Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 278-770-4 | CAS number: 77804-81-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 2 NOV 2004 to 27 DEC 2004
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study (OECD TG 476)
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Dimethyl 2-[[1-[[(2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)amino]carbonyl]-2-oxopropyl]azo]terephthalate
- EC Number:
- 252-650-1
- EC Name:
- Dimethyl 2-[[1-[[(2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)amino]carbonyl]-2-oxopropyl]azo]terephthalate
- Cas Number:
- 35636-63-6
- Molecular formula:
- C21H19N5O7
- IUPAC Name:
- dimethyl 2-({2-oxo-1-[(2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)carbamoyl]propyl}diazenyl)terephthalate
- Test material form:
- solid: nanoform
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media:
RPMI 1640 (Hepes buffered medium) supplemented with 15% horse serum, penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL respectively 100 µl/mL), 220 µg/mL sodium pyruvate and 1.25 U/mL Amphotericin
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9 (induced with phenobarbital/beta-naphtoflavone)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I:
without S9 mix: 11.7; 23.4; 46.9; 93.8; 187.5, and 375.0 microgram/mL
with S9 mix: 23.4; 46.9; 93.8; 187.5, and 375.0 microgram/mL
Experiment II: without S9 mix: 11.7; 23.4; 46.9; 93.8; and 187.5 microgram/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility properties of the solvent and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in suspension
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 h (Experiment I: with and w/o metabolic activation) and 24 h (Experiment II w/o metabolic activation)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 3 days total (i.e. experiment I: 4 hours treatment period plus 68 hours expression time; experiment II: 24 hours treatment period plus 48 hours expression time)
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10 to 15 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): trifluorothymidine (TFT)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: two independent experiments, using two parallel cultures each
NUMBER OF CELLS USED: Per culture 1 x 10EXP7 cells
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: relative suspension growth - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as positive if it induces either a reproducible concentration-related increase in the mutant frequency or a reproducible positive response for at least one of the test points.
A test item producing neither a reproducible concentration-related increase in the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A significant response is described as follows:
The test item is classified as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces a mutation frequency that is at least two times higher than the spontaneous mutation frequency (negative or solvent control) in the experiment.
The test item is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase in the mutation frequency. Such an evaluation may be considered independently of the enhancement factor for induced mutants.
However, in the evaluation of the test results the historical variability of the mutation rates in negative and solvent controls and the mutation rates of all negative and solvent controls of this study are taken into consideration.
Results of test groups are rejected if the relative total growth, the relative suspension growth and/or cloning efficiency 1 (survival of the cells after treatment) is less than 10 % of the solvent control or the cloning efficiency 2 (viability) after the expression period is less than 20 %.
Whenever a test item is considered mutagenic according to the above mentioned criteria, the ratio of small versus large colonies is used to differentiate point mutations from clastogenic effects. If the increase of the mutation frequency is accompanied by a reproducible and dose dependent shift in the ratio of small versus large colonies clastogenic effects are indicated.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- indicated by reduced relative cloning efficiency 1 in experiment I at 375 µg/mL in both cultures
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- experiment I: 1st culture at 375 µg/mL, 2nd culture at 187.5 µg/mL and above; experiment II: both cultures at 187.5 µg/mL and above
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation:
Precipitation of the test item was observed by the unaided eye at 187.5 and 375.0 microgram/mL in all experimental parts.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The mutation frequency did not exceed the historical range of negative and solvent controls at any concentration with and without metabolic activation. The threshold of two times the number of mutant colonies/10EXP6 cells was reached at 46.9 microgram/mL in the second culture of experiment I (with S9 mix). Since this effect was not observed at higher concentrations or in the parallel culture, this isolated effect was judged as biologically irrelevant.
The mutation frequency of the positive control in the first culture of experiment I fell just short of the historical range of positive controls with 233 versus 292 colonies per 10EXP6 cells. Since the threshold of twice the mutation frequency of the solvent control was clearly exceeded and the mean value of both positive controls is well within the historical range, this effect was considered as irrelevant fluctuation.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In experiment I without metabolic activation relevant toxicity (relative cloning efficiency 1 and / or relative total growth of less than 50 % survival) was detected at 187.5 µg/mL and above in the second culture. In culture I a clear toxic effect occurred at the highest concentration of 375 µg/mL.
In experiment I with metabolic activation a toxic effect indicated by a reduced relative cloning efficiency 1 was observed at 375 µg/mL in both cultures.
In the second experiment (24 h treatment without metabolic activation) relevant toxic effects occurred at 187.5 µg/mL and above in both cultures. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative
The test substance did not increase the mutant frequency at the TK+/- locus in L5178Y cells and is therefore considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of the test. - Executive summary:
Mouse Lymphoma cells (L5178Y TK+/-) were treated with the test substance at five or six concentrations in the range of 11.7 to 375 microgram/mL. Precipitation of the test substance was detectable at dose level 187.5 and 375 microgram/mL. The solvent control gave mutant frequencies within the normal range. The positive controls gave marked increases in the mutant frequency, both in the presence or absence of metabolic activation, indicating the satisfactory performance of the test system. The test substance demonstrated no statistically significant or dose related increases in mutant frequency at any dose level, either with or without metabolic activation, thus indicating that the test item is not mutagenic under the conditions tested.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.