Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 260-135-8 | CAS number: 56375-79-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15-17 February 1994
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- This study was performed according with the guideline EPA-600/4-90/013, as well as in accordance with GLP principles. However, nominal concentrations are not confirmed by analytical measurements. Therefore, a Klimisch code 2 was assigned. Since test solutions were renewed after 24h and the read-across substance TMAH was stable in an algae study, it can be assumed that the exposure was constant.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA-600/4-90/013
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ASTM, 1993. Standard E 729-88a, Book of Standards Volume 11.04.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method:
A working stock solution of methyltributylammonium chloride was prepared on the day the test was initiated. The stock solution was prepared on a weight-to-volume basis in a class A volumetric flask. The concentration was 10mg/mL. From this stock solution, five exposure concentrations were prepared for each test.
For test 1 (reconstituted fresh water), the exposure solution was prepared with moderately hard reconstituted fresh water, which was prepared with glass-distilled deionized water and reagent grade salts following the procedures outlined in US EPA-600/4-90/013.
For test 2 (effluent and river water), an effluent solution was prepared with 6.8% effluent (collected from outfall 002, GE-Plastics, Mt. Vernon, Indiana, USA) in Ohio River water on a volume-to-volume basis.
Test solution renewals were accomplished following 24 h of exposure by transferring test organisms into freshly prepared test solutions. - Test organisms (species):
- Ceriodaphnia dubia
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Water flea
- Source: Woodward-Clyde Consultants (WCC) in-house laboratory cultures
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): Less or equal to 24 h
- Feeding during test: None - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Hardness:
- Test 1 (reconstituted fresh water): 100 (control group only)
Test 2 (effluent and river water): 150 (control group only) - Test temperature:
- Test 1 (reconstituted fresh water) and test 2 (effluent and river water): 25±1°C
- pH:
- Test 1 (reconstituted fresh water): 7.66 -8.37
Test 2 (effluent and river water): 7.85 - 8.66 - Dissolved oxygen:
- Test 1 (reconstituted fresh water): 8.2 -8.8
Test 2 (effluent and river water): 8.5 - 9.0 - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal test material concentrations (mg/L):
Test 1 (reconstituted fresh water): Control (reconstituted fresh water), 8.1, 27, 90, 300 and 1000
Test 2 (effluent and river water): Control (effluent and river water), 8.1, 27, 90, 300 and 1000 - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 30mL Styrine
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: Styrine, with a capacity of 30mL and filled with 15mL
- Aeration: None
- No. of organisms per vessel: 5
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 4
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water:
Test 1 (reconstituted fresh water) - in moderately hard reconstituted fresh water prepared from glass-distilled deionized water and reagent grade salts following the procedures outlined in EPA-600/4-90/013. Test 2 (effluent and river water) - in 6.9% effluent solution prepared with Ohio River (USA) water on a volume-to-volume basis.
- Alkalinity:
Test 1 (reconstituted fresh water): 70 (control group only)
Test 2 (effluent and river water): 80 (control group only)
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16 h light / 8 h dark
- Light intensity: 50-100 Ft. candles
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : Mortality and behavioral characteristics
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations:
Test 1 (reconstituted fresh water) and test 2 (effluent and river water): Approximately 3. - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 12.3 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL: 8.7-16.6 mg/L (Test 1 - reconstituted fresh water).
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 9.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL: 6.5-12.4 mg/L (Test 1 - reconstituted fresh water). These results are recalculated by the reviewer based on a MTBAC content of 75% in the test material.
- Details on results:
- - The effect levels for test 2 (effluent and river water) were the following (mg test material/L):
EC50: 52.4 (95% CL: 46.6 - 58.9 mg/L) - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Water fleas (Ceriodaphnia dubia) were more sensitive to methyltributylammonium chloride when exposure was performed using reconstituted fresh water to prepare exposure solutions compared to industrial effluent solutions prepared in Ohio River water. Based on nominal test material concentrations the resulting 48h-EC50 was equal to 12.3 mg/L and the NOEC was 8.1 mg/L. This corresponds with a nominal 48h-LC50 of 9.2 mg MTBAC/L and a NOEC of 6.1 mg MTBAC/L
- Executive summary:
In two 48-h acute toxicity study, water fleas (Ceriodaphnia dubia) were exposed to methyltributylammonium chloride at nominal test material concentrations of 0 (control), 8.1, 27, 90, 300 and 1000 mg/L.
In the test conducted with reconstituted fresh water the 48h-EC50 was 12.3 mg test material/L.This corresponds with a nominal 48h-EC50 of 9.2 mg MTBAC/L. Test 2, conducted with 6.8% industrial effluent solution in Ohio River water, showed that water fleas (Ceriodaphnia dubia) were less sensitive to methyltributylammonium chloride toxicity compared to the test conducted with reconstituded fresh water. The resulting 48h-EC50 was 52.4 mg test material/L. This corresponds with a nominal 48h-EC50 of 39 mg MTBAC/L.
Analytical confirmation of test concentrations were not performed and the water quality of Ohio river water was not properly determined (e.g.dissolved organic carbon). Nevertheless, since test solutions were renewed after 24h and the read-across substance TMAH was stable in an algae study (Scheerbaum, 2011), it can be assumed that the actual exposure to MTBAC was in agreement with the nominal MTBAC concentration.
For the evaluation of the intrinsic toxicity of the substance, only the test results with reconstituted water should be used, because in the other tests (applying 6.8% industrial effluent solution in Ohio River water), the test medium was not well defined.
Reference
Description of key information
In test 1 conducted with reconstituted fresh water the 48h-EC50 was 12.3 mg test material/L. This corresponds with a nominal 48h-EC50 of 9.2 mg MTBAC/L.
In test 2 conducted with 6.8% industrial effluent solution in Ohio River water, the resulting 48h-EC50 was 52.4 mg/L. This corresponds with a nominal 48h-EC50 of 39 mg MTBAC/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 9.2 mg/L
Additional information
In two 48-h acute toxicity study, water fleas(Ceriodaphnia dubia) were exposed to 75% methyltributylammonium chloride at nominal test material concentrations of 0 (control), 8.1, 27, 90, 300 and 1000 mg/L.
In the test conducted with reconstituted fresh water the nominal 48h-EC50 was 12.3 mg test material/L. This corresponds with a nominal 48h-EC50 of 9.2 mg MTBAC/L. Test 2, conducted with 6.8% industrial effluent solution in Ohio River water, showed that water fleas (Ceriodaphnia dubia) were less sensitive to methyltributylammonium chloride toxicity when compared to the test conducted with reconstituded fresh water. The resulting 48h-EC50 was 52.4 mg test material/L. This corresponds with a nominal 48h-EC50 of 39 mg MTBAC/L.
Analytical confirmation of test concentrations were not performed and the water quality of Ohio river water was not properly determined (e.g.dissolved organic carbon). Nevertheless, since test solutions were renewed after 24h and the read-across substance TMAH was stable in an algae study (TMAH Consortium 2005 and Scheerbaum 2011), it can be assumed that the actual exposure to MTBAC was in agreement with the nominal MTBAC concentration.
For the evaluation of the intrinsic toxicity of the substance, only the test results with reconstituted water should be used, because in the other tests (applying 6.8% industrial effluent solution in Ohio River water), the test medium was not well defined.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.