Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 271-089-3 | CAS number: 68515-47-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study is rated a "2" because it applied GLP, used appropriate testing procedures, but did not follow an accepted testing guideline.
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Results of the L5178Y Mouse Lymphoma Assay and the Balb/3T3 Cell In Vitro Transformation Assay for Eight Phthalate Esters
- Author:
- Barber ED, Cifone M, Rundell J, Przygoda R, Astill BD, Moran E, Mulholland A, Robinson E and Schneider B
- Year:
- 2 000
- Bibliographic source:
- J Appl Toxicol 20:69-80
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 986
- Report date:
- 1986
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- L5178Y Mouse Lymphoma Assay and the Balb/3T3 Cell In Vitro Transformation Assay
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Diundecyl phthalate
- EC Number:
- 222-884-9
- EC Name:
- Diundecyl phthalate
- Cas Number:
- 3648-20-2
- IUPAC Name:
- diundecyl phthalate
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase (TK)
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells in culture were used in the study. The cells were properly maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with F68 pluronic solution, L-glutamine, sodum pyruvate, and antibiotics, and horse serum (10% v/v) and periodically checked for mycoplasma contamination. In addition they were periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 derived from Aroclor 1254, rat liver
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The w/v concentrations of the doses assayed and density of test substance were not provided. The concentrations reported were in v/v. Six doses (2.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 8.0 and 10.0 ul/ml) were tested without S9 activation. Six doses (1.0, 2.5, 4.0, 5.0, 5.54 and 8.0 ul/ml) were tested with S9 activation. Mutant frequencies were determined for all evaluated levels.
Cytotoxic Concentration: 10 ul/ml - Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: None provided
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- acetone
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- ethylmethanesulfonate, 3-methylcholanthrene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Mouse lymphoma cells were seeded into a series of tubes at 6 x 10E6 cells per tube. Dosed tubes were exposed for 4 hours to the test substance. An expression period of 48 hours was used; after the 48 hour expression time, 3 x 10E6 cells per plate were added to semi-solid selection medium containing 3 ug/ml 5-triflourothymidine (TFT) to score for mutant colonies and 200 cells per plate were added to cloning medium, without TFT, to evaluate viability. Mutant frequencies were calculated after 10-14 days incubation. Mutant and total colony counts at each dose level were determined by triplicate plates.
METHOD OF APPLICATION: Cloning medium consists of the RPMI 1640 growth medium with the addition of agar to a final concentration of 0.35% to achieve a semisolid state.
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 12 days
- Exposure duration: 4 hours
- Expression Time: 2 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10-14 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 5-trifluorothymidine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: greater than 3 x 10E8 cells/ml
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- The assay was considered valid if all of the following criteria were satisfied:
1. The average cloning efficiency of the negative controls must be in the range of 60-130%.
2. The suspension growth, calculated as [(Day 1 cell count/3x10^5)] x [(Day 2 cell count)/(Day 1 split back volume density)], for the negative controls must be greater than or equal to 8.0.
3. The mutant frequency for the negative controls should be within the range of 10 x 10^-6 to 100x10^-6.
4. The mutant frequencies induced by the positive controls for either the nonactivation assay (using 0.3 ul/ml ethylmethanesulfonate) or the activation assay (using 2.5 ug/ml 3-methyl cholanthrene) must be greater than or equal to 200x10^-6.
5. For test materials determined to be non-mutagenic, the concentrations assayed must include one that will induce a reduction in the percent relative growth to 10-20% of the average for the negative controls, or a maximum concentration of 5ul/ml. The percent relative growth is an expression of toxicity calculated as the relative suspension growth x relative cloning efficiency/100.
6. The relative cloning efficiency must be greater than or equal to 10%; the total number of viable clones must be > 60 in order to accept an experimental mutant frequency.
7. A minimum of two dishes per set, with colony numbers that differ by no more than 3-fold, must be used to derive the mutant frequency.
8. A minimum of three test doses must be analyzed to evaluate the mutagenicity of the test substance.
In order to demonstrate mutagenesis for any given dose level, the mutant frequency must be greater than or equal to 150% the concurrent background mutant frequency plus 10x10^-6. To be considered a mutagen,
1. A toxicity-related or dose-related increase in the mutant frequencies must be demonstrated, or 2. if for a single dose near the max tested, mutant frequency is > 300% the concurrent background mutant frequency plus 20x10^-6. - Statistics:
- The data were not evaluated for statistical significance.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: Doses were selected to cover toxicity from little or no survival to 80-100% growth relative to the solvent control
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- pH: At the end of the 4 hour treatment period, the pH of the culture medium containing the highest concentration of test chemical was measured. All pH values were in the range of 7.21-7.47.
- Remarks on result:
- other: other: TK locus of mouse lymphoma cells, L5178Y cell line
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Cytotoxicity ranged from 3.5 - 21 % at the high dose levels. In the absence of activation, 2 to 10 ul/ml induced moderate to high toxicity (percent relative growths: 18.8% to 70.7%), but no increase in mutation frequency. In the presence of a metabolic fraction, 1 to 8 ul/ml was toxic (percent relative growths: 3.5% to 62.7%), without increasing the incidence of mutations. Thus, the test compound was considered non-mutagenic with activation in this assay.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Under conditions of this study diundecyl phthalate was non-mutagenic in the mouse lymphoma assay with or without metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
In a mammalian cell gene mutation assay at the thymidine kinase locus, L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells cultured in vitro were exposed to the test substance, in acetone, at concentrations of 2.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 8.0, or 10.0 ul/ml in the absence of S9 mammalian metabolic activation or at concentrations of 1.0, 2.5, 4.0, 5.0, 5.54, or 8.0 ul/ml in the presence of S9.
The test substance was tested up to cytotoxic concentrations. Under non-activation conditions (dose levels 2 -10 ul/ml), the percent relative growth values were 70.7%-18.8%, indicating moderate to high toxicities, and the mutant frequencies were18.1 x 10 -6 to 30.7 x 10 -6. Because moderate to high toxicity was observed, but mutagenesis was not observed at any dose level assayed, the test substance was determined not to be a mutagen under non-activation conditions. In the S9 activation assay, the test substance was assayed at low to highly toxic dose levels (1 -8 ul/ml), and the mutant frequencies for the assayed dose levels were 21 x 10^-6 to 53.9 x 10^-6. The test substance was determined not to be a mutagen under S9 activation conditions. In both the non-activated and activated conditions, the positive controls induced the appropriate response. There was no evidence of induced mutant colonies over background as a result of exposure. The test material is considered inactive in the mouse lymphoma forward mutation assay with and without metabolic inactivation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.