Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
4.2 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
1
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
4.2 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Calculations based on worst case. Performance of the study was waived according to column 2 of REACH Regulation 1907/2006/EC Annex VIII section 8.6.1 (see section 7.5.2).  

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
NOAEL value was initially used for calculations
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
Recommended AF (for chronic exposure) ECHA REACH Guidance document R8, 2012
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
Not applicable according to ECHA REACH Guidance document R8, 2012
AF for other interspecies differences:
1
Justification:
Not applicable, derived from human data
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
Justification:
Not applicable, see below in "justification and comments"
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
See below in "justification and comments"
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
See below in "justification and comments"
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
12 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
1
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
12 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Calculations based on worst case. Performance of the study was waived according to column 2 of REACH Regulation 1907/2006/EC Annex VIII section 8.6.1 (see section 7.5.2).  

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
NOAEL used for calculations
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
Recommended AF (for chronic exposure) ECHA REACH Guidance document R8, 2012
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
Not applicable, derived from human data
AF for other interspecies differences:
1
Justification:
Not applicable, derived from human data
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
Justification:
Not applicable, see below in "justification and comments"
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
See below in "justification and comments"
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
See below in "justification and comments"
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - workers

DNEL derivation for each of the relevant endpoints was based on the most conservative dose descriptors obtained. Assessment factors were assigned accordingly. Thus, the DNELs represent worst-case scenarios.

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
1.8 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
1
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
1.8 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Calculations based on worst case

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
NOAEL value was initially used for calculations
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
Recommended AF (for chronic exposure) ECHA REACH Guidance document R8, 2012
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
Not applicable, derived from human data
AF for other interspecies differences:
1
Justification:
Not applicable, derived from human data
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
Justification:
Not applicable, see below in "justification and comments"
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
See below in "justification and comments"
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
See below in "justification and comments"
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
12 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
1
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
12 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Calculations based on worst case. Performance of the study was waived according to column 2 of REACH Regulation 1907/2006/EC Annex VIII section 8.6.1 (see section 7.5.2).  

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
NOAEL used for calculations
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
Recommended AF (for chronic exposure) ECHA REACH Guidance document R8, 2012
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
Not applicable, derived from human data
AF for other interspecies differences:
1
Justification:
Not applicable, derived from human data
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
Justification:
Not applicable, see below in "justification and comments"
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
see below in "justification and comments"
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
See below in "justification and comments"
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
1.2 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
1
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
1.2 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

No route to route extrapolation required

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
NOAEL used for calculations
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
Recommended AF (for chronic exposure) ECHA REACH Guidance document R8, 2012
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
Not applicable, derived from human data
AF for other interspecies differences:
1
Justification:
Not applicable, derived from human data
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
Justification:
Not applicable, see below in "justification and comments"
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
See below in "justification and comments"
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
See below in "justification and comments"
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - General Population

DNEL derivation for each of the relevant endpoints was based on the most conservative dose descriptors obtained. Assessment factors were assigned accordingly. Thus, the DNELs represent worst-case scenarios.