Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-680-9 | CAS number: 109-55-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 991
- Report date:
- 1991
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Dimethylaminopropylamine (DMAPA) was tested in an in vitro cytogenetics assay using duplicate human lymphocyte cultures both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (S9 mix), according to the OECD n° 473 Guideline and EC 92/69/EEC B.10 guidelines in compliance with the Principles of Good Laboratory Practice.
With metabolic activation, lymphocytes cultures were exposed for 3 hours to solvent vehicle or DMAPA at 0, 350.5, 500.8, 715.4 µg/ml and then incubated for a further 17 or 41 hours.
Without metabolic activation, lymphocytes cultures were exposed for 20 or 44 hours to solvent vehicle or DMAPA at 0, 120.2, 171.8, 245.4 µg/ml.
The proportion of cells with structural aberrations in negative controls cultures fell within historical solvent control ranges. Positive controls induced statistically significant increases in the proportion of cells with structural aberrations.
Chromosome aberrations were analyzed in cells sampled 20 hours after the start of treatment at 3 consecutive dose levels. The highest concentrations chosen for analysis at this time, 245.4 and 715.4 11µg/ml, induced approximately 51% and 54% mitotic inhibition in the absence and presence of S-9 respectively. The effects of single concentrations only, 245.4 µg/ml without and 715.4 µg/ml with S-9 were investigated at the delayed harvest at which time 0% and 34% mitotic inhibition was induced. - GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3-aminopropyldimethylamine
- EC Number:
- 203-680-9
- EC Name:
- 3-aminopropyldimethylamine
- Cas Number:
- 109-55-7
- Molecular formula:
- C5H14N2
- IUPAC Name:
- N,N-dimethylpropane-1,3-diamine
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Chromosome defects
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: A single female donor was used in this study. The volunteer was not suspected of any virus infection nor had been exposed to high levels of radiation or hazardous chemicals. An appropriate volume of whole blood was drawn from the peripheral circulation on the day of culture. Whole blood cultures were established in sterile disposable centrifuge tubes by placing 0.4 ml heparinised blood into 9.0 ml Hepes-buffered RPMI medium containing 20% (v/v) foetal calf serum and 50 ug/ml gentamycin. Phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) was included at a concentration of 37.5 µl per ml of culture to stimulate the lymphocytes to divide. Cultures were rocked continuously during incubation.
- Properly maintained: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- mammalian liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S-9) prepared from male Sprague Dawley rats induced with Aroclor 1254 (obtained from Molecular Toxicology Incorporated, Annapolis, Maryland, USA.)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Without metabolic activation: 120.2, 171.8, 245.4 µg/ml for 20 hours sampling time and 245.4 µg/ml for 44 hours sampling time.
With metabolic activation: 350.5, 500.8, 715.4 µg/ml for 20 hours sampling time and 715.4 µg/ml for 44 hours sampling time. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: -S9: Methylmethansulfonate (MMS) 50.0 µg/ml. +S9: Cyclophosphamide (CPA) 25.0 µg/ml
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 48 hours at 37°C
- Exposure duration: 20 and 44 hours for cultures without metabolic activation and 3 hours for cultures with metabolic activation (followed by 17 and 41 hours of additional sampling time before harvesting)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 20 or 44 hours
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): colchicine was added 1.5 hour prior to harvest.
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colchicine
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 (for cultures treated with DMAPA and positive controls) and 4 (for cultures treated with negative controls)
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: One hundred metaphases from each culture were analysed for chromosome aberrations.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; percentage of cell in mitosis
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- Determination of endoreplication: yes
- Other: hyperploidy - Evaluation criteria:
- The test chemical was to be considered as clearly positive if:
- statistically significant increases in the proportion of structurally aberrant cells (without gaps) occurred at one or more concentrations
- the proportion of aberrant cells at such data points exceeded the normal range - Statistics:
- The proportion of aberrant cells in each replicate were used to establish acceptable heterogeneity between replicates by means of a binomial dispersion test.
The proportion of cells in category 2 for each test treatment condition were compared with the proportion in negative controls by using Fisher's exact test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Selection of doses
Mitotic Index (%) | ||||||||
Treatment (µm/ml) | 20 hours | 44 hours | ||||||
- S-9 | + S-9 | - S-9 | + S-9 | |||||
A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | |
Solvent | 5.8 | 4.0 | 5.3 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.8 |
20.21 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
28.87 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
41.24 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
58.92 | NS | NS | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
84.17 | NS | NS | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM |
120.2 | 5.8 | 4.8 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NM | NM |
171.8 | 4.9 | 4.6 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
245.4 | 1.6 | 3.2 | NS | NS | 4.2 | 4.3 | NS | NS |
350.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 0.2 | NS | NS |
500.8 | 0 | 0 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 0 | 0 | NS | NS |
715.4 | 0 | 0 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 3.2 | 1.6 |
1022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
NS = not scored | NM = not made |
Table 2: Cells with structural aberrations
20 hour sampling time, - S-9
Treatment (µg/ml) | Replicate | Cells scored | Cells with aberrations including gaps | Cells with aberrations excluding gaps | Significance § | Mitotic index (mean) |
Solvent | A | 100 | 1 | 0 | 5.8 | |
B | 100 | 1 | 0 | 4.0 | ||
Totals | 200 | 2 | 0 | (4.9) | ||
120.2 | A | 100 | 0 | 0 | 5.8 | |
B | 100 | 5 | 0 | 4.8 | ||
Totals | 200 | 5 | 0 | NS | (5.3) | |
171.8 | A | 100 | 5 | 1 | 4.9 | |
B | 100 | 1 | 0 | 4.6 | ||
Totals | 200 | 6 | 1 | NS | (4.8) | |
245.4 | A | 100 | 3 | 2 | 1.6 | |
B | 100 | 1 | 0 | 3.2 | ||
Totals | 200 | 4 | 2 | NS | (2.4) | |
MMS, 50 | A | 25 | 14 | 13 | ||
B | 25 | 18 | 17 | |||
Totals | 50 | 32 | 30 | p <0.001 | ||
§ Statistical significance | ||||||
NS = not significant |
Table 3: Cells with structural aberrations
20 hour sampling time, + S-9
Treatment (µg/ml) | Replicate | Cells scored | Cells with aberrations including gaps | Cells with aberrations excluding gaps | Significance § | Mitotic index (mean) |
Solvent | A | 100 | 5 | 2 | 5.3 | |
B | 100 | 1 | 0 | 4.1 | ||
Totals | 200 | 6 | 2 | (4.7) | ||
350,5 | A | 100 | 3 | 1 | 3.8 | |
B | 100 | 5 | 1 | 3.5 | ||
Totals | 200 | 8 | 2 | NS | (3.7) | |
500,8 | A | 100 | 4 | 2 | 2.9 | |
B | 100 | 5 | 4 | 3.5 | ||
Totals | 200 | 9 | 6 | NS | (3.2) | |
715,4 | A | 100 | 8 | 5 | 2.2 | |
B | 100 | 5 | 3 | 2.1 | ||
Totals | 200 | 13 | 8 | p<0.05 | (2.2) | |
CPA, 25 | A | 25 | 11 | 7 | ||
B | 25 | 8 | 6 | |||
Totals | 50 | 19 | 13 | p <0.001 | ||
§ Statistical significance | ||||||
NS = not significant |
Table 4: Cells with structural aberrations
44 hour sampling time, - S-9
Treatment (µg/ml) | Replicate | Cells scored | Cells with aberrations including gaps | Cells with aberrations excluding gaps | Significance § | Mitotic index (mean) |
Solvent | A | 100 | 3 | 2 | 4.5 | |
B | 100 | 4 | 4 | 3.3 | ||
Totals | 200 | 7 | 6 | (3.9) | ||
245.4 | A | 100 | 6 | 4 | 4.2 | |
B | 100 | 2 | 0 | 4.3 | ||
Totals | 200 | 8 | 4 | NS | (4.3) |
Table 5: Cells with structural aberrations
44 hour sampling time, + S-9
Treatment (µg/ml) | Replicate | Cells scored | Cells with aberrations including gaps | Cells with aberrations excluding gaps | Significance § | Mitotic index (mean) |
Solvent | A | 100 | 1 | 1 | 3.5 | |
B | 100 | 3 | 1 | 3.8 | ||
Totals | 200 | 4 | 2 | (3.7) | ||
715,4 | A | 100 | 5 | 2 | 3.2 | |
B | 100 | 2 | 1 | 1.6 | ||
Totals | 200 | 7 | 3 | NS | (2.4) |
Cultures treated with DMAPA in the absence and presence of metabolic activation resulted in frequencies of cells with structural aberrations, which were similar to those seen in concurrent negative controls..
Under these experimental conditions, DMAPA did not induce any noteworthy increase in the number of cells with structural chromosome aberration, both with and without metabolic activation at any harvest time.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.