Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-815-1 | CAS number: 110-91-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Morpholine is alkaline and is corrosive to skin and mucous membranes.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 03. Jan 1967 - 11. Jan 1967
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- BASF Test, see details in remarks on material and methods
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 3.22 and 2.94 kg - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: untreated skin of the same animals served as control.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1, 5, 15 min or 20 hours
- Observation period:
- 8 days
- Number of animals:
- 2 animals
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): conc. Lutrol and 50 % Lutrol solution
- Time after start of exposure: 1, 5 or 15 min post exposure - Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Remarks:
- 1 min exposure
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 8 days
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Remarks:
- 5 and 15 minutes
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 8 days
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The application of the test substance for 1 min caused in 1 animal haemorrhagic areas and leathery-like necrosis at the end of the observation period.
The application for 5 min caused after 24 hours parchment-like necrosis in 1 animal and haemorrhagic areas after 24 hours and leathery-like necrosis after 8 days.
The application of the test substance for 15 min caused haemorrhagic areas, oedema and parchment-like necrosis after 24 hours which declined to leathery-like necrosis after 8 days.
Leathery-like necrosis was considered as a full-thickness necrosis. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (corrosive) based on GHS criteria
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- January 20-23, 1997
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- test control not performed
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Covance,The Development Services Company, Denver, PA, USA
- Age at study initiation: 19-21 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.710-3.278 kg
- Housing: rabbits were housed individually in stainless steel cages
- Diet: PMI Certified Lab Rabbit HF Diet
- Water: fresh water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 16-21°C
- Humidity: 25-70 %
- Photoperiod: 12 hours light/12 hours dark - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.5 mL/site - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 min
- Observation period:
- 3 and 55 min
- Number of animals:
- 6 animals (3 males, 3 females)
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: dorsal area of the trunk (clipped free of fur)
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: no data
- Time after start of exposure: 3 min
SCORING SYSTEM:
Draize Evaluation of Dermal Irritation - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: 2/6
- Time point:
- other: immediate after exposure
- Score:
- >= 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: well-defined erythema
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: 4/6
- Time point:
- other: immediate after exposure
- Score:
- >= 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: very slight erythema
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: 3/6
- Time point:
- other: immediate after exposure
- Score:
- >= 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: very slight edema
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: 3/6
- Time point:
- other: immediate after exposure
- Score:
- >= 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: 6/6
- Time point:
- other: 55min
- Score:
- >= 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: severe erythema, necrosis
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: 6/6
- Time point:
- other: 55min
- Score:
- >= 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: severe edema, necrosis
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- In all animals severe erythema, severe oedema and necrosis was observed after 55 min.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1A (corrosive) based on GHS criteria
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (corrosive)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 03. Jan 1967 - 11. Jan 1967
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- BASF-Test, see details in remarks on material and methods.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 2.82 and 2.97 kg - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: The adjacent eye served as saline control.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 50 µL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single application
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 8 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 2 animals
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: no effects
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.6
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24 h
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Housing: individual in cages
- Diet: controlled access
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: appr. one week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 20 ± 3 °C
- Humidity: 50 ± 20 %
- Photoperiod: 12 hours dark/12 hours light - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: the adjacent eye served as control.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.1 mL
- Concentration: undiluted - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single application,
exposure period: 4 seconds, 30 seconds, 24 hours - Observation period (in vivo):
- 21 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 animals per exposure period
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
If necessary, the treated eye was washed with tap water, at least 24 hous after treatment.
SCORING SYSTEM: according to OECD GL 405
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: biomicroscope / fluorescein / ophthalmoscope - Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (exposure 4 s)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 2 - <= 2.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (exposure 30 s)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 2 - <= 2.7
- Max. score:
- 3
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (exposure 24 h )
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 2.7 - <= 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Remarks:
- (exposure 4 s)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 1 - <= 2.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Remarks:
- (exposure 30 s)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 1 - <= 2.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Remarks:
- (exposure 24 h)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 2.7 - <= 3.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- (exposure 4 s)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 1.7 - <= 2.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- (exposure 30 s)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 1.3 - <= 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- (exposure 24 h)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 1.3 - <= 1.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Remarks:
- (exposure 4 s)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 0.5 - <= 0.7
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Remarks:
- (exposure 30 s)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 0.3 - <= 0.5
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Remarks:
- (exposure 24 h)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 0 - <= 0.3
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- All expositions with Morpholine (for 4 s, 30 s, and 24 h) resulted in eye irritation of animals. In addition, rabbits showed necrosis around the eyes. After an exposure time of 24 hours burns (corrosion) were observed. In 2 rabbits corrosion was noted both inside and around the eyes after 30 seconds of exposure. After an observation period of 21 days eye injuries were still observed in one animal.
Exposure group 24 hours:
All animals showed necrosis in the eye and loss of fur, sores, redness, and scarring on the front of the upper eyelids outside. In one animal eye injuries were cleared within 10 days and detachment of the outer layers of the cornea were observed.
Exposure group 30 s:
In all animals whitish secretions were observed both in and around the eyes.In 2/3 animals eye injuries were cleared within 10 days and detachment of the outer layers of the cornea were observed. In the 2 animals where corrosion was noted, hair loss was also observed.
Exposure group 4 s:
In all animals whitish secretions were observed both in and around the eyes. In 2/3 animals eye injuries were cleared within 10 days and detachment of the outer layers of the cornea were observed. One rabbit showed a pale flash film, perhaps with scars. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
Referenceopen allclose all
Findings animal1/animal2 (50 µL):
Time | Opacity | Iritis | Erythema | Chemosis |
1h | 1/1 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
24h | 1/1 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 0/0 |
48h | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1/2 | 0/0 |
72h | 2/1 | 0/0 | 1/2 | 0/0 |
8d | 2/0 | 0/0 | 1/3 | 0/0 |
Mean values over 24 h, 48 h and 72 h:
Animal1: Opacity: 1.3; Chemosis: 0; Erythema: 1.3; Iritis: 0
Animal2: Opacity: 1; Chemosis: 0; Erythema: 2; Iritis: 0
The application of 50 µL test substance caused initially chemosis and moderate opacity and erythema. The corneal opacity and erythema effects were not reversible within the 8 day observation period. One animal developed ingrowing vessels at the end of the observation period.
Findings animal1/animal2 (100 µL):
Time | Opacity | Iritis | Erythema | Chemosis |
1h | 1/1 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
24h | 2/2 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
48h | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
72h | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
8d | 3/3 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
Mean values over 24 h, 48 h and 72 h:
Animal1: Opacity: 2; Chemosis: 2; Erythema: 2; Iritis: 1.3
Animal2: Opacity: 2; Chemosis: 2; Erythema: 2; Iritis: 1.3
The applicaton of 100 µL test substance caused moderate to severe corneal opacity, erythema and chemosis. After 48 hours iritis and after 6 days staphyloma was noted. The effects were not reversible within the 8 day observation period Severe corneal opacity and iritis are considered to be irreversible effects to ophthalmic tissue.
The original BASF grading was converted into the numerical grading according to the OECD Draize system.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Additional information
Skin irritation
In a primary dermal irritation study (Huntsman, 1997), 0.5 mL of Morpholine was applied to one site on the clipped dorsal trunk of 6 New Zealand White rabbits (3 males and 3 females) for an exposure period of 3 minutes. Observations for responses were recorded immediately after unwrap and at 55 minutes. Grading of irritation was performed according to the method of Draize. Following an exposure period of 3 minutes, severe erythema, severe oedema and necrosis were observed. Therefore, Morpholine was considered to be a severe irritant and was considered as corrosive according to DOT classification (Packaging group 1). This study is classified as key study. It satisfies the requirements of OECD test guideline 404.
In a further key skin irritation/corrosion study (BASF AG, 1967), 2 Vienna White rabbits were treated with Morpholine (99.2 %) for 1, 5, 15 min or 20 hours using occlusive conditions. An application site of 2.5 cm² was covered with the liquid test substance. The animals were observed for 3 weeks and skin changes were recorded daily. The application of the test substance for 1 min caused in 1 animal haemorrhagic areas and leathery-like necrosis at the end of the observation period. The application for 5 min caused after 24 hours parchment-like necrosis in 1 animal and haemorrhagic area after 24 hours and leathery-like necrosis after 8 days. The application of the test substance for 15 min caused haemorrhagic areas, oedema and parchment-like necrosis after 24 hours which declined to leathery-like necrosis after 8 days. Leathery-like necrosis was considered as a full-thickness necrosis. This study is classified as acceptable. It generally satisfies the guideline requirements for OECD 404.
In a supporting skin irritation/corrosion study (Loden et al., 1985), 3 albino rabbits were treated with aqueous solutions of 2, 20, 40 or 60 % Morpholine. The skin reactions to treatment were evaluated after 0.5, 24, 48 and 72 hours. A 2% solution of Morpholine caused skin irritation after 72 hours, whereas 40 and 60% solutions immediately caused reddening of the skin. This study is classified as acceptable. It satisfies the guideline requirement of OECD test guideline 404.
In a comparative study (Wang & Suskind, 1988), the irritant potential of Morpholine was measured by applying 0.1 g mixture (0.1, 0.5, 2, 5 and 10 % Morpholine in petrolatum) to guinea pig skin for 24 hours. Observations were made 1, 24 and 48 hours after removal of the test material, and no noticeable effects were found. This study is classified as acceptable guideline study.
In a supporting primary dermal irritation study (Huntsman, 1993), 0.5 mL Morpholine was applied to the shaved skin of 6 male New Zealand White rabbits for exposure durations of 3 min, 60 min, 4 hours and 24 hours using a semiocclusive dressing. Following patch removal, the animals were observed for a period of 14 days. The scoring of reactions was performed according to Draize. The primary dermal irritation index was assessed. Severe erythema, severe oedema and necrosis were noted under the conditions of this study. Based on these results, Morpholine was considered as corrosive. This study is classified as acceptable. It satisfies the requirements for OECD test guideline 404.
In a primary dermal irritation study (Huntsman, 1993) using a semiocclusive dressing, 0.5 mL Morpholine was applied to the shaved skin of one male and one female New Zealand White rabbit for exposure duration of 4 hours. In this supporting study results were reported at 4 h and 48 h after exposure. Morpholine was considered to be corrosive. This study is classified as acceptable.
Eye irritation
In a primary eye irritation study (Koch et al., 1985), 100 µL of undiluted Morpholine (99 %) was instilled into the conjunctival sac of the left eye of 3 rabbits. The eyes were washed out after 24 hours. Further exposure times were 4 and 30 seconds, respectively (3 rabbits/exposure time). Animals were observed for 21 days. Irritation was scored according to OECD guideline 405. All three expositions gave rise to eye irritation. All animals showed necrosis in and around the eyes. After an exposure time of 24 hours burns (corrosion) were observed. Two of the animals also gave rise to corrosion both inside and around the eyes at 30 seconds of exposure. After the observation period eye injuries were still observed in one animal. The authors classified Morpholine as irritant substance; however, corrosive effects in several animals were observed. Thus, Morpholine can be regarded as a corrosive substance. This study is classified acceptable. It satisfies the requirement of OECD test guideline 405.
In this acute eye irritation/corrosion study (BASF AG, 1967), the eyes of 2 Vienna White rabbits were exposed by application of 50 µL undiluted Morpholine (99.2 %) into the conjunctival sac. In a second attempt, 2 animals were treated with an additional 50 µL of the test substance 5 min after the first application. The animals were observed after 10 min, 1 and 3 hours on the day of treatment and up to 8 days afterwards. The eyes were not washed out after 24 hours. Overall, the treatment caused oedema, opacity, staphyloma and corrosion of the eye mucous membranes within 24 hours. Morpholine was graded as corrosive under the conditions of this study. This study is classified as acceptable. It satisfies the requirements of OECD test guideline 405.
In a supporting eye irritation study by Smyth et al. (1954), in which eyes of 7 New Zealand White rabbits were treated with 0.5 mL Morpholine. Based on the outcomes of this study Morpholine was considered as irritating to the rabbit eye. This study is classified an acceptable supporting study.
With regard to other test animals, in-life clinical examinations in rats exposed to up to 0.54 g/m³ (150 ppm) Morpholine revealed increased incidences in inflammation of the cornea at week 103 of a chronic inhalation study (Huntsman 2147-102, cf. 7.5.3). Findings included keratitis, oedema, abrasion, scarring, and ulceration with or without neovascularization and corneal epithelial hyperplasia. A high incidence of retinal degeneration was observed, primarily in female animals, which was probably an age-related light-induced retinal degeneration.
Supportingly, the eye irritating property of DIPA/110-97-4 was also found using other laboratory methods: in vitro Short Time Exposure test by Takahashi et al., 2011 (Toxicology in vitro 25; p.1425-1334), Hansen solubility parameter to predict results of the RhCE method by Ito et al., 2021 (Toxicology in vitro 70, 105039).
Respiratory irritation
Studies of acute inhalation toxicity of Morpholine revealed irritation of the mucous membranes. In a key study there is indication that the test substance causes local irritation to exposed tissues including respiratory tract (BASF AG XVI/352, cf. 7.2.2). A further study noticed irritation of nose and eyes (mucous membranes) after exposure of rats to Morpholine for 6 hours to whole body at a nominal concentration of 5000 ppm equivalent to ca. 18.1 mg/L; 9/10 animals died after one treatment (Huntsman 2147-100, cf. 7.2.2).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labeling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for the purpose of classification under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on this information, the test item is considered to be classified for skin and eye irritation Cat. 1A (H314) and Cat. 1 (H318), respectively under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, as amended for the fifteenth time in Regulation (EU) 2020/1182.
The substance is already listed in Annex VI of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 concerning skin and eye irritation (Cat. 1B, H314).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.