1988). These corresponded to analysed test concentrations of 0, 0.66, 1.1, 1.6, 2.8, 5.2, 8.8, and 15 mg/L, respectively. At the end of the exposure, chlorophyll A concentration and cell counts were significantly reduced at all Bisphenol A test concentrations. Based on the analysed concentration and the observed effects, the EC50s for cell count and chlorophyll A content, calculated by probit analysis, were 1.1 mg/L and 1.4 mg/L, respectively. The 96-hr EC10 for the most sensitive endpoint, cell count, was calculated by probit analysis to be 0.4 mg/L.
Two supporting studies rated as Klimisch 2 (reliable with restrictions) were identified (Stephenson et al., 1983; Liu et al, 2010). The study by Stephenson et al. was conducted in accordance with E09-04 test method with freshwater algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and determined an EC50 of 2.5 mg/L. Liu et al. used a method similar to OECD 201 on the marine Navicula incerta and determined an EC50 of 3.73 mg/L based on growth rate.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.