Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-745-1 | CAS number: 6701-13-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
An Ames test (OECD 471) is available on 1,10 decanediyl bis methacrylate. In this study, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes of frameshifts in the genome of the strains used.
No in vitro study on mammalian cells are available on 1,10 decanediyl bis methacrylate. However data are available on an analogue substance of 1,10 decanediyl bis methacrylate : 1,10-decanediol diacrylate. On this analogue substance, HPRT test (OECD 476) and in vitro micronucleus test (OECD 487) showed negative results in presence and in absence of metabolic activation.
Bacterial reverse mutation assay (Sokolowski 2010):
The study was performed to investigate the potential of the test item to induce gene mutations according to the plate incorporation test (experiment 1) and the pre-incubation test (experiment 2) using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and TA102.
The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the controls, was tested in triplicate. The test item was tested at the following concentrations: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 and 500 µg/plate.
No toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in the tes groups with and without metabolic activation.
The plates incubated with the test item showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in all strains used.
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester srains was observed following treatment with the test item at any dose level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance.
Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies.
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes of frameshifts in the genome of the strains used. The test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in ths Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay.
In vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test (Brient 2013) / read-across :
The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of 1,10-decanediol diacrylate to induce an increase in the frequency of micronucleated cellsin the mouse cell line L5178YTK+/-. This study conducted in compliance with OECD Guideline No. 487 and the principles of Good Laboratory Practices.
After a preliminary toxicity test, the test item was tested in two independent experiments, with and without a metabolic activation system, the S9 mix, prepared from a liver microsomal fraction (S9 fraction) of rats induced with Aroclor 1254, as follows:
-First experiment: 3 h treatment + 24 h recovery (without and with S9 mix),
-Second experiment :24 h treatment + 20 h recovery (without S9 mix), and3 h treatment + 24 h recovery (with S9 mix).
Each treatment was coupled to an assessment of cytotoxicity at the same dose-levels. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by determining the PD (Population Doubling) of cells and quality of the cells on the slides has also been taken into account.
For each main experiment (with or without S9 mix), micronuclei were analyzed for three dose-levels of the test item, for the vehicle and the positive controls, in 1000 mononucleated cells per culture (total of 2000 mononucleated cells per concentration).
The test item was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).
Experiments without S9 mix: Following the first experiment,a severe toxicity was induced at the highest tested dose-level of 20 µg/mL, as shown by a 100% decrease in the PD. The immediately lower dose-level of 10 µg/mL induced a slight but acceptable toxicity, as shown by a 37% decrease in the PD. Following the second experiment,a severe toxicity was induced at the highest tested dose-level of 40 µg/mL, as shown by a 100% decrease in the PD. The immediately lower dose-level of 20 µg/mL induced no toxicity, as shown by no noteworthy decrease in the PD.
In the first experiment, a statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells was noted at the highest dose-level of 10 µg/mL. However, no dose-response relationship was noted, and only one replicate of the two cultures used for this dose-level showed a frequency of micronucleated cells above the corresponding vehicle control historical data range. These results were thus considered to be equivocal, and the second experiment without S9 mix was performed following a long treatment period. During the second experiment, no statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells was noted. Consequently, the increase observed during the first experiment was not reproduced, and was thus not considered to be biologically relevant.
Experiments with S9 mix: Following the first experiment,a marked toxicity was induced at the highest tested dose-level of 80 µg/mL, as shown by a 77% decrease in the PD. The immediately lower dose-level of 40 µg/mL induced a slight but acceptable toxicity, as shown by a 38% decrease in the PD. Following the second experiment, a slight toxicity was induced at the highest tested dose-level of 80 µg/mL, as shown by a 28% decrease in the PD.
In the first experiment, a dose-response relationship was noted, but no statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells was observed. In the second experiment performed in the same experimental conditions, some increases in the frequency of micronucleated cells were noted at both higher doses (40 and 80 µg/mL). However, these increases were not statistically significant, and the corresponding frequencies of micronucleated cells remained within the historical data of the vehicle control. Consequently, these increases did not meet the criteria for a positive response and were thus considered as non-biologically relevant.
Under the experimental conditions of the study, the test item did not induce any chromosome damage, or damage to the cell division apparatus, in cultured mammalian somatic cells, using L5178Y TK+/- mouse lymphoma cells, in the absence or in the presence of a rat metabolising system.
In vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay (Massip 2013) / Read-across :
1,10-decanediol diacrylate was assayed for the ability to induce mutation at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (hprt) locus (6-thioguanine [6TG] resistance) in mouse lymphoma cells using a fluctuation protocol. The study consisted of a cytotoxicity Range-Finder Experiment followed by two independent experiments, each conducted in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by an Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S-9). The test article was formulated in anhydrous analytical grade dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO).
A 3 hour treatment incubation period was used for all experiments.
In Experiment 1, thirteen concentrations, ranging from 2.5 to 150 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and from 25 to 400 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, were tested. Seven days after treatment, the highest concentrations analysed to determine viability and 6TG resistance were 40mg/µL in the absence of S-9 and 330 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, limited by toxicity, which gave 17% and 12% RS, respectively.
In Experiment 2 twelve concentrations, ranging from 5 to 80 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and from 50 to 400 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, were tested.The highest concentrations analysed to determine viability and 6TG resistance were 30 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and 270 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, which gave 14% and 12% RS, respectively.
In Experiments 1 and 2 no statistically significant increases in MF were observed following treatment with1,10-decanediol diacrylate at any concentration tested in the absence and presence of S-9 and there were no significant linear trends.
It is concluded that 1,10-decanediol diacrylate did not induce mutation at the hprt locus of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells when tested up to toxic concentrations in two independent experiments, in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolising system (S-9)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- January - February 2001
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- In the pre-experiment the concentration range of the test item was 3-5000 µg/plate. No relevant toxic effects were observed. 5000 µg/plate was chosen as maximal concentration.
The following concentrations were tested: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine, without S9, TA1537, TA98. 2-aminoanthracene : with S9, all strains
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation) = experiment 1; preincubation = experiment 2
Pre-experiment for toxicity :
To evaluate the toxicity of the test item a pre-experiment was performed with strains TA98 and TA100. 8 concentrations were tested for toxicity and mutation induction with each 3 plates. The experimental conditions in the pre-experiment were the same as described for the experiment 1 (plate incorporation test).
Toxicity of the test item can be evident as a reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants of a clearing of the bacterial background lawn.
Evaluable plates (> 0 colonies) at five concentrations or more in all strains used.
For each strain and dose level, including the controls, three plates were used.
In the preincubation assay, test solution, S9 mix and bacterial suspension were mixed and incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes. After pre-incubation agar was added to each tube. The mixture was poured on minimal agar plates. After solidification the plates were incubated upside down for at least 48 hours at 37 °C in the dark.
Acceptability of the assay :
-regular background growth in the negative and solvent control
-the spontaneous reversion rates in the negative and solvent control are in the arnge of the historical control data
-the psitive control substances should produce a significant increase in mutant colony frequencies - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered positive if either a dose related increase in the number of revertants of a biologically relevant increase for at least one test concentration is induced.
A test item producing neither a dose related increase in the number of revertants nor a biologically relevant positive response at any dose of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A biologically relevant response is described as : A test item is considered mutagenic if the number of reversions is at least twice the spontaneous reversion rate instrains TA98, TA 100 and TA 102, or trice in strains TA1535, TA1537. Also a dose-dependent increase in the number of revertants is regarded as an indication of possibly existing mutagenic potential of the test item regardless whether the highest dose induced the criteria described above or not. - Statistics:
- no
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535, TA1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No precipitation of the test item occurred up to the highest investigated dose.
No toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in the tes groups with and without metabolic activation.
The plates incubated with the test item showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in all strains used.
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester srains was observed following treatment with the test item at any dose level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance.
Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies. - Conclusions:
- In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes of frameshifts in the genome of the strains used.
The test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in ths Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay. - Executive summary:
The study was performed to investigate the potential of the test item to induce gene mutations according to the plate incorporation test (experiment 1) and the pre-incubation test (experiment 2) sing the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and TA102.
The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the controls, was tested in triplicate. The test item was tested at the following concentrations: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 and 500 µg/plate.
No toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in the tes groups with and without metabolic activation.
The plates incubated with the test item showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in all strains used.
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester srains was observed following treatment with the test item at any dose level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance.
Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies.
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes of frameshifts in the genome of the strains used.
The test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in ths Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23 April 2013 - 18 June 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline No. 487 (In vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Target gene:
- Not applicable (not a gene mutation assay).
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: L5178Y TK+/- mouse lymphoma cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum, L-Glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 µg/mL) and sodium pyruvate (200 µg/mL)
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- With a treatment volume of 1% (v/v) in culture medium, the dose-levels used for treatments, were as follows:
. 0.16, 0.31, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 µg/mL in the first experiment without S9 mix,
. 0.31, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 40 µg/mL in the second experiment without S9 mix,
. 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 µg/mL in both experiments with S9 mix. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle used: the vehicle was dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), batch No. K42474850 145.
- Justification for choice according to solubility assays performed at CiToxLAB France: highest recommended dose-level of 5000 µg/mL was achievable using a test item solution at 500 mg/mL under a treatment volume of 1% (v/v) in the culture medium. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: mitomycin C, colchicine (without S9 mix); cyclophosphamide (with S9 mix)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
-First experiment: 3 h treatment + 24 h recovery (without and with S9 mix),
-Second experiment : 24 h treatment + 20 h recovery (without S9 mix), and 3 h treatment + 24 h recovery (with S9 mix).
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 2000 mononucleated cells/dose
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: population doubling - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item was considered to have clastogenic and/or aneugenic potential, if all the following criteria were met:
- a dose-related increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells was observed,
- for at least one dose-level, the frequency of micronucleated cells of each replicate culture was above the corresponding vehicle historical range,
- a statistically significant difference in comparison to the corresponding vehicle control was obtained at one or more dose-levels.
The biological relevance of the results was considered first.
If the criteria of a positive response are only partially met, results will be evaluated on a case by case basis, taking into account other parameters such as reproducibility between experiments. If results remain inconclusive, or when the highest analyzable dose-level does not exhibit about 55% toxicity (in case of toxic items), additional confirmatory experiments may be needed. - Statistics:
- no
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Experiments without S9 mix
Cytotoxicity
Following the first experiment,a severe toxicity was induced at the highest tested dose-level of 20 µg/mL, as shown by a 100% decrease in the PD. The immediately lower dose-level of 10 µg/mL induced a slight but acceptable toxicity, as shown by a 37% decrease in the PD.
Following the second experiment,a severe toxicity was induced at the highest tested dose-level of 40 µg/mL, as shown by a 100% decrease in the PD. The immediately lower dose-level of 20 µg/mL induced no toxicity, as shown by no noteworthy decrease in the PD.
Micronucleus analysis
The dose-levels selected for micronucleus analysis were as follows:
. 2.5, 5 and 10 µg/mL for the 3-hour treatment, the higher being too cytotoxic,
. 5, 10 and 20 µg/mL for the 24-hour treatment, the higher being too cytotoxic.
In the first experiment, a statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells was noted at the dose-level of 10 µg/mL. However, no dose-response relationship was noted, and only one replicate of the two cultures used for this dose-level showed a frequency of micronucleated cells above the corresponding vehicle control historical data range. These results were thus considered to be equivocal, and the second experiment without S9 mix was performed following a long treatment period. During the second experiment, no statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells was noted. Consequently, the increase observed during the first experiment was not reproduced, and was thus not considered to be biologically relevant.
Experiments with S9 mix
Cytotoxicity
Following the first experiment,a marked toxicity was induced at the highest tested dose-level of 80 µg/mL, as shown by a 77% decrease in the PD. The immediately lower dose-level of 40 µg/mL induced a slight but acceptable toxicity, as shown by a 38% decrease in the PD.
Following the second experiment, a slight toxicity was induced at the highest tested dose-level of 80 µg/mL, as shown by a 28% decrease in the PD.
Micronucleus analysis
The dose-levels selected for micronucleus analysis were as follows:
. 10, 20 and 40 µg/mL for the first experiment, the higher being too cytotoxic,
. 20, 40 and 80 µg/mL for the second experiment, the latter showing a precipitate at the end of the treatment period.
In the first experiment, a dose-response relationship was noted, but no statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells was observed. In the second experiment performed in the same experimental conditions, some increases in the frequency of micronucleated cells were noted at 40 and 80 µg/mL. However, these increases were not statistically significant, and the corresponding frequencies of micronucleated cells remained within the historical data of the vehicle control. Consequently, these increases did not meet the criteria for a positive response and were thus considered as non-biologically relevant. - Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions of the study, 1,10-decanediol diacrylate did not induce any chromosome damage, or damage to the cell division apparatus, in cultured mammalian somatic cells, using L5178Y TK+/- mouse lymphoma cells, in the absence or in the presence of a rat metabolising system.
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of 1,10-decanediol diacrylate to induce an increase in the frequency of micronucleated cellsin the mouse cell line L5178YTK+/-. This study conducted in compliance with OECD Guideline No. 487 and the principles of Good Laboratory Practices.
Methods
After a preliminary toxicity test, the test item was tested in two independent experiments, with and without a metabolic activation system, the S9 mix, prepared from a liver microsomal fraction (S9 fraction) of rats induced with Aroclor 1254, as follows:
-First experiment: 3 h treatment + 24 h recovery (without and with S9 mix),
-Second experiment : 24 h treatment + 20 h recovery (without S9 mix), and 3 h treatment + 24 h recovery (with S9 mix).
Each treatment was coupled to an assessment of cytotoxicity at the same dose-levels. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by determining the PD (Population Doubling) of cells and quality of the cells on the slides has also been taken into account.
For each main experiment (with or without S9 mix), micronuclei were analyzed for three dose-levels of the test item, for the vehicle and the positive controls, in 1000 mononucleated cells per culture (total of 2000 mononucleated cells per concentration).
The test item was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).
Results
The mean PD and mean frequencies of micronucleated cells for the vehicle control cultures were as specified in the acceptance criteria. Positive control cultures showed clear statistically significant increases in the frequency of micronucleated cells. The study was therefore considered to be valid.
Since the test item was found to be cytotoxic and poorly soluble in the preliminary test, the selection of the highest dose-level to be used in the main experiments was based on the level of precipitate/emulsion and/or cytotoxicity, according to the criteria specified in the international guidelines.
With a treatment volume of 1% (v/v) in culture medium, the dose-levels used for treatments, were as follows:
. 0.16, 0.31, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 µg/mL in the first experiment without S9 mix,
. 0.31, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 40 µg/mL in the second experiment without S9 mix,
. 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 µg/mL in both experiments with S9 mix.
A precipitate was observed at the end of the treatments performed with S9 mix at the highest tested dose-level of 80 µg/mL.
Experiments without S9 mix
Cytotoxicity
Following the first experiment,a severe toxicity was induced at the highest tested dose-level of 20 µg/mL, as shown by a 100% decrease in the PD. The immediately lower dose-level of 10 µg/mL induced a slight but acceptable toxicity, as shown by a 37% decrease in the PD.
Following the second experiment,a severe toxicity was induced at the highest tested dose-level of 40 µg/mL, as shown by a 100% decrease in the PD. The immediately lower dose-level of 20 µg/mL induced no toxicity, as shown by no noteworthy decrease in the PD.
Micronucleus analysis
The dose-levels selected for micronucleus analysis were as follows:
. 2.5, 5 and 10 µg/mL for the 3-hour treatment, the higher being too cytotoxic,
. 5, 10 and 20 µg/mL for the 24-hour treatment, the higher being too cytotoxic.
In the first experiment, a statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells was noted at the dose-level of 10 µg/mL. However, no dose-response relationship was noted, and only one replicate of the two cultures used for this dose-level showed a frequency of micronucleated cells above the corresponding vehicle control historical data range. These results were thus considered to be equivocal, and the second experiment without S9 mix was performed following a long treatment period. During the second experiment, no statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells was noted. Consequently, the increase observed during the first experiment was not reproduced, and was thus not considered to be biologically relevant.
Experiments with S9 mix
Cytotoxicity
Following the first experiment,a marked toxicity was induced at the highest tested dose-level of 80 µg/mL, as shown by a 77% decrease in the PD. The immediately lower dose-level of 40 µg/mL induced a slight but acceptable toxicity, as shown by a 38% decrease in the PD.
Following the second experiment, a slight toxicity was induced at the highest tested dose-level of 80 µg/mL, as shown by a 28% decrease in the PD.
Micronucleus analysis
The dose-levels selected for micronucleus analysis were as follows:
. 10, 20 and 40 µg/mL for the first experiment, the higher being too cytotoxic,
. 20, 40 and 80 µg/mL for the second experiment, the latter showing a precipitate at the end of the treatment period.
In the first experiment, a dose-response relationship was noted, but no statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells was observed. In the second experiment performed in the same experimental conditions, some increases in the frequency of micronucleated cells were noted at 40 and 80 µg/mL. However, these increases were not statistically significant, and the corresponding frequencies of micronucleated cells remained within the historical data of the vehicle control. Consequently, these increases did not meet the criteria for a positive response and were thus considered as non-biologically relevant.
Conclusion
Under the experimental conditions of the study, the test item did not induce any chromosome damage, or damage to the cell division apparatus, in cultured mammalian somatic cells, using L5178Y TK+/- mouse lymphoma cells, in the absence or in the presence of a rat metabolising system.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 17 April 2013 to 20 August 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HPRT gene
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- The master stock of L5178Y tk+/- (3.7.2°C) mouse lymphoma cells originated from Dr Donald Clive, Burroughs Wellcome Co. Cells supplied to Covance Laboratories Ltd. were stored as frozen stocks in liquid nitrogen. Each batch of frozen cells was purged of mutants and confirmed to be mycoplasma free. For each experiment, at least one vial was thawed rapidly, the cells diluted in RPMI 10 and incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5 ± 1% v/v CO2 in air. When the cells were growing well, subcultures were established in an appropriate number of flasks.
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- The mammalian liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S-9) used for metabolic activation were from male Sprague Dawley rats induced with Aroclor 1254
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- In the cytotoxicity Range-Finder Experiment, six concentrations were tested in the absence and presence of S-9 ranging from 88.13 to 2820 µg/mL (equivalent to 10 mM at the highest concentration tested).
In Experiment 1 thirteen concentrations, ranging from 2.5 to 150 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and from 25 to 400 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, were tested.
In Experiment 2 twelve concentrations, ranging from 5 to 80 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and from 50 to 400 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, were tested.
Positive controls
4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (NQO), stock solution: 0.015 and 0.020 mg/mL and final concentration: 0.15 and 0.20 µg/mL, no metabolic activation
Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), stock solution: 0.200 and 0.300 mg/mL and final concentration: 2.00 and 3.00 µg/mL with metabolic activation - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO diluted 100 fold in the treatment medium
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO diluted 100 fold in the treatment medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- For positive control concentrations see test concentration section
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- DURATION
- Preincubation period: Not applicable
- Exposure duration: 3-hour exposure followed by 7-day incubation period - Evaluation criteria:
- For valid data, the test article was considered to induce forward mutation at the hprt locus in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells if:
1. The mutant frequency at one or more concentrations was significantly greater than that of the negative control (p < 0.05).
2. There was a significant concentration relationship as indicated by the linear trend analysis (p < 0.05).
3. The effects described above were reproducible.
The test article was considered positive in this assay if all of the above criteria were met.
The test article was considered negative in this assay if none of the above criteria were met. - Statistics:
- Not applicable
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- In the cytotoxicity Range-Finder Experiment, six concentrations were tested in the absence and presence of S-9 ranging from 88.13 to 2820 µg/mL (equivalent to 10 mM at the highest concentration tested). The highest concentration to provide >10% relative survival (RS) in the presence of S-9 was 176.3 µg/mL, which gave 96% RS. Extreme or complete toxicity was observed at the remaining higher concentrations analysed in the presence of S-9 (352.5 to 705 µg/mL). In the absence of S-9, complete toxicity (0% RS) was observed at all concentrations analysed (88.13 to 705 µg/mL).
Following consultation with the Study Monitor, an extended range of closely spaced concentrations was tested in the absence of S-9 in Experiment 1.
In Experiment 1, thirteen concentrations, ranging from 2.5 to 150 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and from 25 to 400 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, were tested. Seven days after treatment, the highest concentrations analysed to determine viability and 6TG resistance were 40 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and 330 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, limited by toxicity, which gave 17% and 12% RS, respectively.
In Experiment 2, twelve concentrations, ranging from 5 to 80 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and from 50 to 400 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, were tested. The highest concentrations analysed to determine viability and 6TG resistance were 30 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and 270 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, which gave 14% and 12% RS, respectively.
In both Experiments 1 and 2, no statistically significant increases in mutant frequency were observed following treatment with 1,10-decanediol diacrylate at any concentration tested, in the absence or presence of S-9, and there were no significant linear trends. Mutant frequencies in vehicle control cultures fell within acceptable ranges and clear increases in mutation were induced by the positive control chemicals. The study was therefore accepted as valid. - Conclusions:
- It is concluded that 1,10-decanediol diacrylate did not induce mutation at the hprt locus of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells when tested up to toxic concentrations in two independent experiments, in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolising system (S-9).
- Executive summary:
1,10-decanediol diacrylate was assayed for the ability to induce mutation at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (hprt) locus (6-thioguanine [6TG] resistance) in mouse lymphoma cells using a fluctuation protocol. The study consisted of a cytotoxicity Range-Finder Experiment followed by two independent experiments, each conducted in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by an Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S-9). The test article was formulated in anhydrous analytical grade dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO).
A 3 hour treatment incubation period was used for all experiments.
In the cytotoxicity Range-Finder Experiment, six concentrations were tested in the absence and presence of S-9, ranging from 88.13 to 2820 µg/mL (equivalent to 10 mM at the highest concentration tested). The highest concentration to provide >10% relative survival (RS) in the presence of S-9 was 176.3 µg/mL, which gave 96% RS. Extreme or complete toxicity was observed at the remaining higher concentrations analysed in the presence of S-9 (352.5 to 705 µg/mL). In the absence of S-9 complete toxicity (0% RS) was observed at all concentrations analysed (88.13 to 705 µg/mL). Following consultation with the Study Monitor, an extended range of closely spaced concentrations was tested in the absence of S-9 in Experiment 1.
In Experiment 1 thirteen concentrations, ranging from 2.5 to 150 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and from 25 to 400 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, were tested. Seven days after treatment, the highest concentrations analysed to determine viability and 6TG resistance were 40mg/µL in the absence of S-9 and 330 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, limited by toxicity, which gave 17% and 12% RS, respectively.
In Experiment 2 twelve concentrations, ranging from 5 to 80 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and from 50 to 400 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, were tested.The highest concentrations analysed to determine viability and 6TG resistance were 30 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and 270 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, which gave 14% and 12% RS, respectively.
Negative (vehicle) and positive control treatments were included in each Mutation Experiment in the absence and presence of S-9. Mutant frequencies (MF) in vehicle control cultures fell within acceptable ranges and clear increases in mutation were induced by the positive control chemicals 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (NQO) (without S-9) and benzo(a)pyrene (B[a]P) (with S-9). Therefore the study was accepted as valid.
In Experiments 1 and 2 no statistically significant increases in MF were observed following treatment with1,10-decanediol diacrylate at any concentration tested in the absence and presence of S-9 and there were no significant linear trends.
It is concluded that 1,10-decanediol diacrylate did not induce mutation at the hprt locus of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells when tested up to toxic concentrations in two independent experiments, in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolising system (S-9).
Referenceopen allclose all
Ames tables
Pre-experiment
Test group |
Concentration per plate (µg) |
Revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates) |
|||
TA98 |
TA98 |
TA 100 |
TA 100 |
||
- S9 |
+ S9 |
- S9 |
+ S9 |
||
Negative control |
- |
28 |
38 |
166 |
138 |
Solvent control |
- |
20 |
32 |
166 |
155 |
4-NOPD |
10 |
223 |
- |
- |
- |
Sodium azide |
10 |
- |
- |
690 |
- |
2-AA |
2.5 |
- |
223 |
- |
742 |
Test item |
3 |
22 |
29 |
143 |
126 |
Test item |
10 |
29 |
28 |
139 |
132 |
Test item |
33 |
30 |
29 |
143 |
128 |
Test item |
100 |
27 |
32 |
143 |
126 |
Test item |
333 |
27 |
30 |
133 |
118 |
Test item |
1000 |
18 |
3
|
132 |
130 |
Test item |
2500 |
24 |
23 |
131 |
133 |
Test item |
5000 |
24 |
22 |
124 |
130 |
Experiment 1
TA1535 without S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
8 |
7 |
11 |
9 |
2.1 |
|
Solvent control |
8 |
13 |
8 |
10 |
2.9 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
615 |
664 |
664 |
648 |
28.3 |
67.0 |
33 |
13 |
10 |
7 |
10 |
3.0 |
1.0 |
100 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
333 |
10 |
7 |
8 |
8 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
1000 |
6 |
11 |
5 |
7 |
3.2 |
0.8 |
2500 |
9 |
5 |
9 |
8 |
2.3 |
0.8 |
5000 |
6 |
10 |
8 |
8 |
2.0 |
0.8 |
TA1535 with S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
8 |
8 |
11 |
9 |
1.7 |
|
Solvent control |
15 |
15 |
9 |
13 |
3.5 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
73 |
86 |
64 |
74 |
11.1 |
5.7 |
33 |
8 |
11 |
17 |
12 |
4.6 |
0.9 |
100 |
8 |
8 |
12 |
9 |
2.3 |
0.7 |
333 |
7 |
12 |
10 |
10 |
2.5 |
0.7 |
1000 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
2500 |
10 |
7 |
5 |
7 |
2.5 |
0.6 |
5000 |
6 |
9 |
7 |
7 |
1.5 |
0.6 |
TA1537 without S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
6 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
0.6 |
|
Solvent control |
10 |
7 |
4 |
7 |
3.0 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
52 |
51 |
52 |
52 |
0.6 |
7.4 |
33 |
8 |
5 |
7 |
7 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
100 |
8 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
2.1 |
0.8 |
333 |
5 |
8 |
5 |
6 |
1.7 |
0.9 |
1000 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
7 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
2500 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
5000 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
TA1537 with S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
16 |
11 |
7 |
11 |
4.5 |
|
Solvent control |
5 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
107 |
96 |
84 |
96 |
11.5 |
16.9 |
33 |
12 |
7 |
7 |
9 |
2.9 |
1.5 |
100 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
7 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
333 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
0 |
1.1 |
1000 |
8 |
7 |
4 |
6 |
2.1 |
1.1 |
2500 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0.9 |
5000 |
8 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
2.3 |
0.9 |
TA98 without S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
27 |
27 |
31 |
28 |
2.3 |
|
Solvent control |
23 |
20 |
18 |
20 |
2.5 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
241 |
212 |
217 |
223 |
15.5 |
11.0 |
33 |
29 |
32 |
30 |
30 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
100 |
28 |
29 |
25 |
27 |
2.1 |
1.3 |
333 |
24 |
29 |
27 |
27 |
2.5 |
1.3 |
1000 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
18 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
2500 |
25 |
22 |
26 |
24 |
2.1 |
1.2 |
5000 |
23 |
24 |
26 |
24 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
TA98 with S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
38 |
39 |
38 |
38 |
0.6 |
|
Solvent control |
34 |
32 |
29 |
32 |
2.5 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
379 |
430 |
402 |
404 |
25.5 |
12.7 |
33 |
29 |
27 |
30 |
29 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
100 |
31 |
31 |
34 |
32 |
1.7 |
1.0 |
333 |
29 |
32 |
28 |
30 |
2.1 |
0.9 |
1000 |
21 |
23 |
25 |
23 |
2.0 |
0.7 |
2500 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
23 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
5000 |
19 |
23 |
24 |
22 |
2.6 |
0.7 |
TA100 without S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
156 |
161 |
180 |
166 |
12.7 |
|
Solvent control |
166 |
160 |
171 |
166 |
5.5 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
721 |
702 |
648 |
690 |
37.9 |
4.2 |
33 |
143 |
148 |
138 |
143 |
5.0 |
0.9 |
100 |
143 |
142 |
145 |
143 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
333 |
132 |
135 |
131 |
133 |
2.1 |
0.8 |
1000 |
139 |
128 |
130 |
132 |
5.9 |
0.8 |
2500 |
130 |
133 |
129 |
131 |
2.1 |
0.8 |
5000 |
125 |
121 |
127 |
124 |
3.1 |
0.8 |
TA100 with S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
147 |
132 |
135 |
138 |
7.9 |
|
Solvent control |
158 |
157 |
149 |
155 |
4.9 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
713 |
757 |
756 |
742 |
25.1 |
4.8 |
33 |
130 |
129 |
124 |
128 |
3.2 |
0.8 |
100 |
127 |
121 |
131 |
126 |
5.0 |
0.8 |
333 |
122 |
118 |
115 |
118 |
3.5 |
0.8 |
1000 |
125 |
129 |
135 |
130 |
5.0 |
0.8 |
2500 |
132 |
129 |
139 |
133 |
5.1 |
0.9 |
5000 |
132 |
128 |
131 |
130 |
2.1 |
0.8 |
TA102 without S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
207 |
194 |
194 |
198 |
7.5 |
|
Solvent control |
195 |
182 |
201 |
193 |
9.7 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
973 |
915 |
1026 |
971 |
55.5 |
5.0 |
33 |
233 |
198 |
205 |
212 |
18.5 |
1.1 |
100 |
229 |
195 |
178 |
201 |
26.0 |
1.0 |
333 |
210 |
210 |
183 |
201 |
15.6 |
1.0 |
1000 |
190 |
190 |
177 |
186 |
7.5 |
1.0 |
2500 |
193 |
205 |
177 |
192 |
14.0 |
1.0 |
5000 |
217 |
203 |
185 |
202 |
16.0 |
1.0 |
TA102 with S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
192 |
149 |
149 |
163 |
24.8 |
|
Solvent control |
161 |
194 |
238 |
198 |
38.6 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
749 |
785 |
806 |
780 |
28.8 |
3.9 |
33 |
184 |
198 |
237 |
206 |
27.5 |
1.0 |
100 |
196 |
196 |
167 |
186 |
16.7 |
0.9 |
333 |
147 |
165 |
181 |
164 |
17.0 |
0.8 |
1000 |
172 |
182 |
198 |
184 |
13.1 |
0.9 |
2500 |
156 |
139 |
117 |
137 |
19.6 |
0.7 |
5000 |
116 |
107 |
117 |
113 |
5.5 |
0.6 |
Experiment 2
TA1535 without S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
9 |
10 |
8 |
9 |
1.0 |
|
Solvent control |
13 |
11 |
9 |
11 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
738 |
754 |
677 |
723 |
40.6 |
65.7 |
33 |
13 |
11 |
7 |
10 |
3.1 |
0.9 |
100 |
14 |
10 |
13 |
12 |
2.1 |
1.1 |
333 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
10 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
1000 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
2500 |
10 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
1.7 |
0.7 |
5000 |
6 |
8 |
8 |
7 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
TA1535 with S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
10 |
13 |
13 |
12 |
1.7 |
|
Solvent control |
13 |
10 |
9 |
11 |
2.1 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
120 |
128 |
119 |
122 |
4.9 |
11.5 |
33 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
100 |
13 |
9 |
8 |
10 |
2.6 |
0.9 |
333 |
8 |
7 |
9 |
8 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
1000 |
5 |
13 |
6 |
8 |
4.4 |
0.8 |
2500 |
11 |
12 |
8 |
10 |
2.1 |
1.0 |
5000 |
13 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
2.1 |
1.0 |
TA1537 without S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
7 |
5 |
7 |
6 |
1.2 |
|
Solvent control |
5 |
7 |
6 |
6 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
47 |
49 |
65 |
54 |
9.9 |
8.9 |
33 |
6 |
6 |
8 |
7 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
100 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
333 |
5 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1000 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
2500 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
5000 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
TA1537 with S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
12 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
0.6 |
|
Solvent control |
12 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
2.1 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
57 |
55 |
55 |
56 |
1.2 |
5.8 |
33 |
7 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
100 |
12 |
9 |
12 |
11 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
333 |
9 |
8 |
13 |
10 |
2.6 |
1.0 |
1000 |
9 |
11 |
10 |
10 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2500 |
9 |
0 |
10 |
6 |
5.5 |
0.7 |
5000 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
0.0 |
1.1 |
TA98 without S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
25 |
24 |
32 |
27 |
4.4 |
|
Solvent control |
31 |
21 |
23 |
25 |
5.3 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
220 |
203 |
234 |
219 |
15.5 |
8.8 |
33 |
34 |
26 |
23 |
28 |
5.7 |
1.1 |
100 |
30 |
30 |
21 |
27 |
5.2 |
1.1 |
333 |
19 |
25 |
30 |
25 |
5.5 |
1.0 |
1000 |
21 |
30 |
23 |
25 |
4.7 |
1.0 |
2500 |
27 |
27 |
21 |
25 |
3.5 |
1.0 |
5000 |
19 |
24 |
26 |
23 |
3.6 |
0.9 |
TA98 with S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
30 |
44 |
40 |
38 |
7.2 |
|
Solvent control |
45 |
44 |
34 |
41 |
6.1 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
586 |
591 |
548 |
575 |
23.5 |
14.0 |
33 |
52 |
38 |
46 |
45 |
7.0 |
1.1 |
100 |
47 |
47 |
42 |
45 |
2.9 |
1.1 |
333 |
44 |
38 |
46 |
43 |
4.2 |
1.0 |
1000 |
35 |
33 |
36 |
35 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
2500 |
40 |
30 |
32 |
34 |
5.3 |
0.8 |
5000 |
37 |
38 |
34 |
36 |
2.1 |
0.9 |
TA100 without S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
97 |
112 |
129 |
113 |
16.0 |
|
Solvent control |
129 |
107 |
100 |
112 |
15.1 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
832 |
902 |
856 |
863 |
35.6 |
7.7 |
33 |
99 |
100 |
106 |
102 |
3.8 |
0.9 |
100 |
101 |
107 |
113 |
107 |
6.0 |
1.0 |
333 |
91 |
102 |
100 |
98 |
5.9 |
0.9 |
1000 |
116 |
109 |
101 |
109 |
7.5 |
1.0 |
2500 |
90 |
97 |
104 |
97 |
7.0 |
0.9 |
5000 |
62 |
84 |
66 |
71 |
11.7 |
0.6 |
TA100 with S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
81 |
78 |
113 |
91 |
19.4 |
|
Solvent control |
132 |
125 |
131 |
129 |
3.8 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
691 |
711 |
698 |
700 |
10.1 |
5.4 |
33 |
119 |
111 |
124 |
118 |
6.6 |
0.9 |
100 |
104 |
104 |
114 |
107 |
5.8 |
0.8 |
333 |
98 |
83 |
84 |
88 |
8.4 |
0.7 |
1000 |
83 |
100 |
95 |
93 |
8.7 |
0.7 |
2500 |
100 |
82 |
84 |
89 |
9.9 |
0.7 |
5000 |
89 |
90 |
78 |
86 |
6.7 |
0.7 |
TA102 without S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
210 |
220 |
212 |
214 |
5.3 |
|
Solvent control |
199 |
157 |
189 |
182 |
21.9 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
1040 |
984 |
1090 |
1038 |
53.0 |
5.7 |
33 |
212 |
214 |
183 |
203 |
17.3 |
1.1 |
100 |
228 |
214 |
207 |
216 |
10.7 |
1.2 |
333 |
205 |
215 |
198 |
206 |
8.5 |
1.1 |
1000 |
184 |
196 |
182 |
187 |
7.6 |
1.0 |
2500 |
196 |
199 |
166 |
187 |
18.2 |
1.0 |
5000 |
174 |
156 |
163 |
164 |
9.1 |
0.9 |
TA102 with S9
Concentration µg/plate |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Plate 3 |
Mean revertant/ plate |
s.d |
factor |
Negative control |
275 |
191 |
191 |
219 |
48.5 |
|
Solvent control |
191 |
201 |
229 |
207 |
19.7 |
1.0 |
Positive control |
805 |
723 |
822 |
783 |
52.9 |
3.8 |
33 |
218 |
234 |
214 |
222 |
10.6 |
1.1 |
100 |
262 |
251 |
217 |
243 |
23.5 |
1.2 |
333 |
230 |
224 |
218 |
224 |
6.0 |
1.1 |
1000 |
219 |
215 |
202 |
212 |
8.9 |
1.0 |
2500 |
225 |
214 |
218 |
219 |
5.6 |
1.1 |
5000 |
218 |
228 |
223 |
223 |
5.0 |
1.1 |
Table 1: %RS Values –Range-Finder Experiment
Treatment (µg/mL) |
-S-9 % RS |
+S-9 % RS |
0 |
100 |
100 |
88.13 |
0 |
122 |
176.3 |
0 |
96 |
352.5 P |
0 |
3 |
705.0 P, PP |
0 |
0 |
1410 P, PP |
NP |
NP |
2820 P, PP |
NP |
NP |
P Precipitation observed at time of treatment
PP Precipitation observed following treatment incubation period
NP Not plated
Table 2: Summary of Mutation Data
Experiment 1 (3-hour treatment in the absence and presence of S-9)
Treatment (mg/mL) |
-S-9 |
Treatment (mg/mL) |
+S-9 |
||||||
%RS |
MF§ |
%RS |
MF§ |
||||||
0 |
100 |
5.38 |
0 |
100 |
2.79 |
||||
2.5 |
103 |
1.29 |
NS |
50 |
101 |
2.39 |
NS |
||
5 |
101 |
2.34 |
NS |
100 |
77 |
1.71 |
NS |
||
10 |
73 |
3.45 |
NS |
150 |
$$, P |
51 |
(4.76) |
||
20 |
59 |
2.46 |
NS |
200 |
P |
39 |
2.45 |
NS |
|
30 |
31 |
2.91 |
NS |
230 |
P |
29 |
4.18 |
NS |
|
40 |
17 |
4.28 |
NS |
250 |
P |
22 |
4.00 |
NS |
|
270 |
$$, P |
18 |
(6.36) |
||||||
300 |
P |
10 |
2.18 |
NS |
|||||
330 |
P |
12 |
1.32 |
NS |
|||||
Linear trend |
NS |
Linear trend |
NS |
||||||
NQO |
B[a]P |
||||||||
0.15 |
63 |
31.36 |
2 |
79 |
21.52 |
||||
0.2 |
43 |
47.63 |
3 |
57 |
56.34 |
Experiment 2 (3-hour treatment in the absence and presence of S-9)
Treatment (µg/mL) |
-S-9 |
Treatment (µg/mL) |
+S-9 |
||||||
%RS |
MF§ |
%RS |
MF§ |
||||||
0 |
100 |
3.31 |
0 |
100 |
2.06 |
||||
5 |
78 |
3.20 |
NS |
50 |
92 |
5.28 |
NS |
||
7.5 |
76 |
1.52 |
NS |
75 |
84 |
1.55 |
NS |
||
10 |
64 |
1.86 |
NS |
100 |
65 |
2.83 |
NS |
||
20 |
31 |
1.88 |
NS |
150 |
43 |
2.67 |
NS |
||
25 |
18 |
2.15 |
NS |
200 |
23 |
3.36 |
NS |
||
30 |
14 |
3.01 |
NS |
250 |
P |
14 |
3.23 |
NS |
|
270 |
P |
12 |
2.00 |
NS |
|||||
Linear trend |
NS |
Linear trend |
NS |
||||||
NQO |
B[a]P |
||||||||
0.15 |
71 |
54.02 |
2 |
58 |
23.88 |
||||
0.2 |
61 |
47.44 |
3 |
22 |
53.43 |
§ 6-TG resistant mutants/106viable cells 7 days after treatment
%RS Percent relative survival adjusted by post treatment cell counts
$$ Treatment excluded from analysis due to excessive heterogeneity for mutation
Data in parentheses indicates marked heterogeneity observed
P Precipitation noted at time of treatment only
NS Not significant
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the negative results in all three regulatory in vitro genotoxicity tests, no classification for 1,10-decanediyl bis methacrylate is required for genotoxicity according to the Regulation EC n°1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.