Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-514-5 | CAS number: 107-71-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 4.4 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 560 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 328.3 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
For the given human exposure route there is a dose descriptor for the same route in experimental animals but there are differences in respiratory volumes between experimental animals (at rest) and humans (light activity).
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- The default extrapolation factor for exposure duration is used: subacute (starting point) to chronic (end point).
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Respiratory interspecies differences are fully covered by the factors used for route to route extrapolation.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Recommended AF for other interspecies differences.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- The default value for the relatively homogenous group "worker" is used.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 13.2 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 0.33
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.7 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 140 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
There are no relevant experimental data on repeated dermal exposure. Therefore, route-to-route extrapolation was performed. Please refer to discussion for details.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 4
- Justification:
- The exposure duration of the OECD TG 422 study performed with the test item was 54 days for females and 42 days for males. In comparison to a subacute 28-day study the OECD TG 422 study provides additional information on fertility and reproduction of the parental generation and furthermore information on developmental toxicity of the offspring. Together with the longer exposure duration (57 days) for females an Assessment factor of 4 is justified.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- The default allometric scaling factor for the differences between rats and humans is used.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Recommended AF for other interspecies differences.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- The default value for the relatively homogenous group "worker" is used.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General
DNEL derivation for the test item is performed under consideration of the recommendations of ECHA, Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.8: Characterization of dose-response for human health (Version: 2.1, November 2012).
Acute, systemic, DNEL
Tert-butyl peracetate is not classified and labelled for acute systemic dermal toxicity, according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP).
However, the test substance is classified and labelled for acute inhalation toxicity cat. 3 (H331: toxic if inhaled) according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP). Hence, the DNEL for acute, short term exposure is derived from the long-term, inhalation DNEL.
DNEL (long-term, systemic, inhalation) x 3 = 4.4 mg/m3 x 3 = 13.2 mg/m3= DNEL (acute, short term)
Acute/long term DNEL for local effects
Inhalation DNEL for short term as well as long term local effects does not need to derived as no adverse local effects were observed in the subacute inhalation study.
However, the test item is classified as a skin sensitizer cat. 1 B according Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) and associated to the medium hazard band.
The test item is classified for eye irritation cat. 2 according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) and associated to the low hazard band.
Long term, systemic DNEL
Occupational exposure to TBPA occurs by dermal route and also by inhalation exposure. Therefore two long-term DNELs are calculated for workers. In view of the data used for evaluation, the "quality of whole database factor", “remaining uncertainties” and "dose-response factor" are considered to amount each to a value of 1, and are thus not shown in the calculations presented below.
Exposure by inhalation
Step 1: Selection of the relevant dose descriptor (starting point):
The sub-acute (four-week) inhalation toxicity study is selected for DNEL derivation as it is the relevant repeated dose study which is equivalent to the OECD guideline 412. In this study, the NOAEC in rats is 560 mg/ m3, the highest dose tested.
Step 2: Modification into a correct starting point
Using a conservative approach, a worker DNEL (long-term inhalation exposure) is derived. This worker DNEL is considered to ensure an appropriate level of protection with regard to acute inhalation exposure (no high peaks of exposure expected).
Relevant dose descriptor (NOAEC): 560 mg/ m3
Duration of exposure used in study: 7 h (5 days/week)
Duration of exposure of the worker: 8 h (5 days/week)
Standard respiratory volume of humans (sRVhuman) for 8 hours: 6.7 m3
Worker respiratory volume (wRV) for 8 hours with light physical activity: 10 m3
Corrected inhalatory NOAEC for workers:
= 560 mg/ m3x 7 h/8 h x 6.7 m3/10 m3= 328.3 mg/ m3
Step 3: Use of assessment factors: 75
AF for differences in duration of exposure: 6
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling): 1
AF for other interspecies differences: 2.5
AF for intraspecies differences: 5
In conclusion, long term systemic inhalation DNEL, workers = 4.4 mg/m3
Dermal exposure
Step 1: Selection of the relevant dose descriptor (starting point):
The OECD TG 422 study (2007) is selected for DNEL derivation as it is the relevant repeated dose study performed in accordance to OECD guideline and GLP. In this study, the oral NOAEL in rats is 100 mg/kg bw/day.
Step 2: Modification of the starting point:
Using a conservative approach, a worker DNEL (long-term dermal exposure) is derived. Based on the physico-chemical properties of TBPA (log Kow: 1.6 and water solubility: calculated to be 5000 mg/L) the substance favour dermal absorption. Since the substance has been identified as a skin sensitizer, some uptake must have occurred although it may only have been a small fraction of the applied dose. However, TBPA is not a skin irritant or corrosive and no signs of acute dermal toxicity indicate that absorption has occurred.
Oral absorption of the rat/ dermal absorption of humans (ABS oral-rat / ABS derm-human): 100%/100 % (default)
Correction for difference between human and experimental exposure conditions: 7 d rat/5 d worker
Corrected NOAEL (dermal) for workers:
= 100 mg/kg bw/day x 1.4
= 140 mg/kg bw/day
Step 3: Use of assessment factors: 200
AF for differences in duration of exposure: 4
The exposure duration of the OECD TG 422 study performed with the test item was 54 days for females and 42 days for males. In comparison to a subacute 28-day study the OECD TG 422 study provides additional information on fertility and reproduction of the parental generation and furthermore information on developmental toxicity of the offspring. Together with the longer exposure duration (57 days) for females an Assessment factor of 4 is justified.
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling): 4
AF for other interspecies differences: 2.5
AF for intraspecies differences: 5
In conclusion, long term systemic dermal DNEL, workers = 0.7 mg/kg bw/day
References
ECHA (2012). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.8:
Characterization of dose [concentration]-response for human health. Version 2.1, November 2012
ECHA (2016). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Part E: Risk Characterization, Version 3.0, May 2016
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
General
General population is not intended to be exposed to tert-butyl peracetate (TBPA) via inhalation or dermal route. Therefore, no DNEL (long-term, inhalation and dermal exposure) is derived for general population. As TBPA has no bioaccumulation potential no risk assessment for secondary poisoning is required for the general population.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.