Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-889-7 | CAS number: 75-65-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.7 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- LOAEC
- Value:
- 204 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 3
- Justification:
- The starting point for the 90-day inhalation study is a LOAEC. The severity of the kidney nephropathy was minimal-mild (compared to minimal in controls). Therefore, a factor of 3 is also considered appropriate to account for the associated uncertainty.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- A default factor of 2 will be applied to extrapolate to long-term exposure.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Since we are deriving an inhalation DNEL, no allometric scaling is necessary
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify the variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to tertiary butyl alcohol in the human population. The default value of 5 for workers will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies variability
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the database is adequate. The information comes from an NTP 90-day inhalation study. The results of which are supported by the effects observed in other studies.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 214 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 12.5
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 2 677 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The starting point is a NOAEC. A factor for uncertainties is not considered necessary
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- There are no data for tertiary butyl alcohol to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect interspecies extrapolation. On this basis the default value of 2.5 to account for other species difference will be applied.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Since the dose descriptor was derived from an inhalation study and is being used to derive an inhalation DNEL, no allometric scaling is necessary.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify the variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to tertiary butyl alcohol in the human population. The default value of 5 for workers will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies variability
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the database is adequate. The information comes from an NTP 18-day inhalation study. The results of which are supported by effects observed in other studies. This consistency provides confidence in the reliability of these studies. It is not necessary to apply a factor to take account of deficiencies in the quality of the database.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- irritation (respiratory tract)
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 5.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 150
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- LOAEL
- Value:
- 818 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The oral chronic study in rats was selected for worker long-term dermal DNEL derivation. To convert the oral value to dermal, a route-to-route extrapolation is required. The equations used were obtained from ECHA’s Practical Guide 14; Table 2, page 38. The dermal N(L)OAEL = oral N(L)OAEL*(Absoral/Absdermal)). Using data from the chronic study in rats: 90*(1/0.38) *0.67*(11/60) = 818 mg/kg bw/day (LOAEC).
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 3
- Justification:
- The starting point for the chronic oral study is a LOAEL, based on a 15% bodyweight reduction
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- Chronic study. No factor is required as exposure is already long-term
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- For the oral study in the rat, an allometric scaling factor of 4 is required to take account of differences in basal metabolic rates between rats and humans.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There are no data for tertiary butyl alcohol to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect interspecies extrapolation. On this basis the default value of 2.5 to account for other species difference will be applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify the variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to tertiary butyl alcohol in the human population. The default value of 5 for workers will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies variability
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the database is adequate.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.5 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 150
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- LOAEC
- Value:
- 72.5 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 3
- Justification:
- The starting point for the 90-day inhalation study is a LOAEC. The severity of the kidney nephropathy was minimal-mild (compared to minimal in controls). Therefore, a factor of 3 is also considered appropriate to account for the associated uncertainty.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- A default factor of 2 was applied to extrapolate to long-term exposure.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Since we are deriving an inhalation DNEL, no allometric scaling is necessary.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There are no data for tertiary butyl alcohol to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect interspecies extrapolation. On this basis the default value of 2.5 to account for other species difference will be applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- The default factor of 10 for consumers was used.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the database is adequate. The information comes from an NTP 90-day inhalation study. The results of which are supported by the effects observed in other studies.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 159.8 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 3 995 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The starting point is a NOAEC. A factor for uncertainties is not considered necessary.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Since the dose descriptor was derived from an inhalation study and is being used to derive an inhalation DNEL, no allometric scaling is necessary.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the database is adequate. The information comes from an NTP 18-day inhalation study. The results of which are supported by the effects observed in other studies. This consistency provides confidence in the reliability of these studies. It is not necessary to apply a factor to take account of deficiencies in the quality of the database.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- irritation (respiratory tract)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.7 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 300
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- LOAEL
- Value:
- 818 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The oral chronic study in rats was selected for general population long-term dermal DNEL derivation. To convert the oral value to dermal, a route-to-route extrapolation is required. The equations used were obtained from ECHA’s Practical Guide 14; Table 2, page 38. The dermal N(L)OAEL = oral N(L)OAEL*(Absoral/Absdermal)). Using data from the chronic study in rats: 90*(1/0.38) *0.67*(11/60) = 818 mg/kg bw/day (LOAEC)
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 3
- Justification:
- The starting point for the chronic oral study is a LOAEC, based on a 15% bodyweight reduction. Default factor for LOAEC to NOAEC used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- Chronic study. No factor is required as exposure is already long-term
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- For the oral study in the rat, an allometric scaling factor of 4 is required to take account of differences in basal metabolic rates between rats and humans.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There are no data for tertiary butyl alcohol to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect interspecies extrapolation. On this basis the default value of 2.5 to account for other species difference will be applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- The default factor of 10 for consumers was used
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the database is adequate.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.3 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 300
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- LOAEL
- Value:
- 90
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 3
- Justification:
- The starting point for the chronic oral study is a LOAEC, based on a 15% bodyweight reduction.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- Chronic study. No factor is required as exposure is already long-term.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- For the oral study in the rat, an allometric scaling factor of 4 is required to take account of differences in basal metabolic rates between rats and humans.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There are no data for tertiary butyl alcohol to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect interspecies extrapolation. On this basis the default value of 2.5 to account for other species difference will be applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- The default factor of 10 for consumers was used.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the database is adequate.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
General population-DNEL for infrequent use for inhalation route, systemic effects: 13.8 mg/m3(assumptions: not more than10 days/year, 24 hours/day, ECHA Guidance R.15)
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.