Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-805-4 | CAS number: 99-97-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The study study contains experimental data of the registered substance.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 022
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test using the Hprt and xprt genes)
- Version / remarks:
- Adopted: July 29 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the Hprt and xprt genes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine
- EC Number:
- 202-805-4
- EC Name:
- N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine
- Cas Number:
- 99-97-8
- Molecular formula:
- C9H13N
- IUPAC Name:
- N,N,4-trimethylaniline
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Appearance: Clear light yellow colour oily liquid
Batch/ Lot Number: DMPT/22/10
Purity: 99.86%
Manufactured by: Industrial Solvents and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
Manufacturing date: February 2022
Expiry Date: January 2024
Storage condition: Room Temperature (20 to 30oC)
Method
- Target gene:
- Hprt gene
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Cofactor-supplemented S9 liver microsomal fraction obtained from phenobarbital and β-naphthoflavone-injected rat.
The composition of S9 mix:
Glucose-6-phosphate (180 mg/ml): 1 ml
NADP (25 mg/ml): 1 ml
Potassium chloride (150 mM): 1 ml
S9 Fraction: 20ml
Final Volume: 5 ml
S9 Mix: 40 %
A volume of 2.5 ml S9 cofactor mix (40%) was added to 100 ml of culture medium to achieve 1 % v/v S9 in the culture medium. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Test concentrations: 0 (NC), 0 (VC), 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1 mg/ml
Justification:
Test concentrations were selected based on the solubility, precipitation and pH checks and a preliminary cytotoxicity test. In the pre-test, CHO cells were exposed to the following test substance concentrations: 0 (NC), 0 (VC), 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/ml with and without S9 metabolic activation.Complete cytotoxicity was observed at the highest tested concentration, i.e. 2 mg/ml, both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation. At 1 mg/ml, the relative survival values were 15.49% and 13.79% in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation, respectively. Therefore, the main study was performed with the following test substance concentrations: 0 (NC), 0 (VC), 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/ml and without metabolic activation. - Vehicle / solvent:
- Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Distilled water
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration (single, duplicate, triplicate): Triplicates were used.
- Number of independent experiments: One
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): 10 × 106 cells /flask
- Test substance added in medium; in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation; in suspension; as impregnation on paper disk: In medium; 5 ml of treatment media (RPMI 1640 media and 150 mM potassium chloride) and 50 µl of negative/vehicle/Test Item formulation/positive control were added to each respective flask.
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period, if applicable: NA
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment:4 hrs
- Harvest time after the end of treatment (sampling/recovery times): Expression period: 8 days, growing on selective medium: 8 days
FOR GENE MUTATION:
- Expression time (cells in growth medium between treatment and selection): 8 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selective agent): 8 hrs
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 16 days
- Method used: agar or microwell plates for the mouse lymphoma assay.
- If a selective agent is used (e.g., 6-thioguanine or trifluorothymidine), indicate its identity, its concentration and, duration and period of cell exposure: 2x105cells / 10 ml of cloning media were seeded in the presence of 10 µg/ml of 6-thioguanine (6TG) in triplicate and incubated at 37±2 °C, 5 % CO2 in a CO2 incubator for 8 days for mutation frequency (MF) determination.
- Number of cells seeded and method to enumerate numbers of viable and mutants cells:
- Criteria for small (slow growing) and large (fast growing) colonies:
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method, e.g.: background growth inhibition; mitotic index (MI); relative population doubling (RPD); relative increase in cell count (RICC); replication index; cytokinesis-block proliferation index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth (RTG); relative survival (RS); other: Cytotoxicity was determined by the calculation of Relative survival (RS)
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity:
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICIY: Mutation Frequency (MF) was determined. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test chemical was considered to be clearly positive if:
a) at least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control,
b) the increase is concentration-related when evaluated with an appropriate trend test,
c) any of the results were outside the distribution of the laboratory negative control data.
When all of these criteria were met, the test chemical was then considered able to induce gene mutations in cultured mammalian cells in this test system.
The test chemical was considered clearly negative if:
a) none of the test concentrations exhibits a significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control,
b) all results are inside the distribution of the laboratory negative control data.
The test chemical was then considered unable to induce gene mutations in cultured mammalian cells in this test system. - Statistics:
- Statistical analysis was performed to assess a possible dose-dependent increase of mutation frequency using Fisher’s Exact Test (NCSS statistics software). The mutation frequency of the Test Item-treated group was compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Solubility and precipitation checks: The Substance was soluble up to 200 mg/ml in dimethyl sulfoxide. No precipitation was observed at the tested concentration of 200 mg/ml.
pH check: The pH values at the highest concentration of the Test Item in the medium were as follows:
Test Item
Concentration pH
0 hour 4th hour
R1 R2 Mean SD R1 R2 Mean SD
0 mg/ml 7.4 7.4 7.4 0.00 7.4 7.4 7.4 0.00
2 mg/ml 7.4 7.4 7.4 0.00 7.4 7.4 7.4 0.00
Preliminary cytotoxicity test: In the pre-test, CHO cells were exposed to the following test substance concentrations: 0 (NC), 0 (VC), 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/ml with and without S9 metabolic activation.Complete cytotoxicity was observed at the highest tested concentration, i.e. 2 mg/ml, both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation. At 1 mg/ml, the relative survival values were 15.49% and 13.79% in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation, respectively. Therefore, the main study was performed with the following test substance concentrations: 0 (NC), 0 (VC), 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/ml and without metabolic activation. - Remarks on result:
- other: Non-mutagenic
Any other information on results incl. tables
Appendix 1: Relative Survival – Preliminary Cytotoxicity Assay: Absence of metabolic activation
Dose level | Concentration | No. of Cells | No. of colonies | Mean Colony count | No. of cells seeded | CE | Adjusted CE | RS | |||
Before | After | R1 | R2 | R3 | |||||||
NC | Distilled water | 20000000 | 23660000 | 242 | 228 | 265 | 245.00 | 100 | 2.450 | 2.898 | 100.00 |
VC | Dimethyl sulfoxide | 20000000 | 23420000 | 232 | 232 | 240 | 234.67 | 100 | 2.347 | 2.748 | 94.81 |
T1 | 0.125 mg/ml | 20000000 | 22400000 | 218 | 214 | 210 | 214.00 | 100 | 2.140 | 2.397 | 87.22 |
T2 | 0.25 mg/ml | 20000000 | 21800000 | 205 | 211 | 201 | 205.67 | 100 | 2.057 | 2.242 | 81.58 |
T3 | 0.5 mg/ml | 20000000 | 20400000 | 168 | 174 | 171 | 171.00 | 100 | 1.710 | 1.744 | 63.47 |
T4 | 1 mg/ml | 20000000 | 18640000 | 51 | 41 | 45 | 45.67 | 100 | 0.457 | 0.426 | 15.49 |
T5 | 2 mg/ml | 20000000 | 11200000 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.67 | 100 | 0.007 | 0.004 | 0.14 |
Key: NC = Negative Control, VC = Vehicle Control, T5 - T1= Test Item concentration from higher to lower, R = Replicate, CE = Cloning Efficiency, RS = Relative Survival, mg = milligram, ml = milliliter.
Appendix 2: Relative Survival – Preliminary Cytotoxicity Assay: Presence of metabolic activation
Dose level | Concentration | No. of Cells | No. of colonies | Mean Colony count | No. of cells seeded | CE | Adjusted CE | RS | |||
Before | After | R1 | R2 | R3 | |||||||
NC | Distilled water | 20000000 | 23400000 | 235 | 242 | 230 | 235.67 | 100 | 2.357 | 2.757 | 100.00 |
VC | Distilled water | 20000000 | 23160000 | 233 | 228 | 231 | 230.67 | 100 | 2.307 | 2.671 | 96.87 |
T1 | 0.125 mg/ml | 20000000 | 22600000 | 204 | 196 | 208 | 202.67 | 100 | 2.027 | 2.290 | 85.74 |
T2 | 0.25 mg/ml | 20000000 | 21460000 | 196 | 201 | 188 | 195.00 | 100 | 1.950 | 2.092 | 78.33 |
T3 | 0.5 mg/ml | 20000000 | 19840000 | 155 | 161 | 168 | 161.33 | 100 | 1.613 | 1.600 | 59.92 |
T4 | 1 mg/ml | 20000000 | 18120000 | 45 | 41 | 36 | 40.67 | 100 | 0.407 | 0.368 | 13.79 |
T5 | 2 mg/ml | 20000000 | 9840000 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.33 | 100 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.06 |
Appendix 3: Relative Survival – Main Study: Absence of metabolic activation
Dose level | Concentration | No. of Cells | No. of colonies | Mean Colony count | No. of cells seeded | CE | Adjusted CE | RS | |||
Before | After | R1 | R2 | R3 | |||||||
NC | Distilled water | 20000000 | 23600000 | 226 | 235 | 230 | 230.33 | 100 | 2.303 | 2.718 | 100.00 |
VC | Dimethyl sulfoxide | 20000000 | 22800000 | 225 | 231 | 228 | 228.00 | 100 | 2.280 | 2.599 | 95.63 |
T1 | 0.125 mg/ml | 20000000 | 21420000 | 214 | 224 | 214 | 217.33 | 100 | 2.173 | 2.328 | 89.55 |
T2 | 0.25 mg/ml | 20000000 | 21420000 | 205 | 205 | 186 | 198.67 | 100 | 1.987 | 2.128 | 81.86 |
T3 | 0.5 mg/ml | 20000000 | 20800000 | 165 | 162 | 155 | 160.67 | 100 | 1.607 | 1.671 | 64.29 |
T4 | 1 mg/ml | 20000000 | 16620000 | 51 | 54 | 49 | 51.33 | 100 | 0.513 | 0.427 | 16.41 |
PC | 400 µg/ml | 20000000 | 19880000 | 225 | 236 | 231 | 230.67 | 100 | 2.307 | 2.293 | 88.21 |
Appendix 4: Relative Survival – Main Study: Presence of metabolic activation
Dose level | Concentration | No. of Cells | No. of colonies | Mean Colony count | No. of cells seeded | CE | Adjusted CE | RS | |||
Before | After | R1 | R2 | R3 | |||||||
NC | Distilled water | 20000000 | 23820000 | 233 | 225 | 242 | 233.33 | 100 | 2.333 | 2.779 | 100.00 |
VC | Dimethyl sulfoxide | 20000000 | 23280000 | 231 | 228 | 230 | 229.67 | 100 | 2.297 | 2.673 | 96.20 |
T1 | 0.125 mg/ml | 20000000 | 21620000 | 211 | 215 | 209 | 211.67 | 100 | 2.117 | 2.288 | 85.59 |
T2 | 0.25 mg/ml | 20000000 | 20880000 | 204 | 205 | 196 | 201.67 | 100 | 2.017 | 2.105 | 78.76 |
T3 | 0.5 mg/ml | 20000000 | 18820000 | 170 | 158 | 162 | 163.33 | 100 | 1.633 | 1.537 | 57.49 |
T4 | 1 mg/ml | 20000000 | 16280000 | 41 | 45 | 55 | 47.00 | 100 | 0.470 | 0.383 | 14.31 |
PC | 30 µg/ml | 20000000 | 19620000 | 228 | 217 | 226 | 223.67 | 100 | 2.237 | 2.194 | 82.08 |
Appendix 5: Cloning Efficiency (Non-selective medium) Main Study: Absence of metabolic activation
Dose level | Non Selective medium | ||||||
Concentration | No. of cells seeded | No. of colonies | Mean No. of colonies | CE | |||
R1 | R2 | R3 | |||||
NC | Distilled water | 100 | 211 | 208 | 199 | 206 | 2.06 |
VC | Dimethyl sulfoxide | 100 | 202 | 189 | 194 | 195 | 1.95 |
T1 | 0.125 mg/ml | 100 | 184 | 188 | 191 | 188 | 1.88 |
T2 | 0.25 mg/ml | 100 | 174 | 169 | 184 | 176 | 1.76 |
T3 | 0.5 mg/ml | 100 | 168 | 180 | 168 | 172 | 1.72 |
T4 | 1 mg/ml | 100 | 166 | 168 | 165 | 166 | 1.66 |
PC | 400 µg/ml | 100 | 172 | 158 | 162 | 164 | 1.64 |
Appendix 6: Cloning Efficiency (Non-selective medium) Main Study: Presence of metabolic activation
Dose level | Non Selective medium | ||||||
Concentration | No. of cells seeded | No. of colonies | Mean No. of colonies | CE | |||
R1 | R2 | R3 | |||||
NC | Distilled water | 100 | 211 | 205 | 209 | 208 | 2.08 |
VC | Dimethyl sulfoxide | 100 | 196 | 191 | 201 | 196 | 1.96 |
T1 | 0.125 mg/ml | 100 | 196 | 211 | 210 | 206 | 2.06 |
T2 | 0.25 mg/ml | 100 | 189 | 194 | 193 | 192 | 1.92 |
T3 | 0.5 mg/ml | 100 | 178 | 168 | 178 | 175 | 1.75 |
T4 | 1 mg/ml | 100 | 162 | 174 | 160 | 165 | 1.65 |
PC | 30 µg/ml | 100 | 180 | 175 | 193 | 183 | 1.83 |
Appendix 7: Cloning Efficiency (Selective medium): Absence of metabolic activation
Dose level | Selective medium | ||||||
Concentration | No. of cells seeded | No. of colonies | Mean No. of colonies | CE | |||
R1 | R2 | R3 | |||||
NC | Distilled water | 200000 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3.33 | 0.00001667 |
VC | Dimethyl sulfoxide | 200000 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3.33 | 0.00001667 |
T1 | 0.125 mg/ml | 200000 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3.33 | 0.00001667 |
T2 | 0.25 mg/ml | 200000 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3.33 | 0.00001667 |
T3 | 0.5 mg/ml | 200000 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4.33 | 0.00002167 |
T4 | 1 mg/ml | 200000 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3.67 | 0.00001833 |
PC | 400 µg/ml | 200000 | 86 | 80 | 74 | 80.00 | 0.00040000 |
Appendix 8: Cloning Efficiency (Selective medium) Phase I: Presence of metabolic activation
Dose level | Selective medium |
| |||||
Concentration | No. of cells seeded | No. of colonies | Mean No. of colonies | CE | |||
R1 | R2 | R3 | |||||
NC | Distilled water | 200000 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3.67 | 0.00001833 |
VC | Dimethyl sulfoxide | 200000 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3.00 | 0.00001500 |
T1 | 0.125 mg/ml | 200000 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3.33 | 0.00001667 |
T2 | 0.25 mg/ml | 200000 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 0.00001500 |
T3 | 0.5 mg/ml | 200000 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | 0.00002000 |
T4 | 1 mg/ml | 200000 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4.33 | 0.00002167 |
PC | 30 µg/ml | 200000 | 92 | 84 | 96 | 90.67 | 0.00045333 |
Appendix 9: Mutation Frequency: Absence of metabolic activation
Dose level | Absence of metabolic activation | ||
Concentration | Mutation Frequency | MF x 10-6 | |
NC | Distilled water | 0.00000809 | 8.09 |
VC | Dimethyl sulfoxide | 0.00000855 | 8.55 |
T1 | 0.125 mg/ml | 0.00000888 | 8.88 |
T2 | 0.25 mg/ml | 0.00000949 | 9.49 |
T3 | 0.5 mg/ml | 0.00001260 | 12.60 |
T4 | 1 mg/ml | 0.00001102 | 11.02 |
PC | 400 µg/ml* | 0.00024390 | 243.90 |
Dose level | Presence of metabolic activation | ||
Concentration | Mutation Frequency | MF x 10-6 | |
NC | Distilled water | 0.00000880 | 8.80 |
VC | Dimethyl sulfoxide | 0.00000765 | 7.65 |
T1 | 0.125 mg/ml | 0.00000810 | 8.10 |
T2 | 0.25 mg/ml | 0.00000781 | 7.81 |
T3 | 0.5 mg/ml | 0.00001145 | 11.45 |
T4 | 1 mg/ml | 0.00001310 | 13.10 |
PC | 30 µg/ml* | 0.00024818 | 248.18 |
Key: NC = Negative Control, VC = Vehicle Control, PC = Positive Control (Absence of metabolic activation- Ethylmethanesulfonate, Presence of metabolic activation- Benzo[a]pyrene), T4-T1= Test item concentration from higher to lower, MF = Mutation Frequency, mg = milligram, µg =microgram, ml = milliliter, * = Stastically significant increse in mutation frequency.
Annexure 3: Historical Control Data
Mutation Frequency (10-6) | NC | VC | PC | |||
-S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | |
Mean | 7.08 | 6.97 | 7.71 | 7.92 | 222.00 | 229.09 |
SD | 0.72 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 16.65 | 12.33 |
Min | 6.09 | 6.02 | 6.35 | 6.51 | 197.57 | 209.32 |
Max | 8.21 | 8.43 | 8.9 | 8.7 | 236.11 | 242.6 |
Key: - NC = Negative Control (Distilled water), VC = Vehicle Control (Dimethyl sulfoxide), PC = Positive Control (Absence of metabolic activation- Ethylmethanesulfonate, Presence of metabolic activation- Benzo[a]pyrene), SD = Standard Deviation,Min = Minimum, Max = Maximum, - S9 = Absence of metabolic activation, +S9 = Presence of metabolic activation. Number of studies = 09.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The registered substance, 4-Dimethylaminotoluene (CAS number: 99-97-8), tested non-mutagenic (negative) in cultured Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells both in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
The potential of 4-Dimethylaminotoluene (CAS number: 99-97-8) to induce gene mutation at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (Hprt) locus in cultured Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells was tested in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and according to OECD TG 476. Cofactor-supplemented liver S9 microsomal fraction, derived from phenobarbital and β-naphthoflavone-injected rat, were used. Dimethyl sulfoxide was used as a vehicle for the test substance. The cytotoxicity of the test substance was assessed in a preliminary cytotoxicity assay. In this pre-test, CHO cells were exposed to the following test substance concentrations: 0 (NC), 0 (VC), 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/ml with and without S9 metabolic activation. Cytotoxicity was determined by the calculation of Relative survival (RS). Complete cytotoxicity was observed at 2 mg/ml in the absence and presence of metabolic activation. At 1 mg/ml, the RS values were 15.49% and 13.79% in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation, respectively. Therefore, the main study was performed with the following concentrations: 0 (NC), 0 (VC), 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/ml. In the main study, cultures were exposed to the negative control (Distilled water), vehicle control (DMSO), different concentrations of the test item, and positive controls (Ethylmethanesulfonate and Beno[a]pyrene) for 4 hours in the absence and presence of metabolic activation. Result: In the absence of metabolic activation, the RS values were 100% (negative control), 95.63% (vehicle control), 89.55% (at 0.125 mg/ml), 81.86% (at 0.25 mg/ml), 64.29% (at 0.5 mg/ml), 16.41% (at 1 mg/ml) and 88.21% (at 400 µg/ml-positive control [Ehtylmethanesulfonate]). In the presence of metabolic activation, the RS values were 100% (negative control), 96.20% (vehicle control), 85.59% (at 0.125 mg/ml), 78.76% (at 0.25 mg/ml), 57.49% (at 0.5 mg/ml) 14.31% (at 1 mg/ml) and 82.08% (30 µg/ml-positive control[Benzo[a]pyrene]). No significant increase in the mutation frequency (MF) either in absence (8.88x10-6, 9.49 x10-6, 12.60 x10-6 and 11.02 x10-6 at 0.125 mg/ml, 0.25 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/ml and 1 mg/ml, respectively) or presence of metabolic activation (8.10 x10-6, 7.81x10-6, 11.45x10-6 and 13.10x10-6 at 0.125 mg/ml, 0.25 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/ml and 1 mg/ml, respectively) was observed when compared to vehicle control (8.73 x10-6, 8.00 x10-6, absence and presence of S9, respectively). The positive controls (Ethylmethanesulfonate and Beno[a]pyrene in the absence and presence of metabolic activation, respectively) produced statistically significant increases in mutation frequency (243.90 x10-6, p<0.0001 [Ethylmethanesulfonate], 248.18 x10-6, p<0.0001 [Benzo(a)pyrene] in the absence and presence of metabolic activation, respectively). Conclusion: The registered substance (CAS number: 99-97-8) did not induce a statistically significant or biologically relevant increase in the mutation frequency at concentrations of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/ml when compared to the vehicle control either in the presence or in the absence of S9 metabolic activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.