Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-677-4 | CAS number: 68-11-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction: other studies
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to reproduction: other studies
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: For the time being, the draft report is still undergoing a multi-tiered review that includes NTP staff review and external peer review. However, the data available on the NTP website are sufficiently detailed for a preliminary assessment.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- other: draft study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 003
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- SPERMATID HEAD COUNT AND VAGINAL CYTOLOGY EVALUATIONS (SCVCE)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of method:
- in vivo
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium mercaptoacetate
- EC Number:
- 206-696-4
- EC Name:
- Sodium mercaptoacetate
- Cas Number:
- 367-51-1
- Molecular formula:
- C2H4O2S.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium sulfanylacetate
- Details on test material:
- Supplier: Midwest Research Institute (MRI, Kansas City Ohio)
Batch: 88H1166
Purity: ca. 99%
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Sex:
- male/female
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- dermal
- Vehicle:
- ethanol
- Details on exposure:
- For more details, see IUCLID about NTP study 2003 (Thirtheen-week subchronic dermal toxicity study of sodium thioglycolate (NaT) in Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice). See section 7.5.2
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 13 weeks
- Frequency of treatment:
- five times per week
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 45, 90 and 180 mg/kg bw/d
Basis:
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- Study DesignVaginal cytology slides and frozen left testes were received from BioReliance Corporation on March 28, 2003. The testes were stored in a freezer at -80°C ± 10°C. Sperm data sheets for rats and mice, which included body weights, sperm density, sperm motility, whole left epididymal, left cauda epididymal, and left testicular weights were provided.Frozen left testes and vaginal cytology slides from mice atdose levels of 0, 90, 180, and 360 mg/kg were analyzed. The tunica albuginea and associated blood vessels were removed from the parenchyma and the testicular parenchyma was allowed to thaw. The parenchyma was weighed andthen homogenized in a solution of 10% Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) in physiological saline, stained with 0.1% Trypan Blue and the number of spermatids was counted using a haemacytometer. The vaginal cytology slides were evaluated and the oestrous cycle stage (Prooestrus, Oestrus, Metoestrus or Dioestrus) was determined for each day (Cooper et al., 1993).The cycle length, number of cycles, number of cycling females, and number of females with a regular cycle were determined.
- Statistics:
- Most hypotheses were tested using the nonparametric multiple comparisons procedure of Dunn (1964) or Shirley (1977), as modified by Williams (1986). Shirley's test was designed to detect treatment-related differences when the response to treatment consistently increased (or decreased) with increasing dose. Although the test employs a smoothing algorithm to adjust for dose-response inversions, Dunn's test was more appropriate if the departure from monotonicity was severe. Jonckheere's test (1954) was used to ascertain whether there was sufficient evidence of a dose-related response to apply Shirley's test. If the p-value from Jonckheere's test was less than 0.01, Shirley's test was used; otherwise, Dunn's test was applied. An arcsine transformation was applied to vaginal cytology data, representing the proportion of the observation periods that an animal was in a given oestrous stage, to bring the data into closer conformance with normality assumptions. Treatment effects were investigated by applying a multivariate analysis of variance (Wilk's criterion) to test for the simultaneous equality of measurements across dose levels (Morrison, 1976). The pairwise comparisons for data expressed as a proportion were performed using the Chi-square test (Conover, 1971).All findings described in this report as "increased" or "decreased" were statistically significant as compared to the control group.
Results and discussion
Effect levels
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 180 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No effect on the reproduction parameters
Observed effects
Any other information on results incl. tables
The male
terminal body weight decreased by 7% and 5% at the dose levels of 90
mg/kg and 180 mg/kg respectively (Table R-1). The absolute and relative
weights of male reproductive organs were all comparable across groups
(Table R-1). The percent motility, the number of sperm per mg cauda, the
total number of sperm per cauda, the number of spermatids per mg testis,
and the total number of spermatids per testis were all comparable across
all groups (Table R-2).
The female terminal body weight was comparable across all groups (Table
R-3). The evaluation of vaginal smears revealed no significant
differences among the females in the cycle length, number of cycles,
number of cycling females, or number of females with regular cycles
(Table R-4). The relative amount of time spent in oestrous stages was
heterogeneous among treatment groups, but the pair-wise comparisons
between each dosed group and the control group were not significant.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Sodium thioglycolate would not be a reproductive toxicant in male and female rats following 13 weeks of administration via dermal application at concentrations up to 180 mg/kg.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this study was to determine if exposure to sodium thioglycolate (NaT) affects the reproductive system by evaluating sperm parameters and vaginal cytology data. The potential toxic effects of this compound on male and female rat reproductive system was tested by evaluation sperm parameters and vaginal cytology data.
Four groups of Sprague Dawley rats (10 males and 10 females) were treated with sodium mercaptoacetate at 0, 45, 90, 180 mg/kg bw/d. Sodium mercaptoacetate was applied on skin during 13 weeks, 5 days a week.
For males, data sheets which included body weights, sperm density, sperm motility, whole left epididymal, left cauda epididymal, and left testicular weights were provided. Spermatids in the parenchyma were counted. For females, the vaginal cytology slides were evaluated and the oestrous cycle stage (Prooestrus, Oestrus, Metoestrus or Dioestrus) was determined for each day. The cycle length, number of cycles, number of cycling females, and number of females with a regular cycle were determined.
No effects with statistically significance were observed at any doses, neither males nor females.
Based on these results, sodium thioglycolate would not be a reproductive toxicant in male and female rats following 13 weeks of administration via dermal application at concentrations up to 180 mg/kg.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.