Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
oxidising solids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.17 (Oxidising Properties (Solids))
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Contact with:
powdered cellulose
Duration of test (contact time):
> 216 - <= 222 s
Sample tested:
test mixture (not specified)
Remarks:
migrated information
Parameter:
maximum burning rate
Result:
ca. 0.9 other: mm/s (migrated information)

see attachment 'Results'

Interpretation of results:
other: no oxidising properties
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Thioacid is not an oxidising solid.
The highest burning rate recorded for Thio-Acid in cellulose was 0.9 mm.s -1. Comparing this value with the highest burning rate of Barium Nitrate (1.7 mm.s-1) the sample of Thio-Acid should be classed as ‘Not an oxidising solid’.
Executive summary:

The test is conducted to determine the oxidising properties of a powder solid. The principle is to compare the burning rate of various ratios of the test substance/powdered cellulose mixtures against that of a reference mixture (barium nitrate/powdered cellulose).

Description of key information

Thioacid is not an oxidising solid. The highest burning rate recorded for Thio-Acid in cellulose was 0.9 mm.s -1. Comparing this value with the highest burning rate of Barium Nitrate (1.7 mm.s-1) the sample of Thio-Acid should be classed as ‘Not an oxidising solid’.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Oxidising properties:
non oxidising

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification