Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 213-022-2 | CAS number: 915-67-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: data from peer - reviewed journals
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Genotoxicity Testing of the Food Colours Amaranth and Tartrazine
- Author:
- Aparajita Das and Anita Mukherjee
- Year:
- 2 004
- Bibliographic source:
- Int J Hum Genet, 4(4): 277-280 (2004)
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 475 (Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Chromosome aberration assay was performed to evaluate the mutagenic nature of the test compound Amaranth.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- endogenous gene animal assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Trisodium 3-hydroxy-4-(4'-sulphonatonaphthylazo)naphthalene-2,7-disulphonate
- EC Number:
- 213-022-2
- EC Name:
- Trisodium 3-hydroxy-4-(4'-sulphonatonaphthylazo)naphthalene-2,7-disulphonate
- Cas Number:
- 915-67-3
- Molecular formula:
- C20H14N2O10S3.3Na
- IUPAC Name:
- trisodium 3-hydroxy-4-[(4-sulfonato-1-naphthyl)diazenyl]naphthalene-2,7-disulfonate
- Reference substance name:
- trisodium (4E)-3-oxo-4-[(4- sulfonato-1- naphthyl)hydrazono]naphthalene- 2,7-disulfonate
- IUPAC Name:
- trisodium (4E)-3-oxo-4-[(4- sulfonato-1- naphthyl)hydrazono]naphthalene- 2,7-disulfonate
- Reference substance name:
- Amaranth dye
- IUPAC Name:
- Amaranth dye
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
- Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Amaranth dye
Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): C20H11N2Na3O10S3
Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 604.47
Smiles notation (if other than submission substance): c1ccc2c(c1)c(ccc2S(=O)(=O)[O])N=Nc3c4ccc(cc4cc(c3O)S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+]
InChl (if other than submission substance): 1S/C20H14N2O10S3.3Na/c23-20-18(35(30,31)32)10-11-9-12(33(24,25)26)5-6-13(11)19(20)22-21-16-7-8-17(34(27,28)29)15-4-2-1-3-14(15)16;;;/h1-10,23H,(H,24,25,26)(H,27,28,29)(H,30,31,32);;;/q;3*+1/p-3
Substance type: Organic
Physical state: Solid
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: Swiss Albino
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Details on test animals and env conditions
TEST ANIMALS
Source: No data available
Age at study initiation: 8-10 weeks
Weight at study initiation: 20-25 g
Assigned to test groups randomly: [no/yes, under following basis: ] No data available Fasting period before study: No data available
Housing: No data available
Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Commercial diet, ad libitum
Water (e.g. ad libitum): Water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: No data available
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Temperature (°C): Ambient room temperature
Humidity (%): Relative
Air changes (per hr): No data available
Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): No data available
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: No data available
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- Vehicles
Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: distilled water
Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: No data available
Concentration of test material in vehicle: 50,100 and 200 mg/kg body weight - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 18 hours
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
50,100 and 200 mg/kg bw
Basis:
no data
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Total : 16
0 mg/kg bw: 4 male mice
50 mg/kg bw: 4 male mice
100 mg/kg bw: 4 male mice
200 mg/kg bw: 4 male mice - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Positive controls : cyclophosphamide CP
Doses / concentrations: 20 mg/Kg bw
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow cells
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Details of tissue and slide preparation
CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: The selection of dose was based on the permitted dose of the dyes being 100mg/kg of the prepared food.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields):
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: Bone marrow cells were routinely processed by the standard procedure and slides were coded and stained in diluted Giemsa
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: For chromosomal aberration analysis, four animals were used per point. Hundred well spread metaphase plates were scored per animal (400 metaphase plates per treatment set) at random.
OTHER: All aberrations (chromatid gaps, isochromosome gaps, chromatid breaks and rearrangements) were considered equal- regardless of the number of breakages involved. The percentages of damaged cells (% DC) and chromosomal aberrations per cell (CA/cell) values were calculated excluding gaps. - Evaluation criteria:
- Chromatid gaps, isochromosome gaps, chromatid breaks and rearrangements were noted
- Statistics:
- ANOVA test was performed at 0.05 level
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Chromosomal aberrations of mice bone marrow cells following treatment with different doses of Amaranth
Dose mg/kg |
Type of Aberrations |
%DC (MEAN±SEM)
|
%CA/Cell (MEAN±SEM) |
||||
G’ |
G’’
|
B’
|
B’’
|
RR
|
|||
50 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
- |
- |
2.00± 1.00 |
0.02± 0.01 |
100 |
10 |
1 |
5 |
- |
- |
3.50± 0.50 |
0.03± 0.00 |
200 |
8 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
- |
4.00± 0.81 |
0.04± 0.01 |
Where: G’ G’’ = Chromatid and chromosome gaps
B’ B’’ = Chromatid and chromosome breaks
RR = rearrangements,
DC = Percentage of damaged cells
CA/Cell = Chromosome aberrationApplicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
The test compound amaranth is not mutagenic in the chromosomal aberration study conducted using Swiss albino mouse isolated bone marrow cells. - Executive summary:
Chromosome aberration assay was performed to evaluate the mutagenic nature of the test compound amaranth.
The study was conducted on male Swiss albino mice, 8-10 weeks old and weighing 20-25 g. Four animals per dose were administered intraperitoneally with the different doses of the amaranth (50,100 and 200 mg/kg body weight).
The animals were killed after 18 hr. For bone marrow chromosome analysis, animals were injected with 0.1 ml colchicine solution (4mg/10ml distilled water /10g body weight, 90 minutes before they were killed. Bone marrow cells were routinely processed by the standard procedure and slides were coded and stained in diluted Giemsa.
For chromosomal aberration analysis, four animals were used per point. Hundred well spread metaphase plates were scored per animal (400 metaphase plates per treatment set) at random. The types of aberrations were scored. The percentages of damaged cells (% DC) and chromosomal aberrations per cell (CA/cell) values were calculated excluding gaps.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.